Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science

Similar documents
George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

4th Grade Science Test Ecosystems

PROJECT LEARNING TREE 4 th grade Language Arts Correlation to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Standards Alignment... 5 Safe Science... 9 Scientific Inquiry Assembling Rubber Band Books... 15

Planting Seeds, Part 1: Can You Design a Fair Test?

SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Science Fair Project Handbook

Unit: Human Impact Differentiated (Tiered) Task How Does Human Activity Impact Soil Erosion?

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

Biome I Can Statements

Teaching NGSS in Elementary School Third Grade

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

Program Alignment Worksheet High School

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

Contact: For more information on Breakthrough visit or contact Carmel Crévola at Resources:

Scientific Inquiry Test Questions

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

21 st Century Skills and New Models of Assessment for a Global Workplace

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Physical Features of Humans

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

Study Group Handbook

EQuIP Review Feedback

Text: envisionmath by Scott Foresman Addison Wesley. Course Description

Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1

g to onsultant t Learners rkshop o W tional C ces.net I Appealin eren Nancy Mikhail esour Educa Diff Curriculum Resources CurriculumR

UF-CPET SSI & STARTS Lesson Plan

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

Quantitative Research Questionnaire

Johns Hopkins University

Training Pack. Kaizen Focused Improvement Teams (F.I.T.)

Scott Foresman Science Grade 4

End-of-Module Assessment Task

Lab 1 - The Scientific Method

4-H Ham Radio Communication Proficiency Program A Member s Guide

Summarize The Main Ideas In Nonfiction Text

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

1. Locate and describe major physical features and analyze how they influenced cultures/civilizations studied.

Measurement. When Smaller Is Better. Activity:

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Abc Of Science 8th Grade

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

TASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

level 5 (6 SCQF credit points)

Spinners at the School Carnival (Unequal Sections)

Kindergarten SAMPLE MATERIAL INSIDE

Principal Survey FAQs

Introduction to PROJECT BASED LEARNING. For 21 st Century Learners

Secondary English-Language Arts

For information only, correct responses are listed in the chart below. Question Number. Correct Response

Maryland Science Voluntary State Curriculum Grades K-6

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

What can I learn from worms?

Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) Presented by Rebecca Hiebert

SETTING STANDARDS FOR CRITERION- REFERENCED MEASUREMENT

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

Standards Alignment... 5 Safe Science... 9 Scientific Inquiry Assembling Rubber Band Books... 15

Download or Read Online ebook plant observation chart in PDF Format From The Best User Guide Database

What s in a Step? Toward General, Abstract Representations of Tutoring System Log Data

been each get other TASK #1 Fry Words TASK #2 Fry Words Write the following words in ABC order: Write the following words in ABC order:

Unit 1: Scientific Investigation-Asking Questions

How to Read the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

WHO PASSED? Time Frame 30 minutes. Standard Read with Understanding NRS EFL 3-4

STORIES FOR INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE TEACHING

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

CHANCERY SMS 5.0 STUDENT SCHEDULING

CAFE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS O S E P P C E A. 1 Framework 2 CAFE Menu. 3 Classroom Design 4 Materials 5 Record Keeping

Tap vs. Bottled Water

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

New Features & Functionality in Q Release Version 3.1 January 2016

C U L I N AR Y A R T S

Grade 5: Module 2A: Unit 1: Lesson 6 Analyzing an Interview with a Rainforest Scientist Part 1

Interpreting Graphs Middle School Science

SESSION III: Training on Conducting the Informed Consent Process

Extraordinary Eggs (Life Cycle of Animals)

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Essentials of Rapid elearning (REL) Design

Biology Keystone Questions And Answers

AGN 331 Soil Science Lecture & Laboratory Face to Face Version, Spring, 2012 Syllabus

Physical Versus Virtual Manipulatives Mathematics

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Inquiry Practice: Questions

Concordia Language Villages STARTALK Teacher Program Curriculum

Grade 3 Science Life Unit (3.L.2)

Collaborative Classroom Co-Teaching in Inclusive Settings Course Outline

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Transcription:

4/25/2014 Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science FOSS ENVIRONMENTS Photo by Joanne Johnson Instructional Tools Contributors: Jennifer Bader, Shaun Capper, Andrea Clancy, Kathy Darrow-Joiner, Dale Fournier, Wende Hilyard, Lisa Lockwood, and Kathryn Peck Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B. [Type text]

Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science Instructional Tools In this packet you will find a set of instructional supports for science materials. These documents represent the work-in-progress of teachers in the Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science Project, a Math Science Partnership through the Northwest Educational Service District in Washington State. While we encourage others to use the materials, please know the power of these tools lies in the collaborative discussion and analysis that occurs during their creation. We strongly suggest that anyone utilizing these tools make them your own, adjusting them to fit your teaching context and district priorities. Professional development tools to aid you in this process are available on the ALPS project web page www.nwesd.org/nwalps. For access to editable versions of these documents please contact Nancy Menard nmenard@nwesd.org. Overview of the Tools (not every unit tool-set will include all of these tools) Unit Overview The unit overview grid lays out learning targets or important scientific ideas from Washington State Standards for each investigation in the module and clarifies the success criteria for each learning target. It also details the formative assessments that have been designed to assess each target in the investigation. Learning Progressions A learning progression is a graphical representation of the path students take toward mastery of a science big idea. The ALPS Learning Progression documents include a description of an important big idea from the Washington State Science Learning Standards and the progression of building-block learning targets that students master on their way toward an understanding of that big idea. For each building-block learning target the student success criteria is identified and one or more formative assessment tasks to elicit evidence of student understanding are suggested. Formative Assessment Tasks The suggested formative assessment tasks are examples of tools used by the teachers in the ALPS project to gather evidence of student understanding. The Assessment Task Cover Sheet details each assessment and gives administration tips and suggestions for instructional adjustments based on some of the common student struggles they encountered. Student Work Samples Selected student work samples from students in ALPS classrooms give a picture of the range of student responses gathered from sample formative assessments. The Student Work Sample Cover Sheet describes the student work samples and the teacher s interpretation of student understanding. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: FOSS Environments by Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Inquiry Inquir y Inquiry Life Environments Unit Overview Lesson Learning Targets & Success Criteria Assessment Pre requisite knowledge Living and nonliving things are subsets in every environmental system. Use the formative assessment probe Is it Living? (Keely, Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 1, pg. 123-130, #17) Prerequisite Skills Identify living and nonliving things. Make observations and record data from observations Investigation 1 Part 1 Living and nonliving things are subsets in every environmental system. I can explain why something is living or nonliving. Use Investigation 1: Terrestrial Environments No. 4 Modified Student Sheet Investigation 1 Part 1 Investigation 1 Parts 1-2 Investigation 1 Part 1 & 2 There are different types of investigations: Observations and controlled experiments using models. Living organisms depend on living and nonliving factors of the environmental system. I can explain how non-living factors (variables) influence living organisms. Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. Talking head scenarios Doing Science Keeley 2008 Use Investigation 1: Terrestrial Environments No. 4 Modified Student Sheet *WA Edition, parts b, c, d. Student Sheet #3 Terrarium Map I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Inquiry Inquiry Inquiry Inquiry Lesson Learning Targets & Success Criteria Assessment Investigation 2 Parts 1, 2, and 3 A controlled experiment starts with a question from an observation. Variables are controlled except the one manipulated variable. I can ask a question and conduct a fair experiment that identifies controlled, manipulated, and responding variables. Investigation 2: student sheet # 6 Animal Investigations Students identify their question and white board which variables will be controlled, manipulated, and responding. Investigation 2 Part 4 A controlled experiment starts with a question from an observation. Variables are controlled except the one manipulated variable. Investigation 2, Part 4 Designing an Animal Investigation. Use Rubric on Page 9 of Assessment Folio for scoring. I can ask a question and conduct a fair experiment that identifies controlled, manipulated, and responding variables. Investigation 3 Part 1 & 2 Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. Investigation 3: Student Sheet #10 Plant Observations I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. Investigation 2 Part 4 Variables that affect our investigations can be biotic or abiotic. Investigation 2, Part 4 Designing an Animal Investigation. Use Rubric on Page 9 of Assessment Folio for scoring. I can identify 3 4 variables that could affect an investigation. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Inquiry Inquiry Inquiry Lesson Learning Targets & Success Criteria Assessment Investigation 3 Part 3 Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. Student Sheet #12 Plant Profile I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. Investigation 4 Parts 1, 2, and 3 Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. Investigation 4: Student Sheet #14 Aquarium Log Investigation 5 Part 3 I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. A scientific conclusion can be generated a based on data gathered. I can use my evidence to write a conclusion. Complete: Writing a Conclusion in Science using data from Investigation 5 Student Sheet #17 Brine Shrimp Hatching Response Sheet #18 Brine Shrimp Hatching Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Learning Progression FOSS Environments: EALR 4 Food Webs Big Idea: 2-3 LS2A Learning Target 1: Living and nonliving things exist in every environmental system. 