Fullhurst Community College

Fullhurst Community College Student survey report September 2014 In case of enquiries please contact Kirkland Rowell Surveys by emailing info@kirkland-rowell.com. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited. Kirkland Rowell is part of GL Assessment, a division of the GL Education Group. Report generated on 12//2014

Student survey report Contents Page 1. Executive summary An overview of findings for this survey with comparison to the previous survey if applicable. 2. Key results Satisfaction levels for academic, non-academic and additional criteria. 3 3. Student priorities Importance ratings and priorities for improvement. 15 4. Parent View : Student summary Your survey data linked to the 12 questions in Ofsted s Parent View. 20 5. ASCL self-evaluation summary Linking your survey data to the current evaluation schedule. 22 6. Unexpected results Highlighting any particularly unusual or unexpected results. 43 7. Standard analysis Analysis of all remaining data which may include gender analysis,healthy lifestyle, home environment, values and homework. 50 8. group analysis group scores compared to national averages. 68 9. Time series analysis Trends for surveyed criteria over time. 76. Appendix Supplementary data and further information. 84 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 2 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Executive summary This report details the findings of the fourth Kirkland Rowell Student Survey for Fullhurst Community College. The report measures the levels of satisfaction among the students for a range of criteria, which have been previously identified as being important to the parents of school students, as well as for the core subjects, taught at the school. The report measures the relative importance of the criteria surveyed, as well as providing results tables that identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the school in the year to September 2014. The report also measures performance with regard to overall satisfaction and improvement. Summary of results for this survey 380 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 43.7%. The response meant that meaningful data could be drawn for all criteria except for Psychology. The students gave an excellent overall performance score (75.8%) (see page 6). Among the students who had been attending the school for over a year, 59% said the school had improved over the last year and 22% thought that the school s performance was worse (see page 50). With regard to academic subjects, the highest proportion of students who said they were making good progress was for French, Music and Religious Studies. The highest proportion of students who said they were not making good progress was for Hospitality, Film Studies and History. With regard to non-academic areas, students awarded the highest scores for the delivery of School facilities, Community spirit and School discipline. The students awarded the lowest scores for the delivery of Levels of homework, School security and Developing potential. The students' top priorities for improvement are Control of bullying, Choice of subjects and Exam results. The male students gave significantly higher scores for Promoting racial harmony. The female students gave significantly higher scores for Music, Physical Education, English, Art, Geography, Food Technology, French, Drama, Religious Studies, Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress, Celebrating and rewarding achievement, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results since the previous survey The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Quality of school management, Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Extra curricular activities, Encouraging and listening to parent views, Encouraging local community activity and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results over more than two surveys The following academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Mathematics, French, Music and Physical Education. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 3 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Exam results and Truancy control. The following additional area received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Extra curricular activities. The survey has achieved a good benchmark of performance against which future academic years might be compared. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 4 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Strengths and weaknesses The results below are the areas in which the school has the highest and lowest perceived standards of performance. Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black is room for improvement and red attention advised. Criterion scores in blue are only reliable to within 1 and scores in pink should only be considered indicative. Relative strengths for academic criteria 1.2% French 99.5% Music 96.6% Religious Studies 95.5% Mathematics 95.4% Engineering Relative weaknesses for academic criteria 82.9% Hospitality 86.2% Film Studies 88.1% History 88.7% Health & Social Care 88.7% English Relative strengths for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking 4.1% School facilities (57.) 7th 96.4% Community spirit (35.5%) 19th 88.5% School discipline (78.7%) 1st 87.7% Developing confidence (39.4%) 15th 87.2% Teaching quality (57.1%) 6th Relative weaknesses for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking 75.8% Levels of homework (52.4%) 8th 76.1% School security (66.6%) 3rd 76.9% Developing potential (41.2%) 14th 77.9% Caring teachers (43.3%) 12th 77.9% Exam results (62.) 5th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 5 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Response to survey 380 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 43.7%. Proportion of responses (%) Number of responses Responses from male students 51.7 185 Responses from female students 48.3 173 Responses from 7 students 34.2 125 Responses from 8 students 22.7 83 Responses from 9 students 14.8 54 Responses from students 26.3 96 Responses from students 1.9 7 Overall student satisfaction This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Change (%) Overall, rate the performance of the school 75.8 70.3 +5.5 Overall student satisfaction 5 53% 3 3 2 16% 1 1% Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good More students rate the overall performance of the school as good or very good. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 6 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Overall performance scores broken down by gender and year group Overall performance scores broken down by gender 9 7 76% 76% 76% 7 7 71% 5 3 2 1 All students Male students Female students This survey Last survey The students gave an excellent overall performance score of 75.8%, improved since the last survey. Male students scored the overall performance of the school broadly in line with female students. Overall performance scores broken down by year group 9 86% 86% 87% 7 77% 77% 78% 68% 71% 66% 71% 69% 73% 79% 75% 5 3 2 1 All students Male students Female students 7 students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore most satisfied with the school s performance. 7 male students and female students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore most satisfied with the school s performance. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 7 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Time series analysis of overall performance scores Graph showing the overall performance scores trend broken down over time. 9 77% 76% 7 66% 7 5 3 2 1 20 2012 2014 2015 There was no significant change over four surveys for the overall performance score. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 8 of 91

