UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Table of Contents PART I. Introduction 1 PART II. Key Themes and Trends 5 PART II. Universitywide Indicators with Campus Comparisons Section 1. Undergraduate Student Success 13 Indicator 1.1 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 1999 Cohort Indicator 1.2 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen, Fall 1997 to 2004 Indicator 1.3 Indicator 1.4 Indicator 1.5 Indicator 1.6 Indicator 1.7 Indicator 1.8 Indicator 1.9 Indicator 1.10 Indicator 1.11 Indicator 1.12 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 1999 Cohort Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 1997 to 2004 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 1999 Cohort Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Gender, Fall 1997 to 2004 Graduation Rates for Entering Upper-Division California Community College Transfer Students, Fall 1997 to 2006 Graduation Rates for Entering Upper-Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 1997 to 2006 Graduation Rates for Entering Upper-Division California Community College Transfer Students by Gender, Fall 1997 to 2006 Retention of New Freshmen UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2005 to 2006 Retention of New Students (Freshmen and CCC Transfers), Fall 1997 to 2007 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Discipline UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 Indicator 1.13 Undergraduate Degrees Awarded, 2000-01 to Indicator 1.14 Degree Aspirations of Seniors, Spring 2008 UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 i
Indicator 1.15 Post-Graduation Plans of Seniors, Spring 2008 Section 2. Undergraduate Affordability 43 Indicator 2.1 Estimated Total Cost of Attendance UC and Comparison Institutions, Indicator 2.2 Average Cost of Attendance, 2000-01 to Indicator 2.3 Indicator 2.4 Indicator 2.5 Estimated Average Gift Aid and Net Cost of Attendance for Need-based Aid Recipients UC and Comparison Institutions, Undergraduate Pell Grant Receipt UC and Comparison Institutions, Average Amount and Percent of Undergraduates Receiving Gift Aid, 1999-00 to Indicator 2.6 Average Net Cost of Attendance by Family Income, 1999-00 to Indicator 2.7 Distribution of Undergraduates by Parent Income UC and Comparison Institutions, 2004 Indicator 2.8 Distribution of Undergraduates by Parent Income, 1999-00 to Indicator 2.9 Indicator 2.10 Number of Hours Undergraduates Worked Per Week by Family Income UC and Comparison Institutions, 2004 Number of Hours Undergraduates Worked Per Week by Family Income, Indicator 2.11 Percent of Graduating Seniors With Student Loan Debt UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 Indicator 2.12 Cumulative Debt of Graduating Seniors UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 Indicator 2.13 Cumulative Debt of Graduating Seniors, 1999-00 to Section 3. Undergraduate Access 67 Indicator 3.1 Indicator 3.2 Indicator 3.3 Indicator 3.4 Freshman Applicants, Admits and Enrollees, Fall 1995 to 2008 Percent of Minority Students in the Freshman Class Compared to California High School Graduates, Fall 1989 to 2008 Freshman Applicants, Admits and Enrollees by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 1994 to 2008 Upper Division California Community College Transfer Applicants, Admits and Enrollees, Fall 1994 to 2008 UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 ii
Indicator 3.5 Upper-Division California Community College Transfer Applicants, Admits and Enrollees by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 1994 to 2008 Indicator 3.6 Indicator 3.7 Indicator 3.8 Middle 50% of SAT Math and Critical Reading Score Range for Entering Freshmen UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2006 Average SAT Scores for Entering Freshmen, Fall 1994 to 2008 Middle 50% of SAT Score Range for Entering Freshmen, Fall 2008 Indicator 3.9 Average High School GPA of Entering Freshmen, Fall 1994 to 2008 Indicator 3.10 Average College GPA for Entering Upper-Division California Community College Transfer Students, Fall 1994 to 2008 Section 4. Undergraduate Student