THE EFFECT OF TALKING STICK TO THE STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE IN SMKN 1 KEDIRI IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 ARTICLE

Similar documents
1. Drs. Agung Wicaksono, M.Pd. 2. Hj. Rika Riwayatiningsih, M.Pd. BY: M. SULTHON FATHONI NPM: Advised by:

THE INFLUENCE OF ENGLISH SONG TOWARD STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY AND STUDENTS MOTIVATION

Promoting Students Speaking Skill by Using Pair Taping to the Eleventh Grade Students of SMK PGRI Kayuagung

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS ENGLISH VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH PUZZLE GAME AT THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SDN 1 SODONG GUNUNGHALU

-Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce

By. Candra Pantura Panlaysia Dr. CH. Evy Tri Widyahening, S.S., M.Hum Slamet Riyadi University Surakarta ABSTRACT

The Impact of Formative Assessment and Remedial Teaching on EFL Learners Listening Comprehension N A H I D Z A R E I N A S TA R A N YA S A M I

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN NATURAL APPROACH AND QUANTUM LEARNING METHOD IN TEACHING VOCABULARY TO THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH CLUB AT SMPN 1 RUMPIN

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

The Implementation of Interactive Multimedia Learning Materials in Teaching Listening Skills

TEACHING VOCABULARY USING DRINK PACKAGE AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI 1 KREBET MASARAN SRAGEN IN 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

I. INTRODUCTION. for conducting the research, the problems in teaching vocabulary, and the suitable

IMPROVING SPEAKING SKILL OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK 17 AGUSTUS 1945 MUNCAR THROUGH DIRECT PRACTICE WITH THE NATIVE SPEAKER

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

LISTENING STRATEGIES AWARENESS: A DIARY STUDY IN A LISTENING COMPREHENSION CLASSROOM

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

DOES RETELLING TECHNIQUE IMPROVE SPEAKING FLUENCY?

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Syamsul Rizal Vera Fitria

The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of English Article Usage in L2 Writing

USING STORYTELLING FOR TEACHING VOCABULARY. By Farizawati. Universitas Jabal Ghafur, Sigli, Aceh ABSTRACT

THE INFLUENCE OF COOPERATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUE TO TEACH WRITING SKILL VIEWED FROM STUDENTS CREATIVITY

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SPEED READING TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 )

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Aas Samrotul Faidah¹ Metty Agustine Primary².

The Effects of Jigsaw and GTM on the Reading Comprehension Achievement of the Second Grade of Senior High School Students.

Effect of Cognitive Apprenticeship Instructional Method on Auto-Mechanics Students

IMPROVING STUDENTS READING COMPREHENSION USING FISHBONE DIAGRAM (A

TEACHING SPEAKING USING COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH AT THE SIXTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SDN 1 SODONG GUNUNGHALU

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Travis Park, Assoc Prof, Cornell University Donna Pearson, Assoc Prof, University of Louisville. NACTEI National Conference Portland, OR May 16, 2012

Research Journal ADE DEDI SALIPUTRA NIM: F

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE. together and language learning is supposed to happen. As stated by

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Language Acquisition Chart

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Improving Student s Listening Skill Using Task- Based Approach in EFL Classroom Setting

Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Prodi

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Monitoring Metacognitive abilities in children: A comparison of children between the ages of 5 to 7 years and 8 to 11 years

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Game-based formative assessment: Newton s Playground. Valerie Shute, Matthew Ventura, & Yoon Jeon Kim (Florida State University), NCME, April 30, 2013

THE EFFECT OF DEMONSTRATION METHOD ON LEARNING RESULT STUDENTS ON MATERIAL OF LIGHTNICAL PROPERTIES IN CLASS V SD NEGERI 1 KOTA BANDA ACEH

Textbook Evalyation:

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

USING STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENTS WRITING ABILITY

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

One Stop Shop For Educators

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Corresponding Author, Phone Number: Accepted on April 25, 2013 Academic Journal

Communication around Interactive Tables

STUDENT SATISFACTION IN PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION IN GWALIOR

