Dyslexia Manual. Revised July 2017

Similar documents
SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Phonemic Awareness. Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education TST BOCES

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

STAFF DEVELOPMENT in SPECIAL EDUCATION

Stages of Literacy Ros Lugg

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

All Kinds of Minds. Web-site: To Contact NY Student Success Center. or

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Get Your Hands On These Multisensory Reading Strategies

Fisk Street Primary School

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Assessment and Evaluation

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Philosophy of Literacy Education. Becoming literate is a complex step by step process that begins at birth. The National

Loveland Schools Literacy Framework K-6

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

South Carolina English Language Arts

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

The Effect of Close Reading on Reading Comprehension. Scores of Fifth Grade Students with Specific Learning Disabilities.

The EDI contains five core domains which are described in Table 1. These domains are further divided into sub-domains.

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

No Parent Left Behind

Books Effective Literacy Y5-8 Learning Through Talk Y4-8 Switch onto Spelling Spelling Under Scrutiny

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

Selecting Accommodations: Guidance tor Individual Educational plan Teams

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

Tier 2 Literacy: Matching Instruction & Intervention to Student Needs

Idaho Early Childhood Resource Early Learning eguidelines

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

Longitudinal family-risk studies of dyslexia: why. develop dyslexia and others don t.

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Using SAM Central With iread

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

eguidelines Aligned to the Common Core Standards

Kings Local. School District s. Literacy Framework

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

Examinee Information. Assessment Information

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Building Fluency of Sight Words

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Chapter 5. The Components of Language and Reading Instruction

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT ONE BALANCED LITERACY PLATFORM

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

MIDDLE SCHOOL. Academic Success through Prevention, Intervention, Remediation, and Enrichment Plan (ASPIRE)

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

EQuIP Review Feedback

The ABCs of O-G. Materials Catalog. Skills Workbook. Lesson Plans for Teaching The Orton-Gillingham Approach in Reading and Spelling

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORTON-GILLINGHAM APPROACH ON SOLVING THE WRITING DISORDER OF PRIMARY SCHOOL DYSLEXIC CHILDREN AT COIMBATORE DISTRICT.

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

BASIC TECHNIQUES IN READING AND WRITING. Part 1: Reading

Reading Horizons. A Look At Linguistic Readers. Nicholas P. Criscuolo APRIL Volume 10, Issue Article 5

WHO ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS? HOW CAN THEY HELP THOSE OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM? Christine Mitchell-Endsley, Ph.D. School Psychology

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Electronic Edition. *Good for one electronic/printed copy. Do not distribute.

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

21st Century Community Learning Center

Reviewed by Florina Erbeli

The Beginning Literacy Framework

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Considerations for Aligning Early Grades Curriculum with the Common Core

Mercer County Schools

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Transcription:

Dyslexia Manual 1 Revised July 2017

Table of Contents MISD Mission Statement....3 Definitions of Dyslexia and Related Disorders.. 4 Strengths of a Dyslexic.6 Common Risk Factors Associated with Dyslexia 7 Trends and Tendencies Related to Dyslexia.9 Dyslexia Flow Chart. 10 Dyslexia Identification Procedures... 11 Critical, Evidenced-Based Components of Dyslexia Instruction..12 Instructional Curriculum 13 Exit Criteria....14 Appendix 15 2

Mission Statement The mission of the Mansfield Independent School District Dyslexia Program is to provide specialized instruction to the individual needs of students with dyslexia and related disorders to provide opportunities for these students to develop their potential as learners. 3

Definitions of Dyslexia and Related Disorders As defined by TEC 38.003: 1. Dyslexia means a disorder of constitutional origin manifested by a difficulty in learning to read, write, or spell, despite conventional instruction, adequate intelligence, and sociocultural opportunity. PROFILE OF A DYSLEXIC CHILD Normal Below Normal Math Other Alphabet Reading Reading Comprehension Writing Spelling 2. Related disorders include those similar to or related to dyslexia such as developmental auditory imperception, dysphasia, specific developmental dyslexia, developmental dysgraphia, and developmental spelling disability. Developmental Auditory Imperception Developmental auditory imperception is characterized by difficulty learning sounds, sound-symbol relationships, and the meaning of words despite adequate intelligence and socio-cultural opportunity. PROFILE OF A CHILD WITH DEVELOPMENTAL AUDITORY IMPERCEPTION Normal Below Normal Oral Language Written Language 4