Student survey report Executive summary Students recommend this school broken down by gender and year group Recommend this school scores broken down by gender 9 7 86% 9 78% 77% 78% 83% 5 3 2 1 All students Male students Female students This survey Last survey 85.7% of students said they would recommend this school to another student. Male students would recommend this school to another student more than female students. Recommend this school scores broken down by year group 96% 98% 94% 9 7 86% 78% 76% 88% 85% 86% 82% 82% 83% 73% 5 3 2 1 All students Male students Female students 7 students would recommend this school to another student more than other year groups. 8 male students and female students would recommend this school to another student more than other year groups. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 9 of 91

Student survey report Key results Key results The core analysis of your survey data; proportions making progress in academic subjects and satisfaction levels in non-academic and additional criteria. Explanations have been provided to help you to interpret your results. Interpreting results For the sake of assessment in most schools, academic questions receiving a score of: Over 9 are 'outstanding' (above the gold line) to 89.9% are 'good' (above the green line) 75% to 79.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line) Below 75% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line) Non-academic and additional questions receiving a score of: Over are 'outstanding' (above the gold line) 7 to 79.9% are 'good' (above the green line) 65% to 69.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line) Below 65% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line) Weighted scores In the results tables the scores achieved are given as a percentage. A full explanation of how true/false responses were converted to percentages is given on our website. As there is a measurable bias in the way that students score criteria, it is necessary to create weighted scores so that the score for any one criterion might be compared meaningfully with the score for any other criterion on a level playing field. These weighted scores are calculated based upon the average scores achieved from over 190 similar, English schools. Results quoted from the previous survey, if applicable, may show small differences from those originally given, as the weightings applied change slightly from one year to the next. Statistical reliability Generally all of our results are quoted as being reliable to within less than 5% at the 95% confidence level. Where this is not possible due to the sample achieved, results are quoted as reliable to within less than 1 at the 95% confidence level and are highlighted in blue. Occasionally when results are even less reliable we show an indicative result and highlight in pink. Where there are fewer than responses we only show low response and no further result is quoted. For further information see our website for details. Criteria which have not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools do not yet have an average figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents usually say. These un-weighted scores are marked *. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page of 91

Student survey report Key results Understanding your results table Your results are shown as a weighted score. This is a calculation applied to your raw results using the average scores achieved from over 190 similar, English schools. It allows each criterion to be compared meaningfully on a level playing field. This score can be over. The previous survey results may appear to differ slightly from your original report last year. This is because the weighting calculation applied changes slightly from one year to the next. Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change Scores above ICTthe gold 96.2 92.8 +3.4 line are outstanding. French 92.6 90.9 +1.7 Religious Education 82.4 76.1 +6.3 Physical Education 82.3 79.6 +2.7 Only highlighted changes should Music 82.1 be 78.3 considered significant +3.8 a Food Technology 81.4 green highlight shows a significant 81.7-0.3 improvement, a red highlight shows Scores above History the green 80.8 a significant 75.0 decline, since +5.8 the last line are good. Mathematics 80.1 survey. 79.4 +0.7 Geography 79.9 74.9 +5.0 Business Studies 77.2 Design Technology 77.2 72.1 +5.1 Scores above Artthe red 76.5 75.4 +1.1 line indicate Textiles 'room for 76.3 improvement'. English 75.5 72.8 +2.7 Russian * 74.3 Science 72.1 84.8-12.7 Drama 71.5 73.4-1.9 Engineering 59.5 Psychology * This criteria has not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools. As such we do not have an average figure and therefore cannot weight this score against what students parents usually say. Scores below the red line indicate 'attention advised'. Low response Low response indicates that there were fewer than responses. Subject scores in blue are only reliable to within 1 due to the sample achieved. Subject scores in pink should only be considered indicative due to a low sample size, or high polarisation. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page of 91

