Council for Aid to Education 215 Lexington Avenue, 16 th Floor Contact: Ann E. Kaplan New York, NY

Similar documents
November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Financing Education In Minnesota

Giving in the Netherlands 2015

ELLEN E. ENGEL. Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, Ph.D. - Accounting, 1997.

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

The Dropout Crisis is a National Issue

Master of Science in Taxation (M.S.T.) Program

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

Financial Plan. Operating and Capital. May2010

Trends in College Pricing

CLASS EXODUS. The alumni giving rate has dropped 50 percent over the last 20 years. How can you rethink your value to graduates?

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Fiscal Years [Millions of Dollars] Provision Effective

Executive Summary. Marian Catholic High School. Mr. Steven Tortorello, Principal 700 Ashland Avenue Chicago Heights, IL

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

CHAPTER 4: REIMBURSEMENT STRATEGIES 24

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

Financing Public Colleges and Universities in an Era of State Fiscal Constraints

ATHLETIC ENDOWMENT FUND MOUNTAINEER ATHLETIC CLUB

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS PROGRAMS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2005

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

UCLA Affordability. Ronald W. Johnson Director, Financial Aid Office. May 30, 2012

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING. ATI Physical Therapy 4765 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Communities in Schools of Virginia

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Building a Vibrant Alumni Network

University of Michigan Dean, School of Information

School of Medicine Finances, Funds Flows, and Fun Facts. Presentation for Research Wednesday June 11, 2014

THE IMPACT OF YOUR GIVING 2015 ENDOWMENT REPORT

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

Music Chapel House Rules and Policies hapelle Musicale Reine Elisabeth, fondation d'utilité publique

State Budget Update February 2016

CHESTER FRITZ AUDITORIUM REPORT

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

College Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics

BLACKBOARD & ANGEL LEARNING FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Introduction... 2

TENNESSEE S ECONOMY: Implications for Economic Development

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Len Lundstrum, Ph.D., FRM

CHAPTER XI DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

United states panel on climate change. memorandum

Trends in Student Aid and Trends in College Pricing

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

Michigan and Ohio K-12 Educational Financing Systems: Equality and Efficiency. Michael Conlin Michigan State University

Draft Budget : Higher Education

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Building Bridges Globally

RETAIL SECTOR CONTINUES SLOW RECOVERY AFTER A HARSH WINTER

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA TO THE STATEWIDE ECONOMY

Paying for. Cosmetology School S C H O O L B E AU T Y. Financing your new life. beautyschoolnetwork.com pg 1

Augusta Independent Board of Education August 11, :00 PM 207 Bracken Street Augusta, KY

WASHINGTON COLLEGE SAVINGS

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

TCC Jim Bolen Math Competition Rules and Facts. Rules:

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

Understanding University Funding

What s in it for me: A qualitative look into the mindset of young alumni non-donors

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Invest in CUNY Community Colleges

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Fundraising 101 Introduction to Autism Speaks. An Orientation for New Hires

The Racial Wealth Gap

March 28, To Zone Chairs and Zone Delegates to the USA Water Polo General Assembly:

Michigan State University

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Breneman, Lapovsky, and Meyers describe how in recent years institutional financial aid has

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

LEN HIGHTOWER, Ph.D.

Paper No. 34. The Entrepreneruship-Philanthropy Nexus: Implication for internationalization 1. Zoltan Acs and Pontus Braunerhjelm

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

WHY GRADUATE SCHOOL? Turning Today s Technical Talent Into Tomorrow s Technology Leaders

Federal Update. Angela Smith, Training Officer U.S. Dept. of ED, Federal Student Aid WHITE HOUSE STUDENT LOAN INITIATIVES

Transcription:

