Can Do Descriptors KEY USES EDITION. Grades 4-5

Similar documents
LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Biome I Can Statements

Language Acquisition Chart

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION. English as a Second Language Level 1 (Entering) and Level 2 (Beginning)

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

EQuIP Review Feedback

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

English 2, Grade 10 Regular, Honors Curriculum Map

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

The Short Essay: Week 6

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

Mercer County Schools

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

5.1 Sound & Light Unit Overview

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Tap vs. Bottled Water

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Grade 6: Module 3B: Unit 2: Overview

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Secondary English-Language Arts

Honors 7 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Writing a composition

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Lecturing Module

Grade Band: High School Unit 1 Unit Target: Government Unit Topic: The Constitution and Me. What Is the Constitution? The United States Government

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

GTPS Curriculum English Language Arts-Grade 7

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Space Travel: Lesson 2: Researching your Destination

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Summarize The Main Ideas In Nonfiction Text

correlated to the Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards Grades 9-12

Grade 5: Curriculum Map

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

South Carolina English Language Arts

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Transcription:

Can Do Descriptors KEY USES EDITION Grades 4-5

The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition, Grades K 12 The Can Do Descriptors provide examples of what language learners can do at various stages of English language development in listening, speaking, reading and writing. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition are one component of the WIDA Standards Framework (shown at right). The Framework, as a whole, supports the implementation of the WIDA Language Development Standards in the instruction and assessment of language learners. We encourage educators to use the WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition in conjunction with the other components of the Framework, along with the previous edition of the Can Do Descriptors. For more information on the WIDA Standards Framework, visit www.wida.us. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition provide examples of academic language use for four specific communicative purposes. These purposes, referred to as Key Uses, were identified based on reviews of literature and a language analysis of college and career readiness standards: Recount: To display knowledge or narrate experiences or events. Example tasks that include the Key Use of Recount include telling or summarizing stories, producing information reports, and sharing past experiences. Explain: To clarify the why or the how of ideas, actions, or phenomena. Example tasks that include the Key Use of Explain include classroom discussions of natural phenomena, presentations of systems explanations, multimedia projects showing processes, causes and effects, and consequences of events. Guiding Principles of Language Development Performance Definitions Developmentally-Appropriate Academic Language Standards & their Matrices in Sociocultural Contexts Exemplifying the WIDA Can Do Philosophy English Language Development Standards Framework Argue: To persuade by making claims supported by evidence. Example tasks that include the Key Use of Argue include oral presentations defending points of view, creating persuasive texts, and constructing arguments supported by evidence. Discuss: To interact with others to build meaning and share knowledge. Example tasks that include the Key Use of Discuss include participating in small or large group activities and projects. The Key Uses, as well as the example tasks, are not exhaustive, but are meant to help guide the planning and conversation around meaningful participation of language learners in standards-based content curriculum, instruction and assessment. 2

Organization of the WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition, Grades K 12 The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition are organized by grade-level bands (K, 1, 2 3, 4 5, 6 8, and 9 12) that correspond to those in ACCESS for ELLs 2.0. Within each grade-level band, the descriptors are organized by Key Use (Recount, Explain, Argue and Discuss) and within each Key Use, there are example descriptors across WIDA s six levels of language proficiency (ELP Levels 1 6). The descriptors in Level 6 represent the language performance of students who have met all the criteria for Level 5. Unlike the descriptors at Levels 1 5 that provide examples of performance at the end of the level, the descriptors at Level 6 are examples of performance within the Level 6. For three of the Key Uses (Recount, Explain, and Argue) you ll see descriptors for the four language domains (Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing). The descriptors for the Key Use Discuss are only shown for the domain of Oral Language. The Key Use Discuss highlights the importance of oral language development for the meaningful participation of all language learners at this grade level, regardless of their level of language proficiency. The descriptors in the Key Use Discuss provide examples of what students can do to participate in oral discussions. Potential Uses for the Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition Audiences Educators who work with language learners, including coaches, teachers (e.g., general education, gifted and talented, special education, Title I), language specialists, and support staff. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition can help. Interpret results from WIDA English language proficiency assessments (e.g., ACCESS for ELLs 2.0, WIDA MODEL, and language screeners) to inform classroom decisions Differentiate curriculum, instruction, and assessments designed in English based on language learners levels of English language proficiency Collaborate and engage in instructional conversations about the academic success of language learners in English environments Advocate for equitable access to content for language learners based on their level of language proficiency Administrators and school leaders Interpret results from WIDA English language proficiency assessments (e.g., ACCESS for ELLs 2.0, WIDA MODEL, and language screeners) to inform decisions on educational programming for language learners Communicate with other educators about students English language development Support the WIDA Can Do philosophy throughout schools and districts Advocate for equitable access to content for language learners based on their level of language proficiency Stakeholders are encouraged to use the Can Do Descriptors beyond the audiences and purposes identified above to advocate on behalf of language learners. 3

