AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

Similar documents
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

November 2012 MUET (800)

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2009 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES SCORE DESCRIPTION TASK COMPLETION* TOPIC DEVELOPMENT* LANGUAGE USE*

Language Center. Course Catalog

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

9779 PRINCIPAL COURSE FRENCH

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL DIPLOMA EMPLOYMENT ENGLISH I: NINTH, TENTH, ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH GRADES

University of New Orleans

South Carolina English Language Arts

This publication is also available for download at

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Secondary English-Language Arts

Technical Manual Supplement

Thank you letters to teachers >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Improving Advanced Learners' Communication Skills Through Paragraph Reading and Writing. Mika MIYASONE

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

MGMT3403 Leadership Second Semester

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Language Acquisition Chart

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Handbook for Teachers

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

HCI 440: Introduction to User-Centered Design Winter Instructor Ugochi Acholonu, Ph.D. College of Computing & Digital Media, DePaul University

Mercer County Schools

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

The Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015

English Language Arts Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Creating Travel Advice

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Idaho Public Schools

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Wheelchair Rugby. The performance of skills and techniques in isolation/unopposed situations

Pre-AP English 1-2. Mrs. Kimberly Cloud Career Tech & Global Studies Room N-201

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Student Writing Manual

Difficulties in Academic Writing: From the Perspective of King Saud University Postgraduate Students

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Timeline. Recommendations

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium:

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Primary English Curriculum Framework

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

Transcription:

AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Identical to Scoring Guidelines used for German, Italian, and Spanish Language and Culture Exams Presentational Writing: Persuasive Essay 5: STRONG performance in Presentational Writing Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a high degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints, with very few minor inaccuracies Integrates content from all three sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic with a high degree of clarity; develops a persuasive argument with coherence and detail Organized essay; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility Varied and appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax and usage, with few errors Develops paragraph-length discourse with a variety of simple and compound sentences, and some complex sentences 4: GOOD performance in Presentational Writing Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates comprehension of the sources viewpoints; may include a few inaccuracies Summarizes, with limited integration, content from all three sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic with clarity; develops a persuasive argument with coherence Organized essay; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language General control of grammar, syntax and usage Develops mostly paragraph-length discourse with simple, compound and a few complex sentences 3: FAIR performance in Presentational Writing Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a moderate degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints; includes some inaccuracies Summarizes content from at least two sources in support of the essay Presents and defends the student s own viewpoint on the topic; develops a somewhat persuasive argument with some coherence Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language Some control of grammar, syntax and usage Uses strings of mostly simple sentences, with a few compound sentences 2014 The College Board.

AP FRENCH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE EXAM 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Identical to Scoring Guidelines used for German, Italian, and Spanish Language and Culture Exams 2: WEAK performance in Presentational Writing Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates a low degree of comprehension of the sources viewpoints; information may be limited or inaccurate Summarizes content from one or two sources; may not support the essay Presents, or at least suggests, the student s own viewpoint on the topic; develops an unpersuasive argument somewhat incoherently Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the reader Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language Limited control of grammar, syntax and usage Uses strings of simple sentences and phrases 1: POOR performance in Presentational Writing Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task Demonstrates poor comprehension of the sources viewpoints; includes frequent and significant inaccuracies Mostly repeats statements from sources or may not refer to any sources Minimally suggests the student s own viewpoint on the topic; argument is undeveloped or incoherent Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility Very few vocabulary resources Little or no control of grammar, syntax and usage Very simple sentences or fragments 0: UNACCEPTABLE performance in Presentational Writing Mere restatement of language from the prompt Clearly does not respond to the prompt; completely irrelevant to the topic I don t know, I don t understand or equivalent in any language Not in the language of the exam - (hyphen): BLANK (no response) 2014 The College Board.