Career Initiative Alumni Survey 2003/2004 to 2005/2006 Graduates

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Principal vacancies and appointments

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

Market Intelligence. Alumni Perspectives Survey Report 2017

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

NCEO Technical Report 27

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

An Analysis of the El Reno Area Labor Force

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Redirected Inbound Call Sampling An Example of Fit for Purpose Non-probability Sample Design

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

BENCHMARK TREND COMPARISON REPORT:

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Testimony in front of the Assembly Committee on Jobs and the Economy Special Session Assembly Bill 1 Ray Cross, UW System President August 3, 2017

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Proficiency Illusion

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Montana's Distance Learning Policy for Adult Basic and Literacy Education

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

EDUCATING TEACHERS FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY: A MODEL FOR ALL TEACHERS

MPA Internship Handbook AY

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

Trends in College Pricing

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

Segmentation Study of Tulsa Area Higher Education Needs Ages 36+ March Prepared for: Conducted by:

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Shelters Elementary School

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Graduate/Professional School Overview

AMERICA READS*COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION. School Year

Educational Attainment

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

University-Based Induction in Low-Performing Schools: Outcomes for North Carolina New Teacher Support Program Participants in

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

Table of Contents Welcome to the Federal Work Study (FWS)/Community Service/America Reads program.

Outreach Connect User Manual

Feature-oriented vs. Needs-oriented Product Access for Non-Expert Online Shoppers

Best Colleges Main Survey

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

Program Change Proposal:

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

2010 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE STUDENTS OPINION ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CAREER PROSPECTS

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Student Experience Strategy

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Kelli Allen. Vicki Nieter. Jeanna Scheve. Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Annual Report Accredited Member

Summary Report. ECVET Agent Exploration Study. Prepared by Meath Partnership February 2015

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE STUDENT PLACEMENTOFFICE PROGRAM REVIEW SPRING SEMESTER, 2010

Calculators in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom: Helpful or Harmful?

Soulbus project/jamk Part B: National tailored pilot Case Gloria, Soultraining, Summary

Transcription:

Career Initiative Alumni Survey 2003/2004 to 2005/2006 Graduates This report was made possible through the financial support of the Office of the Chancellor, Rebecca Blank, and ongoing partnerships with the Wisconsin Foundation and Alumni Association as well as the UW Madison Survey Center.

Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 Career Outcomes...2 Employment Status...2 Unemployment...3 Degree Requirements...4 Annual Salaries Eight to Ten Years after Graduation...5 Job Expectations...6 Sector Placement...6 Alumni Views on their University Experience...7 The UW-Madison Advantage...8 Experiences with Professors and Mentors...8 UW-Madison and Professional and Life Satisfaction...9 Alumni Professional Skill Sets and Responsibilities...11 Self-Ranking of Skill Sets...11 Job Requirements...12 Conclusion...14 Appendix A: UW Madison Survey Center Sample Description and Response Rate Report... A1 Appendix B: Confidence Intervals for All Charts and Tables... B1

Executive Summary During the fall of 2014, the College of Letters and Science (L&S) Career Initiative surveyed alumni to better understand their career outcomes and the impact of their UW-Madison experience on their personal and professional lives. The results show that our alumni secure meaningful employment and see themselves at a competitive advantage compared to coworkers from other universities and colleges. The survey of the 2003/2004 2005/2006 classes yielded a response rate of 49.7 percent or 2,523 out of a possible 5,118 possible respondents. A complete description of the sampling and survey processes used in the survey is provided in Appendix A of this report. 1 Key findings show alumni engaged in meaningful work with strong, positive associations with their UW-Madison experience. Approximately 90 percent of these alumni are employed full-time, attending graduate school, or both. More than 60 percent of unemployed alumni chose not to be employed or are not working due to family responsibilities. Approximately 78 percent are in jobs that require at least a B.A. or B.S. degree. Approximately 55 percent earn annual salaries of $60,000 or more. More than 70 percent of alumni in full-time positions believe their academic preparation gave them an advantage compared to employees from other colleges and universities. More than 90 percent would choose to attend UW-Madison again. Approximately 95 percent would recommend UW-Madison to a prospective student. To carry out this survey, the University of Wisconsin Madison Survey Center (UWSC) surveyed all L&S alumni who completed their undergraduate degrees in the 2003/2004 2005/2006 academic years. Surveyed alumni included graduates from the academic divisions of the Humanities, Natural Science, and Social Science. The UWSC also surveyed L&S alumni who graduated one year prior to the survey. The results of this second survey are discussed in a separate report. 1 To gather data on a sufficient number of alumni, sampling weights were used in this report s analyses. While 2,523 students responded to the survey, the number of observations in each chart at times breaks students up by their major and probability of being selected for the survey. To avoid confusion, the number of observations is not listed on each chart. 1

