Author(s): Koji Shimatani, Yoshifumi Tanaka, Masaki Hasegawa, Sadaaki Oki, Hiroshi Sekiya

Similar documents
PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Lancaster Lane CP School. The Importance of Motor Skills

Developmental coordination disorder DCD. Overview. Gross & fine motor skill. Elisabeth Hill The importance of motor development

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

Milton Public Schools Special Education Programs & Supports

TRAFFORD CHILDREN S THERAPY SERVICE. Motor Skills Checklist and Advice for Children in PRIMARY & SECONDARY Schools. Child s Name.Dob. Age.

Occupational Therapy Guidelines

A Comparison of the Effects of Two Practice Session Distribution Types on Acquisition and Retention of Discrete and Continuous Skills

The Learning Tree Workshop: Organizing Actions and Ideas, Pt I

Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third edition

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

2. CONTINUUM OF SUPPORTS AND SERVICES

THE USE OF TINTED LENSES AND COLORED OVERLAYS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DYSLEXIA AND OTHER RELATED READING AND LEARNING DISORDERS

The Complete Brain Exercise Book: Train Your Brain - Improve Memory, Language, Motor Skills And More By Fraser Smith

Dyslexia/LD Attention Deficit Disorders

ASSISTIVE COMMUNICATION

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Clinical Review Criteria Related to Speech Therapy 1

Special Educational Needs School Information Report

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Paper presented at the ERA-AARE Joint Conference, Singapore, November, 1996.

PRESCHOOL/KINDERGARTEN QUESTIONNAIRE

PERFORMANCE COMPETENCE LIFESPAN FRAMEWORK

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO. Department of Psychology

Assessing Functional Relations: The Utility of the Standard Celeration Chart

Tracy Dudek & Jenifer Russell Trinity Services, Inc. *Copyright 2008, Mark L. Sundberg

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Appalachian State University Department of Family and Child Studies FCS 3107: Variations in Development in Early Childhood Fall 2015

Fort Lauderdale Conference

Special Education Program Continuum

Trend Survey on Japanese Natural Language Processing Studies over the Last Decade

Learning and Teaching

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

ADHD Classroom Accommodations for Specific Behaviour

Curriculum Vitae of. JOHN W. LIEDEL, M.D. Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrician

Physical Education in Kindergarten Promotes Fundamental Motor Skill Development

Occupational Therapist (Temporary Position)

L.E.A.P. Learning Enrichment & Achievement Program

WHO ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS? HOW CAN THEY HELP THOSE OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM? Christine Mitchell-Endsley, Ph.D. School Psychology

UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All. Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments

eguidelines Aligned to the Common Core Standards

Dr. Shaheen Pasha Division of Education University of Education, Lahore

Idaho Early Childhood Resource Early Learning eguidelines

No Parent Left Behind

Tomball College and Community Library Occupational Therapy Journals

Virginia Commonwealth University Retrospective Concussion Diagnostic Interview - Blast. (dd mmm yyyy)

PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND KINESIOLOGY

STAFF DEVELOPMENT in SPECIAL EDUCATION

Developmental Disabilities

The effects of imagery-based occupation on duration of prone extension in four-and five-year old children

Case study Norway case 1

Abstractions and the Brain

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INDEPENDENT STUDY IN MULTIVARIATE CALCULUS

5 Early years providers

MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

SNAP, CRACKLE AND POP! INFUSING MULTI-SENSORY ACTIVITIES INTO THE EARLY CHILDHOOD CLASSROOM SUE SCHNARS, M.ED. AND ELISHA GROSSENBACHER JUNE 27,2014

Special Diets and Food Allergies. Meals for Students With 3.1 Disabilities and/or Special Dietary Needs

Prevalence of Oral Reading Problems in Thai Students with Cleft Palate, Grades 3-5

2015 SUMMER SKILLS CAMPS

Speech/Language Pathology Plan of Treatment

A Case-Based Approach To Imitation Learning in Robotic Agents

Adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often have word retrieval problems (Barrow, et al., 2003; 2006; King, et al., 2006a; 2006b; Levin et al.

