Terms of Reference. NCEA Review. Purpose of the review

Similar documents
Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

VISION: We are a Community of Learning in which our ākonga encounter Christ and excel in their learning.

Alcohol and Other Drug Education Programmes GUIDE FOR SCHOOLS

International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma. Source Material IBO Website, IB Handbook, Kristin School Auckland and a range of other relevant readings.

Sancta Maria Catholic Primary School

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

Report of External Evaluation and Review

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Qualification Guidance

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING THROUGH ONE S LIFETIME

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Kaipaki School. We expect the roll to climb to almost 100 in line with the demographic report from MoE through 2016.

Bachelor of Engineering

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Health Impact Assessment of the Makoura College Responsibility Model

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA

Summary and policy recommendations

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme at Carey

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Aurora College Annual Report

Monitoring and Evaluating Curriculum Implementation Final Evaluation Report on the Implementation of The New Zealand Curriculum Report to

The Bologna Process: actions taken and lessons learnt

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Te Whanau Tahi-The way we do Family at Naenae College. Cultural Responsiveness and Restorative Practice

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Assessment of Generic Skills. Discussion Paper

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

YOUTH GUARANTEE STRATEGY FEES FREE PLACES REFLECTIONS CPIT

Exploring the Development of Students Generic Skills Development in Higher Education Using A Web-based Learning Environment

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

The Nature of the Key Competencies

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

Developing the Key Competencies in Social Sciences

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

Services for Children and Young People

teaching issues 4 Fact sheet Generic skills Context The nature of generic skills

Information Sheet for Home Educators in Tasmania

ANNUAL REPORT of the ACM Education Policy Committee For the Period: July 1, June 30, 2016 Submitted by Jeffrey Forbes, Chair

Subject Selection Booklet

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

Celebrating 25 Years of Access to HE

The EQF Referencing report of the Kosovo NQF for General Education, VET and Higher Education

Te Hono ki Toi (Poutiriao)/ Master of Professional Creative Practice [Level 9]

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND VOCATIONAL TRAINING CURRICULUM FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD I AND II

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

An APEL Framework for the East of England

22/07/10. Last amended. Date: 22 July Preamble

District Advisory Committee. October 27, 2015

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

for appointment as Lecturer in Functional/Clinical Anatomy (Confirmation Path) DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY OTAGO SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Bachelor of Engineering in Biotechnology

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

POST-16 LEVEL 1 DIPLOMA (Pilot) Specification for teaching from September 2013

WITH MARY IN FAITH TATOU KO MERE E WHAKAPONO ANA. Marian College Prospectus

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Evaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Interview on Quality Education

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Mathematical Misconceptions -- Can We Eliminate Them? Phi lip Swedosh and John Clark The University of Melbourne. Introduction

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Briefing document CII Continuing Professional Development (CPD) scheme.

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

Lifelong Learning Programme. Implementation of the European Agenda for Adult Learning

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Transcription:

Terms of Reference NCEA Review The Minister of Education, the Honourable Chris Hipkins, has asked the Ministry of Education to lead a review of the National Certificates of Educational Achievement (NCEA). The review will comply with the New Zealand Qualifications Authority s Rules for reviewing qualifications. It is an opportunity to learn from NCEA s users, and to explore potential refinements to ensure that the qualifications continue to be credible and robust. These Terms of Reference explain: Why the Government is reviewing NCEA. The broad scope and guiding principles of the review. How people can participate in the review. An overview of the review process. Purpose of the review The New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF) Qualification Listing and Operational Rules were updated in 2013, requiring a review of qualifications every five years. The first review of NCEA is due to be completed by the end of 2018. The introduction of NCEA as New Zealand s main national qualifications for secondary school students represented a significant and positive modernisation of the system of secondary school assessment. However, the full potential of NCEA has yet to be fully realised, likely due in part to the way targets around credit accumulation have driven the implementation of the qualifications. Government has decided to conduct the review to build on what has been achieved with NCEA thus far, and respond to emerging needs and opportunities. This will ensure NCEA helps create an education system where learning is central, and provides relevant value into the future for those who attain the qualification. It is an opportunity to understand the experiences of New Zealanders who interact with NCEA whether as students, parents, whānau, teachers, school leaders, tertiary providers, iwi, employers, or members of the wider community. Those experiences can be used to refine NCEA to strengthen its design and implementation, both in secondary and tertiary education. Any changes to NCEA or its implementation resulting from consultation will need to be approved by the Minister of Education. The NZQF Operational Rules also require the development of purpose and outcome statements for every qualification, including NCEA describing where a qualification leads, and what can be expected from graduates with the qualifications. Developing these statements for NCEA will ensure that NCEA remains useful, relevant and fit for purpose by continuing to meet the needs of learners and our broader society and economy. 1