Career Outcomes 8 to 10 Years after Graduation Career Outcomes in Brief Survey results reveal that L&S alumni find employment in meaningful jobs with strong salaries eight to ten years after graduation. Major findings from the survey show: More than 89 percent are either employed full-time, attending graduate school, or both. Approximately 78 percent of full-time positions require a B.A. or B.S. degree. Roughly 55 percent of alumni working full-time report annual salaries of $60,000 or more. Approximately 21 percent of alumni earn annual salaries of $100,000 or more. Employment Status Responses to surveys of L&S alumni eight to ten years after graduation reveal that the vast majority secured full-time employment or are pursuing graduate or professional education. Chart 1 shows that, out of 2,523 respondents, approximately 90 percent are employed full-time, enrolled in graduate or school, or working while continuing their education. Approximately four percent report that they are unemployed while approximately six percent are employed part time. 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Chart 1: Which one of the following best describes your current activities? 4.3% 3.4% Not engaged in paid employment Enrolled in graduate or professional school 7.7% 6.4% Both employed and continuing your education Employed fewer than 35 hours per week 78.3% Employed 35 hours per week or more The majority of this report concentrates on career outcomes related to those who have attained full-time employment or are pursuing graduate or professional education. This report also examines those working part time or unemployed to better understand differences in their respective UW-Madison experiences. 2

Text boxes, like the one labeled Career Outcomes by Division below, are included throughout the report and describe differences in career outcomes and other statistics among the college s three academic divisions. Career Outcomes by Division Rounded to nearest percentage point Social Science 80% employed 35 hours or more per week 9% attending graduate or professional school Natural Science 77% employed 35 hours or more per week 14% attending graduate or professional school Humanities 75% employed 35 hours or more per week 16% attending graduate or professional school Unemployment Digging deeper into survey results reveals that only a small percentage of L&S alumni meet classic definitions of unemployment (a person actively seeking employment but unable to find work). As shown in Chart 2, approximately 10 percent of alumni not engaged in paid employment said they have chosen not to be employed. Roughly 55 percent are not engaged in paid work because they have family responsibilities. Since these alumni account for only four percent of total alumni respondents, very few are unemployed because they were laid off from their previous position. Chart 2: Which one of the following best describes why you are not currently employed? You were laid off by your employer You quit a job to seek other employment You have family responsibilities You are engaged in volunteer activities You are not employed due to disability You have chosen not to be employed 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 3

Degree Requirements The majority of full-time positions require a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) or Bachelors of Science (B.S.) degree an indicator of the substantive level of the positions. Chart 3 shows that a B.A. or B.S. degree was required or considered helpful for approximately 94 percent of full-time positions. A bachelor s degree was required for roughly 78 percent of full-time positions. Chart 3: Is a B.A. or B.S. degree required for your current position? Yes 77.6% No, but it is helpful 16.5% No, it is irrelevant 6.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% B.S. or B.A. Required at Jobs by Division 77% Social Science - 84% Natural Science - 75% Humanities B.S or B.A. Helpful at Jobs by Division 17% Social Science - 13% Natural Science - 18% Humanities 4

Annual Salaries Eight to Ten Years after Graduation In addition to securing employment, many recent L&S alumni earn competitive salaries. As shown in Chart 4, more than 20 percent of alumni earn annual salaries of $100,000 or more. Approximately 55 percent of alumni earn salaries of $60,000 or more. Chart 4: What is your current salary before taxes? $100,000 or more 20.6% $90,000 to $99,999 4.4% $80,000 to $89,999 6.8% $70,000 to $79,999 10.1% $60,000 to $69,999 $50,000 to $59,999 $40,000 to $49,999 13.5% 14.3% 15.8% $30,000 to $39,999 8.7% $20,000 to $29,999 Less than $19,999 2.9% 3.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Salaries by Division (Percentage between $40,000 and $79,999) Social Science = 52 percent Natural Science = 47 percent Humanities = 58 percent Salaries by Division (Modal or most common Categories) Social Sciences & Natural Science = More than $100,000 Humanities = $40,000 to $49,999 5

