February Signature Report 14 State Supplement: Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Completion Rates

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

46 Children s Defense Fund

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Housekeeping. Questions

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

Proficiency Illusion

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

Understanding University Funding

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

Building a Grad Nation

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Produced by the Feminist Majority Foundation s Campus Leadership Program East Coast: 1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 801, Arlington, VA

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

ATTRIBUTES OF EFFECTIVE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Intellectual Property and Online Courses: Policies at Major Research Universities. Jeffrey Kromrey

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Update Peer and Aspirant Institutions

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

GRADUATE CURRICULUM REVIEW REPORT

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

NCEO Technical Report 27

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Use of CIM in AEP Enterprise Architecture. Randy Lowe Director, Enterprise Architecture October 24, 2012

National FFA Collegiate Scholarships Catalog

2014 Journalism Graduate Skills for the Professional Workplace: Expectations from Journalism Professionals and Educators

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

A Snapshot of the Graduate School

Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology Nicholas C. Kawa (co-authors: Chris McCarty, José A. Clavijo Michelangeli, and Jessica Clark)

A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF IMPLEMENTING A 1:1 INITIATIVE ON STUDENT ACHEIVMENT BASED ON ACT SCORES JEFF ARMSTRONG. Submitted to

Fighting for Education:

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Innovation Village: Building Tradition

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The Effects of Statewide Private School Choice on College Enrollment and Graduation

NCTE Early Career Educator of Color Leadership Awards. NCTE Advancement of People of Color Leadership Award. NCTE Distinguished Service Award

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Transcription:

14 February 2018 Signature Report 14 State Supplement: Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Completion Rates

14 Signature Report 14 State Supplement: Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Completion Rates In the state supplement to our sixth annual report on national college completion rates, we take a state-by-state look at the six-year outcomes for students who began postsecondary education in fall 2011. Suggested Citation: Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Huie, F., Wakhungu, P., Yuan, X., Nathan, A & Bhimdiwala, A. (2018, February). Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Completion Rates (Signature Report No. 14a). Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. TABLE OF CONTENTS About This Report... 3 Introduction... 4 Cohort and Data Definitions... 6 Highlighting State-Level Results... 7 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 2

ABOUT THIS REPORT Authors: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center Doug Shapiro Afet Dundar Faye Huie Project on Academic Success, Indiana University Phoebe Khasiala Wakhungu Xin Yuan Angel Nathan Ayesha Bhimdiwala Among the study s findings: The national completion rate for the fall 2011 cohort who started in four-year public institutions was 64.7 percent. In 24 states, this percentage was higher than the national average. In eight states (Connecticut, Iowa, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Carolina, Vermont, and Virginia), at least three in four students who started at a four-year public institution completed a degree within six years. The national completion rate for the fall 2011 cohort who started in two-year public institutions was 37.5 percent. In 24 states, the completion rate was higher than the national average. In three states (Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota), over half of the twoyear public starters completed a credential in six years. In the majority of states (38 states), more than one in 10 students starting at four-year public institutions completed their first credential at a different institution. In five states (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wisconsin), more than 15 percent of four-year public starters completed their first credential at a different institution. Nationally, 15 percent of students who started at a two-year public institution completed a degree at a four-year institution with or without a twoyear credential. In Illinois and Kansas one in five two-year public starters finished in a four-year institution in six years. The college completion rate for students who started in four-year public institutions increased from the fall 2010 cohort s 62.4 percent to the fall 2011 cohort s 64.7 percent, nationally. In the majority of states (38 states), the college completion rate also increased from 2010 to 2011. Nationally, 48.9 percent of adult learners who started in a four-year public institution completed a degree within six years. In Illinois and Texas nearly three-quarters of adult learners completed a degree within the same period. The overall completion rate for women who started at four-year public institutions was 68.5 percent whereas for men it was 61.1 percent, resulting in an overall national gender achievement gap at 7.5 percentage points. The gender gap in favor of women was largest in Maryland, North Dakota, and Utah (14 percentage points) and nonexistent in Maine, where both men and women s six-year completion rate was 54 percent. The national completion rate for the fall 2011 cohort who started in four-year private nonprofit institutions was 76 percent. In 12 states, more than 80 percent of students who started at a four-year private nonprofit institution completed a degree within six years. 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 3