4-5 LS2A Success Criteria: I can Prerequisite skill: Students can identify living and nonliving things. Pre-assessment: Is it Living? (Keely, Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 1, pg. 123-130, #17) Explain why something is living or nonliving. Formative Assessment: Response Sheet Investigation 1 Part A Learning Target 2: Living organisms depend on living and nonliving factors of the environmental system. 4-5 LS2A Success Criteria: I can Explain how nonliving factors (variables) influence living organisms. Formative Assessment: Response Sheet Investigation 1 Part B, C and D Learning Target 3: Organisms have a range of tolerance within their preferred environmental system. The optimum condition for a living organism is within its range of tolerance. Success Criteria: I can I can evaluate data to determine an organism s optimum environment and range of tolerance. Formative Assessment: Animal Investigations - Planning: student sheet # 6 (modified for Washington State.) Investigation 3: Student sheet #10 : Plant Observation s, Student sheet # 12: Plant Profile, Student sheet #17: Brine Shrimp Hatching Learning Target 4: Changes in ecosystems can affect the organisms within the environmental system. 4-5 LS2D & E Success Criteria: I can Predict how a slow or rapid change might affect the living and nonliving factors of the environment. Formative Assessment: Science Stories: Mono Lake Story, respond to after the story questions. If then statements: Predict what would happen to the organism in the environmental system if (we had a rapid change such as freezing temperatures, sand instead of dirt, removed all access to sunlight, fertilized, added salt to water, removed dirt). Habitat Change (Keeley, Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 2, pp.143-148, #19) Learning Target 5: All plants and animals change the ecosystem where they live. 4-5 LS2D & E Success Criteria: I can Identify how an organism can change an ecosystem where it lives. Formative Assessment: Describe the relationship between the environment and the organisms that live there. Environments I-Check : Question #15 Living and nonliving changes in ecosystems can affect the populations they support. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Living and nonliving changes in ecosystems can affect the populations they support. Formative Assessment Task Cover Sheet Learning Target #1 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Students label living and non-living parts of a terrestrial environment. Response Sheet Investigation 1 Part A Learning Target 1: Living and nonliving things are subsets in every environmental system. - 4-5 LS2A Success Criteria: Explain why something is living or nonliving. Teacher Background Suggestions for Instructional Adjustments: Simultaneously discuss the variables that exist within your terrariums in the classroom. Address the idea that this is not a controlled experiment but meant to be observations and continually asking questions and adjusting terrarium. Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: yes Learning Target #2 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Parts B, C and D of response sheet 1 from investigation 1 Teacher Background Learning Target 2: Living organisms depend on living and nonliving factors of the environmental system. - 4-5 LS2A Success Criteria: Explain how nonliving factors (variables) influence living organisms. Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: yes Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Living and nonliving changes in ecosystems can affect the populations they support. Learning Target #3 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Student Sheet 6 is where students plan the Beetle investigation. Animal Investigations - Planning: student sheet # 6 (modified for Washington State.) Investigation 3: Student sheet #10 : Plant Observation s, Student sheet # 12: Plant Profile, Student sheet #17: Brine Shrimp Hatching Learning Target 3: Organisms have a range of tolerance within their preferred environmental system. - 4-5 LS1B-D Success Criteria: I can manipulate an organism s environment in order to determine their optimum conditions. Teacher Background Suggestions for Instructional Adjustments: The modified version is better but student sheet 6 from the kit will work too. Make sure to have students analyze data to discover Range of Tolerance and Optimum Conditions Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: no Learning Target #4 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: If Then statements. Example on Learning Progression. Teacher Background Science Stories: Mono Lake Story, respond to after the story questions. Habitat Change (Keeley, Uncovering Student Ideas in Science, Vol. 2, pp.143-148, #19) Learning Target 4: Changes in ecosystems can affect the organisms within the environmental system. - 4-5 LS2D & E Success Criteria: Predict how a slow or rapid change might affect the living and non-living factors of the environment. Student Task Sheet Included: no Student Work Samples Included: no Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Living and nonliving changes in ecosystems can affect the populations they support. Learning Target #5 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Describe the relationship between the environment and the organisms that live there. Teacher Background Environments I-Check : Question #15 Learning Target 5: All plants and animals change the ecosystem where they live. - 4-5 LS2D & E Success Criteria: Identify how a change in resources affects the living and non-living factors of the environmental system. Student Task Sheet Included: no Student Work Samples Included: no Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Name Date ANIMAL INVESTIGATIONS PLANNING Question What conditions do (isopods or beetles) prefer in their environment? Planning the Investigation Prediction I think there will be more (isopods or beetles) in the environment a er amount of time because. Materials List the materials and put a check by each material that is kept the same for all conditions. Procedure Describe, draw, and label how you set up the runway. Be sure to include one variable kept that stays the same (controlled) one variable that changes (manipulated) FOSS Environments Module The Regents of the University of California Can be duplicated for workshop or classroom use. Investigation 2: Responding to Moisture No. 6 Modified Student Sheet WA Edition

