C2C:Workplace Communication and Influence. OHDCC Teachers College, Columbia University

Similar documents
WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Making Confident Decisions

Cognitive Thinking Style Sample Report

Innovative Methods for Teaching Engineering Courses

Introduction 1 MBTI Basics 2 Decision-Making Applications 44 How to Get the Most out of This Booklet 6

Kelli Allen. Vicki Nieter. Jeanna Scheve. Foreword by Gregory J. Kaiser

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Using Rhetoric Technique in Persuasive Speech

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Team Report

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

A BOOK IN A SLIDESHOW. The Dragonfly Effect JENNIFER AAKER & ANDY SMITH

Strategic Practice: Career Practitioner Case Study

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

Change Mastery. The Persuasion Paradigm

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Teachers Guide Chair Study

1.1 Examining beliefs and assumptions Begin a conversation to clarify beliefs and assumptions about professional learning and change.

SHINE. Helping. Leaders. Reproduced with the permission of choice Magazine,

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

NAIS Case Studies for School Leaders and Boards of Trustees. Contact:

g to onsultant t Learners rkshop o W tional C ces.net I Appealin eren Nancy Mikhail esour Educa Diff Curriculum Resources CurriculumR

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

No Parent Left Behind

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

LEADERSHIP AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS

COMM 210 Principals of Public Relations Loyola University Department of Communication. Course Syllabus Spring 2016

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

What is Thinking (Cognition)?

Characteristics of Functions

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Note Taking Handbook Mount Aloysius College Disability Services

There are three things that are extremely hard steel, a diamond, and to know one's self. Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard s Almanac, 1750

To provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that

Decision Making Lesson Review

Engaging Youth in Groups

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Tap vs. Bottled Water

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Running head: THE INTERACTIVITY EFFECT IN MULTIMEDIA LEARNING 1

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Community Rhythms. Purpose/Overview NOTES. To understand the stages of community life and the strategic implications for moving communities

WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

VIA ACTION. A Primer for I/O Psychologists. Robert B. Kaiser

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Challenging Texts: Foundational Skills: Comprehension: Vocabulary: Writing: Disciplinary Literacy:

The Ti-Mandi window: a time-management tool for managers

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

NAIS Case Studies for School Leaders and Boards of Trustees. Contact:

Simulation in Maritime Education and Training

Creating a Working Alliance: Generic Interpersonal Skills and Concepts

Soaring With Strengths

USING SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY TO ANALYZE QUALITY OF LIFE AND CONTINUOUS URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1

Should a business have the right to ban teenagers?

leading people through change

Leader s Guide: Dream Big and Plan for Success

School Leadership Rubrics

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress.

The Teenage Brain and Making Responsible Decisions About Sex

Are You a Left- or Right-Brain Thinker?

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

Tutor s Guide TARGET AUDIENCES. "Qualitative survey methods applied to natural resource management"

Using Motivational Interviewing for Coaching

Explorer Promoter. Controller Inspector. The Margerison-McCann Team Management Wheel. Andre Anonymous

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

Kristin Moser. Sherry Woosley, Ph.D. University of Northern Iowa EBI

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

Behavior List. Ref. No. Behavior. Grade. Std. Domain/Category. Social/ Emotional will notify the teacher when angry (words, signal)

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

- SAMPLE ONLY - PLEASE DO NOT COPY

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

White Paper. The Art of Learning

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY: PER COURSE TEACHING POSITIONS Winter, 2017

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

THE CONSENSUS PROCESS

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit

Key concepts for the insider-researcher

PreReading. Lateral Leadership. provided by MDI Management Development International

F O C U S Challenge? Reaction? Insight? Action Chapter Three Learning About Learning

Digital Media Literacy

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Transcription:

C2C:Workplace Communication and Influence OHDCC Teachers College, Columbia University

What is this session about?

Getting your message across YOU ME `

Effective vs. Ineffective Communicators Part I What do effective communicators do? How do they keep your attention?

Effective vs. Ineffective Communicators Part II What do ineffective communicators do? How do they lose your attention?

The Three Elements of Communication You ` Credibility Self-confidence Presence

The Three Elements of Communication You Message ` Credibility Self-confidence Presence Content and benefits of the message

The Three Elements of Communication You Message ` Your Audience Credibility Self-confidence Presence Content and benefits of the message Your ability to diagnose others, empathize and adjust

Johari Window Known To You Not Known To You Known to Others Public Life Blind Spots Unknown By Others Secrets Unconscious

We don t see things as they are; we see them as we are.

