Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Plan Questions Resource Bundle

Similar documents
Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Textbook Chapter Analysis this is an ungraded assignment, however a reflection of the task is part of your journal

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Lecturing for Deeper Learning Effective, Efficient, Research-based Strategies

Language Acquisition Chart

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

MOTION PICTURE ANALYSIS FIRST READING (VIEWING)

Quality teaching and learning in the educational context: Teacher pedagogy to support learners of a modern digital society


Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

Missouri Mathematics Grade-Level Expectations

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Page 1 of 11. Curriculum Map: Grade 4 Math Course: Math 4 Sub-topic: General. Grade(s): None specified

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

Working with Rich Mathematical Tasks

Integrating Blended Learning into the Classroom

learning collegiate assessment]

Should I Use ADDIE as a Design Map for My Blended Course?

Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade

Co-teaching in the ESL Classroom

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Timeline. Recommendations

METHODS OF INSTRUCTION IN THE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL Math 410, Fall 2005 DuSable Hall 306 (Mathematics Education Laboratory)

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Radius STEM Readiness TM

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Growth of empowerment in career science teachers: Implications for professional development

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA COE COURSE SYLLABUS TEMPLATE

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

The My Class Activities Instrument as Used in Saturday Enrichment Program Evaluation

new research in learning and working

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

First Grade Standards

Relating Math to the Real World: A Study of Platonic Solids and Tessellations

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

AP Statistics Summer Assignment 17-18

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Common Core State Standards

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

COMM 210 Principals of Public Relations Loyola University Department of Communication. Course Syllabus Spring 2016

An Asset-Based Approach to Linguistic Diversity

Answer Key For The California Mathematics Standards Grade 1

The Use of Metacognitive Strategies to Develop Research Skills among Postgraduate Students

Copyright Corwin 2015

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Active Learning a pathfinder guide to active learning resources Developed by Roberta (Robin) Sullivan

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

How to Read the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Epistemic Cognition. Petr Johanes. Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale

Guest Editorial Motivating Growth of Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching: A Case for Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics

Montana Content Standards for Mathematics Grade 3. Montana Content Standards for Mathematical Practices and Mathematics Content Adopted November 2011

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

SOLUTION-FOCUSED (S.F.) COUNSELLING AT AN INNER CITY SCHOOL, LONDON UK Reflection, Results and Creativity

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Running Head: Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model 1. Implementing Articulate Storyline using the ADDIE Model.

Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

Tests For Geometry Houghton Mifflin Company

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

Running head: THE INTERACTIVITY EFFECT IN MULTIMEDIA LEARNING 1

Understanding Language

Transcription:

Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Plan Questions Resource Bundle I. Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Plan Questions Resource II. III. IV. How to Task Analyze an Objective Supplement Creating Questions Content Area Examples Supplement References Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Plan Questions Resource (Back to Table of Contents) Level of Thinking Instructional Situations What Students Will Do Question Stems What would happen if? Create When a teacher wants students to synthesize information or material to form a new idea, concept, or product. Construct, design, develop, formulate, generate, hypothesize, invent, plan, produce, propose test? Can you propose an alternative? What would be a new way to? How might we prove or confirm? plan to research? Would it be better if? Why? What changes would you suggest for? Evaluate When a teacher wants students to develop or apply criteria in order to make a judgment or determination. Assess, check, critique, defend, determine, judge, justify, rate How effective is? Why? determine? What choice would you have made? Why? Do you agree with? Why or why not? What evidence supports the view that? Analyze When a teacher wants students to examine how the parts of a work relate to one another and to the whole. When a teacher wants students to infer what s not explicitly stated. Categorize, classify, differentiate, organize, infer, provide evidence, sort, take apart What is the relationship between and? What might you infer? What is the main idea or theme? What evidence supports? What conclusions can you draw about? categorize Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

Level of Thinking Instructional Situations What Students Will Do Types of Question Stems carry out? solve? Apply When a teacher wants students to carry out a task or perform a procedure. Carry out, execute, implement, solve, use What would be an example of? organize? What questions could be asked about? What approach or strategy would you use to? How would this concept apply to? state that in your own words? Understand When a teacher wants students to construct meaning, or build connections between new knowledge and prior knowledge. Compare, classify, demonstrate, explain, interpret, show an example, summarize, translate summarize? distinguish between? How is similar to? explain? What is an example of? What problem are we trying to solve? What is? Where is? Remember When a teacher wants students to retrieve relevant knowledge from long-term memory. Identify, list, match, memorize, name, recall, recognize When did happen? Who were? What is the definition of? How many? Can you name the? Is true or false? Informed by Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218; Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2005). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

