Introduction and Purpose for the Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

School Leadership Rubrics

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Program Change Proposal:

Dr Marios Panteli (EdD) Deputy Primary Headteacher, Teacher Trainer and External Collaborator with the PIC

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

University of Toronto

The 21st Century Principal

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

IMPORTANT STEPS WHEN BUILDING A NEW TEAM

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

EQuIP Review Feedback

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Note on the PELP Coherence Framework

Loyola University Chicago Chicago, Illinois

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

Emerald Coast Career Institute N

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

Incorporating Social and Emotional Learning Into Classroom Instruction and Educator Effectiveness

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

AGENDA Symposium on the Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Populations

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Sancta Maria Catholic Primary School

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Trainee Handbook. In Collaboration With. University of Arkansas for Medical Science (UAMS)

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Common Core Path to Achievement. A Three Year Blueprint to Success

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Robert S. Unnasch, Ph.D.

What does Quality Look Like?

Teacher Development to Support English Language Learners in the Context of Common Core State Standards

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

An Introduction to LEAP

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

Utfordringer for naturfagene, spesielt knyttet til progresjon. Doris Jorde Naturfagsenteret

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

2010 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Proposition 1: Teachers are committed to students and their learning.

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Transcription:

Introduction and Purpose for the Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs are intended to set forth a clear framework to assist in the development of research-based programs that meet local needs and are responsive to local contexts. The standards are broad and interdependent, describing a vision of a comprehensive and dynamic program for beginning teachers and those who support them. The standards provide a research-based foundation that will guide and support development of induction programs. The intent of these standards is to foster thoughtful, high quality growth and development; they become purposeful and meaningful when implemented fully at the local level. Standards help reflect on best practices and effective structures necessary to the design and delivery of high quality, effective induction programs. Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs have been developed by a diverse stakeholder group that has broadly reviewed the research on induction and induction programs as well as their implementation. Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs are offered to facilitate and support the development, implementation and continual improvement of induction programs that in turn achieve the goals for induction programs. In accordance with Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code 1, goals of beginning teacher induction programs are to: provide a system for teacher induction that provides an effective transition into teaching for first and second year teachers improve student performance through improved training, information and assistance for beginning teachers enable beginning teachers to be effective in teaching a range of student populations ensure success and retention of beginning teachers who show promise of becoming highly effective professionals identify beginning teachers who need additional feedback, assistance and training establish an effective, coherent system of formative assessments based on the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. 1 Section 21-2 (c) (2) (A) of the 2006 Illinois School Code [105 ILCS 5/21-2 (c) (2) (A)], induction programs may be offered by two or more school districts or other organizations. 1

Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs Standard 1: Induction Program Leadership, Administration, and Support The induction program has an administrative structure with specified leaders who plan, implement, evaluate and refine the program through data analysis, program evaluation, and stakeholder communication linked to relevant standards. Standard 2: Program Goals and Design Local program design is focused on beginning teacher development, support, retention and improved student learning. The goals are guided by current induction research, effective practices, Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs, the district/school improvement plan and local concerns/context. Standard 3: Resources Program leadership allocates and monitors sufficient resources to meet all goals and deliver program components to all participants. Standard 4: Site Administrator Roles and Responsibilities Site administrators lead efforts to create a positive climate for the delivery of all essential program components. Site administrators and program leadership collaborate to ensure that they are well prepared to assume their responsibilities for supporting beginning teachers in the induction program. Standard 5: Mentor Selection and Assignment Mentors are recruited, selected and assigned using a comprehensive strategy that includes a clearly articulated, open process and specific criteria that are developed by and communicated to all stakeholder groups. Standard 6: Mentor Professional Development Mentor professional development provides a formal orientation and foundational mentor training before they begin their work with beginning teachers and should continue over the course of the mentor s work with beginning teachers. Mentors have time, supported by the program, to engage in this mentor learning community and are consistently supported in their efforts to assist beginning teachers in their development, with a focus on student learning. Standard 7: Development of Beginning Teacher Practice Beginning teachers have regularly scheduled time, provided during the two year program, to participate in ongoing professional development that is focused on their professional growth to support student learning. Standard 8: Formative Assessment Beginning teachers and mentors participate in formative assessment experiences, collaboratively collecting and analyzing measures of teaching progress, including appropriate documentation, mentor observations and student work, to improve classroom practices and increase student achievement. Standard 9: Program Evaluation Programs operate a comprehensive, ongoing system of program development and evaluation that involves all program participants and other stakeholders. 2

Standard 1: Induction Program Leadership, Administration, and Support The induction program has an administrative structure with specified leaders who plan, implement, evaluate and refine the program through data analysis, program evaluation, and stakeholder communication linked to relevant standards. Induction leadership focuses on allocation of sufficient resources, facilitation of professional development, program oversight and evaluation. They also ensure effective coordination of services and communication for beginning teachers, teacher leaders, mentors, site and district administrators, and other support providers.! Induction leadership, administration, and support are aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Responsibilities for program planning, operation and oversight are clearly defined and program leadership is designated.! The program leadership implements a high quality program in accordance with state guidelines and state induction standards, as applicable.! Adequate time, fiscal resources, and appropriate authority are allocated to program leadership, which should include a team of stakeholders that provides support and oversight.! Stakeholder collaboration is focused on creating a culture of commitment to beginning teacher induction and improving student achievement, and includes teachers, administration, school boards, union/association, and additional professional partners.! Program leadership participates in professional development to understand, design and implement high quality induction and mentoring.! Program leadership participates in on-going professional development linking to a professional learning community specifically for program leadership.! Program leadership uses data to facilitate on-going program planning, implementation, evaluation and improvement. 3

