Accountability Sub-Report on Diversity Figures September 2009
List of Figures FIGURE 1: University Community by Race/Ethnicity and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 2: University Community by Gender and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 3: Race/Ethnicity at UC, California and the Nation, 2008 FIGURE 4: Undergraduate Student Diversity Index from USNWR, August 2009 Rankings FIGURE 5: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index at UC, in California and in the Nation, 2008 FIGURE 6: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Member Type, October 2008 FIGURE 7: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 8: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 FIGURE 9: Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 FIGURE 10: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program, October 2008 FIGURE 11: All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 12: All Staff by Gender and Campus, October 2008 FIGURE 13: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 14: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 15: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Fall 2007 FIGURE 16: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, Fall 2007 FIGURE 17: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 18: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Associate and Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 19: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 20: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Associate & Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 FIGURE 21: Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 22: PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 23: Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 24: Graduate Professional Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 25: Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 FIGURE 27: Undergraduate Freshmen Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 FIGURE 29: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Underrepresented Minorities, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 30: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 31: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 FIGURE 32: Six-Year Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2002 FIGURE 33: Four-Year Graduation Rates - Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2004 FIGURE 34: Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 FIGURE 35: Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus. Percent responding Somewhat Agree, Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 FIGURE 36: Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 2
FIGURE 1: University Community by Race/Ethnicity and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 3 University Community by Race/Ethnicity October 2008 N = 9,101 2,756 22,150 7,399 78,307 13,968 11,683 11,139 30,140 173,078 International/ Undergraduate Students Graduate Academic Students Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Non-career Staff Professionals & Support Staff Senior Management Group & Managers/ Senior Professionals Other Academics Lecturers Ladder Rank Faculty Note: Other Academics includes many faculty titles in the Health Sciences and elsewhere that are not in the Ladder Ranks.
FIGURE 2: University Community by Gender and Detailed Member Type, October 2008 University Community by Gender October 2008 N = 9,101 2,756 22,150 7,399 78,307 13,968 11,683 11,139 30,140 173,078 4 9 7 5 3 1 Undergraduate Students Graduate Academic Students Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Non-career Staff Professionals & Support Staff Senior Management Group & Managers/ Senior Professionals Other Academics Lecturers Ladder Rank Faculty
FIGURE 3: Race/Ethnicity at UC, in California and the Nation, 2008 11% Race/Ethnicity at UC, in California and the USA 4% 3% 9 7 41% 43% 65% Internation al/ 5 13% 3 1 29% 5% 34% 14% 14% 5% 7% 13% University of California California USA 5
