Engaging National Delegates and Animal Welfare Focal Points

Similar documents
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

WHAT IS AEGEE? AEGEE-EUROPE PRESENTATION EUROPEAN STUDENTS FORUM

Services for Children and Young People

5 Early years providers

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCES

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Meeting on the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and Good Practices in Skills Development

Self-archived version. Citation:

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Knowledge Sharing Workshop, Tiel The Netherlands, 20 September 2016

Guidelines on how to use the Learning Agreement for Studies

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

General report Student Participation in Higher Education Governance

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

2 di 7 29/06/

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

Addressing TB in the Mines: A Multi- Sector Approach in Practice

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

No educational system is better than its teachers

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING. Version: 14 November 2017

University of Toronto

The International Coach Federation (ICF) Global Consumer Awareness Study

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

EPA RESOURCE KIT: EPA RESEARCH Report Series No. 131 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND POLICY

Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

You said we did. Report on improvements being made to Children s and Adolescent Mental Health Services. December 2014

IAB INTERNATIONAL AUTHORISATION BOARD Doc. IAB-WGA

Partnership Agreement

03/07/15. Research-based welfare education. A policy brief

Tanga Dairy Platform: Case study teaching note

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Organised by

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

Michigan State University

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Content. 1. Technical workshop Marine Directive

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education

Librarian/Library Faculty Meeting

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Evaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Head of Maths Application Pack

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME ERASMUS Academic Network

Interview on Quality Education

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

GHSA Global Activities Update. Presentation by Indonesia

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ECVCP

Briefing for Parents on SBB, DSA & PSLE

Sharing Information on Progress. Steinbeis University Berlin - Institute Corporate Responsibility Management. Report no. 2

teaching issues 4 Fact sheet Generic skills Context The nature of generic skills

Teaching Excellence Framework

Conditions of study and examination regulations of the. European Master of Science in Midwifery

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

5.7 Country case study: Vietnam

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

PROJECTS FOR HAPPINESS 2015

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Department of Sociology and Social Research

CEN/ISSS ecat Workshop

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WORKING PARTY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW PANEL ON UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE. Report of the Working Party

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

BUSINESS OCR LEVEL 2 CAMBRIDGE TECHNICAL. Cambridge TECHNICALS BUSINESS ONLINE CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA IN R/502/5326 LEVEL 2 UNIT 11

Executive Summary. DoDEA Virtual High School

Transcription:

GUIDANCE FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION ORGANIZATIONS Engaging National Delegates and Animal Welfare Focal Points of the World Organisation for Animal Health

Contents 1 1 2 2 3 3 5 7 Int roduct ion What are OIE Delegat es? What are Anim al Welfare Focal Point s? The Role of AW Focal Point s AW Focal Point Training Term s of Reference for AW Focal Point s Key Issues Where APOs can t ake act ion Taking t he Plunge

Introduction World Animal Net (WAN) has compiled this resource in response to inquiries from Animal Protection Organisations (APOs) about how to work with their country?s World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Delegate and Animal Welfare (AW) Focal Point to contribute to the development of animal welfare policy, capacity and activities. This guidance incorporates information about the roles of Delegates and Focal Points (including the latter?s Terms of Reference), along with insights from experienced Focal Points. We hope that this resource can assist in forming and strengthening the relationship between APOs and OIE Delegates and AW Focal Points in countries around the world. There is also general background about the OIE and its work on the WAN website, with links to relevant pages of the OIE website. What are OIE Delegates? There are 181 Permanent Delegates to the OIE, and these are often also the country?s Chief Veterinary Officer? see here for your national Delegate. The OIE recommends that animal protection organisations make contact and develop a relationship with their Delegate before AW Focal Points. The Delegate is assisted in his/ her role by designated Focal Points, including an AW Focal Point. 1