Job Expectations Many recent graduates find jobs that are different from what they expected prior to graduation. Chart 5 shows that approximately 33 percent of alumni found positions that were either very or extremely close to the jobs they expected to find. On the other side, 35 percent said the job was either not at all or only a little related to what they expected. Approximately 12 percent had no clear expectation about the type of job they find after graduation. Chart 5: How close is your job to the type you expected to find prior to graduation? Had no clear expectations 11.5% Extremely 14.3% Very Somewhat 19.1% 19.9% A little 12.8% Not at all 22.4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Sector Placement Chart 6 describes the sectors in which recent alumni work. To understand if there are differences across employment status, the chart also displays information for alumni working part time or working while attending graduate school. The basic trends are similar for full-time and part-time employees. The majority of alumni are employed in the private sector with fewer working in government or nonprofit sectors. Higher percentages of graduate students are employed by the public sector, which is in part due to their employment as research and graduate students at public institutions. For those working while attending graduate school, employment in the public sector is slightly higher than employment in the private sector. This is likely due to the number of alumni working for public universities. 6

60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Chart 6: In your current full-time or part-time position, are you employed by... 41.2% 38.4% 20.4% 16.8% 50.9% 32.3% 26.9% 56.0% 17.2% 10% 0% Both Job & Edu Part time Full time by the government or public sector? by a non-profit organization? by a private company? Private Sector Employment by Division (Full Time) Social Sciences = 62% Private Natural Science = 48% Private Humanities = 51% Private Alumni Views on Their University Experience The University Experience in Brief UW-Madison L&S alumni feel empowered by their education. Survey results eight to ten years after graduation show: Approximately 70 percent of alumni with full-time positions believe their academic preparation gave them an advantage compared to employees from other colleges and universities. Alumni who went on to graduate or professional school are more likely to report having a mentor who encouraged them to pursue their goals and dreams. Approximately 94 percent of alumni with full-time positions would choose to attend UW- Madison if they could do it all over again. Approximately 92 percent of those not currently employed would choose to attend UW- Madison if they could do it all over again. More than 95 percent would recommend UW-Madison to potential students. 7

The UW-Madison Advantage Across all categories of employed alumni, Chart 7 shows that more than 70 percent believe their academic preparation gave them a competitive advantage compared to employees from other institutions. Approximately one percent said they were disadvantaged compared to other employees. 80% 70% Chart 7: Compared to new employees from other colleges or universities, do you feel that your UW- Madison academic preparation gave you... 75.5% 71.0% 70.4% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 23.6% 28.1% 28.4% 10% 0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% Both Job & Edu Part time Full time An advantage A disadvantage Neither Percent believing UW-Madison gave them a competitive advantage (Full Time) Social Sciences = 70% Natural Science = 72% Humanities = 69% Experiences with Professors and Mentors L&S alumni report receiving considerable support during their undergraduate education. Chart 8 shows that across all types of employment, more than 95 percent said they had at least one professor who got them excited about learning. While this is a relatively low standard of professor-to-student connections, it is one that has recently been used in major studies such as 8

the 2014 Gallop-Purdue Index 2. High percentages also said their professors seemed to care about them as a people. Chart 8 shows that the majority of alumni had professors who seemed to care about them as people. However, this percentage is lower among alumni who are unemployed than it is for the other categories. Chart 8 shows significant variation in mentorship. Alumni who are currently in graduate school are much more likely to report having had a mentor who encouraged them to pursue their hopes and dreams than alumni in the other categories. Alumni who are working full time, part time, or are currently unemployed are less likely to mention benefiting from such a relationship. 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% Chart 8: Experiences with professors and mentors 95.2% 96.6% 96.3% 96.9% 96.1% 73.9% 74.9% 72.0% 73.7% 65.9% 57.2% 40.9% 37.1% 34.4% 29.5% 20% 0% Had at least one professor at UW- Madison who got you excited about learning Professors seemed to care about you as a person Had a mentor who encouraged you to pursue your goals and dreams No job Grad Sch Both job&edu Part time Full time UW-Madison and Professional and Life Satisfaction Beyond the largely positive views about the connections alumni have to the professions, L&S alumni also tend to believe that their university experience has enhanced their quality of life. Chart 9 shows that on a one- (lowest) to five- (highest) point scale, alumni across all categories are likely to provide a rating roughly between 3.80 and 4.07. Chart 9 also shows responses about satisfaction with life. Alumni provide similarly high ratings across the five categories of employment with unemployed alumni responding with slightly lower scores. 2 Gallup-Purdue Index Inaugural National Report. Great Jobs and Great Lives. Washington, DC. 2014. http://www.gallup.com/services/178496/gallup-purdue-index-inaugural-national-report.aspx 9