Dysphasia Dysphasia is characterized by difficulty learning both receptive and expressive oral language despite adequate hearing, intelligence, and socio-cultural opportunity. PROFILE OF A DYSPHASIC CHILD Normal Below Normal Oral Language Written Language Developmental Dysgraphia Developmental dysgraphia is characterized by an inability to write legibly. This may occur in addition to other difficulties in written language. Visual-motor coordination skills are frequently within the average range and are not the primary cause of dysgraphia. PROFILE OF A CHILD WITH DYSGRAPHIA Normal Reading Visual-Motor Coordination Below Average Handwriting Developmental Spelling Disability Developmental spelling disability is characterized by significant difficulty learning to spell. This occurs in the absence of reading or other written language difficulties. PROFILE OF A DYSPHASIC CHILD WITH DEVELOPMENTAL SPELLING DISORDER Normal Below Normal Reading Spelling Handwriting 5

Strengths of a Dyslexic Preschool Years First Grade Curiosity A great imagination Eager to embrace new ideas Getting the gist of things A good understanding of new concepts Surprising maturity A large vocabulary for the age group Enjoyment in solving problems Talent at building models Excellent comprehension of stories read or told to him Second Grade Teens Excellent thinking skills: conceptualization, reasoning, imagination, abstraction Learning that is accomplished best through meaning rather than rote memorization Ability to get the big picture A high level of understanding what is read to him The ability to read and to understand a high level overlearned words in a special area of interest Improvement as an area of interest becomes more specialized and focused, when he develops a miniature vocabulary that he can read A surprisingly sophisticated listening vocabulary Excellence in areas not dependent on reading, such as math, computers, and visual arts, or excellence in more conceptual subjects such as philosophy, biology, social studies, neuroscience, and creative writing Young Adults and Adults A high learning capability A noticeable improvement when given additional time on multiple-choice exams Noticeable excellence when focused on a highly specialized area Excellence in writing if content and not spelling is important A noticeable articulateness in the expression of ideas and feelings Exceptional empathy and warmth, and feeling for others Success in areas not dependent on rote memory A talent for high-level conceptualization and the ability to come up with original insights Big picture thinking Inclination to think out of the box A noticeable resilience and ability to adapt -Overcoming Dyslexia by Sally Shaywitz 6

Common Risk Factors Associated with Dyslexia From The Dyslexia Handbook, Revised 2014, Texas Education Agency If the following behaviors are unexpected for an individual s age, educational level, or cognitive abilities, they may be risk factors associate with dyslexia. A student with dyslexia usually exhibits several of these behaviors that persist over time and interfere with his/her learning. A family history of dyslexia may be present Preschool Delay in learning to talk Difficulty with rhyming Difficulty pronouncing words Poor auditory memory for nursery rhymes and chants Difficulty in adding new vocabulary words Inability to recall the right word Trouble learning and naming letters and numbers and remembering the letters in his/her name Aversion to print Kindergarten and First Grade Difficulty breaking words into smaller parts (syllables) Difficulty identifying and manipulating sounds in syllables Difficulty remembering the names of letters and recalling their corresponding sounds Difficulty decoding single words Difficulty spelling words the way they sound or remembering letter sequences in very common words seen often in print Second Grade and Third Grade Many of the previously described behaviors remain problematic along with the following: Difficulty recognizing common sight words Difficulty decoding single words Difficulty recalling the correct sounds for letters and letter patterns in reading Difficulty connecting speech sounds with appropriate letter or letter combinations and omitting letters in words for spelling Difficulty reading fluently Difficulty decoding unfamiliar words in sentences using knowledge of phonics Reliance on picture clues, story theme, or guessing at words Difficulty with written expression 7

Fourth Grade through Sixth Grade Many of the previously described behaviors remain problematic along with the following: Difficulty reading aloud Avoidance of reading Acquisition of less vocabulary due to reduced independent reading Use of less complicated words in writing that are easier to spell than more appropriate words Reliance on listening rather than reading for comprehension Middle School and High School Many of the previously described behaviors remain problematic along with the following: Difficulty with the volume of reading and written work Frustration with the amount of time required and energy expended for reading Difficulty with written assignments Tendency to avoid reading Difficulty learning a foreign language 8