EL RODEO SCHOOL VOLUNTEER HANDBOOK

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

As used in this part, the term individualized education. Handouts Theme D: Individualized Education Programs. Section 300.

REG. NO. 2010/003266/08 SNAP EDUCATION (ASSOCIATION INC UNDER SECTION 21) PBO NO PROSPECTUS

Cognitive Development Facilitator s Guide

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

TOEIC Bridge Test Secure Program guidelines

OFFICE OF DISABILITY SERVICES FACULTY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

EVALUATION OF AN INNOVATIVE SCHOOL EYE HEALTH EDUCATIONAL MODE

Baker College Waiver Form Office Copy Secondary Teacher Preparation Mathematics / Social Studies Double Major Bachelor of Science

The Use of ipads in the Literacy Learning of Students with ADHD

Sample Iep Goals For Anxiety

CHILDREN ARE SPECIAL A RESOURCE GUIDE FOR PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. From one parent to another...

Language and Literacy: Exploring Examples of the Language and Literacy Foundations

Guide to the New Hampshire Rules for the Education of Children with Disabilities

BIOH : Principles of Medical Physiology

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Public Policy Agenda for Children

Guatemala: Teacher-Training Centers of the Salesians

You said we did. Report on improvements being made to Children s and Adolescent Mental Health Services. December 2014

Disability Resource Center (DRC)

What are some common test misuses?

Extending Learning Across Time & Space: The Power of Generalization

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

HiSET TESTING ACCOMMODATIONS REQUEST FORM Part I Applicant Information

OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS

JUNIOR HIGH SPORTS MANUAL GRADES 7 & 8

California Rules and Regulations Related to Low Incidence Handicaps

Transcription:

Do children with developmental disorders have low gross motor abilities? -A comparison with normal children, using Motor Ability ests for young children Author(s): Koji Shimatani, Yoshifumi Tanaka, Masaki Hasegawa, Sadaaki Oki, Hiroshi Sekiya Vol. 13, No. 1 (2009-01 - 2009-12) Koji Shimatani 1,2, Yoshifumi Tanaka 1, Masaki Hasegawa 2, Sadaaki Oki 2, Hiroshi Sekiya 1 1 Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima City, Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan 2 Department of Physical Therapy, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan Key words: Developmental disorders, gross motor abilities, motor ability tests for young children Accepted 23 September 2008 Abstract It has been noted that the symptoms of children with developmental disorders (DD) include problems such as high frequency of accidentally bumping into objects or people. However, as of yet there has been no clarification of the characteristics of gross motor abilities in children with DD. The purpose of this study was to clarify those characteristics by comparing the gross motor abilities of children with DD to that of normal children. Participants were 5- and 6-year-old children, of whom 9 had DD and 9 were normal. For testing, we used the motor ability tests for young children designed by Sugihara et al. [1]. We tested 6 skills, including 25 m runs and standing long-jumps to evaluate quickness, tennis-ball throws, repetitive jump-overs, and ball catches to evaluate coordination, and continuous body-support to evaluate endurance. When we compared children with DD to normal children, no significant differences were observed in any of the motor skills tested. Gross motor abilities of children with DD were equal to those of the normal children in terms of quickness, coordination, and endurance. Therefore, we infer that the high frequency of accidentally bumping into objects or people by children with DD cannot be attributed simply to underdeveloped gross motor abilities. Introduction Primary symptoms of children with developmental disorders (DD) such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and Asperger syndrome include restlessness, inability to complete tasks, inability to read people s feelings and situational circumstances, and motor activity characteristics such as high frequency of accidentally bumping into objects or people[2,3]. These issues have been evaluated with activity questionnaire surveys, activity observation, intellectual development tests, and interviews, then diagnosed by physicians with clinical experience using diagnostic standards [2,3]. Moreover, with respect to the motor activities of children with DD undergoing rehabilitation, a variety of methods have been used, including drawing tests, posture-imitation tests, posture and movement observation, and various evaluations on desk, to investigate their perception, body schema, postural control, and motor coordination, among others [4]. Although children with DD showed no developmental delay in body site recall in drawing tests, evaluation of body schema by postural imitation tests, in which children observed the movement of other people and responded accordingly, showed that children with DD were inferior to normal children [5]. Additionally, in studies of balance function, children with DD have been shown to be less developed with respect to standing postural control, and have visual control predominance in comparison to normal children [6]. In studies of motor coordination in children with DD, tests involving the tracing of lines and the reproduction of diagrams have shown that these children lack precision in

