Texas Woman s Texas Accountability System Comparisons with In-State Peers February 2008
Table of Contents Description Page Participation - Headcount Enrollment 1 Participation - FTE Enrollment 2 Success - 4 Year Graduation Rates 3 Success - 5 Year Graduation Rates 4 Success - 6 Year Graduation Rates 5 Success - Degrees Awarded 6 Excellence - Lower Division SCH Taught by Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty 7 Excellence - Student/Faculty Ratio 8 Research - Research Expenditures 9 Research - Federal Research Expenditures per FTE Faculty 10 Institutional Efficiencies and Effectiveness - Administrative Cost Ratio 11 Institutional Efficiencies and Effectiveness-Classroom Utilization 12 Institutional Efficiencies and Effectiveness - Lab Utilization 13
Participation - Headcount Enrollment Definition: Total headcount enrollment as of the official census date in the fall semester. Headcount Enrollment Fall 2004 and Fall 2007 with Percent Change 28,121 +5% Sam Houston State 16,400 +14% Texas Woman's Texas Southern 11,838 +10% 9,540-18% Fall 2007 Fall 2004 8,879 +4% 6,547-8% 0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 18,000 21,000 24,000 27,000 30,000 Headcount Enrollment Headcount Enrollment Fall 2004 Fall 2007 26,783 28,121 Sam Houston State 14,333 16,400 Texas Woman's 10,746 11,838 Texas Southern 11,635 9,540 8,547 8,879 7,126 6,547 Group Target for 2007: Increase headcount enrollment by 8% from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Page 1
Participation - FTE Enrollment Definition: The sum of Undergraduate semester credit hours (SCH)/15, Master's SCH/12, and Doctoral SCH/9. FTE Enrollment Fall 2004 and Fall 2007 with Percent Change 22,924 +7% Sam Houston State 13,606 +16% Texas Woman's Texas Southern 8,670 +12% 8,199-20% Fall 2007 Fall 2004 6,125 +19% 4,991-5% -1,500 1,000 3,500 6,000 8,500 11,000 13,500 16,000 18,500 21,000 23,500 26,000 FTE Enrollment FTE Enrollment Fall 2004 Fall 2007 21,438 22,924 Sam Houston State 11,741 13,606 Texas Woman's 7,731 8,670 Texas Southern 10,192 8,199 5,146 6,125 5,256 4,991 Group Target for 2007: Increase FTE enrollment by 6% from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Page 2
Success - 4 Year Graduation Rates Definition: Percentage of first-time-in-college (FTIC), full-time, degree-seeking students who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public institution after four, five, and six years. 4 Year Graduation Rates 1999 and 2002 Cohorts 35% 30% 30% 25% 22% 24% 24% 4 Year Grad Rate 1999 Cohort 4 Year Grad Rate 2002 Cohort 20% 20% 19% 15% 15% 17% 10% 9% 8% 5% 3% 3% 0% Texas Woman's Texas State Univ- San Marcos Sam Houston State Texas A&M - Commerce Texas A&M Univ- Kingsville Texas Southern 4 Year Grad Rate 1999 Cohort 2002 Cohort Texas Woman's 15% 30% 22% 24% Sam Houston State 19% 24% Texas A&M -Commerce 17% 20% 8% 9% Texas Southern 3% 3% Group Target for 2007: Increase 4 year graduation rate for 2002 cohort by 3 percentage points over 1999 cohort. Page 3
Success - 5 Year Graduation Rates Definition: Percentage of first-time-in-college (FTIC), full-time, degree-seeking students who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public institution after four, five, and six years. 5 Year Graduation Rates 1998 and 2001 Cohorts 60% 55% 54% 5 Year Grad Rate 1998 Cohort 50% 48% 5 Year Grad Rate 2001 Cohort 45% 40% 44% 42% 41% 42% 41% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 21% 26% 15% 10% 11% 8% 5% 0% Texas State Univ- San Marcos Texas Woman's Sam Houston State Texas A&M - Commerce Texas A&M Univ- Kingsville Texas Southern 5 Year Grad Rate 1998 Cohort 2001 Cohort 48% 54% Texas Woman's 42% 44% Sam Houston State 41% 42% Texas A&M -Commerce 41% 40% 21% 26% Texas Southern 11% 8% Group Target for 2007: Increase 5 year graduation rate for 2001 cohort by 4.5 percentage points over 1998 cohort. Page 4