Student survey report Key results Academic criteria The following table shows weighted proportion of students making progress for all academic subjects taught within the school. Where data is available, these are compared to the same score from the previous year s survey, and the percentage change shown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change French 1.2 81.8 +19.4 Music 99.5 93.0 +6.5 Religious Studies 96.6 82.9 +13.7 Mathematics 95.5 90.4 +5.0 Engineering 95.4 Art 95.2 80.6 +14.7 Business Studies 93.3 67.2 +26.1 Citizenship 93.2 95.2-2.0 Philosophy and Ethics 92.3 Geography 92.1 88.5 +3.7 ICT 91.9 Physical Education 91.5 85.4 +6.2 Science 90.4 85.9 +4.6 Drama 89.1 88.3 +0.8 Food Technology 88.9 93.5-4.6 English 88.7 87.1 +1.6 Health & Social Care 88.7 History 88.1 89.5-1.4 Film Studies 86.2 92.7-6.5 Hospitality 82.9 Psychology Low response Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as outstanding : French, Music, Religious Studies, Mathematics, Engineering, Art, Business Studies, Citizenship, Philosophy and Ethics, Geography, ICT, Physical Education and Science. Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as good : Drama, Food Technology, English, Health & Social Care, History, Film Studies and Hospitality. The proportion of students making progress in the following academic subjects has shown significant improvement since the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following academic subject achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 1: Religious Studies, Drama, Food Technology and Health & Social Care. The following academic subject achieved a very low sample; therefore scores should only be considered indicative: Engineering, Business Studies, Philosophy and Ethics, Film Studies and Hospitality. Previous survey data cannot be provided for comparison for the following subjects: Engineering, Philosophy and Ethics, ICT, Health & Social Care and Hospitality. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 12 of 91

Student survey report Key results Non-academic criteria The following table shows the scores given by students for non-academic areas. Where data is available, these are compared to the same score from the previous year s survey, and the percentage change shown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Non-academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change School facilities 4.1 94.5 +9.6 Community spirit 96.4 80.7 +15.6 School discipline 88.5 79.9 +8.6 Developing confidence 87.7 72.1 +15.6 Teaching quality 87.2 75.9 +.3 Availability of resources 87.1 80.4 +6.7 Control of bullying 86.3 65.5 +20.9 Careers advice 85.1 75.9 +9.2 Social health education 83.5 69.8 +13.7 School communication 82.4 76.9 +5.5 Happiness of child 80.4 71.7 +8.7 Truancy control 80.2 73.3 +6.9 Developing moral values 78.7 71.0 +7.7 Computer access 78.4 74.7 +3.7 Choice of subjects 78.3 64.3 +14.0 Exam results 77.9 77.2 +0.7 Caring teachers 77.9 70.4 +7.5 Developing potential 76.9 72.4 +4.4 School security 76.1 73.8 +2.3 Levels of homework 75.8 77.7-1.9 Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as outstanding : School facilities, Community spirit, School discipline, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Availability of resources, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, School communication, Happiness of child and Truancy control. Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as good : Developing moral values, Computer access, Choice of subjects, Exam results, Caring teachers, Developing potential, School security and Levels of homework. The scores given by students in the following non-academic criteria have shown significant improvement since the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following non-academic criteria achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 1: Community spirit. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 13 of 91

