Prior or Background Knowledge

Similar documents
and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

EQuIP Review Feedback

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Welcome to MyOutcomes Online, the online course for students using Outcomes Elementary, in the classroom.

Language Acquisition Chart

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

MC3 Professional Development Framework Making the Common Core Accessible for English Language Learners

Students Understanding of Graphical Vector Addition in One and Two Dimensions

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

21st Century Community Learning Center

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Daily Assessment (All periods)

TASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Secondary English-Language Arts

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Teaching Vocabulary Summary. Erin Cathey. Middle Tennessee State University

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 4 Word Choice: Using Academic Vocabulary to Apply for a Colonial Trade Job

Objective: Model division as the unknown factor in multiplication using arrays and tape diagrams. (8 minutes) (3 minutes)

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Description: Pricing Information: $0.99

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

Rigor is NOT a Four-Letter Word By Barbara R. Blackburn (Eye On Education, Inc., 2008)

Program Rating Sheet - University of South Carolina - Columbia Columbia, South Carolina

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Learning Microsoft Office Excel

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

Test How To. Creating a New Test

FREE COLLEGE Can Happen to You!

Fountas-Pinnell Level M Realistic Fiction

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

success. It will place emphasis on:

Oakland Schools Response to Critics of the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy Are These High Quality Standards?

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Timeline. Recommendations

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Language Arts Methods

Planning for Preassessment. Kathy Paul Johnston CSD Johnston, Iowa

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 1: Lesson 3 Inferring: Who was John Allen?

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

2nd Grade Media. Goal #1: Inquiry EO #1 - UBD

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Characterizing Mathematical Digital Literacy: A Preliminary Investigation. Todd Abel Appalachian State University

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

A Pilot Study on Pearson s Interactive Science 2011 Program

Adolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

4 th Grade Curriculum Essentials Document

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Unit 13 Assessment in Language Teaching. Welcome

Johnny Appleseed. Retrieved from JohnnyAppleseedBiography.com. A WebQuest for 3rd Grade Early Childhood. Designed by

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

Understanding Language

Films for ESOL training. Section 2 - Language Experience

A Study of Metacognitive Awareness of Non-English Majors in L2 Listening

Integrating Grammar in Adult TESOL Classrooms

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

This table contains the extended descriptors for Active Learning on the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

The Multi-genre Research Project

Grade Five Chapter 6 Add and Subtract Fractions with Unlike Denominators Overview & Support Standards:

Plainfield Public School District Reading/3 rd Grade Curriculum Guide. Modifications/ Extensions (How will I differentiate?)

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Handbook for Teachers

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

TIM: Table of Summary Descriptors This table contains the summary descriptors for each cell of the Technology Integration Matrix (TIM).

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

On Human Computer Interaction, HCI. Dr. Saif al Zahir Electrical and Computer Engineering Department UBC

Transcription:

Prior or Background Knowledge Mid-Continent Comprehensive Center (MC3) Regional ELL/CCSS Task Force Rosie García-Belina, Ed.D. 1

Prior Knowledge Every student brings knowledge to school on a variety of areas acquired through past experiences in academic and real life (Beyer, 1991). English language learners (ELLs ) prior knowledge reflect who the students are and how they perceive the world based on their culture and surrounding environment (Kujawa and Huske, 1995). Sometimes, however, the experiences ELLs bring with them are different from the knowledge needed to succeed in the American education system. 2

Prior Knowledge Students learn when they can make connections from new concepts to knowledge they already have. Otherwise, there is a need to develop such background knowledge to allow students make sense of the new information. Prior or background knowledge does not just refer to subject-matter knowledge. It can also be knowledge in different dimensions, such as metacognitive processes, comprehending strategies, vocabularies, skills, and even self understanding. 3

Role of Prior Knowledge As students transition from learning to read to reading to learn, the use of prior knowledge plays an important role in developing comprehension, fluency, student engagement, and motivation to learn. Teachers can facilitate their ELLs literacy success by helping them to activate prior knowledge, and/or providing the necessary information to develop the required background knowledge that allows students make the connections they need. 4

Activating Prior Knowledge Activating prior knowledge can be done through beginning a lesson by discussing topics and using skills that are already familiar to students. By doing so, students improve their sense of preparedness, thus being more motivated to engage in the selected tasks. Teachers can gauge the level of students prior knowledge and use this as the foundation to prepare their instruction. 5

Activating Prior Knowledge Selecting an adequate approach to activate prior knowledge depends on the following: Grade level Level of English language proficiency Students characteristics Text characteristics 6

Building Background Knowledge Students are given introductory material containing definitions of difficult vocabulary, translations of idiomatic expressions/phrases, and/or explanations of complex concepts before they read a particular text. The use of different media resources or short readings, while developing questions to be answered from such materials, will provide a foreword for the concepts to be introduced. Such questions will ensure the material presented to students is adequate to build the necessary knowledge to allow students to understand the new information better. 7

Building Background Knowledge Teachers can also use an indirect approach to prepare students for the new information, such as using field experiences; hands-on activities; reading trade books ahead of time and keeping journals; engaging in interactive discussion/student reflection on prior knowledge; prompting students to state, write down, or otherwise record what they already know about the topic; 8

Building Background Knowledge Teachers can also use an indirect approach to prepare students for the new information, such as content-rich texts on the same topic drawn from different areas (magazines, newspapers, etc.); computer assisted activities where students search for preconceptions that they can compare and contrast with the new information; having students answer questions before and/or while they read new material; and/or training students to interpret topic-related pictures. 9

Identifying the Background Knowledge Needed Wiggins and McTighe (2005), suggest the following criteria for teachers to identify the preceding knowledge needed to comprehend the essential concepts of the new information: Is it essential? Must it be taught? Will it be used for future understanding? What will be remembered after the details are forgotten? 10

Assessing Background Knowledge Just as it is important to activate prior or background knowledge, it is also essential to determine if the learner s previous information is weak, incomplete, or based on any misconception. There are several means to accomplish this, such as the following: qualitative reading inventory: series of questions directly taken from the text that will be read K-W-L Strategy Sheet: a form with three columns, where students write what they know in the first column, what they want to learn in the second column, and what they learned in the third column (completed after the lesson) 11

Assessing Background Knowledge There are several means to accomplish this, such as the following: anticipation guides: present statements that students need to identify as true or false opinionnaires: present statements in a Likert format where students choose from strongly agree to strongly disagree cloze exercises: paragraphs where students insert the words that have been previously omitted thinking maps: graphic organizers 12

Additional Resources Self Assessment of Background Knowledge http://www.heinemann.com/shared/companionresources/ E02655BackgroundKnowledgeRubric.pdf Activating prior knowledge http://www.thinkport.org/career/strategies/reading/activate.tp NCAC Background Knowledge http://www.cast.org/system/galleries/download/ncac/ncac_bk.pdf Building on Prior Knowledge and Meaningful Student Contexts/Cultures http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/learning/lr100.htm Thinking maps http://thinkingmaps.org/ 13

For additional information, please contact MC3 REGIONAL ELL/CCSS TASK FORCE c/o the University of Oklahoma Rosie García Belina, Ed.D., Coordinator 405.200.2242 rbelina@ou.edu Portions of this presentation may have been developed under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education; however, the contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. 2012 The University of Oklahoma 14