Profile 85 Indicator 4.1 Indicator 4.2 Indicator 4.3 Indicator 4.4 Indicator 4.5 Entering Freshman and Transfer Students, 2000-01 to Full-Time and Part-Time Undergraduate Enrollment, Fall 2000 to 2008 Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2000 to 2008 Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2006 Indicator 4.6 Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2000 to 2008 Indicator 4.7 Geographic Distribution of Undergraduate Students, Fall 2000 to 2008 Indicator 4.8 Age of Undergraduate Students, Fall 2000 to 2008 Indicator 4.9 First-Generation Undergraduate Students, Fall 2008 Indicator 4.10 First Language Spoken at Home for Undergraduate Students, Fall 2008 Section 5. Undergraduate Student Experience and Proficiencies 107 Indicator 5.1 Group Learning Experiences, Spring 2008 Indicator 5.2 Active Learning Experiences, Spring 2008 UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 iii
Indicator 5.3 Satisfaction with Institutional Commitment to Student Learning, Spring 2008 Indicator 5.4 Satisfaction with the Academic Experience, Spring 2008 Indicator 5.5 Experiences with Diverse Groups of People and Ideas, Spring 2008 Indicator 5.6 Interactions with Campus Faculty and Staff, Spring 2008 Indicator 5.7 Gains in Thinking Skills, Writing Skills and Understanding a Field of Study, Spring 2008 Section 6. Graduate and Professional Degree Student Profile 117 Indicator 6.1 Indicator 6.2 Indicator 6.3 Indicator 6.4 Graduate and Professional Degree Enrollment UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2006 Graduate and Professional and Undergraduate Enrollment, Fall 2000 to 2008 Graduate and Professional Degree Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2006 Graduate and Professional Degree Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 2000 to 2008 Indicator 6.5 Graduate and Professional Degree Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2006 Indicator 6.6 Indicator 6.7 Indicator 6.8 Indicator 6.9 Indicator 6.10 Indicator 6.11 Graduate and Professional Degree Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2000 to 2008 Geographic Origin of New Graduate and Professional Degree Students, Fall 2008 Graduate, Professional and Undergraduate Degrees Awarded UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 Graduate Degrees Awarded by Discipline UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 10-Year Ph.D. Completion Rates, Students Entering in Fall 1992 to 1994 Time to Degree for Ph.D. Students UC and Comparison Institutions, 2003-04 to 2005-06 Indicator 6.12 Time to Degree for Ph.D. Students, 1995-97 to 2005-07 Indicator 6.13 Plans at Time of Ph.D. Completion, 2005-06 Indicator 6.14 Average Net Stipend Offered to Ph.D. Students Admitted to UC Compared to Their First-Choice Non-UC Schools, 2004 and 2007 Indicator 6.15 Average Net Stipend of Ph.D. Students, 1998-99 to UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 iv
Indicator 6.16 Indicator 6.17 Professional Degrees Awarded by Discipline UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006-07 United States Medical Licensing Examination Pass Rates, 2000-01 to Indicator 6.18 Professional Degree Students Graduating with Debt, 2001-02 to Indicator 6.19 Average Debt of Professional Degree Students at Graduation, 2001-02 to Section 7. Faculty 155 Indicator 7.1 Full-Time Ladder-Rank Faculty, Fall 1989 to 2007 Indicator 7.2 Full-Time Ladder-Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 Indicator 7.3 Full-Time Ladder-Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity, Fall 1993 to 2007 Indicator 7.4 Indicator 7.5 Indicator 7.6 Indicator 7.7 Full-Time Ladder-Rank Faculty by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 Full-Time Ladder-Rank Faculty by Gender, Fall 1993 to 2007 Average Faculty Salaries UC and Comparison Institutions, Average Faculty Salaries UC and Aggregated Comparison Institutions, 1997-98 to Indicator 7.8 Student-Faculty Ratios, 2002-03 to Indicator 7.9 Indicator 7.10 Indicator 7.11 Student Credit Hours by Course Level and Faculty Appointment, 2003-04 to 2006-07 Faculty Recipients of National and International Awards, Cumulative Total Faculty Memberships Indicator 7.12 Annual Faculty Awards and Honors, 2003-04 to Section 8. Staff Profile 179 Indicator 8.1 Staff by Personnel Program and Union Representation, October 2004 to 2008 Indicator 8.2 Staff Appointment Type, October 2004 to 2008 Indicator 8.3 Career Staff by Personnel Program and Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 v
