Collaborative and consortium arrangements for the delivery of vocational qualifications policy. Pearson Qualification Services Version 3 / June 2017

Similar documents
Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Qualification Guidance

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

1st4sport Level 3 Award in Education & Training

Information for Private Candidates

Qualification handbook

Deal with substances hazardous to health

Institutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

EDUCATION AND TRAINING (QCF) Qualification Specification

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

OCR Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector Qualification Units

BIRMINGHAM INDEPENDENT COLLEGE Examination Contingency Plan. Centre Number: 20635

International Advanced level examinations

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Applications from foundation doctors to specialty training. Reporting tool user guide. Contents. last updated July 2016

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 Feb 2016

TRANSNATIONAL TEACHING TEAMS INDUCTION PROGRAM OUTLINE FOR COURSE / UNIT COORDINATORS

Level 3 Diploma in Health and Social Care (QCF)

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

A journey to medicine: Routes into medicine

1 Use complex features of a word processing application to a given brief. 2 Create a complex document. 3 Collaborate on a complex document.

How does an Apprenticeship work?

Everything you need to know about functional skills

Programme Specification

Chiltern Training Ltd.

Business skills in sport

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Job Description Head of Religious, Moral and Philosophical Studies (RMPS)

ENGINEERING EXPLORED FILLED WITH TOP TIPS AND INSIGHTS

Foundation Apprenticeship in IT Software

Centres of Vocational Excellence Case Studies

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Young Enterprise Tenner Challenge

Programme Specification

2. YOU AND YOUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA

Programme Specification

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Programme Specification

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

Spreadsheet software UBU104 F/502/4625 VRQ. Learner name: Learner number:

Summary and policy recommendations

The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Course Brochure 2016/17

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Programme Specification

Recognition of Prior Learning

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Institutional fee plan 2015/16. (Please copy all correspondence to

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Celebrating 25 Years of Access to HE

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

Real Estate Agents Authority Guide to Continuing Education. June 2016

Fashion and Textile Technology, Health and Food Technology, Hospitality: Practical Cake Craft and Hospitality: Practical Cookery

Apprenticeships in. Teaching Support

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Faculty of Social Sciences

Your Guide to the New Train The Trainer

--. THE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANISATION OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN THE CATHOLIC SCHOOL

COLLEGE OF INTEGRATED CHINESE MEDICINE ADMISSIONS POLICY

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS

Programme Specification

value equivalent 6. Attendance Full-time Part-time Distance learning Mode of attendance 5 days pw n/a n/a

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

Transcription:

Collaborative and consortium arrangements for the delivery of vocational qualifications policy Pearson Qualification Services Version 3 / June 2017

Contents 1. Scope of policy... 3 2. Policy statement... 4 3. What are the different types of arrangements?... 4 Informal collaborative arrangement... 5 Collaborative and consortium arrangements... 5 Exceptional collaborative arrangements... 6 4. What happens if a centre wants to leave an arrangement?... 6 5. Definition of centres... 6 Lead centre... 6 International centres... 6 UK centres... 7 6. Regulatory references... 7 7. Policy review date... 7 8. Useful information... 7 9. Appendix A the consortium application process flowchart... 8 10. Appendix B: FAQs... 9 11. Appendix C Consortium and Exceptional Arrangements Application Form Error! Bookmark not defined. Who and what is this policy for: This policy is for centres to use when working with other centres in informal, consortium and exceptional arrangements to deliver Pearson vocational qualifications. This policy describes the requirements needed to ensure quality assurance and certification can take place. Page 2 of 10

Pearson Education Ltd Our Mission and Values Welcome to Pearson, the world's leading learning company. We have a simple mission: to help people make more of their lives through learning. Whether it's at home, in the classroom or in the workplace, learning is the key to improving our life chances. We are the UK's largest awarding body and we are regulated by Ofqual (England), SQA Accreditation (Scotland), CCEA Accreditation (Northern Ireland) and Qualifications Wales (Wales). We offer academic and vocational qualifications that are globally recognised and benchmarked, with educational excellence rooted in names like Edexcel, BTEC, and LCCI. Our regulatory policies are integral to our approach and articulate in a consistent way how we meet regulatory requirements. These policies are designed to support centres and learners with the design, delivery and award of Pearson qualifications and services. 1. Scope of policy 1.1 This policy: Describes the models of collaborative and consortium arrangements that we will support. Describes the process for applying to have collaborative and consortium arrangements. Provides some definitions of centres. 1.2 This policy applies to centres located in the UK and internationally. 1.3 A collaborative arrangement is an agreement where Pearson approved centres work together to deliver a vocational qualification(s). One of the centres will act as the Lead centre and will be the main point of contact with us. We want to support all centres delivering our qualifications and services and will discuss other partnership agreements not described in this policy on a case by case basis. To discuss other arrangements you will need to contact our Centre Management Team vocationalqualitystandards@pearson.com 1.4 This policy applies to centres which deliver vocational qualifications, including regulated BTECs, NVQs SVQs, and Pearson s Self-Regulated Framework customised qualifications 1. For information and advice about delivering Functional Skills or ESOL qualifications collaboratively contact our experts for advice at vocationalqualitystandards@pearson.com 1 Note that SVQs and SQA Accredited qualifications cannot be offered internationally. Page 3 of 10

