IRA STANDARDS FOR READING PROFESSIONALS

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

REQUIRED TEXTS Woods, M. & Moe, A.J. (2011). Analytical Reading Inventory with Readers Passages (9 th edition). Prentice Hall.

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

School Leadership Rubrics

A Diagnostic Tool for Taking your Program s Pulse

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

K-12 Math & ELA Updates. Education Committee August 8, 2017

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Social Justice Practicum (SJP) Description

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

A Guide to Student Portfolios

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

THE FIELD LEARNING PLAN

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Instructional Intervention/Progress Monitoring (IIPM) Model Pre/Referral Process. and. Special Education Comprehensive Evaluation.

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

GRANT WOOD ELEMENTARY School Improvement Plan

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

RDGED 722: Reading Specialist Practicum Field Experience Handbook

Reynolds School District Literacy Framework

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Trends & Issues Report

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Philosophy of Literacy Education. Becoming literate is a complex step by step process that begins at birth. The National

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

Assessment. the international training and education center on hiv. Continued on page 4

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Language Arts Methods

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

MULTIPLE SUBJECT CREDENTIAL PROGRAM HANDBOOK. Preparing Educators to Be Effective Reflective Engaged

21st Century Community Learning Center

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

PARIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL AUDIT

Assessment and Evaluation for Student Performance Improvement. I. Evaluation of Instructional Programs for Performance Improvement

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Kannapolis City Schools 100 DENVER STREET KANNAPOLIS, NC

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Master of Social Work Field Education University of New Hampshire. Policy and Procedure Manual

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

University of New Hampshire Policies and Procedures for Student Evaluation of Teaching (2016) Academic Affairs Thompson Hall

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Timeline. Recommendations

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

NC Global-Ready Schools

The State and District RtI Plans

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

University of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook

A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools

Transcription:

IRA STANDARDS FOR READING PROFESSIONALS (Specialist) Practicum/Student Teaching Use the rubric below. Please read carefully. This rubric is intended to be developmental. Note the intentional growth over time: beginning ; followed by emerging ; and then ready to teach. s may engage in this practicum either pre-student teaching, that is, prior to the completion of the primary methods coursework or s will engage in the practicum as a part of student teaching, as the first student teaching placement or at the conclusion of student teaching. A candidate s placement on this continuum will be dependent upon the timing and duration of the placement. The IRA standards (2010) are intended for reading specialists who have responsibilities for teaching students who struggle with learning to read and who must also be able to support teachers in their efforts to provide effective instruction for all students. The emphasis in this evaluation is on the role of the specialist that focuses on teaching students who struggle with learning to read. The additional part of the specialist s responsibilities, for the most part, is not included in the expectations for the Iowa K-8 Reading Endorsement. The candidates from Luther who are seeking the Iowa reading endorsement do not have prior experience in the classroom as a licensed teacher; they are not ready to support teachers in their efforts to provide effective instruction for all students. Beginning: The teacher candidate demonstrates awareness of the expectations of the standard and is able to articulate knowledge of the standard expectation.. Emerging: The teacher candidate demonstrates understanding of the expectations of the standard and demonstrates application at the level of someone ready to assume some responsibility for the students receiving reading support. The candidate is moving toward greater independence for planning and teaching. Ready to Teach: The teacher candidate demonstrates understanding of the expectations for working with students who need additional support, as described by the standard, and demonstrates application at the level of someone ready to take the responsibility of the teacher. : to Demonstrate Standard 1: Foundational Knowledge s understand the theoretical and evidence- based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction 1.1: Understand major theories and empirical research that describe the cognitive, linguistic, motivational, and sociocultural foundations of reading and writing development, processes, and components, including word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading writing connections. 1.3: Understand the role of professional judgment and practical knowledge for improving all students reading development and achievement. Identifies examples of reading instruction for developing word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading writing connections. Identifies conditions that support individual motivation to read and write (e.g., access to print, choice, challenge, interests, and family and community knowledge) as factors that enhance literacy learning for all. Recognizes the role of professional judgment & practical knowledge for improving students reading development & achievement. With the help of the cooperating teacher, begins to use theories of reading & writing processes & development to understand & respond to the needs of all readers. With the help of the cooperating teacher, analyzes the classroom environment to determine ways to foster individual motivation to read & write. Shows fair-mindedness & joins in the conversation about the importance of fairmindedness, empathy, & ethical behavior in literacy instruction & professional behavior. Interprets major theories of reading a& writing processes & development to understand the needs of all readers in diverse contexts. Analyzes classroom environment quality for fostering individual motivation to read & write (e.g., access to print, choice, challenge, & interests). Reads & understands the literature & research about factors that contribute to reading success (e.g., social, cognitive, and physical). Models fair-mindedness, empathy, & ethical behavior when teaching students & working with other professionals. Communicates the importance of fairmindedness, empathy, & ethical behavior in literacy instruction & professional behavior.

