INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING MODEL

Similar documents
$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

School Leadership Rubrics

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Freshman On-Track Toolkit

The 21st Century Principal

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

EQuIP Review Feedback

State Parental Involvement Plan

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Program Change Proposal:

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

EMPLOYEE CALENDAR NOTES

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

School Action Plan: Template Overview

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Learning Lesson Study Course

Standards for Professional Practice

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Danielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first

Educational Quality Assurance Standards. Residential Juvenile Justice Commitment Programs DRAFT

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Forging Connections Together: A Weekly Math Meeting Model to Support Teacher Learning

University of Toronto

NC Global-Ready Schools

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

Textbook Chapter Analysis this is an ungraded assignment, however a reflection of the task is part of your journal

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Options for Elementary Band and Strings Program Delivery

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

Common Performance Task Data

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Brandon Alternative School

Strategic Plan Dashboard

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

Garfield High School

Luke O'Toole Elementary School

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

Florida s Common Language of Instruction

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Transcription:

INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING MODEL The Shaker Heights City School District Dr. Lynne S. Kulich August, 2014 1

SECTION I: INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS A. THE PURPOSE OF INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING B. RATIONALE C. GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION II: INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING A. THE ROLES OF INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING ROLE #1: CLASSROOM SUPPORTER ROLE #2: INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORTER ROLE #3: CURRICULUM OR CONTENT SPECIALIST ROLE #4: DATA COACH ROLE #5: FACILITATOR FOR CHANGE ROLE #6: LEARNER ROLE #7: PROFESSIONAL LEARNING FACILITATOR ROLE #8: RESOURCE ROLE #9: SCHOOL LEADER B. THE ROLES OF THE PRINCIPAL ROLE #1: COMMUNICATOR ROLE #2: FACILITATOR ROLE #3: INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER ROLE #4: LEARNER C. THE ROLES OF THE TEACHER 2

ROLE #1: INSTRUCTOR ROLE #2: LEARNER ROLE #3: LEARNING PARTNER ROLE #4: ASSESSOR D. COACHING CONTINUUM E. TASKS OUTSIDE THE COACH S ROLE SECTION III: IMPLEMENTATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING MODEL A. HOW DOES A SCHOOL IMPLEMENT THE INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING MODEL? B. ASSESSING AND EVALUATING THE PROGRESS OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING MODEL SECTION IV: TRAINING AND SUPPORT FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES A. KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS B. INFRASTRUCTURE C. PLANNING AND COORDINATION APPENDIX A. TEACHING AND LEARNING CYCLE B. INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING 5-STEP PROCESS C. INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING CYCLE 3

A. The Purpose of Instructional Coaching The purpose of the Instructional Coaching Model is to help close the student achievement gap and accelerate learning for all students by building teacher capacity through implementation of effective instructional practices (Casey, 2008). The coaching model recognizes the needs of each individual teacher and is tied to the Shaker Heights City School District Strategic Five Year Plan. In this way effective collaboration can result in the ultimate goal of improved student performance. Instructional coaching is fundamentally about teachers, teacher leaders, school administrators and central office leaders examining practice in reflective ways with a strong focus on student learning and results as the ultimate barometer of improvement (Annenberg Institute for School Reform). B. Rationale Instructional coaching is an action step in the current Shaker Heights City School District Strategic Five Year Plan (2014-2019). Instructional Coaching can be instrumental in helping to: Support teachers with the implementation of state standards, curriculum maps and resources Increase high school graduation rates 4

Provide a clear and specific connection between student achievement data, individual school improvement plans and the District Strategic Plan Encourage equitable student participation to be disaggregated by ethnicity, gender and socio-economic status in all programs and student discipline data Support for the Instructional Coaching Model is cited in Professional Development Keyed to the Nine Characteristics of High Performing Schools (OSPI, 2006). C. Guiding principles for coaching teacher professional learning teams Student learning is at the heart of our work. Professional learning emerges from mutual respect, collegial relationships and a shared responsibility for student learning. Multiple entry points in the coaching continuum provide team members the opportunity to engage in professional learning. Job embedded learning provides authentic context. Learners benefit from descriptive feedback relevant to their professional goals. Gradual release of responsibility supports student and adult learning. Section II The Instructional Coaching Model A. The Roles of Instructional Coaches in the Instructional Coaching Model Role #1: Classroom Supporter Purpose: To increase the quality and effectiveness of classroom instruction based on using the gradual release model and may include but is not limited to: Collaborating Co-planning Modeling Co-teaching 5