FIGURE 4: Undergraduate Student Diversity Index from USNWR, August 2009 Rankings 0.8 Undergraduate Student Diversity Index US News & World Report August 2009 Rankings 0.7 0.6 0.64 0.64 0.60 0.65 0.69 0.62 0.59 0.60 0.66 0.68 0.54 0.54 0.5 0.4 0.47 0.41 0.39 0.43 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Yale Stanford MIT Harvard U of Virginia SUNY at Buffalo U of Michigan U of Illinois Santa Cruz Santa Barbara San Diego Riverside Los Angeles Irvine Davis Berkeley NOTE: the first step in applying the formula is to calculate the probability that the two randomly chosen persons will be members of the same race: P R = (A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 ) where A, B, C, D are the proportions in the population of each of the four racial groups. The probability that the two persons are of the same national origin is calculated in the same manner: P N = (H 2 + N 2 ) where H and N are the proportions of Hispanics and non-hispanics respectively. The probability that the two random persons are of both the same race and national origin is calculated by multiplying their separate probabilities: P R * P N. Subtracting that figure from 1 yields the probability that the two are different on at least one of the two dimensions. Thus the diversity index is defined as: 1 - (P R * P N ). 6
FIGURE 5: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index at UC, in California and in the Nation, 2008 Diversity Index at UC, in California and the USA 11% 4% 3% 9 7 41% 43% 65% Internation al/ 5 3 1 13% 29% 5% 34% 14% 14% 5% 7% 13% University of California California USA Diversity Index.71.68.53 7
8 FIGURE 6: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Member Type, October 2008 University Community and Diversity Index, October 2008 International/ Undergraduate Students Graduate Academic Students Graduate Professional Students/ General Campus Graduate Professional Students/ Health Sciences Non-career Staff Professionals & Support Staff Senior Management Group & Managers/ Senior Professionals Other Academics Lecturers Ladder Rank Faculty Diversity Index.41.49.61.47..69.68.70.71.67.71
FIGURE 7: Race/Ethnicity Diversity Index by Campus, October 2008 Campus Communities Diversity Index, October 2008 9 7 International/ 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Diversity Index.72.68.70.73.74.76.70.67.65.65.54.62 Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz Ag & Natural Resources Office of the President 9
FIGURE 8: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.3 Note: The charts include all levels of career staff at the ten campuses, five medical centers, Agriculture and Natural Resources and the Office of the President. They do not include the career workforce at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 10
FIGURE 8 (continued): Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Professional & Support Staff by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Managers & Senior Professionals by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Indian Career Senior Management Group by Race/Ethnicity, October 1996 to 2008 Indian 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.3 11
FIGURE 9: Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Staff by Gender October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.4 12
FIGURE 9 (continued): Career Staff by Gender and Personnel Program, October 1996 to 2008 Career Professional & Support Staff by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Managers & Senior Professionals by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Career Senior Management Group by Gender, October 1996 to 2008 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 8.4 13
FIGURE 10: Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program, October 2008 Career Staff by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Personnel Program October 2008 N = 7,065 17,963 14,727 35,931 346 1,151 455 5,245 9 33% 33% 37% 33% 49% 47% 48% 7 5 3 67% 67% 63% 67% 51% 53% 52% 1 Professional & Support Staff Managers & Senior Professionals and Senior Management Group 14
FIGURE 11: All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus, October 2008 All Staff by Race/Ethnicity and Campus, October 2008 N = 8,785 15,449 8,984 23,365 603 2,738 14,410 16,274 3,379 2,971 963 1,753 9 7 5 3 International/ 1 Office of the President Ag & Natural Resources Santa Cruz Santa Barbara San Francisco San Diego Riverside Merced Los Angeles Irvine Davis Berkeley 15
FIGURE 12: All Staff by Gender and Campus, October 2008 All Staff by Gender and Campus, October 2008 16 N = 8,785 15,44 8,984 23,36 603 2,73 14,410 16,274 3,379 2,971 963 1,753 9 7 5 3 1 Office of the President Ag & Natural Resources Santa Cruz Santa Barbara San Francisco San Diego Riverside Merced Los Angeles Irvine Davis Berkeley
FIGURE 13: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 International Indian Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 7.2 Note: The Association of Universities (AAU) is a nonprofit association of 60 U.S. and two Canadian preeminent public and private research universities; six UC campuses are members (Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Barbara). 17
