LEEHURST SWAN CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT, COURSEWORK AND NON-EXAMINATION ASSESSMENT POLICY Reviewed by the Examinations Officer October 2016

Similar documents
WEST HATCH HIGH SCHOOL THE BEST THAT I CAN BE. Exams Policy

Lismore Comprehensive School

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

EXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Examinations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week

Practice Learning Handbook

BIRMINGHAM INDEPENDENT COLLEGE Examination Contingency Plan. Centre Number: 20635

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Information for Private Candidates

Practice Learning Handbook

Post-16 Level 1/Level 2 Diploma (Pilot)

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

Qualification handbook

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

Casual and Temporary Teacher Programs

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE

2. YOU AND YOUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Technical Skills for Journalism

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

MMU/MAN: MASINDE MULIRO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY FACULTYOF EDUCATION THE SECONDARY EDUCATION TRAINING PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

COURSE HANDBOOK 2016/17. Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

REGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble

STUDENT HANDBOOK ACCA

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

THE ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS

School of Education. Teacher Education Professional Experience Handbook

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

International Advanced level examinations

Job Description Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS)

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS

ASTRONOMY 2801A: Stars, Galaxies & Cosmology : Fall term

THREE-YEAR COURSES FASHION STYLING & CREATIVE DIRECTION Version 02

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

Rules and Regulations of Doctoral Studies

Diploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220

PUTRA BUSINESS SCHOOL (GRADUATE STUDIES RULES) NO. CONTENT PAGE. 1. Citation and Commencement 4 2. Definitions and Interpretations 4

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Bachelor of International Hospitality Management, BA IHM. Course curriculum National and Institutional Part

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

Jazz Dance. Module Descriptor.

August 22, Materials are due on the first workday after the deadline.

User Guide. LSE for You: Graduate Course Choices. London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE

Examination Rules University College Absalon

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

Degree Regulations and Programmes of Study Undergraduate Degree Programme Regulations 2017/18

May 2011 (Revised March 2016)

Inoffical translation 1

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Subject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT. Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J

British International School Istanbul Academic Honesty Policy

Exhibition Techniques

Dyslexia and Dyscalculia Screeners Digital. Guidance and Information for Teachers

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Real Estate Agents Authority Guide to Continuing Education. June 2016

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

FACULTY OF ARTS & EDUCATION

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Curriculum and Assessment Policy

ACTL5103 Stochastic Modelling For Actuaries. Course Outline Semester 2, 2014

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

5 Early years providers

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

RECRUITMENT AND EXAMINATIONS

Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN GENETICS

Last Editorial Change:

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Pharmaceutical Medicine

Transcription:

LEEHURST SWAN CONTROLLED ASSESSMENT, COURSEWORK AND NON-EXAMINATION ASSESSMENT POLICY Reviewed by the Examinations Officer October 2016 Objective The aim of this policy is to clearly set how controlled assessments, coursework and non-examination assessments will be carried out. All pupils in Year 11 sit GCSE subjects at Leehurst Swan with the exception of English and Design Technology where pupils sit igcse examinations. Most of these subjects have some element of Controlled Assessment or Coursework, except for Mathematics and Religious Studies which have no controlled assessment with results based purely on the final examination papers. Pupils in Year 10 take IGCSE s in most subjects with coursework. The exception to this is the Sciences and Drama where pupils take GCSE s including non-examination assessments. Controlled Assessment Section A Controlled Assessments have three levels of control; low, medium and high. Teaching staff are responsible for ensuring that the work set is carried out at the appropriate level of supervision. Some low control work may be set as homework but other work must be carried out in the classroom with high control in exam conditions. Non-Examination Assessment Section B Non-examination assessment is a form of internal assessment for reformed GCSE qualifications where it is the only valid means of assessing essential knowledge and skills that cannot be tested by timed written papers. IGCSE Coursework English Whilst English and English Literature Coursework assignments are not controlled assessments there are clear guidelines from the IGCSE board as to how to conduct coursework. Pupils will create the first draft of English and English Literature coursework in class. Pupils are able to use a dictionary, thesaurus and word processor in the preparation of their coursework. Teachers will keep a copy of the first draft on file and will give pupils feedback on this. Pupils are encouraged to revise, edit and correct their work. Teachers will give verbal advice and discuss with pupils how to improve their work. Teachers will highlight errors but not tell pupils how to correct the error. For example sp (spelling) can be put in the margin but the pupil will have to look up the correct spelling. Any revisions that pupils make to the coursework must be their own work. The second draft or final draft may be set as homework but these drafts will be checked by teachers against the original draft written in class to ensure authenticity. IGCSE Coursework Other subjects Coursework sessions may be undertaken in class and also set as homework. It is important that any work completed is that of the individual pupil. If any other source or reference is used it must be referenced appropriately.