Context The National Certificates of Educational Achievement (NCEA) are New Zealand s main national qualifications for secondary school students, comprising certificates at levels 1 to 3. NCEA was implemented over three years from 2002 to 2004 and is listed on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF) alongside other New Zealand secondary and tertiary qualifications. It has developed into a well-regarded set of qualifications, respected nationally and internationally. NCEA is a standards-based assessment system: learners are not compared to one another to determine their grades, but are assessed against a standard. To achieve an NCEA, a learner must gain sufficient credits across a range of standards, each of which tests a discrete package of skills, knowledge and/or attitudes. NCEA is highly flexible, covering a range of learning across a variety of pathways. Since 2004, a number of changes have been made to strengthen NCEA: In 2007, certificate endorsements were introduced to recognise learners who achieved consistently well across their programme of study. Between 2009 and 2011, achievement standards were aligned with the National Curriculum. In 2011, course endorsements were introduced to recognise consistent levels of achievement in a particular course. This review aims to improve on NCEA s strong foundations to ensure that it is a robust qualification system that is valued by learners, their families, whānau, employers, tertiary education organisations, iwi and communities. Scope The NCEA review is an opportunity to discuss New Zealanders experiences with NCEA. The review will be guided by the overall aim of ensuring the robustness of NCEA, and by a commitment to ensuring that NCEA recognises the position of Māori appropriately, giving effect to the rights and duties set out in the Treaty of Waitangi. The review will be framed by the following key principles which ensure a schooling qualification system effectively supports and provides value to its users. These principles are deeply connected, and many topics which will be discussed throughout the review relate to more than one principle. These principles are not presented in order of importance or priority. 2

Key principles 1 Wellbeing 2 Equity 3 Coherence 4 Pathways 5 Credibility The design and use of NCEA should ensure that: NCEA promotes the wellbeing of young people and teachers through effective and fair teaching and assessment practice. NCEA facilitates high expectations for all young people, and ensures that every student has the potential and opportunity to succeed. NCEA enables young people to access the powerful knowledge, skills and attitudes identified in the National Curriculum. NCEA makes it easy for young people, their parents and whānau, and teachers to make informed choices to enable success in education and later life. NCEA is readily understood, widely supported, and validly measures achievement. Most topics relating to the structure and implementation of NCEA including the rules and requirements for each certificate, and how NCEA is supported and administered are within the scope of the review. It will cover a wide range of topics raised by its users, including but not limited to: Principle 1. Wellbeing 2. Equity 3. Coherence 4. Pathways 5. Credibility Topics will include: The impact of overassessment on student wellbeing and teacher workload Internal moderation requirements and practice, and the impact on teacher workload Equity of access to diverse, high-quality learning opportunities Distinction between academic and vocational learning, and how we value the contributions of each Encouraging and recognising Māori learning as Māori, including mātauranga Māori and te reo Māori The degree to which NCEA credentials soft or 21 st century skills and capabilities from the National Curriculum, and cultural competencies, particularly the principles, values, attitudes and key competencies Assessment-driven teaching and learning Literacy and numeracy requirements The evolving role of digital technology in assessment, particularly traditional end-ofyear examinations The role of each level of NCEA, particularly the structure and relevance of NCEA Level 1 The practice of levels of NCEA being treated, in practice, as prerequisites for the next Facilitating seamless transitions between settings, and from schooling on to further education and the world of work The number of credits at each level How we can better ensure that NCEA is easy for young people, families and whānau, teachers, employers and the wider community to understand 3

The review may also cover other matters relating to NCEA which are not explicitly excluded. A series of questions relating to specific topics will be released in the Discussion Document in April 2018. The core features of NCEA such as standards-based assessment and the use of achievement and unit standards are considered sound, and are not included in the scope of the review. The University Entrance and New Zealand Scholarship awards are excluded from the scope of the review because they are independent from NCEA. Individual standards and associated material are also not included, because an achievement standards review in 2019 will follow the NCEA review, where individual and groups of standards may be considered. Out-of-scope Standards-based assessment That both achievement and unit standards can contribute towards an NCEA University Entrance Award NZ Scholarship Award Individual achievement and unit standards and associated resources 4

Engaging stakeholders Extensive public consultation will be conducted in 2018 for the review through a range of media - including working groups, workshops, focus groups, and surveys. The Ministry of Education will also work with the Ministerial Advisory Group and Youth Advisory Group, and a Ministry of Education Reference Group, through the review period. Key processes and outputs 1 Representative Consultation From February 2018, the Ministry and the Ministerial Advisory Group, in consultation with stakeholders, will identify relevant topics for public consultation. 2 Working Groups The Ministry and the Ministerial Advisory Group will work with groups and stakeholders to refine topics to be focused on by the review, and the consultation process. This will involve engagement with a variety of groups to seek input on the topics which will be most relevant to New Zealanders. 3 4 5 6 Discussion Document Public Consultation Consultation and Recommendation Reports Implementation Report In late April, the Ministerial Advisory Group, supported by the Ministry of Education, and with contribution from the Youth Advisory Group and Reference Group, will draft a Discussion Document which will be submitted to the Minister of Education. It will contain a range of resources, including background information to help every interested New Zealander to participate in the review. From late April, the Ministry will hold wider public consultation on NCEA through a range of formats such as workshops and surveys. The Ministry of Education will also engage with focus groups to capture the voices of young people and their families and whānau. In late August, the Ministry will produce a Consultation Report from its consultation processes which summarises what has been heard from New Zealanders about NCEA. In September, with contribution from the Ministerial Advisory Group, Youth Advisory Group and Reference Group, the Ministry of Education will draft a Recommendations Report drawing on the Consultation Report, for the Minister of Education. An Implementation Report will be developed by the Ministry of Education, based on the Minister of Education s recommendations. This report will be released in early 2019 and will lay out the next steps to implement recommendations. 7 Implementation Any outcomes of the review will be clearly signalled and implemented with regard to the impact upon stakeholders. 5