What are Animal Welfare Focal Points? The OIE requires each member country to appoint a national AW Focal Point. These individuals should be important contacts for every APO, and? if their role is carried out effectively? the coordination point or hub of AW expertise and implementation planning in the country. AW Focal Points are usually listed on the OIE?s regional websites, which can be found here. The Role of AW Focal Points AW Focal Points have an important role in supporting the national Delegate in the development and effective implementation of the OIE?s international AW standards. In practice, this means establishing networks of AW experts and stakeholders, including APOs, and carrying out consultations and knowledge-sharing. If the job is done well, it can lead to: - Strengthened national understanding and awareness of AW, guided by the latest science. - Enhanced national contributions and comments on draft AW standards. - Improved implementation of AW standards and Regional AW Strategies (RAWS), including through enhanced national policy, legislation and enforcement; AW education and awareness campaigns; and practical AW programmes. There is more about the work of OIE national AW Focal Points in this video of a European Regional Seminar. As it stresses, AW Focal Points face many challenges. Indeed, our experience has shown that many find it difficult to understand and manage this complex role. Others have admitted to simply not knowing where to begin. 2

AW Focal Point Training The OIE does hold some AW Focal Point training sessions, but these are periodic (as they are costly). AW Focal Point trainings are delivered as part of the overall training of all Focal Points (there are 8 different focal points within a country, with AW being just one) and, like the majority of OIE capacity building activities, they rely heavily on donor support and on the priorities defined by the national Delegates. In terms of financial aid for these OIE activities, there are specific mechanisms for donors defined in the OIE World Animal Health and Welfare Fund. This leaves some AW Focal Points in a position where they are appointed for several years before any training is available. Clearly, further help and support is needed in such cases, and it is in APO?s interests to ensure that these important government contacts are indeed equipped for, and carrying out, the duties needed to develop AW in their countries. APOs may be able to offer assistance to AW Focal Points in this situation. This could mean working collaboratively to identify training opportunities or reaching out to OIE Collaborating Centres for animal welfare to identify training or education possibilities. There is also a list of education and training opportunities in WAN?s Best Practice resource for AW. Terms of Reference for AW Focal Points APOs supporting AW Focal Points should be aware of their allocated duties, as contained in their Terms of Reference from the OIE. We have analysed below the five tasks delegated to AW Focal Points in this document, together with some practical tips and advice on how these tasks could be tackled. This may help APOs in their discussions with AW Focal Points and subsequent co-operation and support. 3

1. To establish a network of animal welfare experts within the country or to communicate with the existing network. A tried and tested way of establishing such a network is through the establishment of an Animal Welfare Committee. There is more about this in WAN?s Model AW Act. This may need to be supplemented by other specialist committees, which feed into the work of the Animal Welfare Committee (for example, a scientific committee). APOs should consider forming a national policy/ advocacy alliance in order to maximise the effectiveness of their representation (both in this forum and other AW consultations and advocacy). But they also need to ensure that they are represented in the Animal Welfare Committee, and included in all consultations! 2. To establish and maintain a dialogue with the Competent Authority for animal welfare in the country, and to facilitate cooperation and communication among several authorities where responsibility is shared. This may require the establishment of an inter-departmental AW coordination group within the government. This would necessitate a lead department and dedicated secretariat to ensure effective communication and organise meetings and follow-up. It is vital that steps are taken to harmonise the government?s approach to AW across departments (if more than one department is involved). The development of a national AW strategy/ policy will help this process, as well as charting a course for the progressive development of AW in the country. The Model AW Act includes suggestions for what should be contained in a national policy. Where a Regional AW Strategy (RAWS) has already been prepared, whether by the OIE itself or by Regional Economic Communities, this will help, as a National Animal Welfare Strategy (NAWS? see below section on National Implementation of AW Standards) can be developed to ensure its implementation. Needless to say this must be prepared democratically, with full consultation. 3. To receive from the OIE Headquarters copies of the reports of the Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission (Code Commission), including reports of the OIE Animal Welfare Working Group and other relevant reports. The AW Focal Point will need to ensure that reports/ updates are made available to all relevant government departments and stakeholders. Then, where necessary, to organise inter-departmental consultation meetings, and other stakeholder consultation, to facilitate stakeholder and government implementation. 4