How to Task-Analyze an Objective Supplement (Back to Table of Contents) It s important to understand how to task-analyze an objective in order to identify the levels of thinking students must use in order to master it. Here are some suggested steps for task-analyzing an objective. Step 1: List the tasks students will need to complete in order to reach the objective. Step 2: Identify the levels of thinking associated with these tasks. Step 3: Determine the highest level of thinking required by the objective. Example A: Secondary English Task-Analysis of Objective Objective: Evaluate the argument and specific claims in a newspaper editorial. REMEMBER LEVEL Recognize key characteristics of a newspaper editorial. UNDERSTAND LEVEL Interpret the opinion of the editorial. ANALYZE LEVEL Infer what s not explicitly stated to examine author s intent. EVALUATE LEVEL Determine the credibility of editorial based on facts and evidence. Explanation Based on this objective, first students will need to recognize the key characteristics of a newspaper editorial (e.g. based on opinion, supports one side of an issue, supported by facts and evidence). Next, they will need to identify and interpret the opinion of the editorial. This is understand level thinking. They may also need to infer what s not explicitly stated in order to examine the author s intent, which is analyze level thinking. Finally, they will need to determine if the editorial is credible that is, whether it is backed up with facts and evidence to substantiate the opinion. This is evaluate level thinking. The highest level of thinking required by this objective is evaluate. Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

Example B: Upper elementary science Task-Analysis of Objective Objective: Compute the value of variables using the scientific formula for density. REMEMBER LEVEL Recall the meaning of variable, scientific formula, density, mass and volume. UNDERSTAND LEVEL Interpret the scientific formula for density (D = M/V). APPLY LEVEL (reaches objective) Solve for density using the formula provided. Explanation Based on this objective, first students will need to recall the meaning of the terms variables, scientific formula, and density. This is remember level thinking. Next, they will need to interpret what the variables mean in the scientific formula for density. This is understand level thinking. Finally, they will need to solve for density using the formula provided, which is apply level thinking. The highest level of thinking required by this objective is apply. Example C: Lower elementary technology Task-Analysis of Objective Objective: Determine key words and use them in an information search. REMEMBER LEVEL Recall what key words are. UNDERSTAND LEVEL Explain how key words help search for information. APPLY LEVEL Carry out informational searches using key words. Explanation Based on this objective, first students will need to recall what key words are. This is remember level thinking. Next, they will need to explain how key words help search for information. This is understand level thinking. Finally, they will need to carry out information searches using key words, which is apply level thinking. The highest level of thinking required by this objective is apply. Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

Creating Questions Content Area Examples Supplement (Back to Table of Contents) Refer to each content-area example to see how a sequence of questions can be developed to target different levels of thinking. Each example has the following information: Sample national standard. An objective that corresponds to it. A set of questions that scaffold toward and extend beyond the level of thinking required by the objective. The level of thinking required by the objective is in blue. The content-area, grade-level specific examples are hyperlinked for your convenience. ART Elementary (Back) MUSIC Elementary (Back) ENGLISH Secondary (Back) P.E. Secondary (Back) LANGUAGE ARTS Elementary (Back) SCIENCE Elementary (Back) MATH Elementary (Back) SCIENCE Secondary (Back) MATH Secondary (Back) SOCIAL STUDIES Secondary (Back) Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

ART Elementary (Back) Standard: Visual Arts: Cr1.1.5a Combine ideas to generate an innovative idea for art-making. Objective: I can create a hybrid animal using a variety of art mediums. Which two animals will you choose for your hybrid animal? How do the two animals compare? What strategy will you use to combine the two animals? What colors will make your hybrid more or less realistic? How will you determine what materials you need to make the hybrid? How will you create the hybrid animal? ENGLISH Secondary (Back) Standard: CCSS, Grades 9-10: Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. Objective: I can form an argument for or against the use of curfews using valid reasoning and sufficient evidence. What is a curfew? How do curfew policies in big cities compare to those in rural neighborhoods? Use brainstorming strategies to outline an argument for or against curfews. What can we infer from differences in curfew policies? argue for or against curfews? What is a proposed alternative to the current curfew policy in your community? Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

LANGUAGE ARTS Elementary (Back) Standard: CCSS for ELA, Grade 3: Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, descriptive details and clear event sequences. Objective: I can compose an original narrative that demonstrates all the necessary elements of a narrative. What is a narrative? What are some examples of narratives you ve read? Why do authors write narratives? What is the relationship between the plot and the setting of a story? How do you determine the quality of a narrative? How will you write an original story that demonstrates all elements of a good narrative? MATH Elementary (Back) Standard: NCTM-Measurement: Explore what happens to measurements of a two-dimensional shape such as its perimeter and area when the shape is changed in some way. Objective: I can prove how changes to a shape affect its perimeter and area. What is perimeter? What is area? What are the perimeters and areas of these two shapes? How do the perimeters and areas of these two shapes compare? If you increase the width of a rectangle by 2 units, what happens to the area and perimeter? Which floor plan provides a larger seating capacity? Why? design a floor plan that meets the needs of your client? Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

