PROGRAMS OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH. MS Occupational Safety & Health. Dr. Wayne D. Jones Department Chair

Similar documents
Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

BOS 3001, Fundamentals of Occupational Safety and Health Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes.

All Professional Engineering Positions, 0800

Department of Legal Assistant Education THE SOONER DOCKET. Enroll Now for Spring 2018 Courses! American Bar Association Approved

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ECVCP

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UN!VERSITY

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Continuing Competence Program Rules

VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATION IN YOUTH AND LEISURE INSTRUCTION 2009

Co-op Placement Packet

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Developing Highly Effective Industry Partnerships: Co-op to Capstone Courses

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

Master in Science in Chemistry with Biomedicine - UMSH4CSCB

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

OSH&E Advisory Committee October 28, 2016 Meeting Report by Mr. Chris Kuiper and Dr. Lu Yuan

Pakistan Engineering Council. PEVs Guidelines

Program Elements Definitions and Structure

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES

Undergraduate Program Guide. Bachelor of Science. Computer Science DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE and ENGINEERING

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

APPLICATION DEADLINE: 5:00 PM, December 25, 2013

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Modified Systematic Approach to Answering Questions J A M I L A H A L S A I D A N, M S C.

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

VIRGINIA INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION (VISA)

Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support of ABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

REGULATION RESPECTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT AND SPECIALIST'S CERTIFICATES BY THE COLLÈGE DES MÉDECINS DU QUÉBEC

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

References 1. Constitution No.2 /1989 on National Education System 2. Government Regulation No.60/1999 on Higher Education

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

MAIS ACCREDITATION MANUAL AND MAIS REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES MAIS TEACHER CERTIFICATION MANUAL MAIS ETHICS POLICY

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

value equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

Basic Standards for Residency Training in Internal Medicine. American Osteopathic Association and American College of Osteopathic Internists

Studies Arts, Humanities and Social Science Faculty

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

World s Best Workforce Plan

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Miami Central Senior High School Academy of Finance

DMA Timeline and Checklist Modified for use by DAC Chairs (based on three-year timeline)

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

CROSS-BATTERY ASSESSMENT, SLD DETERMINATION, AND THE ASSESSMENT- INTERVENTION CONNECTION

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

Palomar College Curriculum Committee Meeting Agenda Wednesday March 1, 2017 Room AA 140 at 3:00 pm

Clinical Mental Health Counseling Program School Counseling Program Counselor Education and Practice Program Academic Year

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Academic Freedom Intellectual Property Academic Integrity

Transcription:

PROGRAMS OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH MS Occupational Safety & Health Dr. Wayne D. Jones Department Chair 16 September 2011 II. MISSION STATEMENT The mission statement of the Department of Occupational Safety & Health parallels the mission statement of Southeastern Oklahoma State University in that it provides an environment of academic excellence that enables students to reach their highest potential. By having personal access to excellent teaching, challenging academic programs, and extracurricular experiences, students will develop skills and habits that promote values for career preparation, responsible citizenship, and lifelong learning. VISION STATEMENT The primary focus of the safety profession is the prevention of harm to people, property and the environment and to improve employee health. Occupational safety professionals are the specialists in the fight to control hazards. To that end, the department of occupational safety & health will remain the leading undergraduate program in size, placement, and quality of instruction in the country. PROGRAM GOALS The goal of the department of occupational safety and health is to provide graduates with the knowledge, skills, situational learning experiences, instruction and assessment that will prepare them for successful careers in the field of occupational safety and health. III. MAJOR PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES The objectives were developed by the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), and the American Board of Engineering Technology (ABET) and were used in the Program Review process of safety degree programs in 2010. The Occupational Safety and Health Department will utilize these nationally developed outcomes and modify as necessary in future program development. A student completing the M.S. degree in Occupational Safety & Health shall be able to: 1

