School Board Briefing/Proposed Action Report

Similar documents
Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Guidelines for Completion of an Application for Temporary Licence under Section 24 of the Architects Act R.S.O. 1990

Hiring Procedures for Faculty. Table of Contents

UW-Stout--Student Research Fund Grant Application Cover Sheet. This is a Research Grant Proposal This is a Dissemination Grant Proposal

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Application for Fellowship Leave

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

ATHLETIC TRAINING SERVICES AGREEMENT

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

SAMPLE AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

BY-LAWS of the Air Academy High School NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY

Faculty Recruitment and Hiring Policy & Procedures. Revised May 19, 2017

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Rotary Club of Portsmouth

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

PROGRAM HANDBOOK. for the ACCREDITATION OF INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION LABORATORIES. by the HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY

Instructions concerning the right to study

Rules and Regulations of Doctoral Studies

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

ESIC Advt. No. 06/2017, dated WALK IN INTERVIEW ON

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

IN-STATE TUITION PETITION INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES Western State Colorado University

STUDENT FEES FOR ADMISSION, REGISTRATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Department of Legal Assistant Education THE SOONER DOCKET. Enroll Now for Spring 2018 Courses! American Bar Association Approved

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

I. General provisions. II. Rules for the distribution of funds of the Financial Aid Fund for students

GENERAL BUSINESS CONSENT AGENDA FOR INSTRUCTION & PROGRAM, OPERATIONS, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL AND GOVERNANCE May 17, 2017

Student Organization Handbook

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Grant/Scholarship General Criteria CRITERIA TO APPLY FOR AN AESF GRANT/SCHOLARSHIP

APPLICATION DEADLINE: 5:00 PM, December 25, 2013

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Fort Lewis College Institutional Review Board Application to Use Human Subjects in Research

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

Office of the Provost

STEM Extension OPT Checklist

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

Table of Contents. Fall 2014 Semester Calendar

The Tutor Shop Homework Club Family Handbook. The Tutor Shop Mission, Vision, Payment and Program Policies Agreement

Legal Technicians: A Limited License to Practice Law Ellen Reed, King County Bar Association, Seattle, WA

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

TOEIC Bridge Test Secure Program guidelines

Adult Vocational Training Tribal College Fund Gaming

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

AFFILIATION AGREEMENT

STUDENT CHARTER INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ET/A ENSCHEDE, 31 AUGUST 2017

Application Paralegal Training Program. Important Dates: Summer 2016 Westwood. ABA Approved. Established in 1972

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

DEPARTMENT OF KINESIOLOGY AND SPORT MANAGEMENT

Casual and Temporary Teacher Programs

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Graduate Social Work Program Course Outline Spring 2014

Hampton Falls School Board Meeting September 1, W. Skoglund and S. Smylie.

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVE

Series IV - Financial Management and Marketing Fiscal Year

Announcement of Vacancy Superintendent of Schools. Frontier Central School District. Apply by October 20, 2017 to:

Research Training Program Stipend (Domestic) [RTPSD] 2017 Rules

Washington Homeschool Organization

Southern Wesleyan University 2017 Winter Graduation Exercises Information for Graduates and Guests (Updated 09/14/2017)

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REGULATIONS PURPOSE

Section 6 DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

IDEA FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART B, Additional Requirements, 2008

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

STANDARD PEI-STUDENT CONTRACT BETWEEN. Textile and Fashion Industry Training Centre (TaF.tc) AND <<STUDENT NAME>>

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Graduate Student Travel Award

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT GOVERNING BOARD AD HOC COMMITTEE ON.

Master of Philosophy. 1 Rules. 2 Guidelines. 3 Definitions. 4 Academic standing

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

The Louis Stokes Scholar Internship A Paid Summer Legal Experience

Transcription:

School Board Briefing/Proposed Action Report Informational (no action required by Board) Action Report (Board will be required to take action) DATE: December 1, 2015 FROM: Dr. Larry Nyland, Superintendent LEAD STAFF: Michael Tolley, Associate Superintendent of Teaching and Learning mftolley@seattleschools.org; (206) 252-0017 Shauna Heath, Executive Director, Curriculum, Assessment &Instruction slheath@seattleschools.org; (206) 252-0050 Kathleen Vasquez, Program Manager, Literacy & Social Studies kavasquez@seattleschools.org; (206)252-0234 Misa Garmoe, Director of School Operations smgarmoe@seattleschools.org; (206)-252-0471 I. TITLE Contract for Middle School and High School yearbooks with Herff Jones For Introduction: January 20, 2016 For Action: February 3, 2016 II. WHY BOARD ACTION IS NECESSARY Per School Board Policy No. 6220, Procurement, Board action is required for review and approval of Personal Services Contracts where the total amount of compensation exceeds $250,000. III. FISCAL IMPACT/REVENUE SOURCE Fiscal impact to this action will not exceed $400,000. The revenue source for this motion is each secondary school s Associated Student Body (ASB) funds. Expenditure: One-time Annual Other Source IV. POLICY IMPLICATION Per School Board Policy 6220, Procurement, Board action is required for review and approval of Personal Services Contracts where the total amount of compensation exceeds $250,000. V. RECOMMENDED MOTION I move that the School Board authorize the Superintendent to execute a contract with Herff Jones in an amount not to exceed $400,000, including three (3) optional annual extensions, for the management and classroom support in the preparation and printing of middle school and high school yearbooks, in the form of the draft Agreement presented to the School Board, with any minor additions, deletions and modifications deemed necessary by the Superintendent, and to take any necessary actions to implement the contract.

VI. BOARD COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION This motion was discussed at the Curriculum & Instruction Policy Committee meeting on December 14, 2015. The Committee reviewed the item and moved it forward to the full Board with a recommendation for approval. VII. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Due to the contract with the current yearbook vendor set to expire in February 2016, Seattle Public Schools advertised Request for Proposal (RFP) 09503: Middle School and High School Yearbooks, in the Daily Journal of Commerce and posted in the Builders Exchange and on the Seattle Public Schools website on October 8, 2015. An RFP notification was also emailed to Balfour, Entourage, Herff Jones, Jostens and Walsworth. Throughout the process, Curriculum and Instruction has worked closely with Contracting Services to ensure the RFP process was followed and that the yearbook specifications listed in the RFP accurately reflected the needs of our various school programs involved. Under recommendation from Contracting Services, middle and high school yearbook advisors were contacted in September 2015 with requests to review the RFP and to provide feedback and considerations regarding the yearbook specifications listed. Additionally, all yearbook advisors were invited to serve on a review committee. Strong efforts were made to secure a representation of both middle and high school advisors on the review committee. On October 29, 2015, the due date for the RFP, four firms submitted proposals: Balfour, Herff Jones, Jostens, and Walsworth. In early November, a review committee of five yearbook advisors representing both middle and high schools was convened and they conducted an initial review and scoring of the products using the review/scoring criteria stated in the RFP. The criteria included both qualification points and price points. The qualification points included: quality of product; quality of service to schools; overall experience, reputation, and expertise; experience and quality of staff; ability to provide service in expedient manner; workshops/seminars for students and yearbook staff; and willingness to accept the District s terms and conditions. Based on the committee s collective points, the committee initially identified Herff Jones and Jostens as top rated candidates based on qualifications only, however when pricing points were included into the scores, Balfour s qualifications score and initial price quote and pricing points adjusted the preliminary scores to include Balfour in the final shortlist of candidates. Walsworth scored last place in qualifications and third place in price, excluding them from further consideration. This necessitated an additional meeting in order to clarify the recommended short list of finalists to move forward. On November 10, the committee met via conference call for an update on the initial scores from Contracting Services and Curriculum and Instruction and the committee came to agreement that Balfour, Herff Jones, and Jostens would move forward as finalists. Following the initial screening review and scoring, the Review Committee requested clarifying information and best and final offers from each of the three finalists. In late November, the Review Team considered the clarifying information provided by the vendors and conducted its final scoring. As a result, Herff Jones was ranked first in qualifications and was tied for first in