Indicator 8.4 Career Staff by Personnel Program and Gender, October 1996 to 2008 Section 9. Research 189 Indicator 9.1 Indicator 9.2 Indicator 9.3 Total Research and Development Expenditures, 1996-97 to Total Research and Development Expenditures, 1996-97 to Rankings of Total NSF Research and Development Expenditures, 1996-97 to 2006-07 Indicator 9.4 Federal Research and Development Expenditures, 1996-97 to Indicator 9.5 Research and Development Expenditures by Source, 1997-98 to Indicator 9.6 Federally Funded Research and Development Expenditures by Agency, 2003-04 to Indicator 9.7 Number of Patents and Inventions, 1997-98 to Indicator 9.8 Number of Active Licenses, 1997-98 to Indicator 9.9 Licensing Income, 1997-98 to Section 10. Libraries 207 Indicator 10.1 Indicator 10.2 Association of Research Libraries Rankings of Campus Libraries UC and Comparison Institutions, 2005 to 2007 Library Holdings in Volumes by Campus UC and Comparison Institutions, 2007 Indicator 10.3 Use of Interlibrary Loan (ILL) within the UC System, 2000-01 to Indicator 10.4 Indicator 10.5 Electronic Journal Usage within the UC System, 2005-06 to Students Participating in Library Classes, Tours and Presentations UC and Comparison Institutions, 2004-05 to 2006-07 Section 11. Campus Rankings 213 Indicator 11.1 Indicator 11.2 National Research Council s Ratings of Doctoral Programs UC and Comparison Institutions, 1995 The Top American Research Universities from The Center for Measuring University Performance UC and Comparison Institutions, 2005 to 2007 UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 vi
Indicator 11.3 Indicator 11.4 Indicator 11.5 Indicator 11.6 U.S. News and World Report s Professional Program Rankings UC and Comparison Institutions, 2000 to 2009 U.S. News and World Report s America s Best National Universities UC and Comparison Institutions, 1999 to 2009 U.S. News and World Report s America s Top 50 Public National Universities UC and Comparison Institutions, 1999 to 2009 Shanghai Jiao Tong University s Academic Rankings of World Universities UC and Comparison Institutions, 2006 to 2008 Section 12. Budget, Finance and Development 223 Indicator 12.1 Revenue by Source, 2003-04 to Indicator 12.2 Expenditures by Function, 2003-04 to Indicator 12.3 Per-Student Average Expenditures for Education, 1998-99 to Indicator 12.4 Indicator 12.5 Endowment Funds per Student UC and Comparison Institutions, Total Endowment and Endowment Funds per Student, 1996-97 to Indicator 12.6 UC Endowment Restrictions, 2008 Indicator 12.7 Total Gifts UC and Comparison Institutions, 2003-04 to Indicator 12.8 Total Annual Private Support, 1997-98 to Indicator 12.9 New Gifts, Section 13. Capital Resources and Sustainability 239 Indicator 13.1 Space and Facilities, Fall 2001 to 2008 Indicator 13.2 Capital Renewal Projected Needs and Actual Spending, 1998-99 to 2012-13 Indicator 13.3 Seismic Retrofitting Progress, 1979 2008 Indicator 13.4 Indicator 13.5 Indicator 13.6 Greenhouse Gas Emission Levels and Reduction Targets Energy Use in State-Maintained Buildings, 1999-00 to 2006-07 Green Buildings Completed and Planned, Cumulative to 2008 Indicator 13.7 Waste Diverted From Landfills, UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 vii
Section 14. Health Sciences and Services 253 Indicator 14.1 Hospital Inpatient Days, 2003-04 to Indicator 14.2 Outpatient Visits, 2003-04 to Indicator 14.3 Patient Complexity, 2003-04 to Section 15. Educational Extension 259 Indicator 15.1 Number of Continuing Education Programs, 2002-03 to Indicator 15.2 Continuing Education Registrations, 2002-03 to PART IV. Campus Profiles 265 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz UC Annual Accountability Report May 2009 viii