Section A Controlled Assessment Outlining staff responsibilities - GCSE controlled assessment The Examinations Officer should: At the end of the previous academic year, begin coordinating with heads of department/subject to schedule controlled assessments. (It is advisable that controlled assessments be spread throughout the academic years of key stage 4). Map overall resource management requirements for the year. As part of this resolve: o clashes/ problems over the timing or operation of controlled assessments. o issues arising from the need for particular facilities (rooms, IT networks, time out of school etc.) Ensure that all staff involved have a calendar of events Create, publish and update an internal appeals policy for controlled assessments. Enter students for individual units, whether assessed by controlled assessment, external exam or on-screen test, before the deadline for final entries. Enter students' 'cash-in' codes for the terminal exam series. Where confidential materials are directly received by the exams office, to be responsible for receipt, safe storage and safe transmission, whether in CD or hard copy format. Download and distribute marksheets for teaching staff to use, and collect and send marksheets to awarding bodies before deadlines. On the few occasions where controlled assessment cannot be conducted in the classroom arrange suitable accommodation where controlled assessment can be carried out, at the direction of the Head of Teaching and Learning. Heads of department should: Decide on the awarding body and specification for a particular GCSE. Standardise internally the marking of all teachers involved in assessing an internally assessed component. Ensure that individual teachers understand their responsibilities with regard to controlled assessment. Ensure that individual teachers understand the requirements of the awarding body's specification and are familiar with the relevant teachers' notes, and any other subject specific instructions.

Section A Controlled Assessment Where appropriate, develop new assessment tasks or contextualize sample awarding body assessment tasks to meet local circumstances, in line with awarding body specifications and control requirements. Teaching staff should Understand and comply with the general guidelines contained in the JCQ publication Instructions for conducting controlled assessments. Understand and comply with the awarding body specification for conducting controlled assessments, including any subject-specific instructions, teachers notes or additional information on the awarding body s website. Supply to the exams office details of all unit codes for controlled assessments. Obtain confidential materials/tasks set by awarding bodies in sufficient time to prepare for the assessment(s) and ensure that such materials are stored securely at all times. Supervise assessments (at the specified level of control). Undertake the tasks required under the regulations, only permitting assistance to students as the specification allows. Ensure that students and supervising teachers sign authentication forms on completion of an assessment. Mark internally assessed components using the mark schemes provided by the awarding body. Submit marks through the exams office to the awarding body when required, keeping a record of the marks awarded. Retain candidates work securely between assessment sessions (if more than one). Post-completion, retain candidates work securely until the closing date for enquiries about results. In the event that an enquiry is submitted, retain candidates work securely until the outcome of the enquiry and any subsequent appeal has been conveyed to the centre. Ask the appropriate special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) for any assistance required for the administration and management of access arrangements. The special educational needs coordinator should Ensure access arrangements have been applied for. Work with teaching staff to ensure requirements for support staff are met.

Controlled Assessment Risk Assessment Example risks and issues Possible remedial action Staff Forward planning Action Timetabling Assessment schedule clashes with other activities Plan/establish priorities well ahead (e.g. start of academic year) for all subjects or lines of learning Plan dates in consultation with school calendar negotiate with other parties EO Too many assessments close together across subjects or lines of learning Plan assessments so they are spaced over the duration of the course Space assessments to at least allow candidates some time between assessments EO/SMT Accommodation Insufficient space in classrooms for candidates Once group sizes are known at the start of the year, flag instances where regular classroom space may not be suitable to conduct controlled assessment Use more than one classroom or multiple sittings where necessary HOD/Cover Insufficient facilities for all candidates Careful planning ahead and booking of rooms / centre facilities HOD/EO/Cover Downloading awarding body set tasks IT system unavailable on day of assessment Download tasks well ahead of scheduled assessment date in all cases Book IT equipment well ahead and download tasks before scheduled date of assessment Teaching staff/assessors unable to access task details Test secure access rights ahead of schedule every year and every session Ensure teaching staff/assessors have access rights for correct area of awarding body secure extranet sites ahead of time /EO Loss of task details in transmission Download tasks well ahead of scheduled assessment date Report loss to awarding body for replacement; download again