pricing with Balfour. A final calculation review of pricing points surfaced a wider discrepancy between Balfour and Herff Jones relative to pricing making Herff Jones the clear front runner. Additionally, the District will receive a 15% discount on the basic book price from Herff Jones as a result of awarding the contract to all middle schools and high schools identified in the RFP. Jostens was noted for having strengths in product, experience, and expertise, however their pricing was more than double the proposed price of Herff Jones, eliminating them from consideration. Ultimately, Herff Jones offered the best product in terms of overall quality, staff experience and expertise, ability to provide service to schools, and their extremely competitive pricing. The committee s recommendation was consistent with each advisor s individual final score. While Curriculum & Instruction oversaw the process to select the yearbook vendor, School Operations will be the contact for this contract. VIII. STATEMENT OF ISSUE Approval of the contract, covering the period from March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017, with three renewals possible, allows for middle and high schools to work with a yearbook vendor selected through a competitive process. IX. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not contract with a vendor identified through a competitive RFP process, and allow each school to select its own yearbook vendor. This alternative is not recommended for two reasons: (1) through the RFP process, the District has obtained competitive pricing, which is lower than each school could obtain on its own, and (2) the District would be in violation of the Superintendent s Procedures for Contracting, which call for competition at this dollar level. 2. Do not contract with any vendor, and require yearbook advisors to perform all of their own yearbook functions without support. This alternative is not recommended, since yearbook advisors do not have the capacity to perform all of the work associated with yearbook creation and printing themselves. 3. Contract with two different yearbook companies rather than one. This recommendation was considered by the committee; however, pricing from the vendors would preclude this as an equitable option because the vendor s pricing would create inequity in pricing of the yearbook in schools across the district. X. RESEARCH AND DATA SOURCES / BENCHMARKS Herff Jones has had three, one-year renewals of its current contract for Middle School and High School yearbooks based on satisfactory annual evaluations of the vendor s product and service. XI. TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION / COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Upon approval of this motion, a contract will be executed with Herff Jones for middle school and high school yearbook production for the 2016-2017 year. XII. ATTACHMENTS

Contract Agreement with Herff Jones (attachment edited) Attachment A: Yearbook Advisor RFP Feedback Form Attachment B: Review Committee Members Attachment C: Review Criteria Attachment D: Review Committee Initial Review and Scoring Attachment E: Review Committee Final Review and Scoring

AGREEMENT MIDDLE SCHOOL AND HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS This Agreement, Contract No. RFP09503, is effective March 1, 2016 by and between Seattle School District No. 1, a Washington municipal corporation (District), and Herff Jones (Vendor). The District and Vendor agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE Vendor shall provide services as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services and Exhibit E, Management Plan. Vendor is authorized to proceed upon receipt of this signed Agreement. This contract shall be in effect from the effective date through February 29, 2017. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice. The Vendor and the District agree that this contract may, with mutual agreement of both parties, be extended up to three (3) additional, one-year terms under the same terms and conditions, pending satisfactory performance by the vendor. 2. CONTRACT PRICE District agrees to pay Vendor an amount not to exceed $400,000 (the Maximum Authorized Compensation ) as shown in Exhibit H, Pricing for management and classroom support in the preparation and printing of middle school and high school yearbooks as identified in the Request for Proposal RFP09503. Vendor acknowledges that the contract covers all District middle and high schools as shown in Exhibit A. This amount shall constitute complete compensation for all costs and fees incurred, including any expenses for meals, travel, lodging, and Washington State sales tax, if applicable. Any increase above this amount will require agreement by the parties. Compensation will be paid monthly to the extent that Vendor presents documented evidence of fees earned and expenses incurred during the period for which payment is requested, and in no case shall the total compensation exceed the Maximum Authorized Compensation. Vendor shall submit its invoices in the form and according to the schedule prescribed in the General Conditions, to the address listed in paragraph 3. 3. COMMUNICATION The District s representative for this contract is Misa Garmoe, Director of School OperationsKathleen Vasquez, Program Manager Literacy & Social Studies. All correspondence, requests, notices and other communications to the District, in relation to this Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be delivered to: To the District: Kathleen VasquezMisa Garmoe Literacy & Social Studies Director School Operations Seattle School District No. 1 Mail Stop 32-15631-522 P. O. Box 34165 Seattle, WA 98124-1165 To the Vendor: Jennifer Gregerson Yearbook Sales Representative Herff Jones 10969 Villa Monte Court Mukilteo, WA 98275 Either party may from time to time change such addresses by giving the other party notice of such change in accordance with the provisions in Paragraph 3. above. 4. VENDOR'S REPORTS Page 1 of 2

Vendor shall provide reports as requested by District and as specified in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. 5. PERSONNEL Vendor shall assign the personnel listed in Exhibit D, Resumes and Service Representatives, for the performance of the Work and shall not (for so long as they remain in Vendor s employ) reassign or remove any of them without the prior written consent of District. 6. THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A B C D E Topic Scope of Services from RFP09503 Specifications from Herff Jones in response to RFP09503, dated October 29, 2105. Company Profile from Herff Jones in response to RFP09503 dated October 29, 2105. Resumes and Service Representatives from Herff Jones in response to RFP09503 dated October 29, 2105. Management Plan from Herff Jones in response to RFP09503 dated October 29, 2105. F Addendum No. 1, dated October 21, 2015. G Services Contract General Conditions (Short Form) H Pricing from Herff Jones and as amended November 20, 2015 HERFF JONES SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 Signature (Vendor Representative) Signature Dr. Larry Nyland Title Date Signed Superintendent Title Date Signed Company Name Employer I.D. No. or Social Security No. Page 2 of 2