Provide descriptive feedback based on teacher-requested observation Role #2: Instructional Supporter Purpose: To support the implementation of effective instructional strategies including but not limited to: Assessment for learning Differentiation of instruction Standards based grading Building teacher capacity by working with intervention groups Role #3: Curriculum/Content Facilitator Purpose: To promote implementation of state standards through adopted curricula but not limited to: Increasing teacher content knowledge by acting as content area experts Collaborating with the Director of Curriculum to facilitate a better understanding of the structure of the written, taught and tested curriculum Dissecting standards to guide identification of essential knowledge, skills and learning targets Role #4: Data Coach Purpose: To facilitate conversations using data to drive instructional decisions including but not limited to: Collaborating with the Director of Research and Accountability and teachers to analyze all classroom data including formative and summative student achievement data 6

Assisting teachers with the use of data to improve student learning Role #5: Facilitator for Change Purpose: To engage teachers in reflective thinking while looking at their own instructional practices critically and analytically including but not limited to: Fostering a safe, trusting environment for teachers Introducing alternatives and refinements for teacher instructional practices Role #6: Learner Purpose: To engage in continuous learning in order to keep current including but not limited to: Engaging in professional learning opportunities and professional reading Practicing and reflecting about what is learned Role #7: Professional Learning Facilitator Purpose: To design and facilitate effective professional learning opportunities based on the Shaker Heights School District Strategic plan including but not limited to: Collaborating with the Director of Professional Learning to provide and support professional development aligned to teacher needs Supporting the successful implementation of professional learning based on teachers needs Role #8: Resource Purpose: To identify a variety of resources to enhance classroom instruction and student achievement including but not limited to: Identifying instructional and assessment resources requested by teachers Sharing research and instructional best practices Supporting teachers as they work toward their OTES evaluation 7

Role #9: School Leader Purpose: To support and communicate school and district initiatives with the school community including but not limited to: Involving stakeholders in the implementation of the Shaker Heights School District Strategic Plan Connecting with community stakeholders by sharing instructional practices that impact students Acting as strong advocate for student learning B. The Roles of the Principal in the Instructional Coaching Model Role #1: Communicator Purpose: To build understanding of the interconnectedness of the coaching model, school improvement plans, and district initiatives including but not limited to: Articulating the purpose and components of the coaching model to staff Leading and communicating to staff about the district and building initiatives in relation to the coaching model Maintaining the fidelity of the Instructional Coaching Model Role #2: Facilitator Purpose: To collaboratively plan, coordinate and support professional learning including but not limited to: Fostering a safe and trusting environment Aligning professional learning with the district s Strategic Plan Facilitating access to the coaching model process Role #3: Instructional Leader 8

Purpose: To support coaches and teachers in the coaching model including but not limited to: Implementing the district and school initiatives Meeting with school coaches and leadership team on a regular basis to examine school data and assist in school-wide planning Acting as a strong advocate for student learning based on data used to inform instruction Sharing best practices research Committing to meet regularly with coaches to support their roles Role #4: Learner Purpose: To promote and model professional learning including but not limited: Engaging in professional reading and learning opportunities Participating actively in the teaching and learning Coaching Continuum (see diagram) C. The Roles of the Teacher in the Instructional Coaching Model Role #1: Instructor Purpose: Reflect, refine and implement effective instructional practices to increase student achievement including but not limited to: Aligning instruction to state standards (written, taught and tested) Advocating for their students learning needs Collaborating with coach(es) Role #2: Learner Purpose: To engage in continuous learning including but not limited to: 9

Accepting and open to collaborating with an instructional coach Choosing learning opportunities, supported by the instructional coach, e.g. book studies, collaboration time, site based workshops, one-on-one coaching and coplanning Creating learning goals consistent with the district Strategic Plan Exploring, implementing, reflecting and adhering to best practices Learning and implementing intervention strategies in the classroom Role #3: Learning Partner Purpose: To engage in professional collaborative relationships including but not limited to: Fostering a safe, trusting environment Co-teaching lesso Participating actively in the Coaching Continuum ( see diagram) Role #4: Assessor Purpose: To participate in data conversations that influence instructional decisions including but not limited: Analyzing formative and summative assessments Using assessment data to inform instruction D. Coaching Continuum Building blocks of the Instructional Coaching Continuum The continuum begins with developing a professional learning relationship between the coach and the teachers through building a common experience and knowledge base. This foundational work is an on-going part of a professional learning community. This knowledge base creates a common vocabulary among staff and promotes the 10