Our Worldview Culture Thinking Preferences Education Worldview ` Life Experience Gender Socio-economic Status

Let s consider one of these lenses. Culture Thinking Preferences Education Worldview ` Life Experience Gender Socio-economic Status

Left Side vs. Right Side Left Hemisphere Sequential Analytical Verbal Logical Looks at Parts Preferences: Counting / Measuring Present and Past Grammar Right Hemisphere Simultaneous Holistic Imagistic Intuitive Looks at Wholes Preferences: Shapes / Motion Present and Future Intonation / Emphasis

What are Brain Preferences? Brain Preferences reflect the extent to which an individual prefers certain types of thinking / mental processes over other types of thinking / mental preferences. Brain Preferences do not equal skills. We might have highly developed skills outside our brain preferences.

Brain Preferences The Model Clear Realistic Logical Curious Imaginative Visionary Concrete Rational Objective Intuitive Risk Taker Creative Goals Performance Bottom-line Simultaneous Challenges Status Quo Big Picture Realist & Analyst Strategist & Imaginer Organizer & Preserver Empathizer & Socializer Orderly Reliable Neat Sociable Approachable Perceptive Punctual Detail- Oriented Habitual Harmony Affectionate Loyal Systematic Organized Methodical Relational Expressive Supportive

Brain Preferences Qualities that Define Each Quadrant Clear Realistic Logical Curious Imaginative Visionary Concrete Rational Objective Intuitive Risk Taker Creative Goals Performance Bottom-line Simultaneous Challenges Status Quo Big Picture Realist & Analyst R1 Strategist & Imaginer Organizer & Preserver L2 R2 Empathizer & Socializer Orderly Reliable Neat Sociable Approachable Perceptive Punctual Detail- Oriented Habitual Harmony Affectionate Loyal Systematic Organized Methodical Relational Expressive Supportive

Properties of L1 Usually Asks Values Oriented Towards What is the point? What does this mean? What is the objective? Performance Sensible rationale Succinct information (data/ facts) Goals Performance Bottom-line Decision Preference Known For Communication Preference In accordance with planned objectives/ goals Based upon accurate information and data Definitively Liking to be right Liking things to be clear Drawing conclusions Clear / Sensible / Accurate Coherent / Calculating / Probing

Brain Preferences Qualities that Define Each Quadrant Clear Realistic Logical Curious Imaginative Visionary Concrete Rational Objective Intuitive Risk Taker Creative Goals Performance Bottom-line Simultaneous Challenges Status Quo Big Picture Realist & Analyst Strategist & Imaginer Organizer & Preserver L2 R2 Empathizer & Socializer Orderly Reliable Neat Sociable Approachable Perceptive Punctual Detail- Oriented Habitual Harmony Affectionate Loyal Systematic Organized Methodical Relational Expressive Supportive

Properties of R1 Usually Asks Values Oriented Towards Why not? What if? Can we try? Freedom to experiment Ability to take risks Challenging the status-quo Future Ideas Big picture Decision Preference Known For Communication Preference According to future possibilities At the conceptual level Instinctively Being unconventional Experimenting Taking risks Imagination Challenging / Visionary / Imaginative Filled with metaphors/ images Synthesizing ideas

Brain Preferences Qualities that Define Each Quadrant Clear Realistic Logical Curious Imaginative Visionary Concrete Rational Objective Intuitive Risk Taker Creative Goals Performance Bottom-line Simultaneous Challenges Status Quo Big Picture Realist & Analyst Strategist & Imaginer Organizer & Preserver Empathizer & Socializer Orderly Reliable Neat Sociable Approachable Perceptive Punctual Detail- Oriented Habitual Harmony Affectionate Loyal Systematic Organized Methodical Relational Expressive Supportive

Properties of L2 Usually Asks Values Oriented Towards How should we do it? What is the plan? What should be done first? Consistency & Efficiency Punctuality Quality & Thoroughness On time An excellent implementer Well organized Focused on the process Decision Preference Known For Communication Preference Relevant information and data Structured process Thoroughly and when well-informed Process Details Routine Correct / Prepared Detailed / Planned / Systematic

Brain Preferences Qualities that Define Each Quadrant Clear Realistic Logical Curious Imaginative Visionary Concrete Rational Objective Intuitive Risk Taker Creative Goals Performance Bottom-line Simultaneous Challenges Status Quo Big Picture Realist & Analyst Strategist & Imaginer Organizer & Preserver Empathizer & Socializer Orderly Reliable Neat Sociable Approachable Perceptive Punctual Detail- Oriented Habitual Harmony Affectionate Loyal Systematic Organized Methodical Relational Expressive Supportive

Properties of R2 Usually Asks Values Oriented Towards How does everyone feel about that? Who will be involved? Who will be effected? Quality of relationships Interpersonal connections Mood and sentiment Loyalty / Harmony Relationships People Feelings Decision Preference Known For Communication Preference After considering the best interests of those involved Based on what feels right With consensus Understanding others perspective Comfortable with multiple realities Connecting with others Encouraging / Understanding Emotionally Expressive / Meaningful / Frequent

Self Assessment Activity

Self Assessment Activity Read the descriptions on Brain Preferences in the handout. Which brain preference is most descriptive of you? You may also rank the others in terms of which are more / less descriptive of you.

