Community College Institutional Survey. Discussion Guide. Exploring High-Impact Practices

Similar documents
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

EQuIP Review Feedback

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

Program Assessment and Alignment

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

An Introduction to LEAP

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

UH STEM Pathways Project

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

Quality in Undergraduate Education

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

Strategic Planning Guide

Date: 9:00 am April 13, 2016, Attendance: Mignone, Pothering, Keller, LaVasseur, Hettinger, Hansen, Finnan, Cabot, Jones Guest: Roof

GOING GLOBAL 2018 SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Online courses for credit recovery in high schools: Effectiveness and promising practices. April 2017

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Math Teacher. Job Outline: Jesuit High School is seeking a full-time high school math teacher for the school year.

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Practical Research. Planning and Design. Paul D. Leedy. Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Public School Choice DRAFT

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

Graduate Program in Education

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

National Survey of Student Engagement

Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Educational Psychology

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

School Participation Agreement Terms and Conditions

TILE at Iowa: Adoption and Adaptation

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2010). Social psychology (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY College of Education & Human Development Graduate School of Education

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Center for Higher Education

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

ROBERT M. FULLER. Ph.D. Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, June 2003 Major: Management Information Systems Minor: Organizational Behavior

El Camino College Planning Model

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

LaGuardia Community College Retention Committee Report June, 2006

Programme Specification

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Transcription:

Community College Institutional Survey Discussion Guide Exploring High-Impact Practices

Acknowledgments The Community College Institutional Survey (CCIS) was developed as part of the Center s national study on identifying and promoting high-impact educational practices in community colleges. The survey is designed to deepen the understanding of high-impact practices on your college campus. This discussion guide is a companion to the survey, intended to serve as a tool for conversation on community college campuses as faculty, staff, and administrators assess their college s current student success initiatives. Armed with this knowledge, the campus community can consider the most effective ways to heighten the quality of educational experiences for larger numbers of students. The Center s exploration of high-impact educational practices in community colleges builds on contributions by many people. We express appreciation to George Kuh, Chancellor s Professor of Higher Education Emeritus at Indiana University Bloomington, for his early work on high-impact educational practices, initially published in a 2008 research report, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to them, and Why They Matter. This work also builds on past and continuing work by Carol Geary Schneider and her colleagues at the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). Alexander McCormick, Jillian Kinzie, and others at the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) have shared generously their learning from NSSE s focus on high-impact practices in the baccalaureate college and university sector. Special thanks go to these Center staff for their tireless work to create the CCIS: Deryl Hatch, Research Associate, Mike Bohlig, Senior Research Associate, and Jeff Crumpley, Associate Director of Operations. And finally, the work has been generously supported by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Lumina Foundation. We are grateful to all contributors. And we hope that this guide will contribute to your college s efforts to improve the success on your campus for every student. Evelyn N. Waiwaiole Associate Director Center for Community College Student Engagement The University of Texas at Austin Supported by grants from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Lumina Foundation Published by the Center for Community College Student Engagement. 2013 Permission granted for unlimited copying with appropriate citation. Please cite this guide as: Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2013). Community College Institutional Survey Discussion Guide: Exploring High-Impact Practices. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.

Foreword In response to increasing demand from the community college field and to escalating national emphasis on college persistence and completion, the Center for Community College Student Engagement has undertaken a large-scale research and practice-improvement initiative: Identifying and Promoting High- Impact Educational Practices in Community Colleges. The Community College Institutional Survey (CCIS) was developed as part of this initiative. CCIS collects information about whether and how colleges implement a variety of potentially high-impact practices, the target student populations, and current scale of implementation. This instrument provides descriptions of 13 potentially high-impact practices implemented in community colleges that are strongly focused on student success that is, student learning, persistence, and attainment. Responses to each survey item within the instrument provide quantitative data on observable aspects of the practices within a given institution. The survey is not intended as a test, nor should it be used as a checklist. Rather it is offered as a tool for prompting reflection and discussion and, ultimately, promoting collective action aimed at focused improvement. Four Surveys, Four Perspectives The Center administers four surveys that complement one another: Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE), Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE), Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE), and Community College Institutional Survey (CCIS). All are tools that assess student engagement how connected students are to college faculty and staff, other students, and their studies and institutional practice. Each of the four surveys collects data from a particular perspective, and together they provide a comprehensive understanding of educational practices on community college campuses, how they are implemented, and which students are participating in them. SENSE is administered during weeks four and five of the fall academic term in classes most likely to enroll first-time students. SENSE focuses on students experiences from the time of their decision to attend their college through the end of the first three weeks of the fall term. The survey collects data on practices that are most likely to strengthen early student engagement. Entering students are those who indicate that it is their first time at the college where the survey is administered. CCSSE, administered in the spring, surveys credit students and gathers information about their overall college experience. It focuses on educational practices and student behaviors associated with higher levels of learning, persistence, and completion. CCFSSE is administered in conjunction with CCSSE to all faculty teaching credit courses in the academic term during which the college is participating in the student survey. The faculty survey reports on instructors perceptions about student experiences as well as data about their teaching practices and use of professional time. CCIS, the Center s newest instrument, was developed as part of the Center s initiative on identifying and promoting high-impact educational practices in community colleges. CCIS collects information about whether and how colleges implement a variety of promising practices.