Standard 2: Program Goals and Design Local program design is focused on beginning teacher development, support, retention and improved student learning. The goals are guided by current induction research, effective practices, Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs, the district/school improvement plan and local concerns/context. Program design and goals reflect a sound understanding of research on the unique strengths and needs of individual beginning teachers as they develop over time. Program goals and design include appropriate support activities, professional development, and assessment practices designed to effectively meet the needs of beginning teachers, teacher leaders, mentors, administrators and other support providers. Program goals are explicitly linked to improving teacher quality and retention while raising student achievement.! The program goals are aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A), Illinois Professional Teaching Standards (IPTS) and relevant content-area standards.! The program design includes learning outcomes for participants that recognize the continuum of teacher development and a focus on student learning, with clearly defined participant expectations for program completion.! The program design provides effective communication among program leadership, mentors, beginning teachers and site administrators. The design of the induction program is consistent with and integrated into the school and district school improvement goals and ongoing professional development initiatives.! The program design includes high quality mentor selection, training, assessment/evaluation and ongoing support in a mentor learning community.! The program design defines essential activities including beginning teacher formative assessment, written documentation of beginning teacher/mentor work, analysis of beginning teacher instruction and student learning, and professional development for all stakeholders.! The program design involves a planned process for program orientation for all participants and ongoing feedback on progress toward program completion in relation to the beginning teacher moving from initial to standard certification.! The program goals and outcomes around teacher development, retention, support and student learning reviewed and revised as necessary, based on multiple sources of program evaluation data analyzed by program leaders and stakeholders. 4

Standard 3: Resources Program leadership allocates and monitors sufficient resources to meet all goals and deliver program components to all participants. The quality and effectiveness of induction programs rely on the appropriate and thoughtful use of human, time, fiscal and other resources. Program leadership allocates resources in a manner consistent with the stated program rationale, design, goals and, when appropriate, local collective bargaining agreements.! Resources are aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! The program leadership allocates adequate resources to ensure an appropriate distribution of funds to support components defined in the program design. This may include materials, release time, salary and benefits, stipends substitute coverage, and other resources.! The program leadership, program partners and all stakeholders access and coordinate existing professional development resources to effectively align and coordinate with the induction program.! The program leadership allocates sufficient, sanctioned, protected time essential for high quality induction and mentoring.! The program leadership monitors resource allocations on a regular basis and makes necessary adjustments.! The program leadership provides fiscal reports documenting allocation of resources as necessary for accountability and on-going program improvement. 5

Standard 4: Site Administrator Roles and Responsibilities Site administrators lead efforts to create a positive climate for the delivery of all essential program components. Site administrators and program leadership collaborate to ensure that they are well prepared to assume their responsibilities for supporting beginning teachers in the induction program. Site administrators are crucial to setting the stage for beginning teacher success and are essential partners. Site administrators seek to secure assignments and establish working conditions for beginning teachers that maximize their success. Site administrators communicate with the beginning teachers and mentors in a formal, ongoing process.! Site administrator roles and responsibilities are aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Site administrators participate in appropriate induction professional development and are an integral part of program operation.! Site administrators collaborate with program leadership to overcome challenging aspects of beginning teacher working environments and other operational and logistical barriers.! Site administrators facilitate the inclusion of beginning teachers in the learning community and promote the commitment of all staff to supporting beginning teachers.! Site administrators clearly communicate roles, responsibilities, and expectations for mentors/beginning teachers based on program design development by leadership.! Site administrators respect the confidentiality of the mentor/beginning teacher relationship.! Site administrators facilitate the integration of induction practices into professional development initiatives with a focus on student learning.! Site administrators align their work in support of beginning teachers with the Illinois Standards for Administrative Certification. 6

Standard 5: Mentor Selection and Assignment Mentors are recruited, selected and assigned using a comprehensive strategy that includes a clearly articulated, open process and specific criteria that are developed by and communicated to all stakeholder groups. The selection of well-qualified mentors based on the qualities of an effective mentor is essential to creating programs that support teacher development, teacher retention, and improved student learning. The process for mentor recruitment, selection and assignment includes ample time for communication, application, selection and assignment. Selection is guided by well-defined, explicit criteria that are consistently applied and periodically reviewed.! Mentor selection and assignment is aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Programs are guided by clear selection criteria that represent a commitment to mentors: o Demonstrating evidence of effective teaching practice, including demonstration of content knowledge for the appropriate student-age level span o Having strong intra-and interpersonal skills, including self reflection of practice and responsiveness to needs of beginning teachers o Exhibiting knowledge of pedagogy, context, and the diverse learning needs of both beginning teachers and their students.! Beginning teachers and their mentors are matched according to relevant factors, including certification, experience, current assignments and/or proximity of location.! The program has defined a process to address changes or necessary adjustments in the mentor/beginning teacher matches. 7