Success - 6 Year Graduation Rates Definition: Percentage of first-time-in-college (FTIC), full-time, degree-seeking students who have graduated from the same institution or another Texas public institution after four, five, and six years. 6 Year Graduation Rates 1997 and 2000 Cohorts 70% 65% 60% 56% 62% 6 Year Grad Rate 1997 Cohort 55% 50% 45% 43% 53% 47% 50% 44% 43% 6 Year Grad Rate 2000 Cohort 40% 35% 30% 30% 36% 25% 20% 21% 15% 14% 10% 5% 0% Texas State Univ- San Marcos Sam Houston State Texas Woman's Texas A&M - Commerce Texas A&M Univ- Kingsville Texas Southern 6 Year Grad Rate 1997 Cohort 2000 Cohort 56% 62% Sam Houston State 43% 53% Texas Woman's 47% 50% Texas A&M -Commerce 44% 43% 30% 36% Texas Southern 21% 14% Group Target for 2007: Increase 6 year graduation rate for 2000 cohort by 3 percentage points over 1997 cohort. Page 5
Success - Degrees Awarded Definition: Total number of degrees awarded by level. 6,500 Degrees Awarded FY 2004 and FY 2007 with Percent Change 6,000 5,801 +12% 5,500 5,000 4,500 FY 2004 FY 2007 4,000 3,500 +17% 3,230 3,000 2,748 +44% 2,500 2,229 +13% 2,000 1,500 1,545 +30% 1,291 +41% 1,000 500 0 Texas State Univ- San Marcos Sam Houston State Texas Woman's Texas A&M Univ-Commerce Texas A&M Univ-Kingsville Texas Southern Degrees Awarded FY 2004 FY 2007 5,186 5,801 Sam Houston State 2,760 3,230 Texas Woman's 1,914 2,748 1,965 2,229 1,186 1,545 Texas Southern 918 1,291 Group Target for 2007: Increase number of degrees awarded in FY 2007 by 15% over FY 2004 levels. Page 6
Excellence - Lower Division SCH Taught by Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Definition: Percent of lower division (freshman and sophomore) semester credit hours taught by tenure/tenure-track faculty. Lower Division SCH Taught by Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Fall 2004 and Fall 2007 with Percent Change 49% -6% Sam Houston State 44% -19% 44% +1% 37% -15% Texas Southern 33% +22% Fall 2007 Fall 2004 Texas Woman's 27% -23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% Lower Division SCH Taught by Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty Fall 2004 Fall 2007 52% 49% Sam Houston State 55% 44% 43% 44% 43% 37% Texas Southern 27% 33% Texas Woman's 36% 27% Group Target for 2007: Increase lower division SCH taught by tenure/tenure track faculty by 3% from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Page 7
Excellence - Student/Faculty Ratio Definition: Full-time equivalent students (FTSE) divided by full-time equivalent faculty (FTFE). Student/Faculty Ratio Fall 2004 and Fall 2007 Texas Woman's 16.1 14.5 16.1 16.2 Fall 2007 Fall 2004 18.1 17.5 ` Texas Southern 18.1 18.8 Sam Houston State 24.1 23.0 30.1 22.6 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Student/Faculty Ratio Fall 2004 Fall 2007 Texas Woman's 14.5 16.1 16.2 16.1 17.5 18.1 Texas Southern 18.8 18.1 Sam Houston State 23.0 24.1 22.6 30.1 Group Target for 2007: Decrease student/faculty ratio by 2 points from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Note: No TWU target for reduction of this ratio has been set at this time because TWU already has a ratio lower than most other state institutions and has the lowest in the doctoral peer group. TWU has been seeking to increase the student-tofaculty ratio. Clarification of exceptions will be sought from the Coordinating Board. Page 8
Research - Research Expenditures Definition: Research expenditures by source of funds as reported in the annual research expenditures report. Research Expenditures Percent Change FY 2004 and FY 2006 Texas A&M Univ- Kingsville +18% Texas State Univ-San Marcos +4% Texas Southern +14% Sam Houston State +10% FY 2006 FY 2004 Texas Woman's -7% Texas A&M Univ- Commerce +94% $0 $3 $5 $8 $10 $13 $15 $ million Research Expenditures FY 2004 FY 2006 $10,536,809 $12,434,000 $9,129,998 $9,498,000 Texas Southern $4,647,980 $5,294,000 Sam Houston State $2,858,129 $3,143,000 Texas Woman's $2,233,085 $2,079,000 $609,864 $1,182,000 Group Target for 2007: Increase research expenditures by 9% from FY 2004 to FY 2007. Page 9