articulation of ideas for improving instruction. The focus for professional learning is based upon collaboratively established district and building priorities. Commitment to a professional relationship between a coach and an individual teacher or small group of teachers takes the work of common experiences to deeper levels of collaboration. At the beginning, the building of congenial relationships begins with shared knowledge and new understandings for change in practices. After providing background content and context, the coach and teacher(s) begin to collaboratively articulate purpose for new teaching practice, assess need using student assessment, and make plans for implementation. At this state the coach may develop and model the lesson as the teacher(s) observes. This provides common ground for discussions on specific instructional strategies and their impact on student learning. Demonstration lessons could also include co-planning with the teacher and debriefing the lesson. The teacher has multiple opportunities to see instructional demonstrations and modeling of new strategies. The coach and teacher(s) continue to build upon demonstration lessons and grow into a co-teaching relationship. At this point in the relationship the coach and teacher(s) coplan the lesson, the coach teaches the lesson with the teacher assisting, and both coach and teacher reflect and debrief the lesson together. Building upon co-teaching experiences, the coach supports the teacher(s) through guided practice as they take on the responsibility of the teaching. Both the teacher(s) and the coach participate in the planning, reflecting and debriefing of the lesson. At this stage of the coaching continuum, the teacher(s) plans instruction based on assessment data, participates in a pre-conference with the coach, and determines the focus of the classroom visit by the coach. Then the teacher debriefs with the coach, and plans for future instruction. 11

COACHING CONTINUUM 12

Develop collaborative relationships to examine student work, plan instruction, establish common vocabulary, background knowledge and experiences. Reflect intentionally to refine instruction through learning focused conversations. Close the student achievement gap and accelerate learning for all students by building teacher capacity through implementation of effective instructional practices. Commit to collaborative and reflective relationships between grade level teachers and coaches. Implement the practice of examining student work to plan instruction. Support the refinement of instruction by implementing best teaching practices. D. The role of the coach does not include: Evaluating teachers Providing information that would be used for evaluation Serving as a substitute teacher 13

Serving as the principal designee Taking primary responsibility for the instruction of a specifically assigned group of students Performing clerical duties outside the primary job performance criteria Developing or preparing school budgets Disciplining students in an administrative capacity The practice of having instructional coaches serve in multiple capacities in a school can be problematic. Coaches who also have administrative duties such as principal assistants or department heads, may feel fragmented. Principals need to clearly communicate the division of duties so that teachers do not feel that they are being evaluated by someone serving as their coach. Section III. Implementation of the Instructional Coaching Model in schools Essential Understandings Instructional staff will have options about how to participate in the coaching model. Participation in instructional coaching is most effective when the purpose of instructional coaching as well as the roles of coaches, principals and teachers are clearly articulated and communicated. Instructional Coaching Models are most effective in improving student learning when assessment data is used. In order to promote a shared understanding of instructional coaching throughout the Shaker Heights City School District, each school will participate in a three part implementation process of readiness, implementation and assessment. 14

Schools establish the readiness to implement instructional coaching through a process such as the following: 1. Administrative team communicates with staff the purpose and the roles of instructional coaches and how the coaching model supports improvement of student learning. 2. Instructional and administrative staff review relevant data and the district Strategic Plan to determine building focus for coaching through the decision making process. A. How does a school implement the coaching model? How is the implementation assessed? The ongoing foundation of a professional learning community is essential for building a common knowledge and experience around the written, taught and tested curriculum. Throughout the implementation of coaching in a school, coaches are able to: Work with teachers to align instruction to state standards Facilitate inter-visitations to see and learn from other classrooms (within and between schools) Participate in study groups, on-site workshops and book studies Work with collaborative groups to examine student work and plan instruction Read and provide research to staff Attend coaching trainings and bring information and strategies back to building staff Help to establish common vocabulary; background knowledge and experience; and collaborative relationships. 15

