Plan for Continuous Improvement (PCI) Virginia Beach City Public Schools Compass to 2020: Charting the Course

Similar documents
K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

African American Male Achievement Update

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Positive Learning Environment

Comprehensive Progress Report

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Clark Lane Middle School

Strategic Plan Dashboard

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

SY School Performance Plan

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

The State and District RtI Plans

CDS Code

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Improvement Plan

Academic Intervention Services (Revised October 2013)

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

RESIDENCE DON APPLICATION

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Hokulani Elementary School

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Gifted & Talented. Dyslexia. Special Education. Updates. March 2015!

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

School Leadership Rubrics

School Improvement Plan

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

Executive Summary. Vicenza Elementary School

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

What are some common test misuses?

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

SMALL GROUPS AND WORK STATIONS By Debbie Hunsaker 1

Applying Florida s Planning and Problem-Solving Process (Using RtI Data) in Virtual Settings

International: Three-Year School Improvement Plan to September 2016 (Year 2)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

ÉCOLE MANACHABAN MIDDLE SCHOOL School Education Plan May, 2017 Year Three

The unexamined life is not worth living. ~ Socrates

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC ADVANC-ED ACCREDITATION

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

Strategic Improvement Plan

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Wellness Committee Action Plan. Developed in compliance with the Child Nutrition and Women, Infant and Child (WIC) Reauthorization Act of 2004

Eye Level Education. Program Orientation

World s Best Workforce Plan

NC Global-Ready Schools

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

Pyramid. of Interventions

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

University of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Sancta Maria Catholic Primary School

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

SOUTH DOWNS PRIMARY SCHOOL 2017 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

MERGA 20 - Aotearoa

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Geographic Area - Englewood

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

BERGEN ARTS AND SCIENCE CHARTER SCHOOL

SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Peter Johansen High School

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

Peninsula School. District Strategic Plan Dashboard. Slide 1.

Oakland Terrace School For The Visual And Performing Arts

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Safe & Civil Schools Series Overview

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Mooresville Charter Academy

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Rita Edwards Miller School

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

The Single Plan for Student Achievement

Saskatchewan Ministry of Education

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

Big Ideas Math Grade 6 Answer Key

ACIP. Matthews Elementary School

Transcription:

School: Diamond Springs Elementary School Year(s): 2015-2017 (2 year plan) Date of Plan: VBCPS Goals 1. High Academic Expectations (Literacy and Numeracy) Compass to 2020 2. Multiple Pathways (Approach to personalized learning) 3. Social Emotional Development (SE learning strategies, RSN behavior) 4. Culture of Growth & Excellence (Build capacity of staff) At Diamond Springs Elementary, we work and play in a pro-active way. School Mission Data Summary Describe in detail the items selected for inclusion (Reading, Math, Discipline, Graduation Rate, Academics, Attendance, etc.) Reading: Our 2015/2016 goal was for 95% of Kindergarten students to be at or above a DRA2 Independent Level 3 by the end of the year. 96.1% of Kindergarten students were at or above a DRA2 Independent Level 3 by the end of the school year. Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3-4 Level 6 or above 4 7 139 131 1.4% 2.5% 49.5% 46.6% 281 students For First Grade students, our 2015/2016 goal was for 90% of students to be at a DRA2 Independent Level 16 by the end of the school year. 88.9% of First Grade students were at a DRA2 Independent Level 16 or above. Level 12 or below Level 14 Level 16-20 Level 24 or above 9 23 168 87 3.1% 8% 58.6% 30.3% 287 Students Math: Our goal in Math for the 2015/2016 school year was for 90% of First Grade students to score 85% or above on the end-of-the-year Math Assessment. 88% of students scored an 85% or above on the assessment. Therefore, we missed our goal by 2%. 2015-2016 BOY 44% average 2015-2016 Mid- 75% average Year 2015-2016 Endof-Year 88% average Page 1 of 12