KEY USE OF RECOUNT LISTENING SPEAKING Matching oral words and phrases to content-related pictures or objects Identifying the topic in oral statements Stating key words and phrases associated with the content using visual or graphic support Communicating personal experiences orally Classifying timerelated language in oral statements (e.g., present, past, future) Connecting the context of narratives (e.g., the who, what, when, & where) to illustrations Retelling short stories or contentrelated events Stating procedural steps across content areas Identifying the beginning, middle and end in an oral retelling of a text Following tasks and directions retold by peers Presenting detailed content-related information that has been rehearsed Stating main ideas in classroom conversations on social and academic topics Sequencing events or steps based on oral reading of informational text Recognizing the language of related genres (e.g., news reports, historical accounts) Giving contentrelated oral reports Sequencing steps to solve a problem (e.g., changing mixed numbers) Identify related information from multiple sources presented orally Recognizing the key historical, scientific or technical language used in a mini-lecture Conveying personal and content-related experiences within a team format Using technical and specific vocabulary when sharing content information Identifying the overall structure (e.g., chronology) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in oral presentations Differentiating similarities and differences of information presented through multimedia and written text Summarizing discussions on content-related topics on topics with descriptive details using varied vocabulary 4

KEY USE OF RECOUNT READING WRITING Identifying words in context during oral reading of illustrated text on familiar topics or experiences Highlighting previewed or familiar phrases Communicating personal experiences through drawings and words Reproducing a series of events through illustrated text Classifying timerelated language in text as present or past Identifying the who, what, where, and when in narrative text with a partner Listing procedural steps across content areas Listing positive and negative effects of events in informational or narrative texts Sequencing events in stories or content-related processes Identifying main ideas in narrative and informational text Using key words and phrases reflective of the main idea Conveying details using concrete words and phrases Connecting details to main ideas or themes Identifying conclusions in multi-paragraph text Relating a sequence of events using a variety of transitional words, phrases, and clauses Synthesizing information across related texts (e.g., author study) Becoming familiar with the language of related genres (e.g., news reports, historical accounts) Summarizing information from multiple related sources Producing contentrelated reports Creating narratives that connect personal experiences and content Identifying the overall structure (e.g., chronology) of events, ideas, concepts, or information in text Highlighting events or procedures that happened in historical, scientific, or technical text Summarizing content-related information Using narrative theme to extend the storyline 5

KEY USE OF EXPLAIN LISTENING SPEAKING Sequencing oral procedures or cycles with images Distinguishing key words and phrases related to the phenomena Naming components of a phenomenon using illustrations, photographs, or diagrams Demonstrating a procedure using realia Organizing routine causal or sequential relationships described orally Following oral directions to show recurring steps in cycles or problemsolving Giving reasons why or how something works using diagrams, charts or images Stating key words or phrases in process in a sequential order Interpreting cause and effect relationships in oral conversations Recognizing relationships in a series of oral statements Stating clear, sequential procedures to peers Comparing data or information Identifying precise details, descriptions, comparisons that support the explanation Following oral information on how or why phenomenon occur Connecting the sequential, cyclical or causal relationships of content-related issues and concepts Presenting detailed information in small groups Recognizing language used to enhance specificity of a phenomenon in class discussions Identifying components of systems (e.g., ecosystems, branches of government) in small group interactions Elaborating by adding precision and details to content-related sequence or causal phenomenon Describing relationships of components within systems (e.g., ecosystems, government) Interpreting the specific language used to enhance descriptions of a phenomenon Attending to the language related to an event or phenomenon in peer presentations Analyzing how variables contribute to an event or outcome Maintaining a formal register 6

KEY USE OF EXPLAIN READING WRITING Matching illustrated words/ phrases to causal and sequential language Sequencing sentences strips to show content-area processes from illustrated texts Producing shortanswer responses to questions using word/ phrase banks Labeling charts and graphs to describe phenomena (e.g., organisms in ecosystems) Identifying different types of connectors (e.g., first, next, because, so) Identifying key words and phrases that describe the topic or phenomena Using key terms related to the phenomena Ordering linear and cyclical sequences of a phenomena (e.g., The steps of how a volcano erupts) Matching causes with effects Identifying words or phrases to determine the type of explanation (e.g., linear sequence, cycle, system) Connecting related ideas or concepts using linking words and phrases Answering how or why questions (e.g., How does the water cycle work? Why are there three branches of government? ) Identifying the different words or phrases that are used to describe the same topic or phenomena Organizing information on how or why phenomena occur Presenting information on processes or phenomena from a variety of sources Elaborating topics with facts, definitions, concrete details, or quotations and examples Identifying how the text provides clear details of the topic or phenomena Identifying components of systems (e.g., ecosystems, branches of government) Describing how factors contribute to an event or an outcome Describing how systems relate or interact Identifying how a text presents information in a factual or neutral manner Evaluating the specific language used to enhance descriptions of a phenomenon Presenting information on processes or phenomena supported by facts and details in essays and reports Selecting the appropriate organizational structure for the process or phenomenon being described 7