Standard 2: Curriculum & Instruction s use instructional approaches, materials, and an integrated, comprehensive, balanced curriculum to support student learning in reading and writing. 2.1: Use foundational knowledge to design or Demonstrates knowledge of research & Implement lessons that are part of the implement an integrated, comprehensive, and literature that supports reading & writing reading & writing curriculum with teacher balanced curriculum. curriculum instruction. guidance & supervision. Collaborates with other teachers to implement the reading & writing curriculum. Demonstrates an understanding of the research & literature that undergirds the reading & writing curriculum instruction for all pre-k 8 students. Develops & implements the curriculum to meet the specific needs of students who struggle with reading. Work with teachers and other personnel to evaluate the literacy curriculum to ensure there is vertical & horizontal alignment across pre-k 8. 2.2: Use appropriate and varied instructional approaches, including those that develop word recognition, language comprehension, strategic knowledge, and reading writing connections. Identifies & describes a variety of instructional approaches related to concepts of print, phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, comprehension, fluency, critical thinking, & writing.. Uses a variety of instructional approaches selected & supervised by the cooperating teacher. Uses instructional approaches supported by literature & research for the following areas: concepts of print, phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, critical thinking, motivation, & writing. Provides appropriate in-depth instruction for all readers & writers, especially those who struggle with reading & writing. As needed, adapts & instructional materials & approaches to meet the language-proficiency needs of English learners & students who struggle to learn to read & write. 2.3: Use a wide range of texts (e.g., narrative, expository, and poetry) from traditional print, digital, and online resources. Identifies & describes a variety of materials. With guidance from the cooperating teacher, selects & uses a wide range of materials. Demonstrates knowledge of & a critical stance toward a wide variety of quality traditional print, digital, & online resources. Engages in collaborative school efforts to evaluate, select, and use a variety of instructional materials to meet the specific needs & abilities of all learners. Standard 3: Assessment and Evaluation s use a variety of assessment tools and practices to plan and evaluate effective reading and writing instruction..

3.1: Understand types of assessments and their purposes, strengths, and limitations. Identifies assessments used to assess student reading performance. Demonstrates an understanding of established purposes for assessing student performance. Demonstrates an understanding of the literature and research related to assessments and their uses and misuses. Demonstrates an understanding of established purposes for assessing the performance of all readers, including tools for screening, diagnosis, progress monitoring, & measuring outcomes. Recognizes the basic technical adequacy of assessments (e.g., reliability, content, and construct validity). Explains district and state assessment frameworks, proficiency standards, and student benchmarks. 3.2: Select, develop, administer, and interpret assessments, both traditional print and electronic, for specific purposes. Is beginning to select for specific purposes appropriate traditional print & electronic assessments. Administers assessments under the direction of certified personnel. Administers and interpret appropriate assessments for students, especially those who struggle with reading and writing. Collaborates with other teachers in the analysis of data, using the assessment results of all students. 3.3: Use assessment information to plan and evaluate instruction. knows a range of standards-based materials, resources, & technologies. Works with the cooperating teacher to collect data & maintain records. Uses multiple data sources to analyze individual readers performance & to plan instruction & intervention. Analyzes & use assessment data to examine the effectiveness of specific intervention practices & students responses to instruction. Participates in professional development initiatives using assessment data. 3.4: Communicate assessment results and implications to a variety of audiences. Understands the importance of student confidentiality & acknowledges the role of certified personnel as communicators of assessment results. With the cooperating teacher, analyzes assessment results & with the cooperating teacher is beginning to explain the results to appropriate audiences. Analyzes & reports assessment results to a variety of appropriate audiences for relevant implications, instructional purposes, & accountability. Demonstrates the ability to communicate results of assessments to various audiences. Standard 4: Diversity s create and engage their students in literacy practices that develop awareness, understanding, respect, and a valuing of differences in our society. 4.1: Recognize, understand, and value the forms of Values diversity as a resource in a functioning Recognizes the forms of diversity in their Demonstrates an understanding of the ways in diversity that exist in society and their importance in democratic society. own lives and understand how these may which diversity influences the reading & learning to read and write. limit or enable their reading and writing. writing development of students, especially those who struggle with reading & writing.