Discipline: Our goal for the 2015/2016 school year was 92% of Kindergarten and First Grade students to demonstrate good citizenship by receiving a P or AP in Citizenship on the 4 th Quarter report card. 84.4% of Kindergarten students and 96.5% of First Grade students reached the goal. The overall percentage for both grades was 90%. Therefore, we missed our goal by 2%. Kindergarten Fourth Quarter Report Card 2015/2016 N DP P AP 10 34 148 89 3.5% 12.1% 52.7% 31.7% 281 First Grade Fourth Quarter Report Card 2015/2016 N DP P AP 2 8 176 101.7% 2.8% 61.3% 35.2% 287 Student Learning Outcomes Literacy Numeracy Choice SMART Goals Kindergarten: By June of 2016, 95% or more of Kindergarten students will be reading at an independent DRA2 Level 3/instructional DRA2 level 4 or above. First Grade: By June of 2016, 90% or more of First Grade students will reading at an independent DRA2 Level 16/instructional DRA2 level 18 or above. Kindergarten: By June of 2017, 95% or more of Kindergarten students will be reading at or above an independent DRA2 Level 3/instructional DRA 2 level 4. First Grade: By June of 2017, 90% or more of First Grade students will reading at or above an independent DRA2 Level 16/instructional DRA2 level 18. First Grade: By June of 2016, 90% or more of First Grade students will score 85% or higher on the end-of-the-year Math Assessment. Kindergarten: By June of 2017, 90% of Kindergarten students will score between 12 and 14 points (with 14 points being the maximum score) on end-of-the year math section of the EDK assessment. First Grade: By June of 2017, 90% or more of First Grade students will score 85% or higher on the end-of-the-year Math assessment. Discipline: For the 2015/2016 4 th Quarter Report Card, 92% of Kindergarten and First Grade students will demonstrate good citizenship as evidenced by an average of P (Proficient) or above (AP -Advanced Proficient) in citizenship. Page 2 of 12

Kindergarten: For the 2016/2017 4 th Quarter Report Card, 90% of Kindergarten students will demonstrate good citizenship as evidenced by a P (Proficient) or above (AP Advanced Proficient) in Citizenship. First Grade: For the 2016/2017 4 th Quarter Report Card, 95% of First Grade students will demonstrate good citizenship as evidenced by a P (Proficient) or above (AP Advanced Proficient) in Citizenship. Page 3 of 12

Duplicate and increase as necessary to address each of the Goal areas. Literacy: Intermediate Measures (i.e. Reading Quarterly Assessments, DRA, SRI) DRA2 - Developmental Reading Assessment Imagine Learning Reports Report Card Data PALs Assessment EDK - Extended Day Kindergarten Assessment Strategies Literacy work stations VBCPS Teaching and Learning Framework Collaboration Analysis of student work and report cards Individualized Teacher Support ImagineLearning program Student goal-setting Tiered Support (students) Inquiry stations integrating technology Numeracy: Intermediate Measures (i.e. Math Quarterly Assessments, Exemplars, SMI) Comprehensive Math Assessments (First Grade) Report Card Data Common Summative Assessments Exemplars EDK Extended Day Kindergarten Assessment TenMarks Assessments (Grade One) Strategies Math work stations Small group instruction Collaboration Analysis of student work and report cards Problem-solving exemplars Math strategies and activities during morning announcements Individualized Teacher Support TenMarks program Tiered Support (students) Inquiry stations integrating technology Choice: Intermediate Measures (i.e. Monthly Discipline Data, Attendance Data, Graduation Rate) Report Card Citizenship Grades Number of referrals Monthly discipline data Citizenship Scoreboards Strategies Leader in Me program Distinguished Young Gentlemen s Club Young Ladies of Excellence Club Student goal-setting Student Response Team to include Behavior Support Team Page 4 of 12