Student survey report Key results Additional criteria Additional criteria were chosen by the school, and investigated with regard to student satisfaction. The following results were achieved with regard to those students who answered the question. The percentage scores are given in descending order. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant. Additional criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change Regular marking of work 95.1 72.7 +22.4 Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1 71.7 +15.4 Encouraging local community activity 84.9 68.9 +16.0 Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83.0 70.7 +12.3 Quality of school management 81.0 70.5 +.6 Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7 64.4 +16.3 Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2 74.8 +5.4 Handling complaints 79.7 72.3 +7.4 Extra curricular activities 78.7 70.3 +8.4 Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3 74.0 +4.3 Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8 74.2 +2.6 Promoting racial harmony 75.7 70.7 +5.0 Unexpected costs/expenses* 74.9 72.6 +2.3 Teaching for special needs 74.2 73.1 +1.1 Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5 74.3-0.8 Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as outstanding : Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Encouraging local community activity, Encouraging and listening to pupil views, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Explaining to parents how to help their child. Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as good : Handling complaints, Extra curricular activities, Celebrating and rewarding achievement, Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress, Promoting racial harmony, Unexpected costs/expenses, Teaching for special needs and Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability. The scores given by students in the following additional criteria have shown significant improvement since the previous survey: Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Encouraging local community activity, Encouraging and listening to pupil views, Quality of school management, Encouraging and listening to parent views and Extra curricular activities. The following additional criteria have not been surveyed in at least 30 schools so we do not yet have an average figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students usually say: Unexpected costs/expenses. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 14 of 91

Student survey report Student priorities Student priorities Students were asked to choose the ten criteria which were most important to them from a list of twenty. This section shows the analysis of these importance ratings and of the priorities for improvement. Student priorities importance Ideally those criteria which are most important to students will be the criteria to which students award the highest scores. In the following table, the second column shows the percentage of students who chose each of the criteria as one of their ten choices of what they felt was most important to them. The third column shows how well the school performs for the criteria ie. 1st = what the school does best, 20th = what the school does least well. Only highlighted rankings should be considered as being worthy of note. A green highlight shows that the school performs well within a criterion that is important to students, a red highlight shows that the school performs less well within a criterion that is important to students. The final two columns show the same information for the previous survey, for comparison. Criteria Importance score (%) Satisfaction ranking Previous importance score (%) Previous satisfaction ranking School discipline 78.7 3rd 77.8 4th Control of bullying 76.6 7th 78.5 19th School security 66.6 19th 69.7 th Happiness of child 66.2 th 69.6 15th Exam results 62.0 16th 68.7 6th Teaching quality 57.1 5th 63.1 8th School facilities 57.0 1st 53.1 1st Levels of homework 52.4 20th 43.6 5th Careers advice 48.2 8th 49.6 9th Social health education 46.8 9th 37.1 18th Choice of subjects 46.0 15th 49.1 20th Caring teachers 43.3 17th 43.2 17th Truancy control 41.9 12th 31.9 12th Developing potential 41.2 18th 44.2 13th Developing confidence 39.4 4th 48.0 14th Availability of resources 39.4 6th 48.8 3rd Computer access 37.2 14th 33.5 th School communication 35.8 th 31.0 7th Community spirit 35.5 2nd 25.1 2nd Developing moral values 28.8 13th 34.3 16th With regard to the five criteria most important to students: The school performs well in: School discipline. The school performs less well in: School security and Exam results. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 15 of 91

Student survey report Student priorities Importance: your school vs. similar schools Students were asked to choose ten priorities from a list of twenty criteria. The table below shows which criteria the students from your school selected as most important. The second column shows you the percentage of students who selected each criterion as one of their ten choices, and the final column compares your school s data to the views from students from similar schools. Position differences of six or more have been highlighted as being worthy of note. Criteria Importance score (%) Importance ranking Average ranking for similar schools Ranking difference to similar schools School discipline 78.7 1st 4th +3 Control of bullying 76.6 2nd 3rd +1 School security 66.6 3rd 2nd -1 Happiness of child 66.2 4th 1st -3 Exam results 62.0 5th 5th 0 Teaching quality 57.1 6th 7th +1 School facilities 57.0 7th 6th -1 Levels of homework 52.4 8th 12th +4 Careers advice 48.2 9th 8th -1 Social health education 46.8 th 15th +5 Choice of subjects 46.0 th 9th -2 Caring teachers 43.3 12th th -2 Truancy control 41.9 13th 17th +4 Developing potential 41.2 14th th -3 Developing confidence 39.4 15th 13th -2 Availability of resources 39.4 15th 16th +1 Computer access 37.2 17th 14th -3 School communication 35.8 18th 18th 0 Community spirit 35.5 19th 20th +1 Developing moral values 28.8 20th 19th -1 Most of the criteria the students from your school selected as important are in line with the criteria that students of similar schools select as important. Students from your school selected the following criteria as more important than students at similar schools: Levels of homework, Social health education and Truancy control. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 16 of 91