Name Date ANIMAL INVESTIGATIONS RESULTS Part 1. Data Collection: Record where each animal was and what it was doing (on surface, buried, or moving). Short run. This is where the animals were a er minutes. Long run. This is where the animals were a er hours. Part 2. Conclusion In order to make a reliable conclusion, scientists perform repeated trials. How does your conclusion compare to those of other students who investigated the same animal? What did you find out about the animals environmental preferences? Your conclusion should include these parts. Supporting data An explaination of how this data supports your conclusion. FOSS Environments Module The Regents of the University of California Can be duplicated for workshop or classroom use. Investigation 2: Responding to Moisture No. 6a New Student Sheet WA Edition

Name Date RESPONSE SHEET INVESTIGATION 1 salamanders L cricket L rocks pan of water broad-leafed plants L light L grassy plants L glass terrarium thin-leafed plants L soil L flowering plants L temperature Sayo used the picture above to make a list of all the environmental factors she saw in this terrestrial environment. She put an L next to each factor she identified as a living factor. The list Sayo made is shown above. a. Do you agree that all the factors Sayo marked with an L are living? If not, tell which selected factors you don t agree with and explain why they should be changed. b. Describe how two of the nonliving factors might influence the living factors in this terrarium. 1. 2. FOSS Environments Module The Regents of the University of California Can be duplicated for workshop or classroom use. Investigation 1: Terrestrial Environments No. 4 Modified Student Sheet WA Edition

Name Date RESPONSE SHEET INVESTIGATION 1 (continued) c. Sort the living things on Sayo s list into two groups: plants and animals. Plants Animals d. State one characteristic that distinguishes plants from animals. FOSS Environments Module The Regents of the University of California Can be duplicated for workshop or classroom use. Investigation 1: Terrestrial Environments No. 4a New Student Sheet WA Edition