THE STUDENTS RESPONSE TOWARD BIG STORY BOOK PROJECT (BSBP) IN TEACHING READING

DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR VOCABULARY FOR THE THIRD GRADERS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

COHESION USED IN NATIVE DEEN`S SONG LYRICS: ANALYSIS ON ITS GRAMMATICAL AND LEXICAL DEVICES THESIS. Sarjana Degree in English Education BY :

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

INCREASING STUDENTS ABILITY IN WRITING OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH PEER CORRECTION

Lecturing Module

DEVELOPING ENGLISH MATERIALS FOR THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF MARITIME VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Programme Specification

IMPROVING VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH LINKING WORDS GAME TO THE FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SDN 2 PETULU IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

THE ORAL PROFICIENCY OF ESL TEACHER TRAINEES IN DIFFERENT DISCOURSE DOMAINS

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Renny Afni Juita Mahdum Syafri. K

STUDENTS NEEDS ANALYSIS IN THECONTENT OF VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH TEXTBOOK. Sri Supiah Cahyati Cynantia Rahmijati, S.

A Decent Proposal for Bilingual Education at International Standard Schools/SBI in Indonesia

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Intensive Writing Class

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY AND SELF-EFFICACY IN THIRD LANGUAGE LEARNING VIA SECOND LANGUAGE UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

Transcription:

THE EFFECT OF TALKING STICK TO THE STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE IN SMKN 1 KEDIRI IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 ARTICLE Presented to Nusantara PGRI Kediri University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirement for The Bachelor Degree of Education In English Department By: MAY WULANSARY 11.1.01.08.0123 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF NUSANTARA PGRI KEDIRI ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

THE EFFECT OF TALKING STICK TO THE STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE IN SMKN 1 KEDIRI IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015 May Wulansary NPM 11.1.01.08.0123 Faculty of Teacher Training and Education - English amhoy.may@gmail.com Yuniksusanti, M.Pd. and Drs. Sugianto, M.Pd. UNIVERSITY OF NUSANTARA PGRI KEDIRI ABSTRACT May Wulansary : The Effect of Talking Stick to the Students Speaking Ability at the Eleventh Grade in SMKN 1 Kediri in Academic Year 2014/2015. Thesis, English Department, FKIP UNP Kediri,2015. Speaking is one of important skill in English because the main of most English learners is can communicate orally using English. This thesis investigate speaking is the big problem for students in learning English. The writer chooses Talking Stick as method to make students interested in studying and to improve their speaking ability. The research conducted here is quantitative. This research is in the area of experiment where the writer uses pre test-post test design. There are two variables, dependent variable, and independent variable. The dependent variable is students speaking ability and the independent variable is the Talking Stick method. The subject of the research was the eleventh grade students of SMKN 1 Kediri in Academic year 2014/2015.It consisted of 640 students, but in this research the researcher only took 27 students from XII TITL4 as the sample of the research by using clustering sampling. The result of the research shows that the mean of post-test (65,092) is higher than pre-test (51,944). It means that the students score is increasing. Furthermore, the result of the calculation then consulted to the value of t-table in accordance to the degree of freedom (df) 26 and level of significance 5% and the value is 1,706. The result shows that t-test (5,772) is > t-table (1,706). It means that null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. In conclusion, Talking Stick is an appropriate method to improve the students speaking ability. By used Talking Stick that give the students a big chance to express their opinion. Also, the English teacher should consider using Talking Stick as a method of teaching speaking to make the students interested in studying English. Key Terms:Talking Stick Method, Speaking Ability, and Teaching Speaking. I. INTRODUCTION Speaking is daily activity done by human being by involving their mouth that has the aim to communicate. According to Nunan in Mart (2012: 91) Speaking is a productive oral skill and it consists of producing systematic verbal utterances to convey meaning. (Nunan,2003,p.48). From Page 5

