SOCRATIC SEMINAR. Teacher s role Leader s role

Similar documents
Socratic Seminar (Inner/Outer Circle Method)

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

Assessment and Evaluation

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Why Pay Attention to Race?

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

Teaching Middle and High School Students to Read and Write Well

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Debriefing in Simulation Train-the-Trainer. Darren P. Lacroix Educational Services Laerdal Medical America s

Lecturing Module

Growing Gifted Readers. with Lisa Pagano & Marie Deegan Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Creating Travel Advice

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

What Am I Getting Into?

Introduction 1 MBTI Basics 2 Decision-Making Applications 44 How to Get the Most out of This Booklet 6

The Foundations of Interpersonal Communication

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Feedback, Marking and Presentation Policy

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Assessment of Philosophy for Children (P4C) in Catalonia

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

THINKING TOOLS: Differentiating the Content. Nanci Cole, Michelle Wikle, and Sacha Bennett - TOSAs Sandi Ishii, Supervisor of Gifted Education

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Show and Tell Persuasion

Getting a Sound Bite Across. Heather Long, MD ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Clearwater, FL March 28, 2015

Refer to the MAP website ( for specific textbook and lab kit requirements.

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme (PYP) at Northeast Elementary

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Creating and Thinking critically

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Syllabus: PHI 2010, Introduction to Philosophy

SOC 175. Australian Society. Contents. S3 External Sociology

Strategy Study on Primary School English Game Teaching

What is Research? A Reconstruction from 15 Snapshots. Charlie Van Loan

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

END TIMES Series Overview for Leaders

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

A Survey of Authentic Assessment in the Teaching of Social Sciences

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

Using Rhetoric Technique in Persuasive Speech

Learning and Teaching

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

Vision for Science Education A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas

1. Professional learning communities Prelude. 4.2 Introduction

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

4a: Reflecting on Teaching

Multiple Intelligence Teaching Strategy Response Groups

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

BSBCMM401A Make a presentation

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Oakland Schools Response to Critics of the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy Are These High Quality Standards?

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress.

Library Reference Services textbook Chapter 7

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

The Master Question-Asker

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Academic Controversy: Increase Intellectual Conflict And Increase The. Quality Of Learning 1. David W. Johnson and Roger T.

UC San Diego - WASC Exhibit 7.1 Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators

This curriculum is brought to you by the National Officer Team.

- «Crede Experto:,,,». 2 (09) ( '36

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Transcription:

SOCRATIC SEMINAR INTRODUCTIONS SEATING CHARTS 25 MINUTE SEMINAR TODAY LOGISTICAL ENVIRONMENT EXERCISE IN CRITICAL LISTENING, CRITICAL THINKING, AND SOCRATIC DISCUSSION

SOCRATIC SEMINAR Teacher s role Leader s role Quick Overview Introduce the Questions Facilitate the Seminar Close the Questions Quick Closure of Seminar

SOCRATIC SEMINAR Participants Inner circle Outer circle Hot Seats Feedback on Inner Circle & Leader FEEDBACK Self-Assessment (Inner Circle) Self-Assessment (Leaders)

HOW TO CRITICALLY LISTEN Be prepared Maintain eye contact with the LEADER Avoid emotional involvement stay objective avoid distractions Treat listening as a challenging mental task Stay active by asking questions Look for key points, cues and clues Use the gap between the rate of speech and your rate of thought Always keep the seminar positive

Socratic Seminars Ground Rules 1. Speak so that all can hear you. 2. Listen closely. 3. Speak without raising hands. 4. Refer to the text.

Socratic Seminars Ground Rules (continued) 5. Talk to each other, not just to the leader (no side conversations) 6. Ask for clarification. Don t stay confused. 7. Invite and allow others to speak. 8. Consider all viewpoints and ideas. 9. Know that you are responsible for the quality of the seminar.

Socratic Seminar-Ground Rules Cont. 10. Address one another respectfully 11. Monitor air time 12. Use sensitivity to take turns and not interrupt others 13. Be courageous in presenting your own thoughts and reasoning, but be flexible and willing to change your mind in the face of new and compelling evidence

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minutes

minute

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

seconds

Indepth Look Socratic Seminar

Benefits include: Time to engage in in-depth discussions, problem solving, and clarification of ideas Building a strong, collaborative culture Enhanced knowledge Increased success for all students Teaching respect for diverse ideas, people, and practices Creating a positive learning environment for all students

The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with right answers.

What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates, a classical Greek philosopher who developed a Theory of Knowledge: the surest way to attain reliable knowledge was through the practice of disciplined conversation dialectic.

Dialectic means the art or practice of examining opinions or ideas logically, often by the method of Question and Answer so as to determine their validity.

How did Socrates use the dialectic? He would begin with a discussion of the obvious aspects of any problem, feign ignorance about a subject, and try to draw out from the other person his fullest possible knowledge about it.

The Vision Participants seek deeper understanding of complex ideas through rigorously thoughtful dialogue, rather than by memorizing bits of information.