2. Policy statement 2.1 Most vocational qualifications are suitable for collaborative delivery, however, some qualifications that include forms of external assessment may not be suitable. Please seek further advice from our Centre Management Team vocationalqualitystandards@pearson.com 2.2 We are able to approve collaborative or consortium arrangements between international centres on a case by case basis only. Please contact vqinternational@pearson.com 2.3 It is important that you get approval from us before you begin delivering programmes so that we can support you and put in place quality assurance mechanisms which will strengthen your collaborative or consortium arrangements. There is a risk that we would not be able to allow certification for learners that have been assessed as part of an unapproved collaborative arrangement. 2.4 We will monitor all UK centres involved in collaborative or consortium arrangements on an annual basis as part of our quality assurance process. 2.5 We reserve the right to withdraw approval, suspend approval or suspend certification if there is unapproved collaboration. 2.6 If any of the centres included in the collaborative agreement decide to end an agreement it is important that the Lead Centre informs us as soon as possible so that we can work together to ensure that the interest of any learner is protected. 3. What are the different types of arrangements? Informal collaborative arrangement Collaborative arrangements Consortium arrangements Exceptional collaborative arrangements Page 4 of 10

Informal collaborative arrangement 3.1 Two or more approved centres, each with their own centre number, work together to share information, assignments, staff and physical resources. There is no shared assessment and each centre has total ownership of its own quality assurance. 3.2 You do not need approval from us for this arrangement. Collaborative and consortium arrangements 3.3 Collaborative arrangements should be applied if two approved Pearson centres work together to deliver, assess and quality assure specific Pearson qualifications. 3.4 Consortium arrangements are when three or more approved Pearson centres work together to deliver, assess and quality assure specific Pearson qualifications. 3.5 In these arrangements each centre needs to have programme approval to deliver the qualifications. The centre delivering the qualification is responsible for the assessment however all centres are jointly responsible for the quality assurance of the qualification(s): each centre has equal responsibility for the registration and certification of learners. 3.6 For UK centres, the centre which receives funding should register learners. If none of the centres are receiving funding then you should apply for an exceptional collaborative arrangement. 3.7 You must apply for approval for these types of arrangement. All consortium and collaborative arrangement approvals are agreed with Centre Quality Managers by sending them to ukapproval@pearson.com before they begin. 3.8 One centre acts as Lead Centre. The Lead Centre is responsible for: Submitting a qualification approval form for each qualification that will be delivered/assessed through the consortium group. The qualification application must be accompanied by The Collaborative and Consortia Arrangements Application Form. Checking that each consortium member delivering a qualification has programme approval to do so communicating the quality assurance arrangements for the qualification(s) and for ensuring that all centres are aware of requirements Co-ordinating the quality assurance for each qualification being delivered and assessed in a consortium agreement. This includes coordinating an annual review of the quality of delivery and/or assessment for each qualification approved across the consortium. The records and reviews must be made available to us. Developing and monitoring any required actions plans to address quality issues as a result of the annual review. 3.9 These arrangements are approved on a qualification by qualification basis. You will need to ensure that you have approval for each qualification that you intend to deliver in this way. 3.10 Learners who are being taught and/or assessed as part of a consortium programme are the responsibility of the centre at which they are registered. 3.11 Centres are jointly responsible for the quality assurance of each qualification included in a Consortium Arrangement. Page 5 of 10