5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Chart 9: Quality and satisfaction with life 4.07 4.00 3.98 4.09 4.08 3.80 3.79 3.79 How much has your overall quality of life been enhanced by your UW-Madison undergraduate experience? 4.06 4.12 At present, how satisfied are you with your life? No Job Grad Sch Both Job&Edu Part time Full time If given the chance to start over, Chart 10 shows that extremely high percentages of alumni would still choose to attend UW-Madison. Similarly high percentages would recommend UW- Madison to potential students. Lower percentages would choose to pursue the same majors, certificates, or concentrations with which they graduated. For example, approximately 94 percent of alumni working full time would choose to attend UW-Madison if they could do it again. However, approximately 53 percent of these alumni would pursue the same major or undergraduate certificate. Alumni pursuing a graduate education are more likely than other alumni to say they would pursue the same major or certificate. 10

Chart 10: Experiences at UW-Madison 100% 97.0% 94.1% 91.6% 91.8% 93.8% 96.0% 98.0% 98.3% 92.1% 90.5% 80% 65.5% 60% 40% 34.5% 52.6% 48.2% 43.6% 20% 0% If you could start over, would you still choose to attend UW- Madison? Would you recommend UW- Madison to a potential student? If you could start over, would you still choose to pursue the same major or majors? No Job Grad Sch Both Job&Edu Part time Full time Alumni Professional Skill Sets and Responsibilities Skill Sets and Responsibilities in Brief On a one- (lowest) to five- (highest) point scale, alumni give themselves an average of approximately 4 or higher in every category of skills ranging from communication to analyzing and solving complex projects. In their current positions, more than ninety percent of full-time employed alumni report having jobs that require working with diverse groups, proficiency with computer software, technical knowledge related to their work, obtaining and processing information, verbal communication, planning, organizing and prioritizing work, problem solving and decision making, and working in a team structure. Self-Ranking of Skill Sets The survey asked respondents to rate several skill sets on a scale from one (lowest) to five (highest). Differences were minimal across the various types of employment. Chart 11 lists the average rating given for each skillset for all respondents, regardless of their employment status. In every category, average responses leaned toward the positive side of the five-point scale. Ratings exceeded four in all but one skillset. 11

Chart 11: Self ranking of skill sets communicate clearly and effectively 4.34 find, organize, and evaluate information from multiple sources 4.46 After completing your degree at UW-Madison, how able are you to... draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts and ideas analyze and solve complex problems create original ideas or projects 3.97 4.31 4.46 understand values and ethical standards 4.48 understand and appreciate individual differences based on culure, ethnicity, disability, or sexual orientation 4.44 Job Requirements Chart 12 shows that UW-Madison alumni enter into jobs that require an impressive range of skill sets. Since required skill sets often vary based on the type of employment, this chart separates alumni according to their employment status. More than 90 percent of respondents with full-time jobs described the same seven skills as being required in their current position: working with diverse groups proficiency with computer software technical knowledge related to their work obtaining and processing information verbal communication, planning, organizing and prioritizing work problem solving and decision making working in a team structure There wasn t a single skill set that received less than a 75 percent response rate among alumni working full time. 12

Chart 12: Does your current job require... working in a team structure? 93.3% 80.5% 93.9% problem solving and decision-making skills? 99.1% 92.4% 98.7% planning, organizing, and prioritizing work? 100.0% 93.5% 99.2% verbally communicating with persons inside and outside the organization? 98.4% 95.0% 98.4% obtaining and processing information? 97.9% 93.6% 98.9% analyzing quantitative information? 62.6% 87.2% 85.7% technical knowledge related to the job? 74.4% 93.2% 92.3% proficiency with computer software programs? 68.4% 89.8% 91.1% creating or editing written reports, memos or presentations? 77.1% 66.1% 77.7% an ability to sell or influence others? 73.2% 66.1% 77.7% working with diverse groups of people? 96.1% 90.6% 91.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Both Job&Edu Part Time Full Time 13

Conclusion Eight to ten years after graduation, the overwhelming majority of L&S alumni are engaged in meaningful work with strong feelings of affinity for UW-Madison. Recent graduates work with high levels of engagement, earn competitive salaries, and utilize a broad range of skills that they attribute to what the learned as students. Nearly 90 percent of recent graduates are either employed full-time, attending graduate school, or both. Fewer than four percent of survey respondents said they were not engaged in paid employment. More than 60 percent of alumni without jobs either chose to be unemployed or are not working out of the home due to family responsibilities. As evidence of the marketable skill sets of an L&S alumnus, more than 70 percent of alumni in full-time positions believe their academic preparation gave them a competitive advantage compared to employees from other colleges and universities. UW-Madison alumni also rank themselves high across a wide range of professional skillsets. 14