1. Demonstrate an ability to analyze and interpret data by understanding fundamental mathematical concepts and to apply those concepts to practical situations in industry. Specifically, Southeastern graduates will be able to formulate and compile safety data and statistics necessary for Job Safety Analysis, Industrial and Insurance Hazard Assessments, and Fault Tree Analysis programs in insurance and industry. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 100 enrolled in MS occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, and summer semesters plus the comprehensive exam. What is the make-up of the sample? All students enrolled in occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, and summer academic period. What work will be evaluated? Online class exams, presentations, reports, and group projects in courses pertinent to the objective were studied. In addition, all graduating MS students were required to take, and satisfactorily complete, the MS comprehensive exam that included questions regarding statistical presentation and analysis were included. How is work evaluated? By individual professors and/or the department chair. What data will result from the assessment? Individual exam scores, project group scores, and presentation scores. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 2. Anticipate, identify, and evaluate hazardous safety and health conditions and practices through use of JSA, FTA, ISO9000, and OSHA specs programs utilized in (SFTY-5233, 5214, 5263, 5153, 5244 and 5103) courses. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 75 enrolled in select (SFTY-5233, 5214, 5263, 5153, 5244, and 5103) occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period plus the graduate comprehensive exam. What is the make-up of the sample? All students enrolled in select (SFTY- 5233, 5214, 5263, 5153, 5244, and 5103) occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period plus the graduate comprehensive exam. What work is evaluated? Class exams, presentations, reports, and group projects in courses pertinent to the objective were studied. In addition, all graduating MS students are required to take, and satisfactorily complete, a comprehensive exam that included questions regarding statistical presentation and analysis were included. 2

How is work evaluated? By individual professors and/or the department chair. What data will result from the assessment? Individual exam scores, project group scores, and presentation scores. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 3. Develop safety and health hazard control designs, methods, procedures, and programs including homeland security and emergency program management. Southeastern students should be able to complete FEMA basic knowledge coursework upon completion of (SFTY-5233, 5214, 5263, 5153, 5244 and 5103) courses. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 75 enrolled in occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period plus the MS comprehensive exam. What is the make-up of the sample? All students enrolled in occupational safety core classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period plus the MS comprehensive exam. What work is evaluated? Class exams, presentations, reports, and group projects in courses pertinent to the objective will be studied. In addition, all graduating seniors are required to take, and satisfactorily complete, a senior exam that included questions regarding statistical presentation and analysis were included. How was work evaluated? By individual professors and/or the department chair. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 4. Evaluate and utilize appropriate technology and online library resources in occupational safety & health situations and training opportunities through extensive use of SOSU occupational safety & health computer lab programs and OSHA and ASSE training online programs. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 75 enrolled in occupational safety classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What is the make-up of the sample? All students enrolled in occupational safety classes during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What work is evaluated? Class presentations, reports, and group projects in courses pertinent to the objective will be studied which required use of the departmental student computer lab. 3

How is work evaluated? By individual professors and/or the department chair. What data will result from the assessment? Individual and group project and presentation scores. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 5. Manifest oral and written communication skills in presentation of occupational safety and health training situations through required courses in Industrial Hygiene II, HAZMAT II, Occupational Safety Statistics, Workers Compensation and Legal Issues and Industrial Safety Program Management courses. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 75 enrolled in Industrial Hygiene II, HAZMAT II, Occupational Safety Statistics, Workers Compensation and Legal Issues and Industrial Safety Program Management courses. courses during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What is the make-up of the sample? All students enrolled in graduate level core courses during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What work is evaluated? Presentations, reports, and group projects in courses pertinent to the objective will be studied. How is work evaluated? By individual professors and/or the department chair. What data will result from the assessment? Individual and group project and presentation scores. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 6. Work independently in analyzing and solving problems in occupational safety & health through proper instruction and internship experience gained during the final graduate years. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 100 How are students selected to participate in the assessment? All graduating students in the program during the fall, spring, summer academic period, especially those in internship positions. What is the make-up of the sample? All graduating students in the program during the fall, spring, summer academic period, especially in internship positions. What work will be evaluated? Weekly internship reports and assignments to include training presentations and inspections on the job. How was work evaluated? By the department chair. 4

What data will result from the assessment? Successful completion of internships and job searches. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. 7. Obtain an entry-level position in occupational safety & health or be admitted to an accredited graduate school in occupational safety & health or industrial hygiene. Number of students participating in the assessment: Approximately 25 How are students selected to participate in the assessment? All graduating students in the program during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What is the make-up of the sample? All graduating students in the program during the fall, spring, summer academic period. What work will be evaluated? Successful job placement or graduate school acceptance. How was work evaluated? By the department chair. What data will result from the assessment? Percentage of successful job search or graduate school acceptance. Outcomes will be compared to previous classes to determine historical trends. TYPES OF ASSESSMENT USED WITH EXPLANATION The department of occupational safety & health uses the following assessment tools: Program Outcomes Various exams are given in several sections to assure that the students are learning required industry related specialties and that expertise in areas such as mathematics, chemistry, ergonomics, hazardous materials, law, environment, management, industrial hygiene, training techniques, fire, and construction safety. In addition, a business/industry advisory board is in place to consult with in determining effective program outcomes. Students are chosen at random for program outcomes assessment with the department chair. Exit Assessment Comprehensive exit exams are conducted to include the exit questionnaire, course evaluation, and career planning evaluation. The department chair conducts additional interviews in order to determine program effectiveness and outcomes assessment. 5

