T

Similar documents
Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Newlands Girls School

Eastbury Primary School

Putnoe Primary School

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

Oasis Academy South Bank

Knowle DGE Learning Centre. PSHE Policy

5 Early years providers

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

The Waldegrave Trust Waldegrave School, Fifth Cross Road, Twickenham, TW2 5LH TEL: , FAX:

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

EXAMINATIONS POLICY 2016/2017

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Head of Maths Application Pack

Upper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

The Holy Cross School Behaviour Policy & Procedure

Archdiocese of Birmingham

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

SELF-ASSESSMENT EXTREMISM & RADICALISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

MINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SIR WILLIAM RAMSAY SCHOOL HELD AT THE SCHOOL ON WEDNESDAY 23 FEBRUARY 2017 AT 7.00 P.M.

Inspection report British International School

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Liverpool Hope University ITE Partnership Handbook

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

St Matthew s RC High School

Subject Inspection in Technical Graphics and Design and Communication Graphics REPORT

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

We seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community.

Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND) Policy

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

MATHS Required September 2017/January 2018

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

Whole School Evaluation REPORT. St. Colmcille s NS Inistioge, Co. Kilkenny Roll No. : 17073V

NATIONAL MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR BOARDING SCHOOLS WELSH ASSEMBLY GOVERNMENT

MOESAC MEDIUM TERM PLAN

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK

Special Educational Needs School Information Report

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

PGCE Trainees' Handbook (With Post-16 Enhancement)

East Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

Dr Marios Panteli (EdD) Deputy Primary Headteacher, Teacher Trainer and External Collaborator with the PIC

Collegiate Academies Response to Livingston School Facility RFA Submitted January 23, 2015

Training Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

Positive Learning Environment

Inspection report The British School of Kuwait

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

School Improvement Plan

Subject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT. Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J

Transcription:

Ofsted Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted 21 December 2017 Mr Paul Brockwell Headteacher Graham School Woodlands Drive Scarborough North Yorkshire YO12 6QW Dear Mr Brockwell No formal designation inspection of Graham School Following my visit with Patricia Head, Ofsted Inspector, to your school on 12 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty s Chief Inspector of Education, Children s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty s Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements at the school. Evidence Inspectors scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements and met with you, other senior leaders, staff, pupils, governors, a representative of the local authority and the executive principal of the Yorkshire Teaching School Alliance (YTSA). Inspectors also evaluated external reviews, your school s self-evaluation and post- Ofsted action plan, safer recruitment procedures, records of staff training, risk assessments and attendance and behaviour records. Inspectors conducted a review of the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum and how it links to issues of safety and pupils welfare. Inspectors also took account of the 124 responses to Ofsted s online questionnaire, Parent View. Together, we conducted visits to a number of classrooms and inspectors observed the behaviour of pupils during lunchtime and break time.

Having considered the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time: Safeguarding is effective Context Graham School was inspected in May 2017 and it was judged to require special measures, with safeguarding judged as ineffective. Since the last inspection, the local authority secured your interim appointment as headteacher and facilitated support from the executive principal of the YTSA. Two deputy headteachers, two assistant headteachers and the middle leader responsible for science left the school. Despite difficulties in staff recruitment locally, you appointed a new deputy headteacher and a new assistant headteacher, in June 2017. You restructured the responsibilities of your senior leadership team to incorporate safeguarding into the role of one of the other assistant headteachers. An additional deputy headteacher will join the school in January 2018. The local authority has also very recently appointed a new chair of governors and two additional governors to the governing body. Since the last inspection, you have moved all pupils to be educated on one site. The school is currently awaiting the confirmation of a preferred sponsor to complete the process of converting to an academy. Following the last inspection in May 2017, the school experienced significant staffing changes and upheaval. Upon your appointment, you and your team conducted a review of the school and correctly identified and prioritised areas for improvement. You took swift actions to address the areas of safeguarding which needed urgent attention. As a result, safeguarding processes and procedures are now more secure and robust. Your focus and determination for continuous improvement have been integral in addressing the decline of the standards of education at the school. You and your team are working tirelessly to ensure there is a much-needed stability across a number of areas of the school and you are beginning to restore the confidence of staff and parents in the school. As a result, staff are more positive about improvements in the school and your leadership. Despite this, some parents continue to have concerns about behaviour and bullying in the school. Your senior leader responsible for safeguarding has acted swiftly to address the issues identified in the last inspection report. Her focus and expertise have ensured that safeguarding processes were reviewed quickly. She implemented new and more robust systems and clearly communicated these to all staff. All members of staff have now received appropriate safeguarding training and clear guidance on procedures for reporting safeguarding concerns. Staff report that they are more confident in using the newly introduced system for recording safeguarding concerns. They are very clear on what they need to do if they have any concerns. Your designated safeguarding lead and her deputies work effectively together and regularly monitor and review safeguarding cases. They frequently analyse school data and ensure that referrals are timely, external agencies are involved if necessary and support to pupils is provided swiftly. You have ensured the single 2