Appendix A: Sample Description and Response Rate Report SAMPLE DESCRIPTION AND RESPONSE RATE REPORT 2014 University of Wisconsin Madison College of Letters and Sciences Alumni Web Surveys (P1064 and P1065) April, 2015 University of Wisconsin Survey Center The University of Wisconsin Survey Center As part of the College of Letters and Sciences Career Services Initiative, UWSC was asked to conduct two web surveys, one with all alumni who completed their undergraduate degrees in the college in 2012/13 and another with a sample of alumni who completed their undergraduate degrees between 2003 and 2006. The 2003 to 2006 sample was obtained through a multi stage sampling approach with a goal of obtaining data from alumni that was both inclusive of all majors/departments within the college, but also reflected the general distribution of the number of graduates who majored in those departments. Data collection for the 2012/13 Alumni study began August 25th, 2014 and ended December 31, 2014. Data collection for the 2003 to 2006 Alumni study began October 23 rd, 2014 and ended January 15, 2015. The UW Survey Center (UWSC) is a unit of the College of Letters and Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and is supported by the College, the Graduate School, and revenue generated from contractual work. Professor Nora Cate Schaeffer is the Faculty Director of the UW Survey Center. John Stevenson is the Associate Director. Kelly Elver served as Project Director on this project. A-1

The UW Survey Center utilizes a customized web survey administration program to allow for programming of complex survey instruments. It allows us to create highly customized instruments that best meet the needs of our clients. UWSC also has the capability to send email to all web survey respondents (including follow-up reminder emails). Included in this email is a username and password that the respondent must use to access and complete the survey. Web survey respondents may leave the survey at any time and return to complete it at their convenience. All UWSC web surveys are hosted on a UWSC administered secure web server. During the completion of a web survey, all web survey data are continually written to a secure UWSC database server. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION This project was conducted with two study populations. The first included all University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Letters and Sciences undergraduate alumni who graduated in 2012/13, a total of 3,207 alumni. The second was a sample drawn with a goal of obtaining survey data from the large number of graduates from all departments within the school who had graduated between 2003 and 2006, or 8 to 10 years prior to the conduct of the study, but also with a goal that this sample have a distribution of graduates that reflected the population of the school during that time period. A sample of 5,018 alumni was drawn from the over 10,000 alumni who graduated during that time period. A multi stage sampling methodology was used to draw the sample. The first stage selected all alumni who graduated with a major with fewer than 100 graduates total during this time period. This was done to ensure that alumni from even very small majors would be included in the study. The second stage sampled 100 alumni who graduated from every major in the population with 100 or more graduates during this time period. This was done to ensure that a minimum of 100 alumni from all larger majors would be included in the study. Finally, stage 3 took a proportional sample from the remaining population of alumni who graduated with a major with 100 or more graduates during this time period. This was done so that larger majors would have larger representation in the study, but to control for the extremely large numbers in a small number of majors compared to others in the college. The above sampling plan was devised to help deal with the complexity introduced by the fact that over 30 percent of alumni in the population graduated with 2 or more majors. Final weighted data will allow for sufficient N to accomplish within major analysis, as well as analysis across majors for the entire college. For both study populations, administrative data was obtained from the UW-Madison Registrar s Office, as well as from the Wisconsin Alumni Association. Kelly Elver and Rebekah Pryor Paré worked collaboratively to obtain this data from the Registrar and the WAA, and final files were received at UWSC in June of 2014. Obtaining administrative data regarding demographic characteristics of the alumni as well as information about when they graduated, with which A-2