definition above speaking means expressing or sharing information to convey message between a speaker and listener. It can be concluded that speaking is expressing information to make listener understand what speaker wants and usually the speaker uses gesture to makes listener easy to get the point of information. Tarigan (1981:15) in Kusmaryati (2008: 4) states that speaking ability is a skill to communicate a speech articulation or to speak a talk for expressing an idea and a message. It means speaking ability is the skill to express an idea and a message. There are some characteristic of speaking according to Brown (2000:270): Clustering, redundancy, redecud forms, performance variables, colloquial language, rate of delivery, stress, rhythm, intonation, and interaction. According to Richard (2008: 21) speaking has three functions, at the first talk as interaction, talk as transaction, and talk as performance. There are six types of speaking, according to Brown (2000:271): Imitative, intensive, responsive, transactional, interpersonal, and extensive (monologue). A great deal of the language teacher s time and attention is devoted to assessing the progress pupils make or preparing them for public examinations. It means, the important of assessing speaking is for providing important information to the students and teachers about the progress made and the work that will done. According to Nunan (2003 : 21) speaking assessing has four basic criteria, they are valid, reliable, practically, and wash back/ instructional. According to Kayi (2006: 1) the meaning of teaching speaking is teach student to produce the English speech sounds and sound patterns uses word and sentence stress, intonation patterns,fluency and the rhythm of the second language and can select appropriate words and sentences according to the proper social setting, audience, situation and subject matter to expressing values and judgments. Based on the explanation above the teaching speaking is teach the students to can produce the English speech sound, and express their feeling confidently also make students can speak English well. According to Noviasari (2014:4) there are four kinds of method of teaching speaking: Think pair share, autonomous learning, meet the guest, and talking stick method. In this section, the researcher will describe about the definitions of talking stick and procedure of talking stick method. Fujioka (1998: 3) state the Talking Stick was a method used by native Americans, to let everyone speak their mind during a council meeting, a type of tribal meeting. Page 2

Based on the statement above the meaning of talking stick is everyone should have an opinion in their mind to share to the others in tribal meeting. It can be concluded that the talking stick is learning using stick, the stick passed one by one student with clockwise. Only the student who is holding the stick can talk and other students are silent. They can give opinion, response or comment. Procedure of talking stick method, Locust in Fujioka (1998:3) state only he can speak while he holds the stick, and the other council members must remain silent. It mean, the students who are holding stick can speak or give opinion and other member should be silent. II. METHOD The research design that is used in this study is quantitative research. The quantitative research uses pre-experimental design. The writer concludes that there are two kinds of variables in this researchis identified the Speaking Ability at the eleventh grade in SMKN 1 Kediri in Academic Year 2014/2015 as dependent variable andthe Effect of Talking Stick to the Students speaking ability as independent variable. The research was conducted insmkn 1 Kediri at the eleventh grade academic year 2015/2016 and it was conducted in second semester. The researcher only used pretest and post-test as the way for collecting the data. Pretest will be conducted before the researcher give treatments to the students and post-test will be conducted after the researcher give treatments to the students. The population in this research was students of the eleventh grade in SMKN 1 Kediri academic year 2014/2015. The sample of this research is the eleventh gradeof SMKN 1 Kediri as the population of the research. It has 20 classes, each class consist of 32 students. The numbers of students are 640. So, the numbers of population are 640 students. The researcher took the sample by using technique clustering and took one of eleventh classes that are XI TITL4, it consists of 29 students, 2 female and 27 male. The researcher collected the data from the subjects. It took for about a month to collect the data, and it was finished on May. In analyzing the data, t-test was used to prove the hypothesis and to know whether this research was significant or not by looking at the results of pre-test and posttest. Page 3

III. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION Based on the result showed about the process of pre-test, treatment, and post-test which had been applied on the eleventh grade students of SMKN 1 Kediri. The Description of Students Speaking Ability before Being Taught Using Talking Stick Method, students felt that their friends would look down andlaugh at them when they made mistakes. Some students, who did not take any English courses, thought that their ability was bad and did not have enough confidence to speak along with their friends. Another problem is that the students had poor grammar and pronunciation and most of learning materials of SMKN 1 Kediri were only taken from textbook.the researcher also provides the result of pre-test by using frequency diagram. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Frequency 20 30 x 31 41 Frequency of Pre-test 42 52 53 63 64 74 75 85 86 96 97 107 Pre-test Score of Speaking Pre-test is conducted to measure how far the progress of the students speaking ability before having treatment. From the score of the students above, it is known that mostly the student got unsatisfying score in students speaking ability in the speaking achievement. y Frequency 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Frequency of Post-test Post-test is conducted to measure how well the students speaking ability is increasing. From the diagram above, it can be seen that the total score which be turned out by 27 students is1757,5. The improvement of students speaking ability after being taught using Talking Stickmethod shown by the table below. Df (N-1) x 20 25 26 31 32 37 38 43 The Result of Data Analysis t-test 44 49 50 55 56 61 62 67 t-table 5% Significant H 0 26 5,772 1,706 Rejected 68 73 74 79 80 85 86 91 92 98 97 103 Post-Test Page 4

From the result analysis mentioned above, the computation of t-test was compared to t-table. If t-test was higher than t-table, the Null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted.the result of this research showed that t-test ( 5,772) > t-table 5% (1,706). So, it means that t-test was significant. And the Null Hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. IV. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS The conclusion is about The Effect of Talking Stick to the Students Speaking Ability at the Eleventh Grade in SMKN 1 Kediri in Academic Year 2014 /2015. Talking stick methodis a good method that gives the students a big chance to express their opinion or their idea freely.talking Stick method makes the students actively involved in the speaking class activity. There is interaction between teachers and students in learning process. By Talking Stick students become more independent and learning more fun. But, in 2013 Curriculum seems still on the process of upgrading to be perfect. So the researcher still used limited knowledge in case of she had limited guidance in doing teaching into 2013 curriculum steps and procedures. Finally, the suggestion is given for the teachers, for the students, and other researcher. There are the suggestions for the teacher who apply talking stick method. For applying Talking Stick method,teacher have to concern about the important things.first, teachers do monitoring to all of the students to work in big group.the teachers should manage the timing in preparationand do not be long playing music because it can disrupts concentration while the teacher want the student to have an optimal result. The other points when the teacher use this method is to test the students ability to read and understand quickly then speak with the same time.then, there are the suggestions for the students. The students have to participate actively during the teachinglearning process. The next suggestion when the teacher asks the student to express the opinion when the students hold stick.the student should respect when the other students roll the stick to make other student who get stick can sending information and give comment clearly.should enrich their knowledge and their vocabulary mastery by creating reading as habitual activity. Then, the other researchers are expected to be able to conduct a better research about Speaking Ability using Talking Stick. The researcher suggests that the other researcher would like to give more treatment to prove the effect of Page 5

Speaking Ability using Talking Stick since the researcher only conducted two treatments in this research. REFERENCES Akhyak, and Anik,I.2013.Improving the Students English Speaking Competence through Storytelling (Study in PangeranDiponegoro Islamic College(STAI) of Nganjuk,EastJava,Indonesia).Internat ional Journal of Language and Literature,(Online),1(2):18-24,available:http://ijllnet.com/journals/ijll/Vol_1_No_2_De cember_2013/3.pdf,downloaded April 2 nd 2015. Anggarini I.G.A,M.D,I Wyn.Sujana,I.B.Gd.Suryaabadi.2012. Pengaruh Model PembelajaranKooperatif Talking Stick Berbasis Aneka SumberTerdahapHasilBelajar IPS SiswaKelas V SD NegeriDalung.(Online), available:http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.i d/index.php/jjpgsd/article/download /1440/1301), downloaded October 30 th 2014. Arikunto,S.2010.ProsedurPenelitianSuatuP endekatanpraktik.jakarta: RinekaCipta. Ary, Donald. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education:Wadsworth. Bookfinder, (online), available in: en.bookfi.org, accessed on June, 15 th, 2015. Brown,H.D.2000.Teaching by Principle An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. (Online),available:http://www.greenbo okee.com/h-douglas-brown-teachingby-principle/), downloaded November 8 th 2014. Brown,H.D.2003.Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practice.(Online),available:http://ww w.slideshare.net/marcomed/languageassessmentprinciplesandclassroomprac tice#14337764474891&fbinitialized, downloaded April 16 Th 2015. Creswell,J.W.2012.Fourth Edition Educational Research Planning,Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.(Online).available:http://en. bookfi.org/book/1385822), downloaded December 28 th 2014. Fujioka,K.2010.Teaching Talking Stick :An American Indian Tradition in the ESL Classroom.The Internet TESL Journal.(Online) 4(9):-, available: http://iteslj.org/techniques/fujioka- TalkingStick.html),downloaded November 1 st 2014. Harmer,J.2007.How to Teach English New Edition (Ocelot Publishing, Oxford, with Helena Gomm, Eds.).Edinburgh Gate. Hasan,R,H.Ngatiyo.and H.Aunurrahman.2014.Penerapan Taling Stick untukmotivasibelajar Mata Pelajaran IPA Kelas III SDN 04 Pontianak.(Online).available:http://ju rnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/articl e/view/660, downloaded April 3 rd 2015. Kayi,H.2006.Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Page 6