Trends and Tendencies Related to Dyslexia Grades slip downward year to year Inconsistent grades from day to day Inconsistent performances on standardized tests Confusion with math symbols, but not computation Math computation better than word problems Memorized spelling better than spontaneous spelling Homework better quality than class work Excessive amount of time spent on homework Deteriorating organization and study habits Deteriorating motivation and self-esteem Good grades but excessive struggle required Chooses oral performance over written when given choice Compensates by use of pictures, prompts from the teacher, etc. Stress reflected by irregular writing and uneven pencil pressure 9

Dyslexia Flow Chart This flow chart illustrates a process for determining the instructional support needed by students with dyslexia using a Response to Intervention process. Special education evaluation should be conducted whenever it appears to be appropriate. Some students will NOT proceed through all steps before being referred for a Full Individual Evaluation (FIE). A dyslexia evaluation may be incorporated into the FIE completed through special education. Student exhibits poor performance on early reading assessment. OR Student fails to respond to scientifically based reading instruction at any grade. OR Parent makes a request Classroom teacher intensifies reading instruction and provides classroom accommodations. Teacher monitors reading progress. Student makes adequate reading progress. Parent is notified in writing that data does not support dyslexia Student does not make adequate reading progress. testing at this time and are given due process rights. Tier 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Student is provided more intensive intervention in addition to the core reading instruction. Teacher monitors reading progress. Student makes adequate reading progress Student is reintegrated into traditional reading instruction in the classroom. Student does not make adequate reading progress AND The student exhibits characteristics of dyslexia. (Campus committee of knowledgeable persons should consider all collected information.) Parent is notified in writing that data does not support dyslexia testing at this time and are given due process rights. Tier 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time, regardless of the process in place, a student may be recommended for dyslexia assessment as accumulated data support a student s continued struggle with one or more of the components of reading. Student has characteristics of dyslexia. Direct, systematic, and intensive reading instruction is provided. Need for Section 504 accommodations are considered, including STAAR accommodations for students with dyslexia. Student is recommended for dyslexia assessment, and Section 504 procedures must be followed (notification of evaluation, parent informed of rights, and permission to assess.) Student does not have characteristics of dyslexia. Does the student have any other disability? If so, the need for Section 504 accommodations is considered. Tier 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *If the student is currently being served through SPED, then any evaluation, identification, and/or placement decisions must be made by the ARD committee and documented in the IEP. *The Reading Specialist needs to be invited to the ARD committee meetings to assist in determining eligibility and in developing the IEP. 10

Dyslexia Identification Process I. Data Gathering If a student is failing to make expected academic progress by struggling in one of the areas of reading (phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency, reading comprehension) and exhibits characteristics of dyslexia, the reading specialist or classroom teacher will initiate the cumulative data gathering process in order for the dyslexia committee to make an instructional decision about the student s needs. II. RtI - Campus Committee If problems in academic achievement have been noted through academic progress reports, parent conferences, or inadequate performance on STAAR, the RtI committee will evaluate the student s progress to determine what actions are needed to ensure improved academic performance. A recommendation for dyslexia assessment may be appropriate at this time; however, needed support actions may also need to be recommended as intervention strategies. III. Committee Actions At this point, a decision should be made about placing the student in the most appropriate intervention. The options include, but are not limited to, a formal dyslexia assessment, a special education referral, or other instructional interventions. If a student does not make appropriate progress, a recommendation may be made for either dyslexia assessment or a special education referral. Parent notification and written consent is needed to conduct individual evaluation of the student. IV. Recommend for Formal Assessment A. Parental Notification of 504 Guidelines Notice of 504 Guidelines must be sent to parents and returned to school before dyslexia assessments can be initiated. If the student is being assessed as part of a special education evaluation or is already served in special education and a dyslexia evaluation is requested, IDEA 2004 procedures must be followed. B. Assessment Areas to be assessed will include the following: Academic Skills letter knowledge, word decoding, fluency, reading comprehension, writing composition Cognitive Processes phonological and phonemic awareness Based on the student s academic difficulties and characteristics and/or language acquisition, additional areas related to vocabulary, listening comprehension, oral language proficiency, written expression, and other cognitive abilities may need to be assessed. V. Dyslexia/504 Committee The dyslexia committee will meet to interpret the results of testing in light of the student s educational history, linguistic background environmental or socioeconomic factors. The committee will make the determination if the student meets eligibility requirements. VI. Identification of Dyslexia/Determination of Services Once the identification of dyslexia has been made and parents have given approval, the student will be placed in the district s dyslexia program. Instructional decisions for a student with dyslexia must be made by a committee (504 or ARD) that is knowledgeable about the instructional components and approaches for students with dyslexia. 11