State Goal: Students will meet or exceed the SOL pass rate of 75% for English (Reading) VBCPS/Division Goal: High Academic Expectations (Literacy) SMART Goal: : By June of 2017, 95% of Kindergarten students will be reading at an independent DRA2 Level 3, and 90% of First Grade students will reading at an independent DRA2 Level 16. Action Steps (List each action step on a separate line) Literacy Work Stations: Continue to create and use literacy work stations daily in classrooms to complement whole group instruction and differentiate small group instruction Teaching and Learning Framework: Continue to use the Framework during weekly collaborative sessions Collaboration: Teachers will continue to participate in twice a month collaboration sessions and monthly PLCs using the state standards, VBCPS curriculum and pacing guides to plan instruction and assessment Analysis of Student Work and Report Cards: Student work and report card data will continued to be reviewed during PLCs and collaboration to analyze strengths and weaknesses and to develop instructional strategies based upon findings Individualized Teacher Support: /instructional coaches will continue to meet with select teachers Timeline (List month and year to start addressing action step) Person(s) Responsible Teachers Teachers, ITS, LMS, Teachers, ITS, LMS,, Teachers, ITS, LMS, Gifted Resource Specialists Teachers, Action Step Completed (List month and year) Professional Development (Provide a brief description of PD needs) Teachers, and Classroom Teachers will share ideas and plans for classroom work stations Debbie Diller Growing Independent Learners book study Fall 2016 Weekly Collaboration Meetings Session with Teaching and Learning to train staff in the analysis of student work -TBD Page 5 of 12

whose students demonstrate proficiency below grade level standards to analyze data, discuss strategies and promote learning Imagine Learning: Students will continue to use Imagine Learning 4 times per week for personalized instruction to strengthen reading skills. Quarterly reports will be utilized for differentiation and reinforcement. Student Goal-Setting: Continue with goal-setting and student-led conferences to establish reading goals and to track individual progress in writing and oral language Tiered Support: Identified students will be supported by instructional staff through small group instruction Inquiry Stations: Development and implementation of personalized learning stations to develop critical thinking December 2016 ITS, Teachers, Classroom teachers, Teachers, Classroom teachers, ITS, LMS, Gifted Resource Specialists, Continue with monthly training with Lighthouse Team DO CHECK Action Plan Review Cycle: Findings Based on Review of the Action Plan (Describe progress made toward meeting the goal based on the immediate measures) DRA2 Data 2016/2017 Beginning of the Year Scores Kindergarten Level Pre A Level Level 2 A/1 92 114 22 11 38% 48% 9% 5% 239 students Level 3 or above Adjustments or Improvements (Describe any changes to the plan that may be necessary for progress to be made toward meeting the goal) Page 6 of 12

First Grade Level 3 or under Plan for Continuous Improvement (PCI) Level 4 Level 6-8 Level 10 or above 82 62 50 73 31% 23% 19% 27% 267 students EDK Beginning of the Year Data Kindergarten Only Score 0-50 51-100 101-121 # of Students 98 139 19 Percentage 38% 54% 8% 256 students tested PALs Beginning of the Year Data 258 Kindergarten students tested 33 or 13% identified 32 First Grade students tested 5 or 16% identified State Goal: Students will meet or exceed the SOL pass rate of 70% for Mathematics VBCPS/Division Goal: High Academic Expectations (Numeracy) SMART Goal: By June of 2017, 90% of First Grade students will score 85% or higher on the end-of-the-year Math Assessment. Action Steps (List each action step on a separate line) Math Work Stations: Continue to create and use math work stations daily to complement whole group instruction and differentiate small group learning Small Group Instruction: Continue daily small group Timeline (List month and year to start addressing action step) Person(s) Responsible Math Specialists, Math Specialists, Action Step Completed (List month and year) Professional Development (Provide a brief description of PD needs) Math Coach and Classroom Teachers will share ideas and plans for classroom work stations Page 7 of 12

instruction for differentiation Collaboration: Teachers will continue to participate in twice a month collaboration sessions and monthly PLCs using the state standards, VBCPS curriculum and pacing guides to plan instruction and assessment Analysis of Student Work and Report Card Data: Student work and report card data will continued to be reviewed during PLCs and collaboration to analyze strengths and weaknesses and to develop instructional strategies based upon findings Math Exemplars: Continue to utilize math exemplars at least once a month to develop problem-solving skills Morning Announcement Math Mini-lessons: Continue math mini-lessons presented twice a week during morning announcements Individualized Teacher Support: /instructional coaches will continue to meet with select teachers whose students demonstrate proficiency below grade level standards to analyze data, discuss strategies and promote learning Ten Marks: Students will continue to use Ten Marks for personalized learning to develop math skills Tiered Support: Identified students will be supported by instructional staff November 2016 Math Specialists, ITS,, Math Specialists, ITS, LMS, Gifted Resource Specialists Math Specialists, Gifted Resource Specialists, Math Specialists, Math Specialists, Math Specialists, ITS, Classroom teachers, Math Specialists, Page 8 of 12