3.12 The delivery and/or assessment of each qualification that is delivered through a consortium agreement must meet the learning outcomes and assessment requirements of the qualifications. 3.13 All learners will be managed as a single cohort for the qualification in a consortium. This means that we will allocate one Standards Verifier who will sample learners from across the consortium. 3.14 If a consortium is inactive for a two year period approval will be removed. 3.15 Each centre has its own centre identity, any quality assurance outcomes, standards verification will apply to all centres collaborating for a given programme. Certificates will show the details of the centre of registration and not the Lead Centre. Exceptional collaborative arrangements 3.16 Two or more centres work together to deliver, assess or quality assure specific Pearson qualifications. At least one of the centres in the arrangement must be a Pearson approved centre and the lead centre will be required to have programme approval. 3.17 You must apply for approval for this type of arrangement. 3.18 The Lead Centre must submit a qualification approval form for each qualification that will delivered/assessed through the collaborative group. The qualification application must be accompanied by The Consortium and Exceptional Arrangements Application Form (please see Appendix C of this policy). 3.19 Exceptional collaborative arrangements must always be agreed beforehand with our Responsible Officer and the Head of Centre Management on a case-by-case basis. We will require a copy of a written contract between all participating centres that will be lodged with us and subject to annual review. 4. What happens if a centre wants to leave an arrangement? 4.1 If a centre wishes to leave a consortium but continue to offer the qualification independently at their centre, registrations must be made on the centre approved qualification code and not the consortium qualification code. 4.2 Centres that are leaving arrangements must inform ukapproval@pearson.com 5. Definition of centres Lead centre 5.1 The collaborative arrangement approval rests with the Lead Centre. The Lead Centre is the centre which contacts and recruits other organisation(s), which must each have been previously approved by us to deliver vocational qualifications. International centres 5.2 An international centre is defined as an approved centre location in any region of the world, other than England; Channel Islands; Isle of Man; Wales; Scotland and Northern Ireland. Jan 2018 version 4 DCL 1: Public (Unclassified) Page 6 of 10

UK centres 5.3 A UK centre is defined as a centre located in England; Channel Islands, Isle of Man; Wales; Scotland or Northern Ireland. 6. Regulatory references 6.1 UK regulators require all awarding organisations to establish and maintain their compliance with regulatory conditions and criteria. As part of this process, policies that relate to Pearson s status as an awarding organisation will reference any particular conditions and criteria that they address. 6.2 This policy addresses the following regulatory criteria and conditions: Ofqual/CCEA Accreditation/Qualifications Wales General Conditions of Recognition Arrangements with third parties Arrangements with centres C1 C2 SQA Accreditation Regulatory Principles (2014) The awarding body shall ensure that it has the necessary arrangements and resources for the effective delivery; assessment and quality assurance of SQA accredited qualifications. 10 7. Policy review date 7.1 This policy will be reviewed in June 2018 8. Useful information 8.1 For more information there is a guide on our website: Centre Guide to consortia Page 7 of 10

9. Appendix A the consortium application process flowchart Step 1: Discuss your needs and get expert advice with our Vocational Quality Advisors by emailing qualitynominees@pearson.com Step 2: Complete the collaborative and consortia arrangements application form Step 3: Submit your completed forms to us by email at ukapproval@pearson.com. We will respond to you withn 36 hours Step 4: Successful consortium applications can start delivering once you've received confirmation by email along with your signed off application form, from ukapproval@pearson.com Step 5: If your application is unsuccessful we will: - support you to address any issues that need to be resolved - discuss any further actions that need to be taken that may require specific approval from the Head Of Centre Management. Page 8 of 10

10. Appendix B: FAQs Question Informal collaboration Consortium arrangements Collaborative arrangements Exceptional collaborative arrangement How many centres are involved? 2 or more approved centres 3 or more approved Pearson centres 2 approved Pearson centres 2 or more centres (1 must be an Approved Pearson centre) Who has responsibility for registration and certification of learners? Each centre registers their own learners Each centre registers their own learners Each centre registers their own learners Lead Centre (And any other centre who is Pearson Approved) Who is responsible for the assessment? Each centre is responsible for assessment of their own learners Centre delivering the qualification Centre delivering the qualification Lead Centre/ all approved Pearson Centres within the arrangement Who is responsible for the learners? The registering centre The registering centre The registering centre The Lead Centre and/or registering centre if there is more than 1 Pearson approved centre within the arrangement Who coordinates quality assurance? Each centre registering the learners. Lead Centre Lead Centre Lead Centre Is Pearson approval required? No Yes Yes Yes - with written agreement between all centres Who should have programme approval for the qualification they are applying for? All centres involved All centres involved Both centres The Lead Centre (and any other centre who is Pearson Approved) Page 9 of 10

What type of consortium arrangement should you apply for? No This is an Informal Collaborative Arrangement. No approval required. Do you want to share the delivery, assessment and quality assurance of a Pearson qualification? Yes How many centres are in this arrangement? 2 approved centres 3 or more approved centres Are you a UK centre? Yes Yes Are you a UK centre? No Are one of the centres receiving funding? Are one of the centres receiving funding? Yes No No No Apply for a Collaborative Arrangement Yes Apply for a Exceptional Collaborative Arrangement Apply for a Consortium Arrangement Page 10 of 10