FIGURE 14: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 Percent of Faculty 5 3 1 Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 Percent of Faculty 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego San Francisco Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 7.4 18
FIGURE 15: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Fall 2007 Ladder Rank Faculty by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, October 2007 N = 201 307 312 1,877 1,405 139 1,132 267 1,141 2,248 International Indian Physical Science & Math (STEM) Medicine Business Life Science (STEM) Law Social Science Arts & Humanities Other Professional Other Health Science Education Note: Other Health includes all health science fields other than medicine, such as dentistry, nursing, optometry, pharmacy, public health and veterinary medicine. Other Professional includes interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary fields, as well as fields such as architecture, communications, divinity, library and information science, public policy and social welfare. 19
FIGURE 16: Full-Time Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, Fall 2007 Ladder Rank Faculty by Gender and Discipline, October 2007 N = 201 307 312 1,877 1,405 139 1,132 267 1,141 2,248 20 Physical Science & Math (STEM) Medicine Business Life Science (STEM) Law Social Science Arts & Humanities Other Professional Other Health Science Education
FIGURE 17: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline Universitywide 2004-2005 to 2007-08, New Appointments Assistant Professors N = 164 511 156 113 210 9 7 5 3 Not URM URM 1 National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability 19% 12% 12% 6% 8% 1 7% 6% 8% 6% National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability Professional Humanities & Social Sciences * Professional excludes Law (JD) and Health Sciences Life Sciences (STEM) Physical Sciences (STEM) Computer Science, Math & Engineering (STEM) 21
FIGURE 18: Ladder Rank Hiring by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline, Associate and Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Race/Ethnicity and Discipline Universitywide 2004-05 to 2007-08, New Appointments Associate and Full Professors N = 62 233 68 49 103 9 7 5 3 Not URM URM 1 14% 5% National UC Hiring Availability Professional 1 12% National UC Hiring Availability Humanities & Social Sciences 7% 6% 5% 4% 6% 2% National UC Hiring Availability Life Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Physical Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Availability Computer Science, Math & Engineering (STEM) * Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 22
FIGURE 19: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Assistant Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 9 7 UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Gender and Discipline Universitywide 2004-05 to 2007-08, New Appointments Assistant Professors N = 164 511 156 113 210 5 3 63% 47% 58% 35% 54% 43% 34% 29% 22% 26% 1 National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability National UC Hiring Availability Professional Humanities & Social Sciences Life Sciences (STEM) Physical Sciences (STEM) Computer Science, Math & Engineering (STEM) *Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 23
FIGURE 20: Ladder Rank Hiring by Gender and Discipline, Associate & Full Professors, 2004-05 to 2007-08 N = UC Ladder Rank Hiring Compared to Availability by Gender and Field Universitywide 2004-05 to 2007-08, New Appointments Associate and Full Professors 62 233 68 49 103 9 7 5 3 39% 51% 35% 49% 1 National UC Hiring Hiring Professsional National UC Hiring Hiring Humanities & Social Sciences * Professional excludes Law (JD) and all Health Sciences 29% 26% 18% 18% National UC Hiring Hiring Life Sciences (STEM) National UC Hiring Hiring Physical Sciences (STEM) 9% National UC Hiring Hiring Computer Science, Math & Engineering (STEM) 24
FIGURE 21: Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Graduate Academic Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide 2006-07 N = 728 2,061 4,091 13,140 9 7 5 3 1 25
FIGURE 22: PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 PhDs Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline Universitywide 2006-07 9 7 5 3 1 N = 22 28 64 71 156 155 522 776 18% 18% 22% 17% 9% 13% 19% 11% 17% 21% 14% 22% 25% 27% 36% 27% 18% 23% 18% 33% 28% 32% 23% 55% 43% 48% 47% 23% 23% 28% 22% Arts & Humanities Social Sciences & Interdisciplinary Life Sciences (STEM) Physical Sciences, Math & Engineering (STEM) 26