Research - Federal Research Expenditures per FTE Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Definition: Federal research expenditures divided by the number of all tenure/tenure-track full-time equivalent faculty (FTFE). Federal Research Expenditures per FTE Tenure/Tenure-Track Faculty Percent Change from FY 2004 to FY 2006 +98% Texas Southern -1% +14% Texas Woman's -32% FY 2006 FY 2004 Sam Houston State -51% +70% $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 Federal $ per FTE Tenure/TT Faculty FY 2004 FY 2006 $19,238 $37,998 Texas Southern $21,987 $21,852 $6,779 $7,700 Texas Woman's $5,019 $3,413 Sam Houston State $6,727 $3,326 $1,905 $3,238 Group Target for 2007: Increase federal research expenditures by 12% from FY 2004 to FY 2007. Page 10
Institutional Efficiencies & Effectiveness - Administrative Cost Ratio Definition: The percentage of funds expended for administrative costs as a percent of operating budget. Administrative costs are Institutional Support expenditure items as designated in the institution's annual financial reports included in the following subcategories: executive management, fiscal operations, general administration and logistical services, administrative computing support, and public relations/development. Administrative Cost as a Percent of Operating Budget FY 2004 and FY 2007 with Percent Change Sam Houston State 7.0% -52% 10.2% -17% 10.4% -2% FY 2007 FY 2004 Texas Woman's 10.7% +3% Texas Southern 11.5% -18% 14.0% +1% 0.0% 4.0% 8.0% 12.0% 16.0% Administrative Cost % of Operating Budget FY 2004 FY 2007 Sam Houston State 14.6% 7.0% 12.3% 10.2% 10.6% 10.4% Texas Woman's 10.4% 10.7% Texas Southern 14.0% 11.5% 13.9% 14.0% Group Target for 2007: Reduce administrative cost by 10% from FY 2004 to FY 2007. Page 11
Institutional Efficiencies & Effectiveness - Classroom Utilization Definition: Average weekly hours of use for classrooms. Classroom Utilization Rates Fall 2004 and Fall 2007 35.8 Texas Woman's 35.4 39.0 38.0 Texas Southern 34.2 35.0 Sam Houston State 32.0 32.5 30.9 25.0 21.0 25.9 Fall 2007 Fall 2004 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 Classroom Utilization Fall 2004 Fall 2007 Texas Woman's 39.0 35.8 38.0 35.4 Texas Southern 35.0 34.2 Sam Houston State 32.0 32.5 25.0 30.9 21.0 25.9 Group Target for 2007: Increase utilization by 2 hrs. per week from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Page 12
Institutional Efficiencies & Effectiveness - Lab Utilization Definition: Average weekly hours of use for teaching laboratories. Lab Utilization Rates Fall 2003 and Fall 2007 33 30 Sam Houston State 28 25 Texas Woman's 24 21 Fall 2007 18 Fall 2004 13 Texas Southern 17 27 15 16 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Lab Utilization Fall 2004 Fall 2007 30 33 Sam Houston State 25 28 Texas Woman's 21 24 13 18 Texas Southern 27 17 16 15 Group Target for 2007: Target is an increase of.5 hours per week from Fall 2004 to Fall 2007. Page 13
Institutional Efficiencies & Effectiveness - Classroom and Lab Utilization Definition: Average weekly hours of use for classrooms and teaching laboratories. Classroom and Lab Utilization Rates Fall 2003-04 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 39.7 31.8 33.1 22.0 23.0 16.7 26.3 22.3 22.7 22.5 12.9 12.4 38.3 30.1 Texas Southern 34.5 27.4 Texas Woman's 38.7 21.4 Sam Houston State Univ 32.2 25.4 24.9 13.0 Classroom Utilization '04 21.4 15.6 Lab Utilization '04 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 Classroom Utilization Lab Utilization Fall 2004 Fall 2004 38.3 30.1 Texas Southern 34.5 27.4 Texas Woman's 38.7 21.4 Sam Houston State Univ 32.2 25.4 24.9 13.0 21.4 15.6 Group Target for 2007: Increase classroom utilization by 2 hrs/week. Fall 2005 Data