INTRODUCTION As a supplement to Completing College: A National View of Student Completion Rates Fall 2011 Cohort (2017), hereafter Completing College, this report focuses on six-year student success outcomes and college completion rates by state. Three sets of tables organized by institution type display the results, presenting each state s outcomes for students who started postsecondary education at fouryear public institutions, two-year public institutions, and four-year private nonprofit institutions. Each set of tables provides state-level overviews of college completion outcomes. Further results are included, displaying state-level six-year outcomes for students: By enrollment intensity across the six-year study period exclusively full time (Tables 2, 11, 20), exclusively part time (Tables 3, 12, 21), and mixed (Tables 4, 13, 22); By age at first entry to college age 20 and younger (Tables 5, 14, 23), over age 20 through age 24 (Tables 6, 15, 24), and over age 24 (Tables 7, 16, 25); By gender women and men who started at each institution type (Tables 8, 17, 26 and 9, 18, 27, respectively). As presented in Completing College, the overall six-year completion rate for first-time-in-college degree-seeking students who started college in fall 2011 was 56.9 percent, including 11.5 percent who completed at an institution different from their starting institution. In other words, one in five students who completed a degree did so at an institution other than the one of their initial enrollment. Findings from Completing College also showed that gains from completions elsewhere were higher for traditionalage students than for delayed entry students (over age 20 through age 24 at first entry) and adult learners (over age 24 at first entry). When disaggregated by institution type, the total completion rate was highest for students who started at four-year private nonprofit institutions (76.0 percent), followed by students who started at four-year public institutions (64.7 percent). The completion rate was 37.5 percent for those who started at two-year public institutions, see Table i below (see Completing College for further details). The overall proportion of students completing elsewhere, was about the same for students who started at any of these three institution types about 11 to 12 percent of the starting cohort. Table i. Six-Year Outcomes by Starting Institution Type (N=2,264,948) Institution Type Total Completion Rate (%) Completion at Same Institution (%) Completion at Different Institution (%) Two-Year Four-Year Still Enrolled (At Any Institution) (%) Not Enrolled (At Any Institution) (%) Overall 56.86 45.39 3.15 8.32 11.74 31.39 Four-Year Public 64.71 53.48 3.42 7.80 11.10 24.20 Four-Year Private Nonprofit Four-Year Private For-Profit 76.04 63.71 2.29 10.04 7.23 16.73 35.25 22.08 1.95 11.22 10.62 54.12 Two-Year Public 37.53 26.48 3.35 7.70 15.21 47.26 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 4

Building on the findings presented in Completing College, this follow-up report examines college completion rates for each state where the Clearinghouse data coverage for the study cohort was at least 65 percent. Both Completing College and this supplement report focus on the fall 2011 cohort, following them through June 30, 2017, and highlighting six-year student outcomes including degree and certificate completion and continuing enrollment ). Completions were established using a combination of degree/certificate award records submitted by institutions as part of their participation in DegreeVerify and StudentTracker. Details on weighting and the imputation of missing data can be found in Appendix A of Completing College. 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 5