FIGURE 23: Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Graduate Professional Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide Fall 2008 N = 663 1,708 6,070 9,057 9 7 5 3 1 27
FIGURE 24: Graduate Professional Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, 2006-07 Graduate Professional Degrees by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, 2006-07 N = 138 71 173 336 599 894 1,115 1,622 5% 15% 13% 11% 11% 15% 9 21% 18% 1 13% 13% 7 21% 12% 33% 13% 27% 11% 26% 13% 9% 17% 16% 9% 15% 11% 5% 8% 5 12% 12% 8% 13% 11% 11% 22% 15% 3 18% 5 22% 34% 41% 22% 32% 25% 1 17% 13% 4% 4% Other Professional Other Health Medicine Law Education Business 28
FIGURE 25: Undergraduate Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 International 5 3 1 9 7 5 3 1 Universitywide AAU Public Total AAU Private Total UC and Comparison Institutions Indian Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 4.3 Note: Universitywide data exclude San Francisco, which has no undergraduates. The Association of Universities (AAU) is a nonprofit association of 60 U.S. and two Canadian preeminent public and private research universities; six UC campuses are members (Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Barbara). 29
FIGURE 26: Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender UC and Comparison Institutions, Fall 2007 UC and Comparison Institutions Universitywide AAU Public AAU Private UC and Comparison Institutions 9 7 5 3 1 Berkeley Davis Irvine Los Angeles Merced Riverside San Diego Santa Barbara Santa Cruz May 2009 Accountability Report Indicator 4.5 U of Illinois U of Michigan SUNY at Buffalo U of Virginia Harvard MIT Stanford Yale 30
FIGURE 27: Undergraduate Freshman Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Undergraduate Freshmen Enrollment by Race, Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide Fall 2008 N = 1,392 6,683 14,071 11,214 9 7 5 3 1 31
FIGURE 28: Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2008 Undergraduate Transfer Enrollment from California Community Colleges by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide, Fall 2008 N = 334 1,997 3,520 4,481 9 7 5 3 1 32
FIGURE 29: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen for Underrepresented Minorities, Fall 1989 to 2009 Percentage of California Public High School Graduates that are Underrepresented Minorities 38. 36.8% 35.1% 33.5% 38.3% 38.7% 39.1% 39.4% 40.2% 40.7% 40.9% 41.8% 42.8% 43.9% 45.5% 44.4% 45.1% 46.9% 48.4% 31.5% 29.6% 21.3% 22. 20.2% 20.1% 19.4% 19.2% 20.1% 19.3% 19.2% 18.2% 17.9% 18.2% 17.4% 18.7% 18.7% 16.8% 17.2% 15.3% Percentage of New UC Freshmen from 15.8% California Public Schools that are Underrepresented Minorities 26.3% 24.3% 23.2% 22.8% 23.3% 8.2% 12.1% 14.2% 17. 17.5% 17.8% 18.1% 20.8% 21.6% 24.1% 24.4% 23.9% 23.7% 23.6% 24.1% 25.3% The Gap (difference) 24. 25.1% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 May Accountability Report Indicator 3.2 33
FIGURE 30: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 Percentage of California Public High School Graduates that are 7.6% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 7.3% 7.5% 7.4% 7.5% 7.7% 7.5% 7.4% 7.2% 7.1% 7.2% 7.3% 7.4% 7.6% 7.4% 7.4% 7.3% 7.2% 5.7% 4.5% 4.2% 4.1% 4.3% 4.1% 4. Percentage of New UC Freshmen from California Public Schools that are 3.6% 3.7% 3. 2.9% 3. 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% 2.8% 3. 3.1% 3.9% 3.6% 3.8% 1.9% 2.9% 3.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.4% 3.4% 3.9% 4. 4.5% 4.5% 4.2% 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.6% The Gap (difference) 4.6% 4.3% 3.8% 3.4% 3.4% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 34
FIGURE 31: The Gap Between California High School Graduates and New UC Freshmen Students, Fall 1989 to 2009 38.7% 40.4% Percentage of California Public High School Graduates that are 29.6% 28.7% 27.1% 30. 30.3% 30.5% 32. 31. 32.6% 32.9% 35.6% 34.5% 33.6% 37. 36.2% 36.9% 23.3% 25.3% 21.2% 14.6% 14. 13.9% 14.3% 15.1% 15.1% 13.2% 13.3% 13. Percentage of New UC Freshmen from California Public Schools that are 6.6% 12.4% 11.7% 16.5% 15.4% 15.7% 14.6% 15. 13.7% 13.2% 19.3% 19.6% 19.4% 19.2% 19.1% 19.6% 17. 17.5% 13.9% 14.3% 14.6% 14.9% 9.4% 11.4% 20.3% The Gap (difference) 21.3% 19.7% 19.7% 17.9% 19. 19. 20.7% 19.7% 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 35
FIGURE 32: Six-Year Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2002 Graduation Rates for Entering Freshmen by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide Fall 2002 68% 78% 71% 76% 82% 87% 81% 85% 1 3 5 7 9 36