4. To conduct the in-country consultation process with recognised animal welfare experts on draft texts proposed in those reports as well as draft standards proposed by the Code Commission when dealing with animal welfare. This duty requires wide and effective consultation. Governments are used to holding such consultation exercises. However, AW can be a new and difficult subject for some governments, and it is easy to make mistakes through lack of awareness of either the latest scientific knowledge or the day-to-day practical and ethical implications of certain approaches. For this reason, it is recommended that wide written consultations are scrutinised by subject-specific experts and the Animal Welfare Committee before finalisation. If there is difficulty finding subject experts on the standards, the OIE Collaborating Centres may be able to provide support and identify regional experts to assist. It may be necessary to organise face-to-face meetings where contentious issues arise. Also, where documents relate to more than one department, an inter-departmental meeting may be necessary. 5. To prepare comments for the Delegate on each of the relevant meeting reports reflecting the scientific view and position of the individual OIE Member and/or the region, including comments on the proposals for new or revised OIE standards related to animal welfare. This follows on from point 4 above. The AW Focal Point will need to brief the country?s Delegate based on the advice given. This includes the provision of full comments on every draft OIE AW standard and any subsequent revisions. Key Issues Where APOs Can Take Action National Implementation of AW Standards and Strategies The biggest challenge in any member country will be implementing the AW standards and RAWS once these have been agreed. The best way to start this process is by collaboratively developing a National AW Strategy (NAWS) to decide on the pathway 5

to successful implementation. Ideally this should be guided by the Regional AW Strategy (RAWS)/ Platform, but adapted to take account of national priorities, challenges and opportunities. The potential for partnerships is a major opportunity for progress. The recent OIE Global Conference on AW highlighted a number of successful implementation partnerships and resources involving APOs and member countries. See, for example: - Partnerships and implementation: the International Coalition for Animal Welfare (ICFAW). - Sector collaboration supports development and implementation of the OIE standard on the welfare of working equids. - The Model Animal Welfare Act: Supporting Legislation to Implement the OIE Animal Welfare Standards. - How partnering with a local NGO can lead to more sustainable and long term animal welfare in a fast growing and multicultural community in Mexico? IFAW. - Practical guidance for monitoring and yes evaluating implementation of OIE?s Stray Dog Control Standard. - Strategic Partnerships Successfully Improving Donkey Welfare in Zimbabwe. WAN?s Best Practice resource was prepared on the suggestion of the World Bank. We developed it to help with RAWS/ NAWS implementation, with the format following the most used RAWS?pillars?. It benefits from the input and expertise of the International Coalition for Animal Welfare, which includes all leading international APOs. This should help with providing useful resources for each aspect of RAWS/ NAWS implementation. 6 Achieving Better Communication and Networking Between Focal Points One way to improve effectiveness and networking for Focal Points is to look for other Focal Points who have more experience. The OIE may be able to help Focal Points or APOs identify these points of contact. Alternatively, APO networks may be able to assist. The EU provides a great example of AW Focal Point networks. AW Focal Points in the EU have built contacts amongst themselves in order to exchange thoughts, ideas and expertise on different issues. Individual Focal Points are then able to ask questions of the group when they need help. There is a?high-level? group, which contains the Focal Points from Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany and Sweden. There are also ad-hoc contacts between Focal Points? for example, in cases where there is a problem with a live animal import consignment from another European country. Other regions, such as the Asia, Far East and Oceania (AFEO) are working towards an improved network for Focal Points that partners new Focal Points with experienced ones.

Assistance for Developing Country Focal Points On the other hand, we have heard that AW Focal Points from developing countries can have real challenges in fulfilling their role and mandate, especially in countries where AW is not yet considered a political priority (and often not a?funded mandate?). This is where there is even more of a need for partnerships and support. Some of the tips above may help, but we also suggest that more could be done institutionally to help these isolated Focal Points, for example: - A?twinning? or?buddy? system with an experienced AW Focal Point with well-developed AW experience. - Support from a RAWS/ NAWS implementation partnership team, led by the OIE or development partners, and including experienced APOs. - Coordinated support from OIE headquarters? for example, electronically (this could even be through support forums). Taking the Plunge Engaging OIE Delegates and AW Focal Points on a country level is integral to ensuring that animal welfare standards and Regional and National Animal Welfare Strategies are implemented. We hope this briefing helps your organization begin taking steps towards this engagement, and are happy to provide advice as you begin this process. Should you have any questions about OIE procedures, structures or operations as you begin, please feel free to contact us at info@worldanimal.net. 7