Learning Progression FOSS Environments: EALR 2 Inquiry Prerequisite skill: Make observations and record data from observations 2-3 INQB & C Learning Target 2: Learning Target 3: A controlled experiment starts with a question from an observation. Learning Target 4: Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. Learning Target 5: Scientific conclusions can be generated based on data gathered. 4-5 INQG Big Idea: Planning Investigations Plan and implement different kinds of investigations, including field studies, systematic observations, models, and controlled Learning Target 1: There are different types of investigations: Observations and controlled experiments using models are one type. 4-5 INQB Success Criteria: I can differentiate between a controlled and noncontrolled investigation when given a scenario... Formative Assessment: Talking head scenarios Variables that affect our investigations can be biotic or abiotic. 4-5 INQB Success Criteria: I can identify 3 4 variables that could affect an investigation. Formative Assessment: Investigation 1 (student sheet 4 modified) labeling living and non-living and how the factors influence the terrarium investigation. Variables are controlled except the one manipulated variable. 4-5 INQ C Success Criteria: I can ask a question and conduct a fair experiment that identifies controlled, manipulated, and responding variables. Formative Assessment: Investigation 2: student sheet # 6 Animal Investigations Students white board which variables will be controlled, manipulated, and responding. Investigation 2, Part 4 Designing an Animal Investigation 4-5 INQD Success Criteria: I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. Formative Assessment: Investigation 1: Student Sheet #3 Terrarium Map Investigation 3: Student Sheet #10 Plant Observations, Student Sheet #12 Plant Profile Investigation 4: Student Sheet #14 Aquarium Log Success Criteria: I can use my evidence to write a conclusion. Formative Assessment: Complete: Writing a Conclusion in Science using data from Investigation 5 Student Sheet #17 Brine Shrimp Hatching AND/OR Investigation 6 Student Sheet #10 Plant Observations Response Sheet #18 Brine Shrimp Hatching Investigation 6: Student Sheet #9 Plant Experiment Setup Later big ideas that build on this big idea include: What questions do you have from this investigation and how could you design a further investigation to answer your question. Within a terrarium how are things co-dependent. Doing Science Keeley 2008 Investigation 6: Student Sheet #9 Plant Experiment Setup Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: FOSS Environments by Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Writing a Conclusion in Science Your conclusion summarizes how your results agree with (support) or do not agree with (contradict) your experimental prediction. Your conclusion does not tell whether you were right or wrong. 1. Restate your original prediction. Tell whether your results support or contradict your prediction, or are your results unclear (may need additional work). 2. Restate your specific data results and make the connection between your data and your original prediction. 3. Evaluate your procedure and explain how it was successful or not. 4. Suggest changes in the procedure and explain what further work could be done. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Plan and implement different kinds of investigations, including field studies, systematic observations, models, and controlled experiments. Formative Assessment Task Cover Sheet Learning Target #1 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Students decide which scenario they agree with from a Talking Heads sheet. Doing Science Keeley 2008 Teacher Background Investigation 1 Part 1 Learning Target 1: There are different types of investigations: Observations and controlled experiments using models are one type. Success Criteria: Differentiate between a controlled and non-controlled investigation when given a scenario. Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: yes Learning Target #2 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: (student sheet 4 WA - modified) labeling living and non-living and how the factors influence the terrarium investigation. Teacher Background Investigation 1 Learning Target 2: Variables that affect our investigations can be biotic or abiotic, and controlled or not controlled. - 4-5 INQ B Success Criteria: I can identify 3 4 variables that could affect an investigation. Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: no Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Plan and implement different kinds of investigations, including field studies, systematic observations, models, and controlled experiments. Learning Target #3 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Investigation 2: student sheet # 6 Animal Investigations Students white board which variables will be controlled, manipulated, and responding. Investigation 2, Part 4 Designing an Animal Investigation Investigation 6: Student Sheet #9 Plant Experiment Setup Teacher Background Investigation 2 and Investigation 6 Suggestions for Instructional Adjustments: The WA modified version is better but student sheet 6 from the kit will work too. Learning Target 3: A controlled experiment starts with a question from an observation. Variables are controlled except the one manipulated variable. - 4-5 INQ C Success Criteria: I can ask a question and conduct a fair experiment that identifies controlled, manipulated, and responding variables. Student Task Sheet Included: no Student Work Samples Included: no Learning Target #4 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Students transfer their raw data and observations to a table. Investigation 1: Student Sheet #3 Terrarium Map Teacher Background Investigation 1. Investigation 3, and Investigation 4 Investigation 3: Student Sheet #10 Plant Observations, Student Sheet #12 Plant Profile Investigation 4: Student Sheet #14 Aquarium Log Learning Target 4: Investigations involve systematic collection and recording of relevant observations and data. - 4-5 INQ D Success Criteria: I can measure and record my observations and organize my data on a table or chart. Student Task Sheet Included: no Student Work Samples Included: no Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

ENVIRONMENTS Big Idea: Plan and implement different kinds of investigations, including field studies, systematic observations, models, and controlled experiments. Learning Target #5 Assessment Task Details Brief Description of the Assessment Task: Complete: Writing a Conclusion in Science using data from Investigation 5 Student Sheet #17 Brine Shrimp Hatching AND/OR Investigation 6 Student Sheet #10 Plant Observations Teacher Background Investigation 5 and Investigation 6 Response Sheet #18 Brine Shrimp Hatching Investigation 6: Student Sheet #9 Plant Experiment Setup Learning Target 5: Generate a scientific conclusion based on data gathered. -4-5 INQ G Success Criteria I can use my evidence to write a conclusion. Student Task Sheet Included: yes Student Work Samples Included: no Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.

Environments Additional Information A useful supplementary video is The Mono Lake Story www.mono Lake.org/about/film Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B..

Environments Bibliography Dylan, William. Embedded Formative Assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree, 2011. Print. Keeley, Page, F. Eberle, and. Farrin. Uncovering Student Ideas in Science: 25 Formative Assessment Probes, Volume 1. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press, 2005. Print. Keeley, Page, F. Eberle, and J. Tugel. Uncovering Student Ideas in Science: 25 More Formative Assessment Probes, Volume 2. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press, 2007. Print. Keeley, Page. Science Formative Assessment: 75 Practical Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2008. Print. Keeley, Page, F. Eberle, and C. Dorsey. Uncovering Student Ideas in Science: Another 25 Formative Assessment Probes, Volume 3. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press, 2008. Print. Popham, W. James. Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2008. Print. Except where otherwise noted, Assessing with Learning Progressions in Science: Northwest Educational Service District 189 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This work is funded by the Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics & Science Partnership under Title II, Part B Program Code: 62CFDA 84.366B.