through small group instruction Inquiry Stations: Development and implementation of personalized learning stations to develop critical thinking December 2016 Classroom teachers, ITS, LMS, math Specialists, Gifted Resource Specialists, DO CHECK Action Plan Review Cycle: Findings Based on Review of the Action Plan (Describe progress made toward meeting the goal based on the immediate measures) EDK Data: 259 kindergarten students took the EDK at the beginning of the school year. At this time, 7 out of 259 students, or 2.7% of students, have achieved a score of 12 or above (out of 14 possible points) on the math portion of the EDK. BOY Mid-Year End-of- Year 12 or above 7 Total Number of Students 259 Percentage Meeting EOY Goal 2.7 % Adjustments or Improvements (Describe any changes to the plan that may be necessary for progress to be made toward meeting the goal) First Grade Math Benchmark Data: The baseline assessment was administered to 265 first grade students in. The overall average for all students was 29.3%. Only 1 student scored above an 85%. The vast majority of the students scored between 10% and 39% correct, which represents 212, or 80%of the students. Page 9 of 12

Students scoring 85% or above Total Number of Students Percentage of Students Meeting EOY Goal BOY Mid-Year End-of- Year 1 265 0.03% A very significant percent of the students (96%) do not understand the concept of equality. The next most missed questions involved understanding and recording fractional parts at 93%. Also a large portion of the students (92%) were unable to count coins. Lastly, the data shows a large percentage of the students (90%) cannot tell time proficiently at this time. State Goal: N/A VBCPS/Division Goal: Social-Emotional Development SMART Goal: For the 2016/2017 4 th Quarter Report Card, 90% of Kindergarten and 95% of First Grade students will demonstrate good citizenship as evidenced by an average of P(Proficient) or above (AP-Advanced Proficient) in citizenship Action Steps (List each action step on a separate line) Leader in Me Program: Continue Leader in Me program to teach leadership skills through the 7 Habits and Citizenship Scoreboards will be used to track and document progress Timeline (List month and year to start addressing action step) Person(s) Responsible Lighthouse Team, Action Step Completed (List month and year) Professional Development (Provide a brief description of PD needs) Facilitators will participate in on-line training Leader in Me Book Study-Monthly Meetings-Teams will present each chapter Page 10 of 12

Distinguished Young Gentlemen and Young Ladies of Excellence Clubs: Continue monthly meetings to teach social skills and acceptance of others Student Goal-Setting: Continue with goalsetting and student-led conferences to establish citizenship goals and to track individual progress in behavior Student Response Team: Continue to support teachers to identify behaviors needing correction and design plans to address and improve inappropriate, repetitive behaviors August 2016 DYG and YLOE Team Leaders, Guidance Counselor, SRT members, SRT Training August 2016, Winter 2016/2017, March 2017 DO CHECK Action Plan Review Cycle: Findings Based on Review of the Action Plan (Describe progress made toward meeting the goal based on the immediate measures) Citizenship 1 st Quarter 1 st Grade Citizenship Scores Quarter 1 N DP P AP 3 20 174 65 1.2% 7.6% 66.4% 24.8% 262 students 91.2% of first grade students received a P or AP in Citizenship for the 1 st Quarter. Adjustments or Improvements (Describe any changes to the plan that may be necessary for progress to be made toward meeting the goal) Kindergarten Citizenship Scores Quarter 1 N DP P AP 1 18 159 61.5% 7.5% 66.5% 25.5% Page 11 of 12

239 students 92% of kindergarten students received a P or AP in Citizenship for the 1 st Quarter. Page 12 of 12