majors, and a variety of other background information variables allowed for a shorter survey instrument by reducing the need to ask respondents about information already on file. Sample files were merged, moved from a hierarchical data structure by major to a flat data structure by alumni, cleaned and transferred to a database suitable for study fielding. UW Survey Center s tracking and locating department began tracing all members of the 2012/13 alumni pool in July of 2014, and completed tracing of each of the 3,207 alumni included in that group in August of 2014. After consulting with sampling statisticians from various departments on campus and within the UW Survey Center, the 2003 to 2006 alumni sample was drawn, and UWSC began tracking and locating members of this group in September, and concluded in mid- October of 2014. In both groups, new contact information was found for over 30% of the sample. Because the first group of alumni had graduated from the UW only a year before, much of the contact information on file for them was actually parent data. UWSC found new contact information for 1 year alumni who no longer lived at home, or at the residence they lived at upon graduation. For the 8 to 10 year alumni, UWSC began with contact information provided by the Wisconsin Alumni Association, and again for this group, found new contact information for over 30% of the sample. In addition, information obtained after fielding began (e-mail bounce backs, and undeliverable or forwarding information obtained from mailing of invitation letters and paper copies of the survey) was collected. For both groups, data obtained during the tracking and locating, and fielding process were delivered back to the college. WEB AND PAPER SURVEY DEVELOPMENT UWSC worked collaboratively with Rebekah Pryor Paré and Dean John Karl Scholz to develop a paper survey instrument for each group. Once surveys that were able to be administered on paper were developed, web survey development began. UWSC recommends this method for development of multi-mode surveys to ensure that the paper and web surveys are similar, and that mode differences that can result from collecting in two modes are minimal. Programming of the web surveys began in late July of 2014, and a draft survey was ready for testing in early August. During this time, paper surveys were formatted and all materials needed were ordered from printing. SURVEYADMINISTRATION In order to obtain the best response rate possible, a multi-mode contact protocol and survey were designed for this study. Survey methods research has shown that the addition of a mailed invitation sent just before an e-mail invitation is sent increases response rates. The letter serves to establish the creditability of the survey sponsor and allows for the delivery of a small preincentive, and the e-mail makes accessing the survey convenient for participants. Because some members of the sample for this study had only valid mailing addresses and some had only valid e-mail addresses, we also hoped that contacting participants by both means would reach the greatest number of alumni possible. A-3

Administration began via a mailed invitation letter. This letter included the URL survey link, along with a unique passcode for each sample member, and a $2 bill pre-incentive. Letters were mailed out via first class mail. Approximately 1 week later, e-mails were sent to all sample members who had not yet participated in the survey. Following these two initial contacts, 6 additional contacts, one including the paper questionnaire, were sent for the 1 Year Alumni, and 4 additional contacts were sent for the 8 to 10 Year Alumni. See below for a table of each contact mode, date, and the number sent. Contacts for 1 Year Alumni Survey Contact Date Sent Count (Total N = 3207) Advance Invitation Letter 8/22/14 3107 (100 cases had no viable mailing address to begin the study) E-mail Invitation 9/3/14 2797 (410 cases had no viable e-mail address to begin the study) Letter 1 st Reminder 9/16/14 2550 E-mail 1 st Reminder 9/17/14 2491 Paper Survey 9/30/14 2269 E-mail 2 nd Reminder 10/7/14 2171 E-mail 3 rd Reminder 11/24/14 1896 Letter 2 nd Reminder 11/24/14 1851 Contacts for 8 to 10 Year Alumni Survey Contact Date Sent Count (Total N = 5118) Advance Invitation Letter 10/23/14 5014 (104 cases had no viable mailing address to begin the study) E-mail Invitation 11/3/14 2520 (2,598 cases had no viable e-mail address to begin the study) Letter 1 st Reminder 11/13/14 2079 E-mail 1 st Reminder 11/14/14 3677 Paper Survey 12/4/14 3195 E-mail 2 nd Reminder 12/16/14 1555 Note that an extra letter and e-mail were sent to the 1 year alumni sample timed to coincide with Thanksgiving. This was done in hopes of reaching young alumni for whom we may have had only parent contact information while they were home for the holiday. A-4

In January of 2015, following the final mailings to non-responders, and after survey completion by participants had concluded, the UWSC removed the surveys from the field and began data cleaning and preparation for delivery. RESPONSE RATE The following table shows the total number of completed surveys broken down by sample type. Note that many participants started the survey without viable mailing addresses, e-mails, or both. Some were located during the field period, and because our goal was to reach everyone in the sample, only those who were determined to be too ill or deceased were removed from the response rate calculations. Outcome codes for 1 Year Alumni Survey Outcome Code Code Description Total Cases N=3,207 1100 Complete 1356 (Web=1190, Paper=166) 1200 Partial 20 2110 Explicit refusal 2 2260 R unavailable during field 1 period 2320 Physically or mentally 1 unable 3300 Returned undeliverable 212 by Mail, 466 by e-mail Final Sample Size 3,206 Total Response Rate 42.9% Simple Response Rate Calculation for 1 Year Alumni Survey # of completed interviews + partial interviews = total sample known ineligible sample 1,356 + 20 = 1,376 = 3,207 1 = 3,206 = 42.9% A-5

Outcome codes for 8 to 10 Year Alumni Survey Outcome Code Description Total Cases N=5,118 Code 1100 Complete 2523 (Web=2156, SAQ=367) 1200 Partial 19 2110 Explicit refusal 1 2260 R unavailable during field period 0 2320 Physically or mentally unable 0 3300 Returned undeliverable 172 Final Sample Size 5,118 Total Response Rate 49.7% Simple Response Rate Calculation for 8 to 10 Year Alumni Survey # of completed interviews + partial interviews total sample known ineligible sample 2,523 +19 = 2,542 5,118 0 = 5,118 = 49.7% A-6

