SAMPLE. SCORE REPORT Versant Writing Test. Test Completion Date: Test Completion Time: OVERALL SCORE. Test Identification Number:

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

The Eaquals Self-help Guide for Curriculum and Syllabus Design Maria Matheidesz and Frank Heyworth

Handbook for Teachers

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

The Short Essay: Week 6

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Lower and Upper Secondary

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

November 2012 MUET (800)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Information for Candidates

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Secondary English-Language Arts

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Timeline. Recommendations

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Lecturing Module

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Language Acquisition Chart

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Teachers Guide Chair Study

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Writing a composition

Biome I Can Statements

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

QLWG Skills for Life Acknowledgements

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Florida Reading for College Success

MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL DIPLOMA EMPLOYMENT ENGLISH I: NINTH, TENTH, ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH GRADES

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

Language Center. Course Catalog

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Metacognitive Strategies that Enhance Reading Comprehension in the Foreign Language University Classroom

ARH 390 Survey of Decorative Arts & Design: The Ancient World to Present Online, Sec. 01, 03 Credit Hours Summer 2017

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Recording Form. Part One: Oral Reading. Recording Form. Snake Myths Level O Nonfiction

5.1 Sound & Light Unit Overview

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Spanish III Class Description

PREVIEW LEADER S GUIDE IT S ABOUT RESPECT CONTENTS. Recognizing Harassment in a Diverse Workplace

Master s Programme in European Studies

Initial English Language Training for Controllers and Pilots. Mr. John Kennedy École Nationale de L Aviation Civile (ENAC) Toulouse, France.

Transcription:

Versant Writing Test Test Identification Number: Test Completion Date: Test Completion Time: 12345678 January 1, 2012 1:23 PM (UTC) OVERALL SCORE 52 SKILL AREA SCORE 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Overall Grammar Vocabulary Organization Voice & Tone Reading Comprehension Overall Candidate's Capabilities 52 58 53 45 47 57 DESCRIPTION The Overall Score of the test represents the ability to understand English input and write accurate, appropriate texts at a functional pace for everyday and workplace purposes. Scores are based on a weighted combination of five sub-scores. Scores are reported in the range from 20 to 80. Candidate understands texts using a variety of words and structures, and given enough time can produce written texts for general purposes. Writing contains errors or inappropriate word choice, but the message is clear to a sympathetic reader. 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. Ordinate and Versant are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). Other names may be the trademarks of their respective owners. For more information, visit us online at www.versanttest.com

EXPLANATION OF SUBSKILL SCORES SKILL AREA UNDERSTANDING THE SKILLS CURRENT CAPABILITIES Grammar Grammar reflects how well the candidate understands, anticipates and produces a variety of sentence structures in written English. The score is based on the ability to use accurate and appropriate words and phrases in meaningful sentences. Candidate understands, anticipates and produces a sufficient range of grammatical structures in English. Errors may occur frequently but do not interfere with the writer's meaning. Vocabulary Organization Voice & Tone Reading Comprehension Vocabulary reflects how well the candidate understands and produces a wide range of words in written English from everyday and workplace situations. The score is based on accuracy and appropriacy of word use for topic, purpose, and audience. Organization reflects how well the candidate presents ideas and information in written English in a clear and logical sequence. The score is based on the ability to guide readers through written text and highlight significant points using discourse markers. Voice and Tone reflects how well the candidate establishes an appropriate relationship with the reader by adopting an appropriate style and level of formality. The score is based on the writer's ability to address the reader's concern and have an overall positive effect. Reading reflects how well the candidate understands written English texts on everyday and workplace topics. The score is based on the ability to operate at functional speeds to extract meaning, inter the message, and respond appropriately. Candidate understands and produces a good range of common English words. Word choices are mostly accurate but are not always the most effective way to convey a message. Candidate's writing has an organizational structure that is adequate. Themes or related ideas may be organized together; the reader can connect concepts with some effort. Candidate's use of tone is generally appropriate. The candidate's writing gives a satisfactory effect on the reader; commitment to addressing the reader's concern is adequate. Candidate reads, understands and responds to texts on everyday topics and at a functional pace. In more complex texts, specific details will be lost.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF LANGUAGE CAPABILITIES The statements in the boxes below are taken from the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, or CEFR (Council of Europe, 2001). They describe the language capabilities of typical candidates who have a similar Overall score as given on this score report. The guidelines are derived from a benchmark study conducted on the Versant Writing Test. A panel of expert linguists judged the performances of candidates who responded to two tasks (Passage Reconstruction and Email Writing). The panel's judgments were then mapped to scores on the Versant Writing Test. Using this research, clear descriptions of average user language ability can be provided. The descriptors of the CEFR were used by the expert panel while rating candidates' performances and determining language competence. The written performances were sampled from speakers representing 32 languages from East Asia, the Middle East, South America, and from both Eastern and Western Europe. Male and female speakers were equally represented, and the age of candidates ranged from 14 to 62 with an average age of 28. Please note that the information presented in this section is modeled on the average ratings of large samples of test takers. It therefore refers to the average candidate. Individual candidates may perform at higher or lower level than indicated in this guide. (See "Current Capabilities" on pages 1 and 2 for personalized results.) SKILL AREA A CANDIDATE WITH THIS OVERALL SCORE TYPICALLY: Reading Can read straightforward factual texts on topics related to his/her job or field of interest with a satisfactory level of comprehension. Can find and understand relevant information in everyday material, such as emails, letters, brochures, and short official documents. Can recognize the general line of argument in a text or in a business document but not necessarily in detail. Can understand clearly written straightforward instructions for a specific task, operation of a piece of equipment, or assembly of a product. Can scan longer texts to locate desired information, and gather information from different parts of a document, or from different documents in order to fulfill a specific task. Written Production Written Interaction Can write straightforward connected texts on a range of familiar subjects within his/her field of interest or job. Can write very brief reports, explaining routine factual information and stating reasons for actions. Can write personal and business letters describing experiences, feelings and events in detail. Can describe basic details of unpredictable occurrences, e.g., an accident or problem. Can describe dreams, hopes, and career ambitions. Can write simple texts on familiar topics, personal interests, or routine workplace tasks. Can briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions, plans and actions. Can convey information and ideas on abstract as well as concrete topics, check information and ask about or explain problems with reasonable precision. Can write personal letters and notes asking for or conveying simple information of immediate relevance, getting across the point he/she feels to be important. Can write personal letters and emails giving news and expressing thoughts about abstract or cultural topics such as books, music, or films. Can write personal letters and emails describing experiences, feelings and events in some detail about personal and professional life.

