BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA

Similar documents
Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

Setting the Scene and Getting Inspired

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

BOLOGNA DECLARATION ACHIEVED LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE ACTIVITY PLAN

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

CRPD- General Comment on Article 24 (Right to Inclusive Education) Written statement

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

5 Early years providers

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

No educational system is better than its teachers

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Public Policy Agenda for Children

JICA s Operation in Education Sector. - Present and Future -

Study Center in Prague, Czech Republic

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REENGAGEMENT. April 25, 2016

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

Brazil. understanding individual rights and responsibilities, as well as those of citizens, the State and other community groups;

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Student Assessment and Evaluation: The Alberta Teaching Profession s View

SEDRIN School Education for Roma Integration LLP GR-COMENIUS-CMP

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATION IN YOUTH AND LEISURE INSTRUCTION 2009

PUBLIC SCHOOL OPEN ENROLLMENT POLICY FOR INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL DISTRICT

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Manual for teacher trainers

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. GENDER MAINSTREAMING POLICY SEPTEMBER 2008 (Revised August 2015)

World Data on Education Données mondiales de l éducation Datos Mundiales de Educación. VII Ed. 2010/11 IBE/2011/CP/WDE/AI

Summary and policy recommendations

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

Australia s tertiary education sector

REGULATIONS RELATING TO ADMISSION, STUDIES AND EXAMINATION AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOUTHEAST NORWAY

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

Harnessing the power and potential of adult learning and education for a viable future

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Differentiated teaching in primary school

The Dar es Salaam Declaration on Academic Freedom and Social Responsibility of Academics (1990).

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

MOESAC MEDIUM TERM PLAN

5.7 Country case study: Vietnam

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Rethinking the Federal Role in Elementary and Secondary Education

Students Council in Georgian Schools - How it should work and how it works? A brief study of students council condition

Education in Armenia. Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

James H. Williams, Ed.D. CICE, Hiroshima University George Washington University August 2, 2012

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Mexico (CONAFE) Dialogue and Discover Model, from the Community Courses Program

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

and The Maria Grzegorzewska Academy of Special Education (Maria Grzegorzewska University in

UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Programme of Education for All. Embracing Diversity: Toolkit for Creating Inclusive Learning-Friendly Environments

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosova - Republic of Kosovo Qeveria Vlada Government

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Is Open Access Community College a Bad Idea?

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Financing Education In Minnesota

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development. A joint initiative by UNESCO and the Government of India

OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES

2 di 7 29/06/

Post-intervention multi-informant survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on disability and inclusive education

Foundations of Bilingual Education. By Carlos J. Ovando and Mary Carol Combs

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: WHAT WORKS? WHO BENEFITS? Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University The Urban Institute February 2010

The Comparative Study of Information & Communications Technology Strategies in education of India, Iran & Malaysia countries

NA/2006/17 Annexe-1 Lifelong Learning Programme for Community Action in the Field of Lifelong Learning (Lifelong Learning Programme LLP)

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION POSTGRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATION GUIDE

PARTNERSHIP IN SECONDARY SCHOOL ASSESSMENT EXAMINATIONS AND KENYA CERTIFICATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION EXAMINATIONS: DILEMMA IN EVALUATION ABSTRACT

Transcription:

BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA Regional Preparatory Workshop on Inclusive Education Eastern and South Eastern Europe Sinaia, Romania, 14 16 June 2007 UNESCO International Bureau of Education