KEY USE OF ARGUE LISTENING SPEAKING Matching illustrations with oral points of view Identifying language related to facts or opinions from oral presentations Stating reasons for choices using words or phrases Answering yes/no or choice questions across content or personal preferences Sorting evidence and claims from oral descriptions Distinguishing words and phrases related to opinions or facts from oral statements Stating opinions based on experiences Responding to opinion statements of other with personal preferences Identifying different perspectives, stances, or points of view Recognizing reasons for position in oral presentations Expressing opinions using content-area specific language Presenting contentbased facts that support a position Identifying evidence that supports predictions or hypotheses Differentiating between multiple points of view in a class discussion Stating relevant evidence for claims Responding to opinion statements of other with reasons or evidence Distinguishing certainty from uncertainty of spoken words or phrases in context Identifying the degree of formality in an oral presentation Supporting a claim with evidence from various sources Using claims and evidences to persuade an audience Recognizing the strength of the quality of evidence presented in oral discourse Identifying the purpose of the argument Countering a different point view Stating conclusions based on a summary of information from the various sides 8

KEY USE OF ARGUE READING WRITING Identifying key words and phrases that make up a claim Identifying a claim or opinion in multimedia with a partner Selecting words and phrases to represent points of view using facts from illustrated texts or posters Using key words or phrases related to the topic Identifying language indicative of points of view Organizing evidence based on sequential language in texts Differentiating between claims and evidence Stating reasons for particular points of view Listing pros and cons of issues Identifying evidence from multiple places within a text Identifying different perspectives, stances, or points of view Connecting reasons to opinions supported by facts and details Making adjustments for audience and context Hypothesizing or predicting based on evidence Comparing multiple points of view on a topic Comparing and contrasting evidence for claims Providing reasons and evidence which support particular points Connecting personal experience with textual evidence to strengthen an interpretation of the text Evaluating the strength of evidence as it supports a claim Evaluating positive and negative implications associated with various positions (e.g., historical events, scientific discoveries) Including evidence from multiple sources Evaluating claims and evidence by drawing multiple print sources Differentiating the strength of different pieces of evidence as it supports a claim Organizing ideas and information logically and coherently Integrating information from multiple sources to provide evidence for claims 9

KEY USE OF DISCUSS DOMAINS: ORAL LANGUAGE Discuss by Expressing own ideas in a variety of ways (e.g., drawing, using gestures, graphing) Tracking the person speaking Sharing own work (e.g., graphic organizers, drawings) to contribute to the conversation Discuss by Taking turns and applying conventions specific to particular conversations Addressing others according to relationship (e.g., student-peers, student-teacher) Discuss by Asking clarifying questions to demonstrate engagement Using examples to clarify own statements Answering questions to contribute on a topic Discuss by Elaborating on statements of others to extend ideas Presenting creative solutions to resolve communication issues Contributing ideas to co-create group responses Discuss by Recognizing how language can be used to express bias and influence others Challenging ideas respectfully Managing conversations to stay focused on a topic Discuss by Examining the value of examples to determine when to add them to bring clarity to own statements Extend conversations by developing topics with clear examples and information 10

Copyright Notice 2016 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of WIDA. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition, Grade 4 5, ( Can Do Descriptors ) may not be reproduced, modified, or distributed without prior written permission from WIDA. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition, Grade 4 5 is for your personal, noncommercial use only. Fair use of the WIDA Can Do Descriptors, Key Uses Edition, Grade 4 5 includes reproduction for the purpose of teaching (including multiple copies for lesson planning). To order more copies of this booklet, please visit the WIDA Store at https://www.wceps.org/store/wida or call toll free 1-877-272-5593 or e-mail store@wceps.org. Acknowledgements The development of the Can Do Descriptors represents the work of many educators in the field. WIDA would like to extend its appreciation to everyone who contributed through their expertise to this work, including the staff at the Center for Applied Linguistics for their ongoing partnership and support. Please visit www.wida.us to view a full list of educators who participated on the development workshop, national experts who shared their expertise in the development process, and those who participated in the review of the Can Do descriptors.

2016 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium www.wida.us