Standard 6: Mentor Professional Development Mentor professional development provides a formal orientation and foundational mentor training before they begin their work with beginning teachers and should continue over the course of the mentor s work with beginning teachers. Mentors have time, supported by the program, to engage in this mentor learning community and are consistently supported in their efforts to assist beginning teachers in their development, with a focus on student learning. Professional development includes both the development of knowledge and skills needed to identify and respond to beginning teacher needs, and the development of a collegial community that engages mentors. Awareness of the diverse needs of students and their learning needs, the range of beginning teacher needs, and the ability to structure and provide opportunities that nurture beginning teachers professional growth and development demand the development of unique abilities and skills of mentors.! Mentor professional development is aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Mentors participate in foundational mentor training, as detailed in Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Mentors participate in an ongoing professional learning community that supports their reflective practice and their use of mentoring tools, protocols, and formative assessment, as well as relevant district tools and standards.! The mentor learning community meets for regularly scheduled professional development and fulfills a number of purposes to deepen mentoring skills and advance induction practices.! Mentors engage in self-assessment and reflect on their own development as teachers and mentors. 8

Standard 7: Development of Beginning Teacher Practice Beginning teachers have regularly scheduled time, provided during the two year program, to participate in ongoing professional development that is focused on their professional growth to support student learning. The development of the beginning teacher s practice is guided by induction research and the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards that describes the needs of beginning teachers, local expectations and priorities. It is also rooted in formative assessment, in which the beginning teacher and mentor collaboratively collect and analyze multiple sources of data and use structured reflection, in an ongoing process, to focus on classroom practice and meeting students individual needs.! Development of beginning teacher practice is aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! Beginning teachers have regularly scheduled learning opportunities, starting with an orientation to the induction program, including an orientation to the community, prior to or at the beginning of the school year and continuing throughout the school year.! Formal support includes opportunities to interact in beginning teacher-only peer groups, as well as sessions with their mentors, for the purpose of professional learning, problem-solving, and mutual support.! Professional development is guided by the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards, as well as relevant content area standards, beginning teachers assessed needs, local instructional needs and priorities.! The program design provides time to ensure that the quality of the process (e.g. analysis of student work, data collection, observations and reflective conversations) is supported. 9

Standard 8: Formative Assessment Beginning teachers and mentors participate in formative assessment experiences, collaboratively collecting and analyzing measures of teaching progress, including appropriate documentation, mentor observations and student work, to improve classroom practices and increase student achievement. The formative assessment process provides a framework that demonstrates beginning teachers growth and progress and engages beginning teachers and their mentors in an ongoing, reflective process. The purpose of formative assessment is to improve teaching, as measured by the Illinois Professional Teaching Standards, the Illinois Continuum of Teacher Development and Illinois content standards.! Formative assessment information is used to determine the scope, focus, and content of professional development activities that are the basis of the beginning teacher s initial selfassessment and development of an individual learning plan.! The formative assessment system is characterized by multiple measures of teaching, including, but not limited to: observation by a mentor, analysis of student work and assessment data, reflection and examination of other teaching artifacts.! Appropriate documentation is utilized to illustrate the use of formative assessment. Documentation should include evidence such as classroom observation data, student work, teacher inquiry, lesson plans and beginning teacher mentor communication tools.! Criteria for levels of beginning teacher development are established and the use of formative assessment allows the beginning teacher and mentor to set clear goals for improving the teacher s level of proficiency.! Formative assessment and the accompanying documentation and observation data guides mentoring and professional development and is not to be used for formal teacher evaluation or employment decisions. 10

Standard 9: Program Evaluation Programs operate a comprehensive, ongoing system of program development and evaluation that involves all program participants and other stakeholders. The program evaluation leads to substantive program improvements and refinements that focus on the outcomes of teacher retention, teacher quality and student achievement. Program leadership and stakeholders use program evaluation to ensure program quality and effectiveness.! Program evaluation is aligned with the relevant Article 21A of the 2006 Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/21A).! The criteria for program evaluation are determined by these standards entitled the Illinois Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Beginning Teacher Induction Programs and local program goals.! The system of program development includes ongoing program evaluation processes, across all of these Standards, based on information from multiple internal and external sources. Program leadership conducts an annual internal program evaluation.! Regular collection and reflection of feedback about program implementation quality and effectiveness from all participants is done using formal and informal measures.! Program leadership analyzes multiple sources of data and shares results with stakeholders in a systematic way.! The program provides for mentor accountability in a supportive environment through a defined process of communication and documentation.! Program stakeholders participate in external reviews designed to examine program quality and effectiveness, including ISBE program approval and review processes.! Program leadership participates in statewide data collection that will inform policymakers and other teacher-quality stakeholders of successes and challenges. 11