Root Cause Analysis. Walter Bak. May 13, 2008

Similar documents
Visit us at:

Information Event Master Thesis

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

READY TO WORK PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR GUIDE PART I

Problem Solving for Success Handbook. Solve the Problem Sustain the Solution Celebrate Success

Certified Six Sigma Professionals International Certification Courses in Six Sigma Green Belt

Expert Reference Series of White Papers. Mastering Problem Management

Measurement & Analysis in the Real World

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

APPENDIX A: Process Sigma Table (I)

SAP EDUCATION SAMPLE QUESTIONS: C_TPLM40_65. Questions. In the audit structure, what can link an audit and a quality notification?

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

The Application of Lean Six Sigma in Alleviating Water Shortage in Limpopo Rural Area to Avoid Societal Disaster

License to Deliver FAQs: Everything DiSC Workplace Certification

Generating Test Cases From Use Cases

UNA PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING PREP PROGRAM

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

Get with the Channel Partner Program

Student Transportation

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Independent Assurance, Accreditation, & Proficiency Sample Programs Jason Davis, PE

C O U R S E. Tools for Group Thinking

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Natchitoches Parish School Board Special Education Progress Monitoring Procedures

Glenn County Special Education Local Plan Area. SELPA Agreement

DNV GL Joint Industry Project: Decision Support for Dynamic Barrier Management

Software Development Plan

Presentation skills. Bojan Jovanoski, project assistant. University Skopje Business Start-up Centre

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

Multi Method Approaches to Monitoring Data Quality

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

GRADUATE COLLEGE Dual-Listed Courses

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Driving Competitiveness. Delivering Growth and Sustainable Jobs. 29 May 2013 Dublin Castle, Ireland

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Study Group Handbook

Qualification handbook

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Team Report

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Research Design & Analysis Made Easy! Brainstorming Worksheet

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

WE GAVE A LAWYER BASIC MATH SKILLS, AND YOU WON T BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

Environmental Science: Earth s Resources (National 3) level 3 (6 SCQF credit points)

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

A CASE STUDY FOR THE SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING CURRICULA DON T THROW OUT THE BABY WITH THE BATH WATER. Dr. Anthony A.

Science Fair Project Handbook

MMOG Subscription Business Models: Table of Contents

Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment

HANDOUT for AMCHP Conference February 14 th 2012

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

STABILISATION AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT IN NAB

Root Cause Analysis. Lean Construction Institute Provider Number H561. Root Cause Analysis RCA

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

London School of Economics and Political Science. Disciplinary Procedure for Students

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

SY 6200 Behavioral Assessment, Analysis, and Intervention Spring 2016, 3 Credits

Co-Professors: Cylor Spaulding, Ph.D. & Brigitte Johnson, APR Office Hours: By Appointment

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Laura A. Riffel

Self Study Report Computer Science

Use of Results 4. Assessment 5. Use of improve Student Learning? (or did it?) 1. Goals/Objective 2. Phase 3. Assessment Procedures

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN

Practice Examination IREB

Essentials of Rapid elearning (REL) Design

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

What to Do When Conflict Happens

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Case Study Analysis of Six Sigma in Singapore Service Organizations

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

ScienceDirect. A Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project management improvement model. Alexandra Tenera a,b *, Luis Carneiro Pintoª. 27 th IPMA World Congress

THINKING TOOLS: Differentiating the Content. Nanci Cole, Michelle Wikle, and Sacha Bennett - TOSAs Sandi Ishii, Supervisor of Gifted Education

It s News to Me! Teaching with Colorado s Historic Newspaper Collection Model Lesson Format

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Green Belt Curriculum (This workshop can also be conducted on-site, subject to price change and number of participants)

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Texas Board of Professional Engineers Professional Practice Update / Ethics

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

REPORT OF THE PROVOST S REVIEW PANEL. Clinical Practices and Research in the Department of Neurological Surgery June 27, 2013

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Executive Council Manual

Transcription:

Root Cause Analysis Walter Bak May 13, 2008

Agenda What is root cause analysis? When is root cause analysis used? Root cause analysis process Questions / Discussion 2

Why Problems Occur Human Performance, Equipment Performance, System Performance Potential human errors, equipment malfunctions, system misoperations Procedures, processes, programs Policies, oversight, culture 3

Problem Solving People have been solving problems since the beginning of time, so why Root Cause Analysis? Structured and systematic approach Honest and objective appraisal, removing any pre-existing biases In-depth examination of the problem Defines actions to prevent recurrence 4

Root Cause Analysis Technique and tool set to assist in the evaluation and analysis of a problem or event. Answer the questions: WHAT happened? HOW did it happen? WHY did it happen? Provide an opportunity for improvement 5

When To Use Root Cause Analysis Decision to perform a root cause analysis: Significant event that had a major business, safety, reliability, or operations impact Repetitive event that could lead to a significant business, safety, or operations impact Discretionary decision to investigate a moderate event Event over which management has control and can develop effective recommendations 6

When Not to Use Root Cause Analysis A problem may not warrant a root cause analysis if: The problem is already being evaluated or was previously evaluated. The cause is identified in a simple manner with certainty. Effect or impact of the problem is negligible (relative to safety, financial, operability, regulatory) Cost or time to evaluate and resolve the problem is far in excess of the impact of the event. 7

Benefits of Timely Problem Solving Actions defined to prevent recurrence of problem Improved safety, quality, operational performance, and business performance. Reduction in expenditure of resources to repeatedly fix complex problems in the workplace (reduced rework). 8