SKILL AREA Language Quality A CANDIDATE WITH THIS OVERALL SCORE TYPICALLY: Has enough language to get by, with sufficient vocabulary to deal with topics such as current events, work, travel, and family. Errors occur, but can express clearly what he/she is trying to say. Can use reasonably accurately a repertoire of frequently used 'routines' and patterns associated with more predictable situations. Can communicate with reasonable accuracy in familiar contexts, though with noticeable mother tongue influence. Has a sufficient vocabulary for expression on most everyday and work-related topics. Strategies & Skills Can take messages communicating inquiries, explaining problems or giving feedback. Can write notes conveying simple information of immediate relevance to friends, colleagues, teachers and others who feature in his/her everyday life, getting across comprehensively the points he/she feels are important. Can take notes as a list of key points during a straightforward presentation or meeting, provided the topic is familiar, and the language is delivered in clearly articulated standard speech. Can collate short pieces of information from several sources and summarize them for somebody else. Can paraphrase short written passages in a simple fashion, using the original text wording and ordering. TO IMPROVE, A CANDIDATE AT THIS LEVEL SHOULD: Practice reading texts or business documents likely to be encountered in your personal and professional life, identifying main points, specific details, and attitudes. Pick a topic, item, or feeling you want to describe or express and learn words and expressions to do it from a dictionary or textbook. Study the use of transitions and connectors, and practice using them to link ideas together when you write texts or emails. Practice summarizing texts related to field of interest or job. Practice paraphrasing texts in a simple fashion. Study formal and informal conventions used in emails and letters, learning how to write in different contexts. Practice writing personal letters and emails sharing your thoughts about abstract topics such as books, music, and film. Practice writing about the pros and cons of a decision or course of action in your workplace. Practice identifying supporting and opposing points of view in a text or business document. Practice scanning long and complex texts from your workplace, underlining the main points and important details. Read from a range of Penguin Reader, Level 4 (these simple books use the most frequent 1700 headwords in English).

TYPING SPEED AND ACCURACY This table shows how quickly and accurately the candidate was able to type during Part A: Typing. Typing speed refers to the number of words typed in one minute. Typing accuracy refers to the percentage correctly typed. TYPING SPEED (WORDS PER MINUTE: WPM) TYPING ACCURACY (% WORDS TYPED ACCURATELY) 71 WPM 97 % RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER SCORES AND LEVELS Research has been conducted to explore how a Versant Writing Test overall score relates to other scales that measure or describe language proficiency. Note that the corresponding scores or levels provided are based on the relationships observed in our studies; the information does not guarantee a score on other tests or in other evaluations. TEST/SCALE CEFR SCORE/RANGE Corresponding level in the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR): B1 Independent User CEF-R global-level descriptor: Can understand the main points of clear standard input on familiar matters regularly encountered in work, school, leisure, etc. Can deal with most situations likely to arise while traveling in an area where the language is spoken. Can produce simple connected text on topics which are familiar or of a personal interest. Can describe experiences and events, dreams, hopes & ambitions and briefly give reasons and explanations for opinions and plans. NOTE: The Versant Writing Test and other tests/scales address different constructs of language proficiency. Therefore, predictions are approximate. More information about these concordance studies is available upon request.