High School and Middle School Yearbook Contract RFP 09503 BAR Attachment A Yearbook Advisor Vendor Contract RFP (Request for Proposal) Review/Feedback Seattle Public Schools is beginning the RFP process for securing a yearbook vendor beyond this school year. The current yearbook contract with Herff Jones expires in February 2016. Therefore, we must go through a process to determine which yearbook vendor is the best fit for SPS moving forward. SPS will give all interested vendors, including Herff Jones, an opportunity to propose a competitive package. As part of the process, vendors are presented with a RFP questionnaire. Their responses will help to inform the review and selection process for the next contract. In order to ensure SPS considers the local needs to all schools when attracting a yearbook vendor, we request your input into the development of an RFP outlining the qualifications, specifications and competitive pricing you believe is important. Please review the following sections of the attached RFP before you provide your thoughts/insights for consideration by Friday, September 25 th. In early November, we will be convening a review team that will review the proposals and selecting a short list of vendors as finalists. Vendor selection is anticipated for mid-november. If you are interested in serving on the review committee, please indicate below. Your name: School Name: I am interested in participating on the review team: Yes No Sections of the RFP Questions Thoughts/insights for consideration Qualifications Length of the contract (p. 4 of RFP document) How long should the contract be? (2 years, 3 years, etc.) How many renewals of the contract should be allowed? Special Conditions (p. 13) Specifications (attachment 1) Pricing (attachment 2) Have you seen a need/desire for an electronic copy of the yearbook available in addition to the hard copy for your student body? Does the number of pages/options available support your yearbook content and design? If not, please indicate quantities needed. Are there specifications that need revision considerations? (basic book requirements, proofs, deadlines, materials, workshops, support, training, proofs?) Do the basic quantities and additional copy amounts support your school s yearbook production needs? Are there additions/revisions you would like to see in the Additional Options and Pricing section? Are there additions/revisions you would like to see in the Special Services section? Additional thoughts/insights for consideration regarding the RFP guidelines:

High School and Middle School Yearbook Contract RFP 09503 BAR Attachment B November 2015 RFP 09503 Yearbook Review Team Name School Elizabeth Liz Andreasen Madison Middle School Wyn Pottinger-Levy The Center School Mark Lovre Garfield High School Janine Magidman Roosevelt High School Lisa Rice Franklin High School

Preliminary Evaluation Points RFP09503: Middle School High School Yearbooks October 29, 2015 Name of Evaluator Date: Note: points shown are preliminary points; the final evaluation points in some categories may change as a result of clarifications about vendor proposals, vendor interviews, references, or other factors. Qualifications Points Price Points - Leave Blank Total Points Vendor Quality of products (20 points) Quality of service to schools (15 points) Overall experience, reputation, expertise, stability (10 points) Experience and Qual. of staff (15 pts) Abililty to provide svc. in expedient manner (5 pts) Workshops, Seminars for student yrbook staff (5 pts) Willingness to accept District's terms and conditions (10 points) Total Qualification points (out of 80) Price (ms/hs yearbook combined price) Total points for price (out of 20) Total Points (out of 100) Balfour 10 Herff Jones 10 Jostens 10 Walsworth 10 Comments from Evaluators:

RFP06951 Special Education Data Management System with IEP Module November 24, 2009 Revised to correct errors on November 20, 2009 spreadsheet showing preliminary points for price