MATH Secondary (Back) Standard: NCTM- Algebra: Interpret representations of functions of two variables. Objective: I can explain the functions of variables in mathematical equations. What is a variable? What is the function of a variable? Give an example. solve for one of the variables? What does each variable represent? Give evidence. determine the value of these two variables? What if one variable was negative? How would that change the function of the other variable? MUSIC Elementary (Back) Standard: MU: Cr3.2.E.8a. Share personally-developed melodies and rhythmic passages individually or as an ensemble that demonstrate understanding of characteristics of music or texts studied in rehearsal. Objective: I can compose a melody that demonstrates my understanding of music. What is melody? What is rhythm? How can you determine how many beats are in a measure? How do you play a staccato note? How can you differentiate a melody from a harmony? What criteria determines the merit of a composition? How will you compose a new melody? Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

P.E. Secondary (Back) Standard: S5.H2.L2. Chooses an appropriate level of challenge to experience success and desire to participate in a self-selected physical activity. Objective: I can develop criteria to determine my success with an appropriate physical activity that is challenging and desirable. What are some physical activities you like to do? What are the benefits of these physical activities? How do you perform these physical activities? What are the criteria for choosing an appropriate physical activity level one that is both challenging and desirable? How will you determine if you experienced success with your selfselected physical activity? plan three months of desirable and challenging physical activity? SCIENCE Elementary (Back) Standard: NGSS 3-ESS3-1 Make a claim about the merit of a design solution that reduces the impact of a weather-related hazard. Objective: I can measure the effectiveness of flood prevention methods. What is a weatherrelated hazard? What are some examples of weather-related hazards? How could you prevent a flood? What evidence supports the effectiveness of different flood prevention methods? Which flood prevention method is more effective? design a campaign to prevent flooding? Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

SCIENCE Secondary (Back) Standard: NGSS HS-ESS3-3. Create a computational simulation to illustrate the relationships among management of natural resources, the sustainability of human populations, and biodiversity. Objective: I can create a proposal for a new waste disposal plan to present to the local city council. What is waste? What are some examples of waste disposal? How can we improve our waste disposal practices? Which area of waste disposal needs the most improvement? What criteria will you use to determine the effectiveness of a new waste disposal solution? propose a new waste disposal plan to the local city council? SOCIAL STUDIES Secondary (Back) Standard: D2.Geo.6.9-12. Evaluate the impact of human settlement activities on the environmental and cultural characteristics of specific places and regions. Objective: I can assess the positive and negative impacts of commercial properties on national parks. What are some commercial properties in your neighborhood? How do companies decide where to locate commercial properties? What approach could a city use to decide how to allocate land for commercial properties? Why do developers locate commercial properties near tourist attractions? determine the positive/negative impact of commercial properties on national parks? Produce an advertisement to support or reject commercial properties in national parks. Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org

Using Bloom s Taxonomy to Plan Questions References (Back to Table of Contents) Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York, NY: Longman. Brookfield, S.D & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc. Caram, D., & Davis, P.B. (2005). Inviting student engagement with questioning. Kappa Delta Pi Delta Record, 42(N1), 18-23. Cazden, C.B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Crowe, M., & Stanford, B. (2010). Questioning for quality. Delta Kappa Gamma, 76(4), 36-44. Feldhusen, J. (1994). Thinking skills and curriculum development. In J. VanTassel-Baska, (Ed.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (pp. 301-324). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Gioroukakis, V. & Cohan, A. (2014). Common core, common language: Reforming instructional questioning. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(4), 12-18. Hannel, G.I., & Hannel, L. (2005). Highly effective questioning, 4 th ed. Phoenix, AZ: Hannel Educational Consulting. Hess, K.K., Jones, B.S., Carlock, D., & Walkup, J.R. (2009). Cognitive rigor: Blending the strengths of Bloom s Taxonomy and Webb s depth of knowledge to enhance classroom-level processes. Oklahoma: ERIC. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. Milman, N.B. (2014). Crafting the right online discussion questions using the revised Bloom s Taxonomy as a framework. Distance Learning, 11(4), 17-20. Serafini, F. (2009). Interactive comprehension strategies: Fostering meaningful talk about text. New York, NY: Scholastic. Teinken, C.H., Goldberg, S., & DiRocco, D. (2010). Questioning the questions. Education Digest, 75(9), 28-32. Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2005). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Wilson, N.S., & Smetana, L. (2009). Questioning as thinking: A metacognitive framework. Middle School Journal, 41(2), 20-28. Copyright 2017 Arizona Board of Regents, All rights reserved SanfordInspireProgram.org