COHORT AND DATA DEFINITIONS Over 2.2 million first-time degree-seeking students who started their postsecondary studies in the fall of 2011 make up the cohort examined in this study. First-time status was established by confirming that a student (1) did not show a postsecondary enrollment record prior to summer 2011, unless such prior enrollment happened before the student turned 18 years old (dual enrollment) (2) did not receive a degree or certificate from any postsecondary institution prior to fall 2011, according to Clearinghouse data. Fall 2011 enrollments were defined as enrollment during any term starting August 15 through October 31, inclusive: if the institution had no term begin date during this period then between June 1 and August 14, 2011. There were two important changes to how the 2011 cohort of first-time degree-seeking students were defined in comparison to previous reports. These include the exclusion of current dual enrolled students and an all years look-back for prior enrollment exclusions. 1. All-years look-back for prior enrollments: Data limitations in previous reports limited our ability to search for previous enrollments in order to establish first-time status, to within four years prior to the cohort year. Beginning with this year s report, students with any prior non-dual enrollment, regardless of how far back in the Clearinghouse data that enrollment occurred, were removed from the cohort as non-first-time students. 2. Exclusion of current dual enrolled students: Students who were 17 years old or younger during the fall 2011 semester were excluded from the dataset (i.e., current dual enrollment students). This was done to ensure that those who were simultaneously attending high school and post-secondary classes were not considered first-time college students. Analyses at the national level revealed that these changes had a larger impact on two-year public institutions outcomes than those of four-year institutions, likely resulting from the exclusion of dually enrolled students who typically enroll in community colleges (see Appendix A in Completing College for more details). Specifically, at the national-level, the direction of the change in the overall completion rate and the rates at four-year public and private non-profit institutions was consistent with the changes from 2010 to 2011 under the older cohort definitions. However, the completion rate for students who started at two-year public institutions declined when we applied new definitions, which would have slightly increased from the 2010 results if we had kept the older definitions. The impact from the cohort definitional changes was similar at the state-level: namely, in those states where a decline in the completion rates of students who started in two-year public institutions was observed, it was mostly the result of the changes made to the cohort definitions. 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 6

HIGHLIGHTING STATE-LEVEL RESULTS This supplemental report presents student outcomes by the state where the students entering institution was located. Data coverage for the cohort identified in this study varies somewhat across states and institution types within states (see Appendix A of this report for coverage by state and institution type). Accordingly, we have included state-by-state results for four-year public, two-year public, and four-year private nonprofit institutions, including within each of these categories those states for which the historical data coverage (percentage of enrollments for the state/institution type) for the cohort is 65 percent or higher. Using this approach, we produced tables showing results for 50, 46, and 43 of the 50 states for four-year public, two-year public, and four-year private nonprofit institutions, respectively. Table ii, below, shows states included in the tables presented for each institutional type in this supplement to the national report. Table ii. Representation of Each State in Results Tables by Institution Type State Four-Year Public Two-Year Public Four-Year Private Nonprofit Alabama X X X Alaska * Arizona X Arkansas X X X California X X X Colorado X X X Connecticut X X X Delaware * ** * District of Columbia * X Florida X X X Georgia X X X Hawaii X X Idaho X X * Illinois X X X Indiana X * X Iowa X X X Kansas X X Kentucky X X X Louisiana X X Maine X X X Maryland X X X Massachusetts X X X Michigan X X Minnesota X X X Mississippi X X X Missouri X X X Montana X X X Nebraska X X X Nevada X * Continued on next page 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 7

State Four-Year Public Two-Year Public Four-Year Private Nonprofit New Hampshire X X X New Jersey X X X New Mexico X X * New York X X X North Carolina X X X North Dakota X X X Ohio X X X Oklahoma X X X Oregon X X X Pennsylvania X X X Rhode Island * * X South Carolina X X X South Dakota X X X Tennessee X X X Texas X X X Utah X * X Vermont X * X Virginia X X X Washington X X X West Virginia X Wisconsin X X X Wyoming * X X Included in report * Fewer than three institutions ** Fewer than 50 students (blank) Lower than 65% coverage Results are not reported because the cohort includes both two-year and four-year enrollments. To further guide readers regarding coverage, and consequently the relative confidence with which results should be interpreted, we grouped the states according to the following three levels of coverage: Low coverage: States with coverage between 65 and 79 percent Medium coverage: States with coverage between 80 and 89 percent High Coverage: States with coverage of 90 percent or higher 2018 National Student Clearinghouse. All rights reserved. 8