Regional Workshop - Europe on Inclusive Education Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina The concept of inclusive education in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is a new one, imported after the war (since 1996) through the presence and projects of the international organizations (IOs) dealing with education reform and human and children rights in BiH. Inclusive education in BiH is predominantly seen as an element of social inclusion. Like everywhere else, reports by IOs (UNICEF, UNDP, OSCE etc.) as well as numerous research studies dealing with issues of equality and participation in education in BiH reflect general agreement that a good quality education is the best tool to prevent inequality and the most efficient way to escape poverty and social exclusion. The basic goal of inclusive education in BiH is based on the premise that every child should have equal right and opportunity in the field of education. At the same time there is no common legal or professional definition and scope of inclusive education in BiH. Also, it covers various vulnerable groups, from poor to returnees (specific for BiH, and to a lesser degree other counties of former Yugoslavia) and minorities (Roma) and, finally, children with special needs. The above-mentioned groups are either not yet fully included and integrated in the mainstream education, or mainstream education does not meet their specific needs, thus making them segregated and excluded. Absurd administrative fragmentation of BiH (2 Entities, 10 Cantons, Brcko District and very week central government), as well as national (ethnic) politicisation of almost all aspects of normal life constitute the major obstacles to the speed, quality and results of the overall education reform. In this lights it is not surprising that the first time that the concept of inclusive education was recognized and included in a state-level education policy was in November 2002, in a document entitled Education Reform Strategy: Five Pledges on Education (A message to people of BiH). This document became the basis for developing policies, laws and regulations in the field of education. In a time of post-conflict recovery of BiH, when numerous aspects of discrimination and division were evident on all levels of society and all aspects of every-day life, this document was largely prepared by IOs as a way to introduce and promote universal values of education: quality, equity, inclusion etc.

In summary, in its five chapters ( five pledges ), this document proposed the following: Accessibility of education to every child and elimination of all forms of discrimination; Modernisation and quality improvement in pre-school, primary and general secondary education; Modernisation and quality improvement in vocational education and training; Modernisation and quality improvement in higher education; Modernisation and quality improvement in financing, administration and legislation of education. Inclusion is addressed in Pledge 1: including children with special needs at all levels of the education system. Under the strong influence of the IO and - to a certain degree - contrary to position of the local stakeholders, it is interesting to note that this document treats children with special needs distinct from other groups that are still discriminated against or excluded from the mainstream education in BiH, such as poor, minorities and returnees. Following this document, the first state-level Framework Law on Primary and Secondary Education in BiH was adopted in summer 2003, mentioning education for children with special needs and inclusive education in its several articles (Articles 3, 4 and 19). However, by being a framework law, it also left plenty of room for misinterpretation and misuse, and therefore should be urgently followed with a separate law or a by-law, based on contemporary international standards and indicators for inclusive and education of children with special needs. Also, a state-level Education agency, as foreseen by this law, with a mandate to develop a state-wide standards, assessments and curricula for primary and general secondary education has not yet been established - four years after the Law has been adopted! One of the problems in describing or discussing current state of play in inclusive education in BiH is the lack of reliable data and statistics. For this reason the case of BiH has also not been properly presented in any international or regional study dealing with inclusive education. In 2005 NGO Duga produced the first and so far the only relatively comprehensive Report on children and students with special needs in pre-schools and primary schools in BiH. The main purpose of this report was to collect data on children with special needs, and list and explain problems and challenges they face in the process of their inclusion into mainstream education and regular classes. The report was based on a sample of 30 per cent of all pre-school and primary school institutions from the whole territory of BiH. In real numbers, it has covered 175 primary schools with 124.502 students enrolled, and

unknown number of pre-schools with 4.940 children enrolled. When it comes to preschool education, it is important to note the drastically low coverage of children in BiH with pre-school education. With only around 6 per cent of children in pre-schools in 2005, BiH has been at the very bottom of the scale of European countries in this sector. According to the findings, there is about 7,99 per cent of students with special needs in primary schools and about 13,17 per cent of children with special needs in pre-schools, which corresponds to the average in other Central and East European countries. The official beginning of inclusive education in BiH in regards to children with special needs happened only in 2002, with 120 primary schools starting integrating them regular classes. The findings of the report confirm that early treatment and inclusion of children with special needs is often decisive for future development of these children. A pre-school institution is an ideal place for children to learn living with and accepting those who differ from them, and where growing up in a company of age-mates is stimulating for overall development of children. The report has shown that inclusion of children with special needs is possible and manageable in pre-school institutions even in the earliest age by meeting specific needs of children and combination of individual work and group work and playing with age-mates in regular program. The role of pedagogue in inclusion of children with special needs is decisive in both preschool and primary education. And if a pedagogue is a leader, than a teacher is a key for successful inclusion of children with special needs in mainstream education. The report claims that three quarters of teachers and almost 90 per cent of parents in preschools and primary schools support concept of inclusive education. The main identified problems are inadequate qualification of teachers (both in pre-service and in-service teacher training); rigid curricula (student must adjust to curriculum instead of adjusting curriculum to specific needs and capacities of a child); lack of wider professional support (ministries, pedagogical institutes, training centers etc.); insufficient cooperation with parents and community; inadequate school infrastructure, transport and support services; inadequate financing. The report ends with a rather comprehensive list of proposed measures to be urgently taken by the education authorities at all administrative levels in BiH: - Inclusion should be precisely defined by laws on pre-school education, primary and secondary school. - Regulate by the special Book of Rules which children with special needs, and in what way will be educated in individual segments of education.