Council for Aid to Education 215 Lexington Avenue, 16 th Floor Contact: Ann E. Kaplan New York, NY 10016 212-217-0875 www.cae.org akaplan@cae.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, February 6, 2018 12:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time Colleges and Universities Raised $43.60 Billion in 2017 Gifts from Alumni Rose 14.5 Percent and Reached $11.37 Billion Gifts for Capital Purposes Increased 12.3 Percent Current Operations Gifts Inched Up 2.6 percent Contributions to the Nation s Colleges and Universities Reached a Record $43.60 Billion Charitable contributions to colleges and universities in the United States increased 6.3 percent in 2017, according to the Voluntary Support of Education (VSE) survey, conducted annually by the Council for Aid to Education (CAE). At $43.60 billion, the total is the highest level reported by CAE since the survey s inception in 1957. Top 20 Fundraising Institutions Less than 1 Percent of the Nation s Colleges Raised 28.1 Percent of All 2017 Gifts. Gifts to These 20 Institutions Grew 10.5 Percent in 2017. The Top 20 fundraising institutions together raised $12.23 billion, 28.1 percent of the 2017 total. In 2016, the same 20 institutions raised $11.07 billion. Institutions that Raised the Most (and Amount Raised), 2017 1. Harvard University ($1.28 billion) 2. Stanford University ($1.13 billion) 3. Cornell University ($743.50 million) 4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology ($672.94 million) 5. University of Southern California ($668.33 million) 6. Johns Hopkins University ($636.91 million) 7. University of Pennsylvania ($626.49 million) 8. Columbia University ($603.08 million) 9. Yale University ($595.89 million) 10. Duke University ($581.05 million) 11. New York University ($567.12 million) 12. University of Washington ($553.89 million) 13. University of California-Los Angeles ($550.93 million) 14. University of Chicago ($483.47 million) 15. University of Michigan ($456.13 million) 16. University of Notre Dame ($451.43 million) Page 1

17. University of California-San Francisco ($422.17 million) 18. University of California-Berkeley ($404.59 million) 19. Ohio State University ($401.85 million) 20. Indiana University ($398.26 million) Personal Giving Drove the 2017 Increase Gifts from alumni increased 14.5 percent, and gifts from nonalumni individuals grew 4.5 percent. These increases came on the heels of declines of 8.5 and 6 percent, respectively, in 2016. Corporate Support Remained at 2016 Levels. Foundation and Other Organization Contributions Rose Modestly. Giving from corporations did not increase from 2016 levels. Contributions from foundations, however, increased 5.5 percent, and those from Other Organizations a category that includes donor-advised funds increased 3.1 percent. Foundations were the largest source of support, representing 30.1 percent of the 2017 total. Alumni were the second-largest source of support, providing 26.1 percent of contributions in 2017. Percentages may not add to 100, and details may not sum to totals, due to rounding. Source: Page 2

Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. Source: Strong Stock Market a Factor in Higher Personal Giving A strong stock market buoyed personal giving in 2017. Alumni support for capital purposes, such as endowments and buildings, increased 16.7 percent in a sample of 663 institutions that provided data on that subject. Those same institutions reported alumni contributions for current operations increased 8.7 percent. A group of 434 institutions that responded to an optional question about the form of gifts reported that the value of gifts made in the form of securities increased 26.6 percent between 2016 and 2017. The number of such contributions increased 16.9 percent. Organizations Donations Affected by the Weaker 2016 Market Contributions from corporations, foundations, and other organizations are based on commitments made the previous year. Therefore, those commitments are affected by the previous year s financial environment. The stock market was weaker in 2016 than in 2017, and this is reflected in the smaller increase in gifts from organizations than from individuals. University Assets Also Affected by Stock Market Endowment values increased 9.1 percent at institutions that provided endowment data at the time of this release for both the 2016 and 2017 surveys. When institutions own assets increase, so do those held by supporting organizations and individuals. Likewise, when the value of endowments decline, other sources of revenue also tend to decline. This is why drawing down on assets in robust economic climates may be deleterious to universities long-term financial stability. Page 3

Dow Jones Industrial Average New York Stock Exchange NASDAQ Standard & Poor's 500 1-Jul-16 17,924.24 4,837.18 10,515.80 2,099.34 30-Jun-17 21,349.63 6,140.42 11,761.70 2,423.41 Percentage Change 19.1% 26.9% 11.8% 15.4% Dow Jones Industrial Average New York Stock Exchange NASDAQ Standard & Poor's 500 1-Jul-16 17,924.24 4,837.18 10,515.80 2,099.34 31-Dec-16 19,762.60 5,383.12 11,056.90 2,238.83 Percentage Change 10.3% 11.3% 5.1% 6.6% Charitable Contributions Amount to 10 Percent of Expenditures Charitable gifts are important to programs they fund. However, philanthropic support represented only about 10 percent of responding universities expenditures in recent years. In 2000, charitable support represented 15.7 percent of the expenditures of institutions that participated in the survey. This was the highest recorded percentage. Source: Page 4