Controlled Assessment Risk Assessment Example risks and issues Possible remedial action Staff Absent candidates Candidates absent for all or part of assessment (various reasons) Plan alternative session(s) for candidates Candidates have a scheduling clash for exams or assessment (possibly offsite on consortium teaching) Always consider candidate timetables well ahead and decide on priorities in advance to scheduling clashes Check before booking the date; provide an alternative date, where necessary and consult awarding body procedures for dealing with timetabling clashes HOD s/eo N.B. retakes of controlled assessment are limited Control levels for task taking Assessment is undertaken under incorrect level of control (time, resources, supervision and collaboration) Ensure teaching staff/assesors know what level is applicable and understand what is involved. Provide training if required Seek guidance from the awarding body HOD Supervision Student study diary/plan not provided or completed* Ensure teaching staff/assessors are aware of the need for study diary/plans to be completed early in course Ensure candidates start, continue and complete study diary/plans that are signed after every session Teaching staff/assessors do not understand supervision of controlled assessment is their responsibility Ensure teaching staff/assessors understand nature of controlled assessments and their role in supervision SLT Suitable supervisor has not been arranged for an assessment where teaching staff/assessors are not supervising A suitable supervisor must be arranged for any controlled assessment where a teacher/assessor is not supervising, in line with the awarding body specification. /Cover * Not all controlled assessment whether for the Diploma or GCSEs will require the completion of a study diary or study plans

Controlled Assessment Risk Assessment Example risks and issues Possible remedial action Staff Forward planning Action Task setting Teaching staff/assessors fail to correctly set tasks Ensure teaching staff/assessors understand the task setting arrangements as defined in the awarding body specification** Seek guidance from the awarding body Assessments have not been moderated as required in the awarding body specification Check specification and plan required moderation appropriately Seek guidance from the awarding body HOD Security of materials Assessment tasks not kept secure before assessment Ensure teaching staff understand importance of task security Request/obtain different assessment tasks Candidates work not kept secure during or after assessment Define appropriate level of security, in line with awarding body requirements, for each department as necessary Take materials to secure storage Teacher Insufficient or insecure storage space Look at provision for suitable storage early in the course Find alternative spaces ** All tasks whether set by the awarding body or the centre/consortium must be developed in line with the requirements of the specification.

Controlled Assessment Risk Assessment Example risks and issues Possible remedial action Staff Forward planning Action Deadlines Deadlines not met by candidates Ensure all candidates are briefed on deadlines/penalties for not meeting them Mark what candidates have produced by deadline and seek guidance from awarding body on further action. Teacher Deadlines for marking and/or paperwork not met by teaching staff/ assessors Ensure teaching staff/assessors are given clear deadlines (prior to awarding body ones) to complete marking/paperwork so the exams office can process and send off marks ahead of AB deadlines Seek guidance from awarding body HOD s Authentication Candidate fails to sign authentication form Ensure all candidates have authentication forms to sign and attach to work when it is completed before handing in Find candidate and ensure form is signed Teacher Teaching staff/assessors fail to complete authentication forms or leave before completing authentication Ensure teaching staff/assessors understand importance of authentication forms and the requirement of a signature Return form to staff for signature. Ensure forms are signed as work is marked, not at end of season HOD s Marking Teaching staff/assessors interpret marking descriptions incorrectly Ensure appropriate training and practicing of marking. Plan for sampling of marking during the practice phase. Arrange for remarking. Consult awarding body specification for appropriate procedure s Centre does not run standardisation activity as required by the awarding body Plan against the requirements for standardisation for the awarding body when and how this activity will be conducted. Check with the awarding body whether a later standardisation event can be arranged. HOD s

Section B - Non-Examination Assessment Non-examination assessment applies control over internal assessment at three points; task setting, task taking and task marking. Responsibilities Head of Centre: To be familiar with Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) instructions for conducting nonexamination assessment. Responsible to relevant GCSE awarding bodies to ensure that all non-examination assessments are conducted according to qualification specifications. Examinations Officer: To be familiar with JCQ instructions for conducting non-examination assessment and other related JCQ documents. To be familiar with general instructions relating to non-examination assessment from each relevant GCSE awarding body. In collaboration with Heads of Department, to submit non-examination assessment marks to the relevant awarding body. In collaboration with Heads of Department, dispatch pupils assessments for moderation. In collaboration with Heads of Department, make appropriate arrangements for the security of non-examination assessment materials Head of Department: To be familiar with JCQ instructions for conducting non-examination assessment To understand and comply with specific instructions relating to non-examination assessment for the relevant GCSE awarding body. Ensure that individual teachers understand their responsibilities with regard to non-examination assessment. Ensure that they use the correct task for the year of submission and take care to distinguish between tasks and requirements for legacy and new specifications. To obtain confidential materials/tasks set by awarding bodies in sufficient time to prepare for the assessment(s) and ensure that such materials are stored securely at all times.; To undertake appropriate departmental standardisation of non-examination assessments In collaboration with the Examinations Officer, to submit non-examination assessment marks to the relevant awarding body. In collaboration with the Examinations Officer dispatch pupils assessments for moderation. In collaboration with the Examinations Officer, make appropriate arrangements for the security of non-examination assessment materials SENCO: To be familiar with JCQ instructions for conducting non-examination assessment with reference to special access arrangements In collaboration with the Examinations Officer Co-ordinate requests for special access Arrangements Subject Teachers: Supervise assessments (at the specified level of control). Undertake the tasks required under the regulations, only permitting assistance to pupils as the specifications allow. Ensure that students and supervising teacher(s) sign authentication forms on completion of an assessment.