Demonstrates an understanding of the forms of diversity that exist in society, with a particular focus on individual & group differences that have been used to marginalize some & privilege others. Values diversity as a resource in a functioning democratic society. Works with other teachers to develop reading & writing instruction that is responsive to diversity. Participates in school community conversations about research on diversity & how diversity impacts reading & writing development. 4.2: Use a literacy curriculum and engage in instructional practices that positively impact students knowledge, beliefs, and engagement with the features of diversity. Describes specific aspects of school &community experiences that can be used to reveal students diversity & engage them in learning. Assists in instructional practices that are linked to students diversity & which also acquaint them with others traditions &diversity. Provides differentiated instruction & instructional materials, including traditional print, digital, & online resources that capitalize on diversity. Assists in instructional practices that engage students as agents of their own learning. Collaborates with others to build strong hometo-school & school-to-home literacy connections. 4.3: Develop and implement strategies to advocate for equity. Identifies strategies to advocate for equity. Identifies the need to advocate for equity in literacy learning. Provides students with linguistic, academic, & cultural experiences that link their communities with the school. Advocates for change in societal practices & institutional structures that are inherently biased or prejudiced against certain groups. Demonstrates how issues of inequity & opportunities for social justice activism & resiliency can be incorporated into the literacy curriculum. Collaborates with teachers, parents & guardians, & administrators to implement policies and instructional practices that promote equity & draw connections between home & community literacy & school literacy. Standard 5: Literate Environment s create a literate environment that fosters reading and writing by integrating foundational knowledge, instructional practices, approaches and methods, curriculum materials, and the appropriate use of assessments. 5.1: Design the physical environment to optimize students use of traditional print, digital, and online resources in reading and writing instruction. Describes a physical environment that optimizes students use of traditional print, digital, & online resources in reading & writing instruction. Works with the cooperating teacher to develop & maintain physical arrangements of traditional print, digital, and online resources that facilitate reading & writing instruction. Arranges instructional areas to provide easy access to books& other instructional materials for a variety of individual, small-group, & whole-class activities & support teachers in doing the same. Modifies the arrangements to accommodate

students changing needs. 5.2: Design a social environment that is low risk and includes choice, motivation, and scaffolded support to optimize students opportunities for learning to read and write. Describes a social environment that is low risk & includes choice, motivation, & scaffolded to support students opportunities for learning to read & write. Works with cooperating teacher to create & maintain a positive social environment. Creates supportive social environments for all students, especially those who struggle with reading and writing. 5.3: Use routines to support reading and writing instruction (e.g., time allocation, transitions from one activity to another; discussions, and peer feedback). Knows a variety of routines to support reading & writing instruction. Understands how and why classroom teachers use specific routines. Assists cooperating teacher to create & maintain supportive classroom routines. Understands the role of routines in creating and maintaining positive learning environments for reading & writing instruction using traditional print, digital, & online resources. Creates effective routines for all students, especially those who struggle with reading and writing. Supports teachers in doing the same for all readers. 5.4: Use a variety of classroom configurations (i.e., whole class, small group, and individual) to differentiate instruction. Is knowledgeable about a variety of instructional grouping options Uses a variety of instructional grouping options selected by & supervised by the cooperating teacher. Uses evidence-based grouping practices to meet the needs of all students, especially those who struggle with reading and writing. In consultation with the cooperating teacher, adjusts instructional groupings to ensure that the diverse needs of learners are being met. Standard 6: Professional Learning & Leadership s recognize the importance of, demonstrate, and facilitate professional learning and leadership as a career-long effort and responsibility. 6.2: Display positive dispositions related to their Respects the importance of confidentiality. Respects the importance of confidentiality. Articulates the research base related to the own reading and writing and the teaching of connections among teacher dispositions, reading and writing, and pursue the development Demonstrates a belief that all students can Cares for the well-being of students. student learning, & the involvement of parents, of individual professional knowledge and learn. guardians, & the community. behaviors. Demonstrates a curiosity and interest in practice that results in student learning. Promotes the value of reading & writing in and out of school by modeling a positive attitude toward reading & writing with students, colleagues, administrators, & parents & guardians. Joins & participates in professional literacy organizations, symposia, conferences, & workshops. Demonstrates effective use of technology for improving student learning. 6.3: Participate in, design, facilitate, lead, and Articulates the value of professional learning/ Participates with teachers in professional Collaborates in planning, leading, &

evaluate effective and differentiated professional development programs. development opportunities. development experiences designed to improve student learning. evaluating professional development activities for individuals & groups of teachers. Activities may include working individually with teachers (e.g., modeling, coplanning, co-teaching, & observing) or with groups (e.g., teacher workshops, group meetings, and online learning). Demonstrates the ability to engage in effective conversations (e.g., for planning& reflective problem solving) with individuals & groups of teachers, work collaboratively with teachers & administrators, & facilitate group meetings. 6.4: Understand and influence local, state, or national policy decisions. Recognizes that policy mandates influence a teacher s responsibilities. Demonstrates an understanding of local, state, & national policies that affect reading and writing instruction. Writes or assists in writing proposals that enable schools to obtain additional funding to support literacy efforts. Promotes effective communication & collaboration among stakeholders, including parents & guardians, teachers, administrators, policymakers, & community members. Advocates with various groups (e.g., administrators, school boards, and local, state, & federal policymaking bodies) for needed organizational & instructional changes to promote effective literacy instruction. Please add narrative feedback that you believe will help the candidate continue to grow as a teacher of students who need additional reading support.