Problem Analysis Approach Event 1 Protection of Evidence 2 Data Collection 3 Apparent Cause Analysis 4 Immediate Corrective Actions to Restore System 5 Further Investigation of Apparent Cause 6 Definition of Short- Term Corrective Actions 7 Is Problem Significant? YES 9 Additional Data Collection 10 Root Cause Analysis 11 Identification & Validation of Root Cause 12 Definition of Long Term Actions to Prevent Recurrence 16 Development of Plan to Evaluate Effectiveness of Long Term Actions NO 13 Review for Extent of Problem 14 Identification of Other Affected Sites 15 Definition of Short- Term Corrective Actions 8 Bucket Problem for Later Evauation 9

Root Cause Analysis Methodology Selection of the team members Definition of problem statement Data protection and collection Reconstruct problem scenario (timeline and process) Perform root cause analysis Define actions to prevent recurrence 10

Team Selection Leadership skills Root cause skills Problem solving skills RCA Team Subject matter experts Familiarity with problem 11

Problem Statement Definition of Problem Statement Description of the problem to be solved. Characteristics of a good problem statement are: Accurate definition of time frame of problem and frequency of occurrence to focus the review Clear description of scope and substance of problem (statement should address a specific, single problem) Factual description (with no predetermined conclusions or biases) Clarification of significance of problem (safety, financial, regulatory) 12

Data Protection and Collection All data must be protected and collected after an event: Data records Documents (procedures, notes, etc.) Physical evidence (equipment, parts, etc.) Interviews 13

Data Collection Interviews Interviews are utilized to confirm and verify results of document review. Primary information gained from interviews is: Factual information relative to how the work or process was performed that led to the problem Existing environmental conditions at the time of the problem Initial conditions that led to the problem Resolution of any discrepancies in the document review or completion of missing information ( gaps ) in reconstructing the problem scenario 14

Reconstruct Problem Scenario The problem scenario is developed in several ways depending on the problem to be solved: Lab or field testing of equipment (inspections, material analysis, functional, recreation of event, other as appropriate) Analysis and simulation (mathematical analysis of the event to recreate the event) Timeline of event Process comparison (showing both as defined and as is processes) The problem scenario is used to form the basis of the root cause analysis 15

Event Timeline Description of the sequence of events leading up to the problem. Description of the sequence of events by organization / person Constructed from the data review and supplemented by interviews Time 5/1/2003 5/25/2003 6/30/2003 7/3/2003 7/4/2003 7/30/2003 8/5/2003 8/10/2003 Organization Engineering Prepares calculation and accepts NCR "as-is" Procurement Finalizes procurement documents Approves shipment Quality Control Review and approves NCR disposition Management Client Client rejects item Identifies NCR for "out of Initiates tolerance" Completes Vendor fabrication item fabrication Ships item 16

Process Comparison Process flow charts: The process flow charts are developed for both the as defined and as is conditions. The key steps are: Define as-is and as defined processes Compare the process flow charts to identify deviations from the as defined process Review as defined process for any inappropriate requirements or directions. NCR Disposition Process Anyone Vendor Engineering Engineering Licensing QC / QA Proj. Mgr. Process "as-defined" NCR identified Prepares NCR disposition NCR reviewed against technical reqjuirements NCR reviewed against regulatory commitments Review of NCR disposition Review of NCR disposition NCR approved Anyone Vendor Engineering Engineering QC / QA Proj. Mgr. Process "as-is" NCR identified Prepares NCR disposition NCR reviewed against technical reqjuirements NCR reviewed against regulatory commitments Review of NCR disposition NCR approved 17

Data Analysis Perform any additional data analysis Various techniques are available, such as: Histograms Pareto charts Scatter charts Relations diagrams 18

Root Cause Analysis The root cause analysis consists of the following basic steps: Review of the problem scenario to identify actions that led to the problem or event Perform a cause and effect analysis for each inappropriate action to identify common causes Perform barrier analysis (or equivalent) on the common causes to identify and verify the root causes Validate the root cause analysis Define actions to prevent recurrence 19

Root Cause Analysis Cause and effect analysis The cause and effect analysis is performed for each identified action to determine a set of common causes. The common causes are developed based on a more rigorous analysis of the action or error. Common cause and effect analysis techniques are: Fishbone diagrams Matrix diagrams Brainstorming (Five Whys) 20

Root Cause Analysis Cause and effect analysis (continued) The techniques examine the following: Assessment of the human or technical cause(s) of the problem based on a review of the timeline and existing conditions Assessment of the procedure, process or program cause of the problem (first line of defense), if appropriate. Assessment of the policy, culture or oversight cause(s) that led to the cause of the problem (second line of defense), if appropriate. 21

Root Cause Analysis Barrier analysis A barrier analysis is utilized with the common causes to identify the true root causes of the problem. The barrier analysis is performed in the following steps: The common cause selected for review is eliminated and a review of the problem or event is performed to determine if the problem would have been prevented. If the barrier analysis indicates that the problem would have been prevented, then this item is considered a root cause. Common causes that do not result in a root cause are treated as contributing causes Each common cause is evaluated in this manner. The root cause(s) are compiled. 22

Root Cause Analysis Develop actions to prevent recurrence A set of recommended actions are developed that specifically address the root cause and are intended to prevent future occurrences of the problem or event. Recommended actions should meet the following criteria: Must address the root cause Must be executable by the organization (actions must be capable of being implemented) Must be cost effective Must be consistent with company goals and strategy 23