High School and Middle School Yearbook Contract RFP 09503 BAR Attachment D Preliminary Evaluation Points RFP09503: Middle School High School Yearbooks October 29, 2015 Name of Evaluator Date: Note: points shown are preliminary points; the final evaluation points in some categories may change as a result of clarifications about vendor proposals, vendor interviews, references, or other factors. Qualifications Points Total Points Vendor Quality of products (20 points) Quality of service to schools (15 points) Overall experience, reputation, expertise, stability (10 points) Abililty to Experience provide svc. and Qual. of in expedient staff (15 manner pts) (5 pts) Workshops, Seminars for student yrbook staff (5 pts) Willingness to accept District's terms and conditions (10 points) Total Qualification points (out of 80) Price (ms/hs yearbook combined price) Total points for price (out of 20) Total Points (out of 100) Balfour 19 13 9 13 5 5 10 74 18 10 7 13 3 3 10 64 $12,868 20 86.6 15 13 8 13 2 0 10 61 19 14 10 10 2 4 10 69 14 12 8 14 5 2 10 65 Herff Jones 20 15 10 15 5 5 10 80 19 14 10 12 4 4 10 73 $15,050 17 93.7 17 14 10 15 4 5 10 75 19 15 10 15 5 5 10 79 18 14 9 15 5 5 10 76 Jostens 18 15 10 15 5 5 10 78 19 15 10 13 3 5 10 75 $24,100 11 84.7 15 13 10 15 4 4 10 71 15 15 10 12 5 3 10 70 18 14 9 15 5 5 10 76 74.0 Walsworth 19 13 9 12 5 0 10 68 20 10 8 12 3 2 10 65 $20,183.00 13 79.2 16 12 8 14 5 0 10 65 15 14 9 13 4 0 10 65 15 13 9 15 5 2 10 69 66.4 Comments from Evaluators: Balfour: Many typos in proposal. Not all resumes included. Multiple errors in propsal. 1 rep for so many schools? Many typos and grammatical errors. Quality of books nice. Herff Jones: Have 2-3 staff with less than 3 years experience with company. Jostens: Proposal was excellent, books are average. Few local staff. No summer camps available. Color on pictures in yearbooks are yellow. Walsworth: Yearbook on Yellow McKinney. Overall, RFP binder showed less cohesive thought & prep by team. No mention of summer camps or support, Virtual cover sessions. Less professional proposal with many typos. 2-3 staff with less than 3 years with company, local staff is few. Mentions Page Maker? Is this a typo? No workshops/seminars mentioned in propsal. Binding, photos not retouched. Less inspriring curriculum materials. Availability of camp/seminars is an issue. 66.6 76.6

RFP06951 Special Education Data Management System with IEP Module November 24, 2009 Revised to correct errors on November 20, 2009 spreadsheet showing preliminary points for price

High School and Middle School Yearbook RFP 09503 BAR Attachment E Finalist Evaluation Points RFP09503: Middle School High School Yearbooks November 23, 2015 Note: points shown are finalist points after clarifications from vendors; the final evaluation points in some categories may change as a result of clarifications about vendor proposals, vendor interviews, references, or other factors. Qualifications Points Price Points Total Points Vendor Quality of products (20 points) Quality of service to schools (15 points) Overall experience, reputation, expertise, stability (10 points) Experience and Qual. of staff (15 pts) Abililty to provide svc. in expedient manner (5 pts) Workshops, Seminars for student yrbook staff (5 pts) Willingness to accept District's terms and conditions (10 points) Total Qualification points (out of 80) Price (ms/hs yearbook combined price) Total points for price (out of 20) Total Points (out of 100) Balfour 19 15 10 10 3 4 10 71 $40,927 16.3 18 13 8 14 4 4 10 71 20 15 10 15 5 5 10 80 87.9 14 13 8 14 5 2 10 66 18 13 8 13 4 4 10 70 71.6 Herff Jones 19 15 10 15 5 5 10 79 $33,331 20.0 19 15 10 15 5 5 10 79 20 15 10 15 5 5 10 80 98.4 18 14 9 15 5 5 10 76 19 15 10 14 5 5 10 78 78.4 Jostens 15 15 10 12 4 3 10 69 $70,117 9.5 19 15 10 13 3 5 10 75 83.1 20 15 10 15 5 5 10 80 18 14 9 15 5 3 10 74 18 13 10 13 3 3 10 70 73.6 Comments from Evaluators: Balfour: Typos and grammatical errors/problems in presented materials speak to a lack of quality awareness. Content is reasonable. Has two reps, one of who is part time. Mentioned a software platform I didn't recognize. Their product was acceptable. Herff Jones: Has 3 representatives. Seems solid. Their product was acceptable. Jostens: No summer workshop unless just for Seattle, however, the collaboration that happens between districts is useful for yearbook teaching. Color on mugs yellowish. Their product was acceptable. Availability of scheduled camps/seminars is an issue although the Adobe CS 6 is appealing. Has 2 representatives.

RFP06951 Special Education Data Management System with IEP Module November 24, 2009 Revised to correct errors on November 20, 2009 spreadsheet showing preliminary points for price