Language.The Internet TESL Journal,(Online),12(11): -,available:,http://iteslj.org/techniques /Kayi-TeachingSpeaking.html downloaded April 2 nd 2015. Kusmaryati,S.E.2008.Improving English Speaking Ability through Classroom Discussion for Students of Ma Nu Banat Kudus in the Academic Year 2008/2009.(Online),available:http://w ww.scribd.com/doc/95851300/improvi ng-english-speaking-ability#scribd, downloaded April 16 Th 2015. Mart,C.T.2012.Developing Speaking Skill trough Reading.International Journal of English Linguistics,(Online),2(6):91-96,available:http://www.ccsenet.org/j ournal/index.php/ijel/article/viewfile/ 22597/14583.downloaded April 1 st 2015. Melendes,R.A.M,Gandy,G.Q.Z,and Rafael,F.M.2014.Teaching Speaking Strategies to Beginners.European Scientific Journal,(Online),1:548-554,available:http://eujournal.org/ind ex.php/esj/article/download/2864/269 2,downloaded April 1 st 2015. Noviasari,R,Ernawati,&Welya,R.2014.Teaching Speaking Through Talking Stick Method,3(5).(Online), available:http://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.i d/index.php?journal=jfkip&page=ar ticle&op=download&path%5b%5d= 2799&path%5B%5D=2419), downloaded October 30 th 2014. Nunan, D. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill ESL/ELT. Kathleen M. Bailey. 2001. Innovations in Rahayuningsih.2013.Improving Students Vocabulary Mastery through Talking Stick Method for the Second Grade Students of SMPN 3Salatiga in Academic Year of 2012/2013.(Online).available:http://e prints.iainsalatiga.ac.id/281/1/improvi ng%20student's%20vocabulary%20 Mastery%20through%20Talking%20 %20- %20STAIN%20SALATIGA.pdf.,do wnloaded April 2 nd 2015. Richards,J.C.2008.Teaching Listening and Speaking From Theory to Practice.(Online).available: http://www.cambridge.org/other_files /downloads/esl/booklets/richards- Teaching-Listening- Speaking.pdf),downloaded December 23 th 2014. Sudarminah,S.2009.UpayaPeningkatanPem belajaranberbicaradengan Model PembelajaranGambar Seri untuksiswakelas VII.LEMLIT Journal,(Online),3(2):45-52,available:http://ejurnal.upgrismg.ac.id/index.php/medi apenelitianpendidikan/article/downloa d/292/259, downloaded April 2 nd 2015. Thornbury Scott.2005.How to Teach Speaking.(Online),available:http://ww w.slideshare.net/fauzanbachrie /how-to-teach-speaking-36519375, downloaded April 16 Th 2015. Zakiah, EniRosnija,&ZainalArifin.2013.Impr oving Students Speaking Frequency through Talking Stick.(Online).available:http://downlo ad.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article =147698&val=2338&title=IMPROVI NG%20STUDENTS%C3%A2%E2% 82%AC%E2%84%A2%20SPEAKIN Page 7

G%20FREQUENCY%20THROUGH %20TALKING%20STICK,downloaded April 1 st 2015. Page 8