Section B - Non-Examination Assessment Mark internally assessed components using the mark schemes provided by the awarding body. Via the Head of Department, submit marks to the Examinations Officer or to the awarding body when required, keeping a record of the marks awarded. (Where assessments are marked internally teachers may disclose marks to candidates provided that it is made clear that the moderation process may result in changes to marks. They should NOT attempt to convert marks to grades in advance of the publication of results.) Take part in appropriate departmental standardisation of Non-Examination Assessments Retain candidates work securely between assessment sessions (if more than one). Post-completion, retain candidates work securely until the closing date for enquiries about results. In the event that an enquiry is submitted, retain candidates work securely until the outcome of the enquiry and any subsequent appeal has been conveyed to the centre. Ask the special educational needs coordinator (SENCO) and the Examinations Officer for any assistance required for the administration and management of access arrangements. Task Setting In accordance with specific GCSE awarding body guidelines, Heads of Department will be responsible for the selection of non-examination assessment tasks from an approved list or for setting appropriate centre specific tasks. Subject Teachers will ensure that students understand the assessment criteria for any given assessment task. Task Taking Unless the awarding body s specification says otherwise, the following arrangements will apply. In accordance with JCQ regulations, invigilators and JCQ No Mobile Phone & Warning to Candidates posters are not required. Teachers will ensure there is sufficient supervision (in accordance with awarding body requirements) to ensure that work can be authenticated as the candidate s own work. They will also ensure that they keep a record of each candidate s contribution in group work, where applicable. Teachers will also ensure candidates understand the need to reference work, give guidance on how to do this and make sure they are aware that they must not plagiarise other material. Teachers can provide candidates with general feedback and allow candidates to revise and redraft work but must not provide model answers or writing frames specific to the task nor assess the work and then allow the candidate to revise it. Any assistance given must be recorded and taken into account when marking the work. Explicitly prohibited assistance must not be given and no assistance should be given if there is no means to record it and take account of it in the marking. Failure to follow this procedure constitutes malpractice. Teachers must be aware of the awarding body s restrictions with regard to access to resources. In formally supervised sessions candidates can only usually take in preparatory notes, they must not access the internet nor bring in their own computers or electronic devices. They must not introduce new resources between formally supervised sessions. Materials must be collected and stored securely at the end of each session and not be accessible to candidates. Authentication: Candidates and teachers must sign the appropriate authentication declarations and these must be kept on file until the deadline for enquiry about results has passed or until any appeal, malpractice or other results enquiry has been completed, whichever is later.

Section B - Non-Examination Assessment Task Marking Teachers are responsible for marking work in accordance with the marking criteria. Annotation should be used to provide evidence to indicate how and why marks have been awarded to facilitate the standardisation of marking within the centre. The centre may disclose marks to candidates provided that it is made clear that the moderation process may result in changes to marks. Centres should not attempt to convert marks to grades in advance of the publication of results. Centres must ensure that the internal standardisation of marks across assessors and teaching groups takes place. They should retain evidence of internal standardisation and keep candidates work in secure storage until after the closing date for enquiries about results. Factors affecting individual candidates If a candidate misses part of a non-examination assessment task through absence, an alternative supervised session will be organised. The school will follow the procedures set out in JCQ guidelines if assessment tasks are lost or accidentally destroyed at the school. Access Arrangements will be agreed according to the published JCQ guidance on Access Arrangements. The school will consider requests to repeat non-examination assessment tasks if they are made before marks have been submitted to the relevant awarding body. Decisions will be made on an individual basis, by SLT in consultation with the Head of Department. If a non-examination assessment task was completed under formal supervision, a completely new task must be set. The policy is subject to annual review by the Examinations Officer last reviewed October 2016