- It is necessary to define the number of children in inclusive classroom, and the number of children-students with special needs in it. - Ensure expert staff team work (special educator-defectologist, speech-therapist, psychologist) in pre-school institutions and primary schools. - Establish an accelerated teaching programme within the education system, with clear achievement indicators in order to support talented, endowed and gifted children who achieve distinguished results in school. - Ensure introduction of assistents and volunteers to groups and classrooms (use civilian military service too), where there are children with special needs. - Ensure that every child with special needs has a file/record. - Development of education programmes in inclusion should get a priority. - Intensify design and implementation of projects for enabling the existing professionals for provision of permanent support to teachers - It is important, besides design of general programmes of cooperation with parents, to develop operational programme modalities of engagement of parents. - Establish Council for Inclusion, which will follow up on implementation of inclusion in education of Bosnia and Herzegovina.BJECT/BODY : - Develop consistent and constant programme of professional training and development of teachers for regular school teachers. Alternative solution: NGOs with experience in teacher education/training. - Ensure terminology with milder labelling for children with special needs and experts in special education. - Ensure mechanism for affirmation of larger efforts of teachers in the field of inclusive work. - Prevent inhumane, unprofessional and unjustified solutions used on the exuse of relating to inclusion, which seriously jeopardize personality and needs of children with special needs. - Inclusion is a long-term process. If its is not properly directed it may cause more harm than good. It is necessary to evaluate the results through the project of scientific and research center.

In spring 2006 all BiH education ministers (14 in total: BiH Minister of Civil Affairs, 2 Entity, 10 Cantonal and Brcko District Minister of Education) adopted the Action Plan for Children with Special Needs developed by the IOs (led by UNICEF) and local stakeholders, predominantly NGOs. The Plan advocates various actions aiming to promote and develop inclusive education as integral part of the mainstream education in BiH, such as adopting adequate laws or by-laws; changing pre- and in-service teacher training; changing curriculum, educational environment, assessment criteria and schoolsupport measures; developing individual approach and raising awareness on inclusive education etc. In order to create necessary conditions for systemic change in education of children with special needs, the Plan underlines three main priority actions to be taken at the statelevel: 1. Promoting systemic change in order to ensure that children with special needs are included at all levels of the education system (adoption of a by-law on education of children with special needs in primary and secondary schools; development of regular and systemic assessment, new classification system and a database of children with special needs in order to provide them with appropriate educational placement while taking into consideration the best interest of the child); 2. Removal of financial and administrative barriers to ensure inclusion of children with special needs in the mainstream schools to the highest possible degree (allocation of funds within existing education budgets for regular assessment and support for children with special needs); 3. Garnering the support and participation of parents, educational institutions and communities related to the education process. But one year later there has been no further action by the governments, and while political and intellectual elites have been very vocal and active when it comes to some aspects of education reform - for example of Higher Education, inclusive education does not even get on their or on the public agenda. Only in the second part of 2007, under new UNICEF project, a detailed mapping out of all BiH pre-schools and primary schools in regards to current status and needs in inclusive education will be carried out. It is expected that this report would finally bring inclusive education closer to the top of the education reform agenda, and force responsible ministers to make some concrete steps that would include development and adoption of the national policy and a number of strategy choices in this field. Twelve years after the war in BiH limited development and progress in inclusive education are happening in spite of almost total lack of governmental support and thanks to the still strong presence and projects of IOs and IO s sponsored network of very active

of NGOs. That, of course, is not enough. But that explains why BiH currently can simply not respond to the growing challenges and European standards in inclusive education. The attitude of every state and society towards persons with special needs are closely connected to the social, economic, civilisational and cultural conditions of each country. Changes and developments in this field mirror the overall democratic changes and developments of the state and society. It is rather sobering, but according to the situation in inclusive education, one could legitimately conclude that in the last 12 years since the end of the war there has been no significant democratisation of the BiH education system.