LAURIE MELANSON SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS SAU 23 GOALS

Similar documents
Hampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

Entry Plan for the First 100 Days for Tari N. Thomas. Interim Superintendent of Schools Orange, Petersham and RC Mahar Regional

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Strategic Plan Update Year 3 November 1, 2013

State Parental Involvement Plan

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide

CURRENT POSITION: Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Greta Bornemann (360) Patty Stephens (360)

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Program Assessment and Alignment

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

Clearfield Elementary students led the board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Copyright Corwin 2015

The 21st Century Principal

School Leadership Rubrics

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

University of Toronto

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

Conceptual Framework: Presentation

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

and Beyond! Evergreen School District PAC February 1, 2012

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Common Performance Task Data

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Program Information. The Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators' Association together with TEACHERS21

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

EVALUATION PLAN

What does Quality Look Like?

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

District Superintendent

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Holbrook Public Schools

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Equitable Access Support Network. Connecting the Dots A Toolkit for Designing and Leading Equity Labs

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

Program Change Proposal:

Texas Southern University FY 2014 Job Title List (By Alpha)

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

West Hall Security Desk Attendant Application

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Seminole State College Board Regents Regular Meeting

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

George Mason University Graduate School of Education

Historical Overview of Georgia s Standards. Dr. John Barge, State School Superintendent

A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Transcription:

LAURIE MELANSON SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS SAU 23 GOALS 2016-2017 My overarching goal for this year is to keep the work of teaching and learning central to everything that we do, Prek-12, district-wide. GOAL #1 The Superintendent will complete an educational audit of all SAU 23 schools, by June 1, 2017. RATIONALE As a new superintendent, an educational audit of each school s performance will provide direction for improvement plans. Input from school board members, school personnel, parents and student will help provide information on the current condition of our schools, our strengths and areas for growth at each building. 1. The Superintendent will be a visible presence in the schools and in classrooms. 2. Information to be gathered in the following categories: OUTCOME Curriculum and instruction Assessment and data Professional Development Personnel Climate and Culture Facilities and operations Community support and involvement A thorough understanding of our schools will serve as a backdrop for future planning and will contribute to the creation of a vision and strategic plan for the future.

GOAL #2 To work with the Administrative Leadership team and teachers to adopt a set of graduation competencies for Prek-8th Grade and 9th-12th Grade in major content and non-content areas: Language Arts, Science, Mathematics, Social Studies, the Arts and Work Study Practices. Completed drafts of grade span competencies will be available for School Board review by January 1, 2017. RATIONALE SAU 23 School Communities need a system and a format that describes what we want our students to be able to do when they graduate from 8th and 12th grades. Competency is the ability of a student to apply content knowledge and skills in and/or across the content area(s). They include explicit, measurable, transferable learning objectives that empower students. Our aligned system will describe learning progressions, describing student performance in each area at each grade level and promoting personalized learning and assessment at the local level. 1. I will work with the Principals, Assistant Principals and Special Education director to develop a plan for the dissemination of the NH Model Competencies for Prek-8 and 9-12 to assure all teachers are given the opportunity to review and give feedback. We will adopt or adapt to create working documents for SAU 23 schools. 2. Reinstate the Curriculum Advisory Council with teachers from each school in SAU 23. 3. Principals and teachers will continue collaborative work during the school day where planning time is available, after school during building meeting times, during available release time and during occasional full day release time for representative groups of teachers. 4. On-going training will be provided for members of the Administrative Leadership Team to assist them in supporting this work in our schools. 5. Selected teachers from each school (Open to all grades and content areas) will receive intensive training on developing rigorous performance assessments for selected competencies. These trained teachers will share their work with colleagues, administer the locally developed assessments and score the student work. 6. I will work with the Principals to develop a presentation for parents and community members on competency based education. OUTCOME SAU 23 Schools will have a set of clearly articulated graduation competencies, from which performance assessments and curriculum documents will be developed.