CRITICAL, EVIDENCE-BASED COMPONENTS OF DYSLEXIA INSTRUCTION Phonological Awareness Sound-Symbol Association Syllabication Orthography Morphology Syntax Reading Comprehension Reading Fluency From The Dyslexia Handbook, Revised 2014, Texas Education Agency; see p. 26 DELIVERY OF DYSLEXIA INSTRUCTION Simultaneous, multisensory Systematic and cumulative Explicit instruction Diagnostic teaching to automaticity Synthetic instruction Analytic instruction From The Dyslexia Handbook, Revised 2014, Texas Education Agency; see p. 28 12

MISD employs dyslexia programming to address the staterequired components for dyslexia program instruction in the following areas: PHONEMIC AWARENESS INSTRUCTION Phonemic awareness instruction enables the student to detect, segment, blend, and manipulate sounds in spoken language. It is the insight that spoken words can be conceived as a sequence of sounds. GRAPHOPHONEMIC KNOWLEDGE- (PHONICS) INSTRUCTION Graphophonemic knowledge (phonics) instruction takes advantage of the letter-sound plan in which words that carry meaning are made of sounds, and sounds are written with letters in the right order. Students with this understanding can blend sounds associated with letters into words and can separate words into component sounds for spelling and writing. LANGUAGE STRUCTURE INSTRUCTION Language structure instruction encompasses morphology (the study of meaningful units of language such as prefixes, suffixes and roots), semantics (ways that language conveys meaning), syntax (sentence structure) and pragmatics (how to use language in a particular context). LINGUISTICS INSTRUCTION Linguistic instruction is directed toward proficiency and fluency with patterns of language so that words and sentences are the carriers of meaning. STRATEGY-ORIENTED INSTRUCTION Strategy-oriented instruction enables students to use strategies for decoding (reading), encoding (spelling), word recognition, fluency and comprehension that students need to become independent readers. 13

EXIT CRITERION The 504 Committee will use the following indicators when a student is considered for exiting the MISD Dyslexia Program. Students must meet ALL of the following criteria to be considered for exit, and must have been serviced by the MISD Dyslexia Program for at least two years: Grade Reading Writing Curriculum K, 1 st, Not eligible for exit 2nd 3 rd DRA2-38+ Reading STAAR at least Approaches Grade Level Passing Grade in ELA 4 th DRA2-40+ Passed Writing STAAR Reading STAAR at least Passing Grade in ELA Approaches Grade Level 5 th /6th DRA2 50+(5), 60+(6) Passing Grade in ELA Reading STAAR at least Approaches Grade Level 7 th DRA2 70+ Passed Writing STAAR N/A Reading STAAR at least Passing Grade in ELA Approaches Grade Level 8 th DRA2 80+ Passing Grade in ELA N/A Reading STAAR at least Approaches Grade Level 9 th -10 th STAAR EOC at least Passing Grade in ELA N/A Approaches Grade Level 11 th -12 th Passing grade in ELA Passing Grade in ELA N/A Passed Dyslexia curriculum check Passed Dyslexia curriculum check Passed Dyslexia curriculum check NOTES: The 504 committee must complete The Annual/Exit Review form (Dys 8), and have a copy mailed to parents. A copy must also be placed in the cumulative folder. Parents of students being considered for exit should be notified by phone or conference. Support System for Exited Students: Accommodation Checklist Annual Monitoring by the Reading Specialist 504 eligible for establishing/documenting needed accommodations for classroom instruction Eligible for the STAAR levels of support if student meets the criteria as set forth by TEA Revised July 2017 14