Appendix B: Confidence Intervals Appendix B: Confidence Intervals for All Charts and Tables Chart 1. Which one of the following best describes your current activities? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 3.49 and 5.18. For alumni enroll in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 2.78 and 4.25. contains the true values lie between 6.62 and 8.90. true values lie between 5.37 and 7.51. true values lie between 76.45 and 79.96. Chart 2. Which one of the following best describes why you are not currently employed? For you were laid off by your employer, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 8.99 and 22.71 For you quit a job to seek other employment, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 6.78 and 20.05. For you have family responsibilities, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 45.26 and 65.36. For you are engaged in a volunteer activities, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 0.64 and 10.39. For you are not employed due to disability, we can be 95 percent certain the true value lies between 2.20 and 12.88. For you have chosen not to be employed, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 4.80 and 19.27. Chart 3. Is a B.A. or B.S. degree required for your current position? For yes, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 75.57 and 79.46. For No, but it is helpful, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 14.78 and 18.26. For No, it is irrelevant, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 4.95 and 7.20. B-1

Chart 4. What is your current salary before taxes? For Less than $19,999, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 2.38 and 3.85. For "$20,000 to $29,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 2.21 and 3.73. For $30,000 to $39,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 7.49 and 10.12. For $40,000 to $49,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 12.77 and 15.88. For $50,000 to $59,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 14.26 and 17.47. For $60,000 to $69,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 12.03 and 15.16. For $70,000 to $79,999", we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 8.76 and 11.57. For $80,000 to $89,999, we can be 95 % certain the true value lies between 5.71 and 7.96. For $90,000 to $99,999, we can ne 95% certain the true value lies between 3.59 and 5.45. For More than $100,000, we can be 95% certain the true value lies between 18.74 and 22.51. Chart 5. How close is your job to the type you expected to find prior to graduation? For Not at all, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 20.56 and 24.30. For A little, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 11.36 and 14.42. For Somewhat, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 18.15 and 21.82. For Very, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 17.41 and 20.93. For Extremely, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 12.83 and 15.93. For Had no clear expectation, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 10.10 and 13.01. Chart 6-A. In your current full-time or part-time position, are you employed by a government or public sector. the true values lie between 33.85 and 48.92. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 11.63and 23.69. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 24.76 and 29.03. B-2

Chart 6-B. In your current full-time or part-time position, are you employed by a private company. contains the true values lie between 31.20 and 46.20. true values lie between 42.10 and 59.55. true values lie between 53.54 and 58.36. Chart 6-C. In your current full-time or part-time position, are you employed by a non-profit organization. contains the true values lie between 14.94 and 27.22. true values lie between 24.57 and 41.21. true values lie between 15.50 and 19.03. Chart 7-A. Compared to new employees from other colleges or universities, do you feel that your UW-Madison academic preparation gave you an advantage. the true values lie between 68.17 and 81.62. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 62.69 and 78.10. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 68.08 and 72.53. Chart 7-B. Compared to new employees from other colleges or universities, do you feel that your UW-Madison academic preparation gave you a disadvantage. the true values lie between 0.35 and 2.49. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 0.37 and 2.36. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 0.79 and 1.92. Chart 7-C. Compared to new employees from other colleges or universities, do you feel that your UW-Madison academic preparation gave you neither an advantage or disadvantage. the true values lie between 17.51 and 30.91. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 21.02 and 36.38. B-3

For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 26.27 and 30.67. Chart 8-A. Did you have at least one professor at UW-Madison who got you excited about learning? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 87.94 and 98.19. For alumni enroll in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 88.28 and 99.23. the true values lie between 92.53 and 98.46. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain s the true values lie between 89.65 and 98.61. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 95.11 and 97.14. Chart 8-B. Did your professors seem to care about you as a person? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 55.99 and 75.24. For alumni enroll in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 64.32 and 82.68. the true values lie between 64.54 and 79.05. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 65.66 and 82.38. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 71.53 and 75.96. Chart 8-C. Did you have a mentor who encouraged you to pursue your goals and dreams? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 21.34 and 39.13. For alumni enroll in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 46.48 and 67.36. contains the true values lie between 33.63 and 48.52. true values lie between 26.84 and 42.86. true values lie between 34.85 and 39.49. B-4