GOAL #3 To continue the development of a sound evaluation process for all school employees that will assure high performance and quality control and that will meet state and local performance standards. RATIONALE The waiver from the federal No Child Left Behind Act and the reauthorization of the Every Child Succeeds Act, requires districts to have an evaluation instrument in place that evaluates teachers and administrators in relationship to an agreed upon set of high performance standards. 1. Introduce the new teacher effectiveness process to teachers at the beginning of the FY17 school year. This process was developed last year with input from teachers and administrators from every school in the SAU. 2. Teachers will self assess, using the scoring rubrics to identify areas of strength and areas to develop. SMART goals will be developed and discussed with the building administrator, to target personal goals, school and district goals. 3. All evaluations will be stored on a free, secure network provided by the NH DOE, called the Educator Evaluation System (ESS). 4. During the summer of 2017, teachers and administrators will reconvene the committee to review feedback from teachers and administrators. Revisions will be considered. 5. All principals will be evaluated, by the Superintendent, with a new standards-based leadership process, developed by a committee of NH leaders and based on ISLLC standards (Interstate School Leader Licensure Consortium). At the summer retreat, principals reviewed the process, rubrics and portfolio component of the process. 6. On-going training and support will be provided to teachers and administrators to support the growth and development of our leaders and faculty OUTCOME SAU 23 Schools will have an evaluation system that accurately assesses performance according to high, agreed upon, performance standards.

GOAL 4 To work with SAU Office employees to improve service to our customers and improve accuracy and efficiency in the finance department. RATIONALE The SAU Office has experienced many challenges over the last two years. Turnover in the finance office and district leadership has had a negative effect on the SAU, financially. A strong, effective SAU Office will help rebuild trust and credibility in our school and local communities. 1. Ensure certified, experienced personnel are in all available positions. 2. Build the SAU Office team to work together, cross training positions. 3. Work with all agencies to establish timelines for payments to avoid ALL late filing payments and fees. 4. Establish customer service as primary goal in the SAU office, along with financial responsibility. Courteous interactions with employees and the public Prompt response to questions: within 24 hours Add payroll to the Mojo Help desk, along with technology and data 5. Work with the auditors to close the 14-15 School year. 6. Close the books on the 15-16 school year by September 1st and work with the auditors to close the 15-16 school year as soon as possible. OUTCOME The SAU office will be efficient in all fiscal responsibilities and be a place SAU office employees are proud to work in.

GOAL #5 Work with all SAU 23 School Boards to update the SAU 23 Policy Manuals. RATIONALE SAU 23 Schools must have current, up-to-date policy manuals which reflect current RSA s, in a format that is easily renewed and updated. 1. Establish a SAU policy committee to review and prioritize policies that may be missing since the last full review in 2009. 2. Work with the NH School Boards Association bank of model policies to consider when developing new or revised policies aligned with new laws and regulations. 3. Consult with the NH School Boards Association program, if needed, to insure our policy manuals are complete and accurate. 4. Review all necessary policies for first and second readings, at public school board meetings, encouraging public participation. OUTCOME Within two years, the SAU School Districts will have a new Policy Manual and an agreed upon process to continually update and renew the manual in an on-going manner.

GOAL #6 The Superintendent will work with the individual School Boards, Principals and Facilities Director (where appropriate), to assess and prioritize the immediate and long term needs of each school. RATIONALE Each school in the SAU has unique facility needs. Our communities have invested significant resources into our school buildings, most of which are the most valuable properties in their respective towns. We have a responsibility to maintain our schools, while demonstrating fiscal prudence. 1. Haverhill Cooperative School District The Superintendent will work with the School Board and Strategic Facilities Committee to develop a proposal to address the needs of students and aging facilities, with an eye towards financial efficiencies. 2. Piermont and Bath The Superintendent will work with the Facilities Director, Principals, Custodians and School Boards to identify immediate and long term facility priorities. 3. Warren The Superintendent will work with the Principal, Custodian and School Board to assess and prioritize the facility needs of the Village School. 4. Annual maintenance plans will be reviewed and developed, if found to be necessary. 5. The Superintendent will review budgets for efficiencies in maintenance departments. OUTCOME Our schools will be maintained properly and immediate and long term needs will be prioritized.