Post-Graduate Assessment Six-month surveys are conducted after the graduate has been employed over 180 days. In addition, the employers are also surveyed to determine the adequacy of the program in providing skilled, educated, and motivated workers for occupational safety in government and industry. FREQUENCY OF ASSESSMENT/FREQUENCY OF RESULTS Program Outcomes Assessment All students are tested on coursework and the results used to determine course effectiveness. As with mid-level assessment, student interviews are conducted throughout the semester to determine program effectiveness and outcomes. Exit Assessment Comprehensive exams are conducted and include the ABET and SOSU exit questionnaire, course evaluation, and career planning evaluation. The assessment exams are administered to each graduating senior at the end of the semester and the results used to determine program effectiveness. Post-Graduate Assessment Six-month surveys are provided to each graduate after 180 days of employment. The results are used to determine program effectiveness and to use as a benchmark to determine if the program is meeting the entry-level professional requirements of the American Society of Safety Engineers. Assessment surveys are also provided to employers to determine the effectiveness of the occupational safety program in meeting employer needs at the entry-level position. ANALYSIS IN AND FOR THE DEPARTMENT Program Outcomes Results from exams in various specialties are taken into consideration as the department seeks to analyze success at the goals and objectives level. In addition, meetings with industry leaders accompanied by their insightful comments and recommendations allows the department to gauge success from the industrial/commercial standpoint. Qualitative outcomes assessment is derived from selected students at this midpoint junction. 6

Exit Assessment Both qualitative and quantitative outcomes assessments are provided by the senior seminar students. Quantitative assessments include the numerical graduate survey with Likert rankings of the effectiveness of the degree program included. Past surveys serve as the benchmark of this exam. Qualitative surveys are also taken from all senior seminar students and their comments recorded for future course and degree plan adjustments. Post-Graduate Assessment Qualitative surveys are provided to graduates after they have completed six months in the workforce. As with the exit survey, comments of graduates and their employers are used to make corrections in the courses and degree plans offered. APPLICATION IN/AND FOR THE DEPARTMENT Planning Using the assessment process, the department of occupational safety & health will plan courses, programs, and instructional methods to best serve both the student and the employers we serve. Planning will center on effectiveness and best use of resources. Budgeting The limited resources of the department will be used to strengthen the mission and goals of both the university and the department. Based on the assessment outcomes, budgeting will be targeted towards courses and teaching methods that satisfy the prime directive, that is, excellence in course preparation, teaching, and the general preparation of the student to meet the challenges of the industrial and occupational safety profession. Curricular Changes All courses and degree programs will be updated and strengthened based partially on the assessment process. Courses determined to be obsolete or redundant will be deleted and replaced with courses that best suit the requirements of industry and government with occupational safety professionalism and efficiency as the major driving force. Courses in need of revision will be modified based in part on the assessment process. 7

HOW FEEDBACK IS TO ACHIEVED All assessment processes and procedures will be reviewed, discussed, and modified as necessary by the faculty. Student exit exams, 180-day alumni surveys, and supervisor/industry surveys will be provided to the faculty with opportunity for discussion at faculty meetings and through regular faculty advisement meetings with the department chair. IV. PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS Modifications to the program will be made using feedback from faculty, students, alumni, and industry leaders to best achieve the stated mission, goals, and objectives of Southeastern Oklahoma State University and the Department of Occupational Safety & Health. How modifications are determined and implemented will be based on the assessment process. The effectiveness or ineffectiveness of any modifications will be determined by future student, faculty, alumni, and industry assessment processes. V. DISTANCE EDUCATION The Master of Science degree program is primarily online with students required to take two on-site lab courses during the degree program. Those courses are Industrial Hygiene II and HAZMAT II and each require 16-hours of face-to-face lab time on the Durant campus. Online courses are evaluated using the Internet Course Survey. VI. FACULTY LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS All faculty members are provided opportunity to be involved in the assessment process. Faculty members are apprised of the different sections and categories of assessment during faculty meetings and were given notice of assessment opportunities via email. Faculty members provided comments and suggestions for the assessment document and all suggestions and comments are seriously studied and considered. Dr. Wayne D. Jones Complete and analyze assessment report and COMP Exam Dr. Chris Bradshaw Administer COMP examinations/class assessments Dr. Nick Nichols Administer COMP examinations/class assessments Dr. Hal Poovey Alumni and employer surveys/class assessments Dr. Richard Braley Conduct exit interviews/class assessments 8

VII. TRANSPARENCY Results of the assessment process will be available to the internal and external constituents in the annual Department of Occupational Safety & Health assessment report and the five-year program review. 9