Group Activity

Flip Chart Activity Spend 15 minutes creating a flip chart that includes:! Some strengths of your preference & a few pitfalls! Some ways in which you could be misunderstood or stereotyped! Define how you like and dislike people to communicate with you

The Million Dollar Question How can you determine which preferences someone has when you haven t had much contact with them?

The Million Dollar Question What should you do if you haven t ever communicated with them before? Proactive Reactive

Questions Defining Each Quadrant What? How? Why? Who?

Application Skills Practice Case

Tips How to communicate with each style Communication Style: Short and to the point what s the bottom line? Communication Style: They want to know the big picture. Why? Logic, facts, figures (but not too much detail) Like to talk about, and hear, possibilities and long term impact. What? Why? How? Who? Communication Style: Just the facts. Present data in an organized way. Communication Style: Address the relationship before the task. Hi Joe Make sure that you have all of the data and details that they need. Like to consider the impact decisions have on people.

Skills Practice In your preference groups:! Read the scenarios individually! In groups of 2 or 3, prepare for the role of Kelly. Strategize as to how you will approach the conversation with Pat what you will say and how you will say it in order to match the Pat s style.! Pat s style will be the opposite of your own.! Role play instructions

Influencing Ice Breaker Interests and Positions Push vs Pull

J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only Warm Up Exercise - 36 -

Instructions Form Pairs, stand opposite each other. Pen between Goal! Get the other person on your side of the line Rules! No body contact! You will have 60 seconds! Talking permitted J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 37 -

Exercise Lessons Relationship! Long-term vs. Short-term! Role of Trust Mindset and Assumptions! Collaborative vs. Competitive! Proactive vs. Reactive! Fixed Pie vs. Expandable Pie J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 38 -

Group Exercise Debrief J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 39 -

What does it mean to Influence? J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 40 -

Harvard Negotiation Project J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 41 -

Substance/Relationship Tension Strategic Influence Substance J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only Relationship - 42 -

Dual Concerns Model Concern for Self Competing Avoiding Compromising Collaborating Accommodating J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only Concern for Others - 43 -

Deadline Dilemma Review the Kelly/Pat scenario In groups of 2/3, Prepare for the role of Kelly Prepare together for the role of Pat Have the Conversation! Kelly: do your best! Pat: be realistically difficult J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 44 -

Interests and Positions Definition! What parties really care about (desires, concerns)! Underlying factors motivating each party! Positions are the what (often demands) Interests are the why (reasons for Positions) J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 45 -

Reframe: Positions and Interests Position A Position B Reframe: How can we meet your needs for X while at the same time meet my needs for Y? J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only SOLUTIONS - 46 -

Communication Tactics - Push and Pull PUSH: Tell people what we think, and try to persuade them by giving reasons and information which are convincing. PULL: Seek and emphasize areas of common ground and agreement. This requires first understanding the other s position/interests and talking to those interests. J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 47 -

Push and Pull The Skills Push Talking about facts and targets Giving opinions and judgements Promoting a point of view Going against the other s perceptions Pull Asking about priorities and needs Sharing a perspective which links to the other s interests Interest in the other s perceptions and emotions Empathy Transparency Asking the other to explain themselves and/or give examples Inviting new ideas J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only - 48 -

Push and Pull - Pitfalls PUSH and PULL - Pitfalls Push Push styles can be effective in achieving compliance but may not achieve commitment. Not everyone likes being told what to do. People can become dependent and unimaginative or they may fight back (sometimes covertly). Requires credibility. Fails if there is a conflict of interest. - 49 - Pull Insincere pull styles can be seen as manipulative and dishonest. Must lead to a reframe that expresses shared values to be effective. Can be more time consuming and uses more emotional and physical energy. J.P. Morgan Internal Use Only

Video Activity Diagnosis

Video Activity Diagnosis Watch the following video clips. 1. What are the characters NBI types? 2. Are they Pushing, Pulling or both? Discuss in small groups. Explain why you diagnosed them the way you did.

Question and Answers

JD Lanigan More at http://www.performanceconsultinginternational.com J.D is a global master trainer and senior partner at Performance Consulting International. He is a motivational speaker who specializes in coaching individuals to communicate clearly and effectively and deliver strong & memorable presentations. He holds a masters degree in organizational psychology from Columbia University and is certified to administer various coaching assessment instruments, including ECI (emotional intelligence) 360, PDI's Profilor 360, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and FIRO-B. Areas of Expertise: Coaching, Communication and Presentation Skills training, Team Development and Group Dynamics