How to Discuss CCIS Results A strong foundation for an effective student success agenda is created when groups within colleges governing boards, leadership teams, faculty, and student services staff establish the institutional habit of coming together to assess the extent to which the college s policies and practices are aligned with the best available evidence about student success. Constituent groups on community college campuses may discuss the results of CCIS in a variety of ways: Scheduling an official Data Retreat of board members and executive leadership Facilitating discussion as part of a college-wide student success summit Conducting break-out sessions during convocations, professional development days, or other collegewide meetings Routinely reserving time in regularly scheduled meetings of the executive cabinet, divisions, and departments for ongoing discussion of results Communicating survey data in a newsletter Instructions for Completing and Submitting CCIS The Community College Institutional Survey (CCIS) is an online survey offered free of charge to encourage community colleges across the nation to examine their own institutional programs, policies, and procedures. The survey collects information about whether and how colleges implement a variety of promising practices (first-year experience/freshman seminars, learning communities, college orientation, etc.). The survey does not need to be completed in one sitting; it is designed for multiple individuals to contribute to its completion prior to final check and submission. (That is, different sections of the survey should likely be completed by different people, each with particular information to contribute.) Additionally, the Center recommends that the college president or chancellor designate a lead person to coordinate completion of the survey and final submission. To access CCIS and complete the online survey you will need an access code. If you do not know your access code, please request your access code by emailing ccishelp@cccse.org. Once you receive your unique access code, go to the following Center website link to complete the online survey: www.ccsse.org/center/ccis After completing the survey, you may access and download a printable copy of your institution s completed CCIS here: www.ccsse.org/center/ccis/reportlogin.cfm

Community College Institutional Survey: Questions for Campus Discussions After completing the survey, facilitated group discussions may be guided by questions such as the following: As a whole, what are college constituents first impressions of results from the Community College Institutional Survey? What percentages of students at our college participate in each of the identified high-impact practices? What are the target levels of participation? What are the characteristics of students who participate and of those who do not in terms of enrollment status, day versus evening enrollment, race/ethnicity, gender, age, etc.? In other words, which students appear to have access to these experiences, and which students do not? Do any particular groups of students appear to benefit from participation in one or more of these practices in disproportionately positive ways? Are there student groups at our college who do not experience those benefits? How do the institutional survey results compare with our student (CCSSE and/or SENSE) and faculty (CCFSSE) survey data? What are the relationships between participation in high-impact practices and students overall levels of engagement? What are the college s strengths/weaknesses as indicated by the data reviewed? What are the implications for scaling up, discarding, or refining certain practices? What specific findings point to potential priorities for college action? Who else needs to be involved in the discussion about designing, implementing, scaling, and improving high-impact practices at the college? Based on this discussion, what are potential next steps for our institution? Who should be responsible for taking those steps? What are the plans and processes set in place for ensuring quality of implementation and routinely evaluating the effectiveness of these practices? What is the standard of evidence that would lead the college to make certain experiences mandatory for some or all students? What measures must the college take to ensure that experiences intended to be mandatory actually are mandatory? In what ways can the college analyze and document the return on investment in bringing high-impact practices to substantial scale? How should the college engage the entire college community in thinking about how high-impact practices can be integrated into clear, coherent, structured academic and career pathways for students? Center for Community College Student Engagement