their movements [7]. Moreover, based on the fact that children with DD are unable to cut out shapes accurately when using scissors in motor coordina- tion tasks, it has been shown that they have problems with hand-eye coordination [8]. In addition to the postural control tasks, motor coordination tasks, and various evaluations on desk mentioned above, it is crucial to evaluate the problems associated with the many gross motor activities performed on a daily basis by children with DD. For example, in studies that had children perform passing-under movements in order to assess their frequency of physical contact with obstacles in daily life, such children had physical contact with obstacles more frequently than did normal children [9]. This type of task requires subjects to pass under obstacles of various heights by moving quickly through tight spaces, and furthermore without letting their bodies touch the obstacles. Therefore, it is possible that gross motor abilities such as quickness and coordination would be inferior in children with DD. However, no studies have been conducted in which speed and coordination as gross motor abilities were analyzed as separate entities in children with DD and compared with normal children. Such a study would make it possible to categorize and measure the gross motor abilities of children with DD in detail, and thereby to investigate the kinds of motor ability problems of children with DD compared to normal children. Additionally, it would be possible to infer the causes responsible for the higher rate of children with DD accidentally making contact with physical obstacles. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to compare the gross motor abilities of young children diagnosed with DD, with those of normal children, and to clarify the characteristics of gross motor abilities in children with DD. Sugihara et al. [1] have developed a motor ability test for young children aimed specifically at measuring the gross motor abilities of young children. Because this test categorizes and measures gross motor abilities in terms of speed, coordination, and endurance, we decided to use this motor ability test for young children in our study. Participants and Methods 1. Participants This study was conducted after obtaining authorization from the Ethics Committee at Hiroshima Prefectural University, and then explaining the content of the study to cooperating research facilities and the guardians of the participants so as to obtain their consent. Participants were 9 normal young children (3 boys, 6 girls) and 9 young children with DD (6 boys, 3 girls). In both groups, 2 children were in the first half of their 6th year, and 7 children in the latter half of their 5th year. The height of the normal children was 111.6±4.9 cm, and of the children with DD was 112.9±4.1 cm. The weight of the normal children was 18.0±1.7 kg, and of the children with DD was 19.3±1.9 kg. No significant differences were observed in either height(t(16)=.33,p=.54) or weight(t(16)=.51,p=.14). The children with DD in this study had been diagnosed as either attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or Asperger syndrome. Because symptoms of these disorders often coexist within a patient, the line of demarcation between the two is not well defined [3]. WHO also classified these disorders as DD [10]. Therefore, the children with one of these disorders were classified as a group of children with DD in this study. 2. Methods Measurements were taken in 6 tasks, following the meth- ods of Sugihara et al., who revised the motor ability test for young children created by the Physical Education and Psychology Research Lab at the Tokyo University of Education [1]. The 6 tasks included the following: a race by either 2 boys or 2 girls on a 25 m course to measure speed (25 m run); throwing a tennis ball over-handed as far as possible to measure coordination (tennis-ball throw); jumping one after another over 10, 5 cm-high building blocks with their legs together to measure coordination (repetitive jumpover); supporting one s body as long as possible using only upper limbs on platforms placed on either side at elbow height to measure endurance (body-support endurance); catching balls thrown at them so as to clear a 170 cm-high bar to measure coordination (ball catch); and jumping as far as possible with their legs together to measure quickness (standing longjump). Following the methods from Sugihara et al. [1], we conducted the measurements as follows: once for the 25 m run, twice for the tennis-ball throw, twice for the repetitive jump-over, once for body-support endurance, 10 times for the ball catch, and twice for the standing long-jump. Where 2 measurements were taken, we recorded the better result, and with the ball catch we recorded the number of times out of 10 throws that each participant was able to catch the ball. Each task was performed in a randomized order.