Student survey report Student priorities How priorities change as students get older The graph below shows which criteria 7 students selected as important compared to which criteria parents of & students selected as important. This shows us how priorities change as the students get older. The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups Student priorities 9 7 5 3 2 1 School discipline Control of bullying School security Exam results Happiness of child Levels of homework School facilities Social health education Teaching quality School communication Caring teachers Computer access Choice of subjects Community spirit Availability of resources Truancy control Developing moral values Developing confidence Developing potential Careers advice 7 & Criteria where difference in ranking is six or more 7 ranking & ranking Social health education 8th 16th School communication th 18th Computer access 12th 19th Community spirit 13th 20th Availability of resources 15th 8th Developing potential 19th th Careers advice 20th 8th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 17 of 91

Student survey report Student priorities How priorities change by gender of student The graph below shows which criteria female students selected as important compared to which criteria male students selected as important. This shows us how priorities change by gender of the student. The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups Student priorities 9 7 5 3 2 1 School discipline Control of bullying School security Happiness of child Exam results Teaching quality School facilities Levels of homework Social health education Careers advice Caring teachers Community spirit Choice of subjects Computer access Availability of resources Developing potential Truancy control Developing moral values Developing confidence School communication Male students Female students Criteria where difference in ranking is six or more Male students ranking Female students ranking Community spirit 12th 19th Developing moral values 18th 20th Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 18 of 91

Student survey report Student priorities Relative student priorities for improvement Student priorities are shown below compared to student priorities in similar schools. The school s previous years figures are also provided for comparison. Criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Similar schools (%) Control of bullying 17.2.7 9.2 Choice of subjects.2.3 7.9 Exam results 9.5 8.1 7.2 School discipline 8.5 8.8 9.4 Happiness of child 7.9.4 9.7 Levels of homework 6.0 3.1 5.1 Computer access 4.7 3.6 4.0 Teaching quality 4.7 7.7 8.3 School facilities 4.3 3.2 13.4 Availability of resources 4.1 2.2 2.6 Developing potential 3.7 3.5 2.3 Careers advice 3.5 2.6 3.8 Developing confidence 3.1 8.2 3.0 School security 2.6 1.7 3.0 Truancy control 2.5 4.0 2.4 School communication 1.8 1.1 1.7 Community spirit 1.5 0.0 1.4 Social health education 1.2 1.2 1.8 Developing moral values 1.1 4.2 0.9 Caring teachers 1.0 2.2 2.9 Students have given a higher priority to the following areas since the last survey: Control of bullying. Students have given a lower priority to the following areas since the last survey: Developing confidence. Students have given a higher priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: Control of bullying. Students have given a lower priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: School facilities. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 19 of 91

Student survey report Parent View : Student summary Parent View : Student summary Below are the twelve "Parent View" questions. For each of the questions, we have given the weighted student scores for any relevant criteria included on your questionnaire. In terms of student perceptions Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black requires improvement and red is inadequate. Score Sample 1. My child is happy at this school Happiness of child 80.4% 336 2. My child feels safe at this school Control of bullying 86.3% 331 School security 76.1% 291 3. My child makes good progress at this school Developing potential 76.9% 344 Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% 346 4. My child is well looked after at this school Caring teachers 77.9% 344 School security 76.1% 291 5. My child is taught well at this school Teaching quality 87.2% 343 Exam results 77.9% 340 Developing potential 76.9% 344 Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% 346 Teaching for special needs 74.2% 341 Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% 344 6. My child receives appropriate homework for their age Respondents saying 'Right' for homework amount Requires improvement 380 Levels of homework 75.8% 342 Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% 344 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 20 of 91