Chart 10-A. How much has your overall quality of life been enhanced by your UW-Madison undergraduate experience? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 3.61 and 3.99. For alumni enrolled in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 3.85 and 4.30. contains the true values lie between 3.86 and 4.15. true values lie between 3.60 and 3.98. true values lie between 3.96 and 4.05. Chart 10-B. At present, how satisfied are you with your life? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 3.66 and 4.04. For alumni enrolled in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 3.94 and 4.25. contains the true values lie between 3.96 and 4.20. true values lie between 3.93 and 4.19. true values lie between 4.09 and 4.16. Chart 11-A. If you could start over, would you still choose to attend the University of Wisconsin-Madison? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 85.58 and 95.26. For alumni enrolled in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 83.58 and 96.36. contains the true values lie between 86.52 and 95.10. true values lie between 84.41 and 94.36. true values lie between 92.47 and 94.94. B-5

Chart 11-B. Would you recommend the University of Wisconsin-Madison to a potential student? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 92.15 and 98.06. For alumni enroll in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 88.30 and 99.30. contains the true values lie between 93.53 and 99.35. true values lie between 87.70 and 97.22. true values lie between 97.55 and 98.82. Chart 11-C. If you could start over, would you still choose to pursue the same major or majors, undergraduate certificate or concentration that you graduated with? For alumni not engaged in employment, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 25.71 and 44.53. For alumni enrolled in graduate or professional school, we can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 54.84 and 74.84. contains the true values lie between 40.51 and 55.91. true values lie between 35.15 and 52.42. true values lie between 50.13 and 55.04. Chart 12. Self-ranking of skillsets How able are you to understand and appreciate individual differences based on culture, ethnicity, disability, or sexual orientation after completing your degree at UW-Madison? We can be 95% certain the true values lie between 4.41 and 4.47. How able are you to understand values and ethical standards after completing your degree at UW-Madison? We can be 95% certain the true values lie between 4.46 and 4.51. How able are you to create original ideas or projects after completing your degree at UW- Madison3 We can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 3.93 and 4.00. How able are you to analyze and solve complex problems after completing your degree at UW-Madison? B-6

We can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 4.28 and 4.34. How able are you to draw conclusions after weighing evidence, facts and ideas after completing your degree at UW-Madison? We can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 4.44 and 4.49. How able are you to find, organize and evaluate information from multiple sources after completing your degree at UW-Madison? We can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 4.44 and 4.49. How able are you to communicate clearly and effectively after completing your degree at UW-Madison? We can be 95% certain contains the true values lie between 4.32 and 4.37. Chart 13-A. Working in a team structure? contains the true values lie between 88.21 and 96.23. true values lie between 72.16 and 86.78. true values lie between 92.52 and 94.97. Chart 13-B. Problem-solving and decision-making skills? contains the true values lie between 97.54 and 99.66. true values lie between 86.93 and 95.69. true values lie between 97.99 and 99.21. Chart 13-C. Planning, organizing and prioritizing work? true values lie between 88.71 and 96.33. true values lie between 98.51 and 99.57. Chart 13-D. Verbally communicating with persons inside and outside the organization? contains the true values lie between 95.58 and 99.40. true values lie between 90.00 and 97.54. B-7

true values lie between 97.64 and 98.91. Chart 13-E. Obtaining and processing information? contains the true values lie between 95.94 and 98.97. true values lie between 89.13 and 96.28. true values lie between 98.17 and 99.31. Chart 13-F. Analyzing quantitative information? contains the true values lie between 81.41 and 91.30. true values lie between 53.78 and 70.60. true values lie between 83.84 and 87.31. Chart 13-G. Technical knowledge related to the job? contains the true values lie between 88.74 and 95.91. true values lie between 65.18 and 81.84. true values lie between 90.80 and 93.50. Chart 13-H. Proficiency with computer software programs? contains the true values lie between 83.96 and 93.69. true values lie between 59.62 and 76.10. true values lie between 89.63 and 92.44. Chart 13-I. Creating or editing written reports, memos or publications? contains the true values lie between 70.02 and 82.97. true values lie between 57.49 and 73.70. B-8

true values lie between 75.56 and 79.65. Chart 13-J. An ability to sell or influence others? contains the true values lie between 65.59 and 79.57. true values lie between 57.49 and 73.70. true values lie between 75.56 and 79.65. Chart 13-K. Working with diverse groups of people? the true values lie between 93.16 and 97.81. For alumni employed fewer than 35 hours per week, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 83.96 and 94.67. For alumni employed 35 hours per week or more, we can be 95% certain the true values lie between 89.68 and 92.50. B-9