Because motor abilities differ in young children according to age and gender, we converted the actual measurements for each of the motor tasks performed by all participants in this study into T-scores based on national averages and national standard deviations for each motor task, differentiated by gender and age. Additionally, using the average T- scores for each grouping on the 6 motor tasks, we conducted a t-test for independent groups in order to compare the children with DD and normal children. Where we could not postulate an equal variance in the t-tests, we used the Welch test. We designated the significance level of all tests to be less than 5%. Do children with developmental disorders have low gross motor abilities? Results The T-scores for the 6 tasks of motor ability tests of the children with DD and normal children are indicated in Table 1. Based on the following t-test results of the children with DD and normal children in the 6 tasks of motor ability tests, no significant differences were observed between the developmentally-disordered and normal children in any task examined: the 25 m run (t (16 =93,p=.37),the ball throw(t(16=48,p =.64),the repetitive jump-over (t(9.77)1.09,p =.30),bodysupport endurance (t(16=1.43,p =.17),the ball catch (t(16)=.86,p=.40),the standing long-jump (t(16)=.29,p=.77). For the repetitive jump-over test, we were unable to postulate an equal variance by means of a t-test, so adjustments of variance were made with the Welch test. Table 1: Gross motor abilities of children with developmental disorders and normal children. (Average and Standard Deviation of actual measure and T-score. ) normal children children with developmental disorders Actual Measure 25 m run Ball throw (m) Repetitive Jumpover Bodysupport endurance Ball catch (times) Standi long-ju (cm 6.59±0.57 7.61±3.06 5.53±0.29 28.90±20.35 9.22±1.30 109.56±1 T-score 50.08±0.70 65.66±1.78 49.35±1.48 44.92±35.82 55.59±17.66 60.48±2. Actual Measure 6.32±0.44 8.56±2.91 5.84±0.87 17.91±12.11 8.78±1.92 111.67±5 T-score 46.71±0.65 63.45±2.16 51.78±1.48 41.59±36.17 58.02±2.71 54.64±18 Discussion According to prior research, it has been pointed out that motor abilities during early childhood are influenced by bodily factors such as height and weight [11]. But in a comparison of these bodily factors among the participants of this study, no difference was observed between those with DD and normal children. Also, when compared with the 2007 School Health Statistical Survey Report [12] by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the height and weight of participants was nearly identical to the national average. Therefore, we can eliminate the influence of age and bodily factors in comparing the 2 groups of children. The purpose of this study was to analyze the gross motor abilities of young children diagnosed with DD by separating the elements of quickness, coordination, and endurance, and compare the results with those of normal children. The results of motor ability tests in 6 tasks show that, with respect to the T-scores on ball throwing and catching, both groups of children who participated in this study achieved higher values than the national average. According to prior research, when it comes to throwing and catching balls, young children who are experienced at physical games involving balls, such as baseball or soccer, have better motor abilities than young children with little such experience