Student survey report Parent View : Student summary Score Sample 7. This school ensures the pupils are well behaved School discipline 88.5% 300 8. This school deals effectively with bullying Control of bullying 86.3% 331 9. Quality of school management Quality of school management 81. 348. This school responds well to any concern I raise Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% 339 Handling complaints 79.7% 343 Caring teachers 77.9% 344. I receive valuable information from the school about my child's progress Regular marking of work 95.1% 341 Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% 347 12. I would recommend this school to another parent Recommended 85.7% 276 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 21 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary ASCL Self-evaluation summary The September 2012 ASCL evaluation schedule asserts the increased importance of a school s own self evaluation data as the starting point of the inspection process. The following evidence summary is presented to allow schools to summarise their inspection self evaluation evidence under the four main judgements: Achievement, Teaching, Behaviour & Safety and Leadership. Also, the school s promotion of Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development (SMSC) is included, along with Overall Effectiveness. The evidence given here is only that achieved from this survey; it is vital that your evidence summary for ASCL also considers any other evidence that you have gathered, either from other surveys or from internal measurement and observation. The Judgement areas, plus an overall summary, are broken down into sub-criteria. Scores of 1 to 4 represent ratings of Outstanding, Good, Requires improvement, and Inadequate, as used by ASCL. Where any area is found to be Inadequate then this rating will be given for the section as a whole. Criteria where evidence was indicative rather than reliable are once again given in pink. Remember, for grading comparisons with our colour coded system: Gold = Outstanding = Grade 1 Green = Good = Grade 2 Black = Requires improvement = Grade 3 Red = Inadequate = Grade 4 It is now also possible to have split grades. If your grade is close to the boundary above, this is indicated with a + (plus). If your grade is close to the boundary below, this is indicated with a - (minus). We show the strengths and weaknesses in each sub-section, where appropriate; where there are fewer than four criteria, these are not shown. Red criteria cannot be shown as strengths; gold criteria cannot be shown as weaknesses. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 22 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Achievement Pupils' learning and progress overall Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Average of academic subject ratings Developing confidence Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Groups progress Your own assessment is required here. Subject / Key Stage progress Academic criteria improving since previous surveys Good Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 23 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Skills - Reading, Writing, Communications and Mathematics across the curriculum Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding English 88.7% Good Choice of subjects 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Strengths Mathematics Developing confidence Weaknesses Teaching for special needs Developing potential Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Attainment and closing gaps Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding English 88.7% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Summary grade Achievement section Your average student grade for "Achievement" = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) To reach the next grade In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below the next grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve the following sections: Pupils' learning and progress overall Subject / Key Stage progress Skills - Reading, Writing, Communications and Mathematics across the curriculum Attainment and closing gaps Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 24 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Quality of teaching at the school Teaching overall Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Strengths 1.2%French 99.5% Music 96.6% Religious Studies Weaknesses 82.9% Hospitality 86.2% Film Studies 88.1% History Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Pupils' progress and learning Average of academic subject ratings Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Average of academic subject ratings Developing confidence Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 25 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Climate for learning Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Regular marking of work Developing confidence Weaknesses Developing potential Celebrating and rewarding achievement Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Teachers' expectations Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Developing potential Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 26 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Teachers' planning and strategies Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Developing confidence Celebrating and rewarding achievement Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2 Interventions and support Your own assessment is required here. Teaching of RWCM Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding English 88.7% Good Strengths Mathematics Weaknesses English Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 27 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Assessment Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Teaching quality Treating all pupils fairly and equally Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Marking, feedback and homework Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Analysis of homework amount Requires improvement Strengths Regular marking of work School communication Explaining to parents how to help their child Weaknesses Analysis of homework amount Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Levels of homework Your average student grade for this section = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Summary grade Quality of teaching at the school section Your average student grade for "Quality of teaching at the school" = 1.5 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 28 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary To reach the next grade In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below the next grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve the following sections: Pupils' progress and learning Teachers' expectations Teachers' planning and strategies Marking, feedback and homework Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 29 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school Climate for learning Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Celebrating and rewarding achievement 78.3% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Regular marking of work Developing confidence Weaknesses Developing potential Celebrating and rewarding achievement Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 30 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Parents', staff and pupils' views of behaviour and safety School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths School discipline Treating all pupils fairly and equally Control of bullying Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Pupils' behaviour Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit School discipline Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 31 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Safety and mutual support Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Developing confidence 87.7% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship Developing confidence Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) School systems for behaviour management Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding School security 76.1% Good Strengths Treating all pupils fairly and equally Control of bullying Weaknesses School security Your average student grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 32 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Bullying Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Control of bullying Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Attendance Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Summary grade Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school section Your average student grade for "Behaviour and safety of pupils at the school" = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 33 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Quality of leadership and management of the school Impact on outcomes; improvement Criteria improving since previous surveys Ratio of pupils saying school improving versus declining Significant improvements versus significant declines Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Summary of results since the previous survey The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: French, Art and Business Studies. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Community spirit, Developing confidence, Teaching quality, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Social health education, Truancy control, Developing moral values, Choice of subjects and Caring teachers. The following additional areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Quality of school management, Regular marking of work, Treating all pupils fairly and equally, Extra curricular activities, Encouraging and listening to parent views, Encouraging local community activity and Encouraging and listening to pupil views. Summary of results over more than two surveys The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Mathematics, French, Music and Physical Education. The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Exam results and Truancy control. The following additional area received significantly higher scores than the last three surveys: Extra curricular activities. Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 34 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Impact on teaching and learning School facilities 4.1% Outstanding Regular marking of work 95.1% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Availability of resources 87.1% Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Extra curricular activities 78.7% Good Computer access 78.4% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Levels of homework 75.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Strengths School facilities Regular marking of work Teaching quality Weaknesses Teaching for special needs Levels of homework Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Performance management and professional development For these categories, please see your Kirkland Rowell Staff Survey, where available. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 35 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Curriculum Mathematics 95.5% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Teaching quality 87.2% Outstanding Careers advice 85.1% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding English 88.7% Good Choice of subjects 78.3% Good Exam results 77.9% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress 76.8% Good Teaching for special needs 74.2% Good Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 73.5% Good Strengths Mathematics Citizenship Teaching quality Weaknesses Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability Teaching for special needs Ensuring pupils do their best and make good progress Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Literacy English 88.7% Good Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2 Self-evaluation Commitment to self-evaluation programme Range of self-evaluation programme Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Outstanding Outstanding Good Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Expectations ambition Your own assessment is required here. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 36 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Engagement with parents and carers Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Explaining to parents how to help their child 80.2% Outstanding Caring teachers 77.9% Good Strengths Citizenship Encouraging and listening to pupil views Weaknesses Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Governance Commitment to self-evaluation programme Criteria improving since previous surveys Range of self-evaluation programme Ratio of pupils saying school improving versus declining Significant improvements versus significant declines Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Outstanding Availability of resources 87.1% Outstanding Encouraging and listening to pupil views 83. Outstanding School communication 82.4% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Encouraging and listening to parent views 80.7% Outstanding Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Good Strengths Commitment to self-evaluation programme Criteria improving since previous surveys Range of self-evaluation programme Weaknesses Rigour of surveys - ability to identify weakness and improvement Your average student grade for this section = 1.1 = Outstanding = Grade 1 Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 37 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Safeguarding Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding School discipline 88.5% Outstanding Treating all pupils fairly and equally 87.1% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Quality of school management 81. Outstanding Truancy control 80.2% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Caring teachers 77.9% Good School security 76.1% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship School discipline Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony School security Caring teachers Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Summary grade Quality of leadership and management of the school section Your average student grade for "Quality of leadership and management of the school" = 1.4 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria. Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 38 of 91

Student survey report Self-evaluation summary Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development The school's promotion of students' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is an element of the new framework, but there is no separate judgement and no specific criteria for evaluation. It is included here (as in the ASCL guidance) as an extra tool to help schools to evaluate the quality and impact of their SMSC work. Personal insight and spiritual development Music 99.5% Outstanding Religious Studies 96.6% Outstanding Art 95.2% Outstanding Drama 89.1% Good English 88.7% Good Developing moral values 78.7% Good Developing potential 76.9% Good Strengths Music Religious Studies Weaknesses Developing potential Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + ) Moral understanding and relationships Community spirit 96.4% Outstanding Citizenship 93.2% Outstanding Control of bullying 86.3% Outstanding Social health education 83.5% Outstanding Developing moral values 78.7% Good Promoting racial harmony 75.7% Good Strengths Community spirit Citizenship Weaknesses Promoting racial harmony Developing moral values Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - ) Copyright 2014 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 39 of 91