Schools implement instructional coaching and assess that implementation through a process best fitting the school culture. The following is one example of a process: Review Data The administrative team and instructional staff reflect on the district Strategic Plan and building goals in order to collaboratively establish a menu of professional learning options for the building. Staff Choices Staff members select professional learning options from the menu and identify one or more opportunities to engage with instructional coaching. Calendar The administration or BLT establishes a calendar for professional learning. The coach(es) create flexible schedules in order to meet the changing needs of teachers and students. Assess Throughout the course of the year and at the end of the year, efforts need to be made to identify ways in which the implementation of the coaching model is and isn t working. Instructional staff analyze student performance data as it relates to their building goals. Instructional staff assess and reflect on their own professional learning. Instructional staff reflects on its engagement with the implementation of the coaching model during the year. Administrative staff and instructional coaches use those reflections to develop, revise and sustain the implementation of the instructional coaching model. Section IV Training and support for the Instructional Coaching Model Guiding principles 16

Coaches require a professional learning community of their own to continually increase their knowledge and skill in order to build the capacity of teachers for quality teaching and learning. The Shaker Heights City School District values, and is committed to, the initial and ongoing training of coaches. A. Knowledge and skills: What do coaches need to know and be able to do in the Shaker Heights City School District? 1. Coaches need to understand and integrate best practices to support quality teaching and learning. A. Training for new coaches should focus on overviews of the following: Instructional Coaching Model District initiatives Curriculum Resources Professional Learning Framework B. On-going training will be provided and topics may include, but not be limited to, the following: Coaching foundations Curriculum and assessment Professional learning communities Use of data to inform instruction 2. Coaches need to understand the essential elements of adult learning Creating a safe and supportive environment Goal setting Group dynamics Learning focused conversations 17

Balancing the continuum of coaching interactions consulting, collaborating and coaching Facilitating collaborative reflection and problem solving Gradual release of responsibility Change theories Planning and giving effective presentations & processing protocols Learning styles 3. Coaches need to understand how to support teaching practices and student learning within the classroom in order to: Respect and honor the culture and practices of the district, school and teachers classrooms Collaborate with teachers to plan, teach and debrief lessons B. Infrastructure: What time and organizational structures will be provided for the ongoing professional learning for coaches? 1. One full day during the first month of school and one full day during the last two weeks of the school year: Coaches will participate in goal setting, review and reflection in alignment with the evaluation system. The Director of Curriculum will evaluate the coaches using the Coordinator Evaluation Process. The Director of Curriculum will facilitate a review and/or presentation of new district/building initiatives and expectations. 2. Periodic training and meetings will be scheduled, as needed, to avoid taking coaches out of their buildings during the weeks when state assessments are administered. 3. Coaches will meet regularly with their principal to focus their work in support of the district Strategic Plan and the building goals. 18

4. All training and meeting agendas for coaches will be communicated to the principals. C. Planning and coordination: Who collaborates to coordinate the professional learning for instructional coaches? Cadre of Coaches Director of Professional Learning Director of Curriculum Director of Pupil Services Principals Consultants 19

Teaching and Learning Cycle Assessing Learning Evaluating Teaching Planning Assessing Collect information. What were the results of the initiative or instructional strategy? Evaluating Reflect on what happened. Was the strategy effective? Why? Develop new theories. What can the learner do? What is the learner attempting to do? What does the learner need to do next? 20

Planning Create a plan of action or experimental design. Step 1: What are our desired results? (SMART goals) Step 2: What will be evidence of real achievement? Step 3: What strategies and/or resources will we employ? Teaching Put the plan into action. How much support is needed for the new learning to occur? Learning Observe the learner s responses. Do the learners need more support, or are they ready for more independence? 21

Instructional Coaching 5-Step Process 1. Focus on Specific Aspects - Teacher Needs & Student Achievement 5. Monitor the Action Plan 2. Gather & Analyze Evidence 4. Design an Action Plan 3. Conduct a Coaching Conversation 22

INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING CYCLE GOAL LEARNING TARGET LOOK FORS STUDENT EVIDENCE TEACHER EVIDENCE DEBRIEF QUESTONS 1. What progress did students make towards the target today? (Based on what evidence?) TEACHER COACH 2. In what ways did your instruction help students make progress towards the target? 23

TEACHER COACH 3. What did you notice students struggle with today? Based on this, what further support do students need? TEACHER COACH NEXT STEPS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT What additional strategies should we consider to address student s challenges? What evidence can we collect to monitor student s progress? COACH SUPPORT NEEDED FROM COACH/ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TEACHER S COMMITMENT TO NEXT STEPS 24