FIGURE 33: Four-Year Graduation Rates - Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Fall 2004 Graduation Rates for Entering Upper Division California Community College Transfer Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender, Universitywide Fall 2004 77% 83% 85% 84% 89% 86% 87% 1 3 5 7 9 37
FIGURE 34: Undergraduate Degrees Awarded by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline, Universitywide, 2006-07 Undergraduate Degrees by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Discipline Universitywide, 2006-07 N = 618 341 2,704 1,883 7,318 6,017 7,866 6,734 9 21% 16% 22% 23% 12% 9% 26% 22% 7 Arts and Humanities 5 66% 59% 64% 49% 53% 53% 43% Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary, and Other Life Sciences (STEM) 3 1 1 4% 11% 13% 1 4% 11% 25% 16% 1 3 16% 5% 14% 21% Physical Sciences, Math, and Engineering (STEM) 38
FIGURE 35: Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus, Percent responding Somewhat Agree, Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Universitywide 2008 75% 76% 84% 89% 93% 89% 81% 87% 83% 84% 87% 58% 63% International Total 39
FIGURE 35 (continued): Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Berkeley Campus 69% 64% 64% 92% 85% 87% 86% 86% 81% 74% 85% 82% Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Davis Campus 95% 96% 91% 88% 89% 9 87% 88% 7 76% 39% 58% International Total International Total Students of race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree, "or "Strongly Agree" Irvine Campus Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Los Angeles Campus 67% 7 73% 76% 88% 93% 85% 88% 83% 83% 63% 78% 84% 88% 56% 56% 7 71% 9 85% 92% 9 88% 82% 79% 87% 84% International Total International Total 40
FIGURE 35 (continued): Students of My Ethnicity are Respected on this Campus, Percentage Responding Somewhat Agree, or Strongly Agree, UCUES 2008 Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Riverside Campus 71% 83% 89% 9 91% 86% 86% 82% 76% 88% 81% 93% 88% 85% Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" San Diego Campus 65% 71% 67% 79% 88% 92% 88% 87% 81% 74% 83% 86% 81% 58% International Total International Total Students of my race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Santa Barbara Campus 96% 91% 9 88% 83% 82% 79% 77% 71% 69% Students of race/ethnicity are respected on this campus Percent responding "Somewhat Agree," "Agree," or "Strongly Agree" Santa Cruz Campus 83% 78% 73% 74% 9 93% 83% 83% 86% 57% 43% 55% 44% International Total ** ** International Total 41
FIGURE 36: Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Universitywide 2008 5.00 1=Tolerant 6=Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.45 2.49 2.24 2.15 2.16 2.03 2.04 1.95 2.21 2.11 2.26 2.11 2.14 2.04 1.00 International Total 42
FIGURE 36 (continued): Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Berkeley Campus 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Davis Campus 5.00 5.00 1= Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.82 2.62 2.28 2.19 2.06 1.99 2.00 2.00 2.07 1.90 1.89 1.98 1.96 1.74 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.95 2.18 2.18 2.06 2.04 2.09 1.93 1.88 1.96 1.81 1.72 2.18 1.99 1.91 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Irvine Campus 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Los Angeles Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.15 2.54 2.40 2.36 2.23 2.29 2.04 2.13 2.19 2.78 2.38 2.32 2.27 2.14 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.67 2.49 2.43 2.19 2.44 2.33 2.09 2.00 2.01 1.98 2.04 1.98 1.98 2.06 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 43
FIGURE 36 (continued): Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity, Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender, UCUES 2008 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Riverside Campus 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender San Diego Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.39 1.85 1.84 1.70 2.56 2.33 2.01 1.99 1.90 1.90 1.93 1.94 1.89 1.84 1 = tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 2.42 2.35 2.42 2.31 2.22 2.23 2.14 2.33 2.49 2.48 2.26 2.30 2.26 1.00 International Total 1.00 International Total 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Santa Barbara Campus 6.00 Tolerance/Intolerance of Diversity Average Rating by Ethnicity and Gender Santa Cruz Campus 5.00 5.00 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.52 3.07 2.42 2.22 2.59 2.34 2.14 1.92 2.27 2.02 2.67 2.50 2.29 2.10 1 = Tolerant 6 = Intolerant 4.00 3.00 2.00 2.35 3.10 2.18 2.27 2.36 2.14 1.93 1.91 2.45 2.04 2.09 2.07 1.00 International Total 1.00 * * International Total 44