central record is compliant, up to date, and regularly checked and monitored. There are now rigorous checking mechanisms in place to ensure the suitability of staff working at the school. You and your team have ensured that recruitment procedures follow safer recruitment guidelines. Any educational trips are risk assessed using a robust system and you and your leaders frequently monitor them. Since the last inspection, you acted swiftly to address the concerns raised about the safety and welfare of pupils on work placements and reduced timetables. You reviewed the curriculum and currently there are no pupils on work experience. There are now more secure risk assessments in place for work placement providers and any future provision will be done through the local authority service with appropriate checks already in place. You took the decision, rightly, to bring all pupils on reduced timetables back into school. You consulted with parents and set up a provision within the school to support these pupils to reintegrate back to mainstream lessons as soon as possible. As a result, you are now confident that these pupils are safe and attending school. There are currently no pupils on reduced timetables, except those with medical needs. There are a small number of pupils who access alternative provision. You and your leaders have ensured that there is a strong and active partnership with these providers, reinforcing safer practices for the pupils studying off site. You and your leaders have introduced appropriate strategies to improve the attendance and punctuality of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. You have strengthened the staffing structure dealing with attendance and have improved the support provided to disadvantaged pupils. You have improved intervention strategies through regular home visits by your educational welfare officer, close collaboration with external agencies and taking legal action, where necessary, to improve attendance of all pupils, including the disadvantaged pupils. As a result, although overall attendance dipped slightly in 2017, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils improved marginally. Punctuality overall has improved significantly since the last inspection. You and your leaders acknowledge that further improvement is needed to bring attendance closer to national averages. You quickly identified issues with pupils attending lessons on two different sites and acted swiftly to bring all pupils onto one site. You also introduced a revised behaviour policy and raised expectations. Staff have received training on behaviour management. As a result, there has been an increase in the recording of behaviour incidents and exclusions. You have identified pupils who need ongoing support with their behaviour and you have deployed your staff strategically to support these pupils to meet the newly introduced high expectations. Staff and pupils report an improvement in behaviour since the last inspection. Pupils say that they feel safe in school and staff deal quickly and effectively with any bullying incidents when they occur. Pupils behaviour in lessons is compliant and the atmosphere is calm with very little low-level disruption. In the few lessons where pupils disturb the learning of others, staff follow the school s behaviour policy. You recognise that behaviour during break and lunchtime needs to improve. A small number of pupils show 3

disrespectful behaviour, use inappropriate language and some staff do not challenge them. The site is secured and there is appropriate adult supervision at the gates at the beginning and end of the school day. You acknowledge that there is more work needed here to ensure that pupils behaviour improves further and all staff implement the revised behaviour policy consistently. A review of governance has taken place since the last inspection. A number of governors have stepped down since May 2017. There has been a delay in recruiting suitable governors. The local authority has very recently appointed a new chair of governors, with experience of improving governance. Two additional governors with appropriate skills and expertise have also been very recently recruited to strengthen the governing body further. The chair of governors has a clear vision and appropriate strategies to improve the effectiveness of the challenge and support governors provide to school leaders. Currently, roles and responsibilities for governors are finalised and a safeguarding governor is due to start working with school leaders imminently. Governors acknowledge that they must work with urgency now to address the concerns identified at the last inspection about the effectiveness of governance in holding the school to account with regard to safeguarding arrangements and child protection processes. External support The local authority has provided effective support to the school since the last inspection on a number of areas, including safeguarding. The support includes appointments of key leadership staff, deployment of behaviour consultants to provide appropriate training and facilitating collaboration with the local pupil referral service. The local authority also supported the school effectively through the transition of pupils out of alternative provision and back into the mainstream lessons and bringing all pupils onto one site. The local authority school improvement adviser works closely with the school to monitor impact of actions. As a result, the safeguarding procedures and processes of the school have been strengthened. The experienced executive principal of YTSA provides effective support to you and your leaders through continuous challenge. His knowledge and expertise has been instrumental in bringing about the rapid improvements in safeguarding. Priorities for further improvement Governors must ensure that they work with urgency to ensure that appropriate challenge and support for school leaders is in place. All staff must consistently implement the revised school behaviour policy, communicate the high expectations to all pupils and challenge any inappropriate behaviour. Leaders must continue to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence for all pupils, including the disadvantaged. 4

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely Dimitris Spiliotis Her Majesty s Inspector 5