[1]. We found that in this study as well, participants showed strong motor abilities with respect to throwing and catching balls because they had significant experience playing physical games involving balls. Next, a comparison of the children with DD and normal children with regards to the results from the motor ability tests showed that there were no significant differences in any of the following motor ability areas: 25 m run, tennis-ball throw, repetitive jump-over, body-support endurance, ball catch, and standing long-jump. In other words, the gross motor abilities of the children with DD were equivalent to those of normal children in terms of the speed necessary for running, the total-body coordination necessary for throwing balls, the total-body rhythmic coordination necessary for repetitive jump-overs, the endurance necessary for body-support endurance, the vision and upper-extremity coordination needed for catching balls, and the quickness needed for standing long-jumps. Prior research on gross motor abilities which tested passing-under movements [9] has shown that children with DD have a higher rate of accidentally making contact with physical obstacles. However, the results of this study suggest that underdevelopment of gross motor skills does not seem to be the cause of such children making contact with obstacles. According to Higuchi et al. [13] and Warren et al. [14], in order to pass through a tight space it is necessary, based on environmentally-indicated information that changes from moment to moment, to assess accurately the possibility of taking action, and simultaneously to use information regarding one s own bodily characteristics to appraise whether one can indeed pass through. Therefore, it is possible that children with DD have insufficient ability to use information regarding bodily characteristics to appraise their actions. It will be necessary in future studies to investigate the ability of children with DD to evaluate their actions in order to clarify further the issue of why they have a higher rate of accidentally making contact with physical obstacles. Acknowledgements A part of this study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (start-up; Assignment No.19830053) from the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS). References 1. Sugihara T. Change over time in preschool children s motor ability and structural analysis of environmental factors. Research report of ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology grants-in-aid for scientific research B in 2002-2003. 2. Koeda T. Five-year-old health examination focused for detection of developmental disabilities. Japanese Journal on Developmental Disabilities 2005; 27: 98-101. 3. Koeda T, Hirabayashi S, Miyamoto S, Sakakibara Y. ADHD and remedical intervention. No to Hattatsu (Brain and Development) 2002; 34: 158-161 (in Japanese) 4. Oota A,Tsuchida R,Miyajima N. Jananease sensory inventory-revised(jsi-r): Data of a national sample Sensory Integrative Therapy and Research 2002; 9: 45-63 5. Shimatani K, Sekiya H, Kanai S, Hasegawa M, Tasaka A, Otsuka A, Oki S. The infant s self-body recognition by person drawing and imitation. Journal of Physical Therapy Practice and Research 2008; 17: 29-34. 6. Shimatani K, Tanaka Y, Hasegawa M, Oki S, Sekiya H. Postural Control of Children with Developmental Disorders. Journal of Physical Therapy Science (in press, Accepted Sep 5 2008) 7. Anita C.B, Shelly J.B, Elizabeth A.M, Tsuchida R, Konishi N eds. Sensory integration: Theory and practice( 2nd ed). Tokyo Kyodo-Isho-Shuppan 2006: 173-204. 8. Sugama K, Sengoku Y, Nakajima S, Sasaki T, Tanaka T.A new device for measuring motor control ability by a visual stimulus: Toward the analysis of clumsiness for eye-hand coordination task corresponding to a visual target. Sapporo Medical University Bulletin of School of Health Sciences 2003; 6: 59-67. 9. Shimatani K, Tanaka Y, Kanai S, Otsuka A, Oki S, Sekiya H. A study of physical contact in passing-under movements: Children with developmental disorders have more collisions, Rigakuryoho Kagaku (Physical Therapy Science), in press, accepted Jun 16.2008 (in Japanese). 10. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Tokyo Igaku-Shoin 2008: 151-180. 11. Shumway-cook A, Woollacot MH. Motor control. Theory and practical applications. (2nd ed). Baltimore Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2001; 204-234. 12. Ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology: School health statistics investigation in 2007, Ⅱ Outline of result of the survey;http://www. mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/001/003/19/08031307/002.htm (2008.5.1)

13. Higuchi T,Imanaka K. Contribution of visual spatial perception and cognition to adaptive walking strategies. Japanese Journal of Biomechanics in Sports and Exercise 2005; 9: 161-169. 14. Warren WH, Whang S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987; 13: 371-383. Correspondence: Hiroshi Sekiya,Koji Shimatani Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1, Kagamiyama Higashi-hiroshima City, Hiroshima 739-8521, Japan e-mail: hsekiya(at)hiroshima-u.ac.jp shimatani(at)pu-hiroshima.ac.jp