What are Socratic Seminars? Highly motivating form of intellectual and scholarly discourse.

What are Socratic Seminars? Usually range from 30-50 minutes An effective Socratic Seminar creates dialogue as opposed to debate.

Starting Dialogue Asking questions is the key! A STUDENT LEADER prompts the use of dialogue Participants learn to be less attached to their ideas and less reliant on persuasion for influencing opinions. Dialogue is a skill of collaboration that enables groups to create collective thinking.

Starting Dialogue When groups begin to use dialogue with discussion, the two practices need to be defined and differentiated. The most productive discourse will flow back and forth from one to the other, from inquiry to advocacy.

Starting Dialogue Students must risk making mistakes in order to learn how to learn to think critically, and work collaboratively. Professionals support this risktaking when they take their own risks in learning how to improve themselves as teachers.

Discussion & Dialogue Discussion in the dictionary is "a close examination of a subject with interchange of opinions, sometimes using argument, in an effort to reach an agreement.

Discussion & Dialogue Dialogue is "an interchange of ideas especially when open and frank and seeking mutual understanding." It is a collective inquiry in which we suspend opinions, share openly, and think creatively about difficult issues. Effective groups need to use both dialogue and discussion

What type of comments should I ask during the seminar? There are three levels of inner circle participation You should come up with a minimum of 2 which will be tracked by facilitator and teacher

Level 1 (Knowledge) Contribute to the discussion by bringing in knowledge as a means of demonstrating the ability to show understanding Add to the discussion by raising the comments to another question

Level II (Application) Application means supporting not only your ideas with evidence, but adding to what others have to say.

Level III (Synthesis Questions) Synthesis means combining or connecting two different elements of a discussion. In terms of the Socratic Seminar you will be connecting two points with each other OR connecting a point made to the outside world examples.

Dialogue is NOT Debate!

Debate Is oppositional One listens to counter arguments. Affirms participant's points of view. Defends assumptions as truth Creates a closeminded attitude Dialogue Is collaborative One listens to find common ground Enlarges points of view Reveals assumptions for reevaluation Creates an openminded attitude

Debate Dialogue Defends thinking to show that it is right. Calls for investing in one's beliefs. One searches for weaknesses Rebuts contrary positions and may belittle others Debate assumes a single right answer Demands a conclusion Expects other s reflections will improve their own thinking Temporarily suspending one's beliefs Searches for strengths Respects others and seeks not to alienate Assumes that cooperation can lead to greater understanding Remains open-ended

Four Elements An effective seminar consists of four interdependent elements: 1. the SOURCE being considered 2. the QUESTIONS raised 3. the seminar LEADER, and 4. the PARTICIPANTS

The Text A seminar text can be drawn from readings in news, history, social sciences, and philosophy or from works of art or music. Just about anything

The Text Socratic Seminar texts are chosen for their richness in ideas, issues, and values, and their ability to stimulate extended, thoughtful dialogue.

The Question An opening question has no right answer It reflects a genuine curiosity on the part of the leader. Should the United States government be the provider of the people s healthcare?

The Question An effective opening question leads participants back to the text, or agreed upon knowledge, as they speculate, evaluate, define, and clarify the issues involved. Responses to the opening question generate new questions The line of inquiry evolves on the spot rather than being predetermined by the leader.

The Leader Plays a dual role as leader and facilitator Consciously leads a thoughtful exploration of the ideas in the text. As a seminar facilitator, actively engages in the group's exploration of the topic at hand

The Leader Helps participants clarify their positions when arguments become confused Involves reluctant participants while restraining their more vocal peers

The Leader Must be patient enough to allow participants understandings to evolve Be willing to help participants explore nontraditional insights and unexpected interpretations

The Participants Share responsibility for the quality of the seminar. Most effective when participants: study the text closely in advance listen actively Come prepared

The Participants Most effective when participants: share their ideas and questions in response to others search for evidence in the text to support their ideas

Designing the Best Seminars in which something new and unexpected is discovered. Seminar is approached as a joint search.

Designing the Best At the end of a successful Socratic Seminar, participants often leave with more questions than they brought with them.

Benefits include: Time to engage in in-depth discussions, problem solving, and clarification of ideas Building a strong, collaborative work culture Enhanced knowledge and research base Increased success for all students Teaching respect for diverse ideas, people, and practices Creating a positive learning environment for all students

Conducting a Fishbowl A strategy we will use when you have a LARGE class (over 20 students) Divide the class into Inner and Outer circles

Conducting a Fishbowl Inner circle = active participants; no more than 10 participants and 1 leader Outer circle = students observe 1-2 active participants for: New ideas Positive comments Question asked Negative Behavior Referred to text Side conversations Offer 1 discussion at the inner circle

Observer Write-up What was the most interesting question? What was the most interesting idea to come from a participant? What was the best thing you observed? What was the most troubling thing you observed? What do you think should be done differently in the next seminar? What do you wish you had said?