Economic and Public-Policy Environments for 2018 Contributions Ann E. Kaplan, Vice President at CAE and Executive Director of the VSE survey, stated, Charitable support for colleges and universities is likely to increase in 2018 if the stock market continues to gain ground through June 30, 2018 the end of the fiscal year. In addition, some individuals may have prepaid intentions and pledges in December of 2017 to take advantage of elements of the tax law that were more favorable for certain donors and types of gifts. Tax policy will affect not only the timing of philanthropy, but its level. The new tax legislation has several provisions that could affect charitable contributions. Half the time span that will be covered in the next VSE study for the 2018 fiscal year fell in 2017, before H.R.1 became law. Half the study period will fall in 2018, after the bill became law. Factors in the law that may affect colleges and universities fundraising outcomes are: The Higher Standard Deduction The increase in the standard deduction, the loss of deductions for a portion of state and local taxes, and the mortgage interest deductibility cap will lead fewer households to itemize. That reduces the tax incentive for charitable giving for those households. That said, the tax incentive is only one incentive for philanthropy. Also, there was sufficient notice for some individuals to prepay their intentions and pledges in 2017, before the law took effect. In addition, the charitable tax deduction remains in place, and itemizing households will benefit from increasing their charitable contributions, especially those paid in the form of stock. Athletic Seating In 2017, 80 percent of the value of contributions that were counted toward preferred seating at athletic events was tax-deductible. H.R.1 completely eliminates the deduction for such gifts. Starting in 2018, those athletic seating gifts cannot be counted on the VSE survey. Again, donors may have pushed those donations into 2017 and were likely advised to do so. Therefore, the effect of this provision in the law will be more salient in FY2019 than in FY2018. Donor-Advised Funds to Pay Personal Pledges Starting in 2018, donor-advised funds may be used to pay personal pledges. This will not affect how gifts from donor-advised funds appear on the VSE survey, as the survey will continue to count those gifts as coming from the fund, not the individual. The change could affect the relative levels of donor-advised-fund contributions as compared to personal gifts when some individuals begin to use donor-advised funds to pay their personal pledges. Excise Tax on Endowments The excise tax on university endowments may affect about 3 percent of VSE survey respondents. The tax and the response to it are complex and not directly related to gift income. Page 5

The Council for Aid to Education (CAE) is grateful to the Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE) for its sponsorship of the Voluntary Support of Education (VSE) survey. About CAE CAE is a national nonprofit organization based in New York City that provides assessment and research services to higher education institutions, K 12 schools, state and local education agencies, and credentialing bodies. It is the nation s sole source of empirical data on private giving to education, through the annual VSE survey and its Data Minter interactive database. Additionally, CAE has a dedicated mission to improve the overall quality of the educational system with a focus on improving teaching and cultivating critical thinkers in elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education. Since 2002, CAE has developed and administered its flagship assessments, the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA+) and the College and Work Readiness Assessment (CWRA+), which are performance-based assessments that measure critical-thinking and written-communication skills through application to real-life problems. CLA+ and CWRA+ are administered to hundreds of thousands of students domestically and internationally. Results are used by school administrators, faculty, students, parents, employers, and policy makers to evaluate student performance, student-learning gains, and academic programs. CAE also develops customized assessments for clients in K-12 and higher education with a focus on high-quality authentic assessments measuring 21 st century skills. Published Survey Results The comprehensive results of the VSE survey will be published in spring 2018. Voluntary Support of Education, 2017, can be ordered in advance at https://shop.cae.org or by calling 212-217-0878. Price: $121 ($86 for survey respondents). The 2017 VSE PowerPoint Presentation featuring all the figures and numbered tables (but not tables of institution-specific data) from the report, along with speaking points, can also be ordered in advance. Price: $78 ($28 when ordered with the report). An online Executive Summary is available in advance of the book publication date. The password to this summary will be provided after purchase. Please go to http://cae.org/vsepublication for information on our other research products and tools. Page 6