Assessment criteria: Phase 6

Similar documents
Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

One Stop Shop For Educators

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

English IV Version: Beta

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Arabic. Victorian Certificate of Education Study Design. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority 2004

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Assessment and Evaluation

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Spanish III Class Description

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

AP SPANISH LANGUAGE 2009 PRESENTATIONAL WRITING SCORING GUIDELINES SCORE DESCRIPTION TASK COMPLETION* TOPIC DEVELOPMENT* LANGUAGE USE*

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

MASTER OF LIBERAL STUDIES

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

November 2012 MUET (800)

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

Applying Speaking Criteria. For use from November 2010 GERMAN BREAKTHROUGH PAGRB01

Adolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS

Textbook: American Literature Vol. 1 William E. Cain /Pearson Ed. Inc. 2004

Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust: delivering excellence in children and young people s health services

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Copyright Corwin 2015

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Language Acquisition Chart

CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES Department of Teacher Education and Professional Development

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Improving Advanced Learners' Communication Skills Through Paragraph Reading and Writing. Mika MIYASONE

The Use of Drama and Dramatic Activities in English Language Teaching

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

Designing Idents for Television

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Syllabus: Introduction to Philosophy

Night by Elie Wiesel. Standards Link:

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Transcription:

Assessment criteria: Phase 6 Phase 6 criterion A: Oral communication Maximum: 8 0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below. 1 2 The student: makes a limited attempt to analyse the important information, details and ideas in social and academic interactions makes a limited attempt to respond appropriately to a wide range of spoken texts in social and academic situations makes a limited attempt to engage in unrehearsed and complex exchanges on a wide range of topics of personal and global significance makes a limited attempt to communicate information containing complex ideas in a wide variety of situations uses limited vocabulary and grammatical structures, with frequent errors makes a limited attempt to use some oratory techniques. 3 4 The student: at times analyses the important information, details and ideas in social and academic interactions responds to some spoken texts in social and academic situations; some responses are inappropriate occasionally engages in unrehearsed and complex exchanges, giving some analysis and explanation, on a wide range of topics of personal and global significance communicates some information containing complex ideas in a wide variety of situations uses a limited range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, with some inappropriate word choice and errors speaks with a limited level of competence in oratory technique. 76 Language B guide

5 6 The student: usually analyses the important information, details and ideas in social and academic interactions responds appropriately to most spoken texts in a wide range of social and academic situations usually engages in unrehearsed and complex exchanges, giving analysis and explanation, on a wide range of topics of personal and global significance communicates ample information and complex ideas in a wide variety of situations makes good use of a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, generally accurately speaks with an adequate level of competence in oratory technique. 7 8 The student: analyses the important information, details and ideas in social and academic interactions responds appropriately to spoken texts in a wide range of social and academic situations engages in unrehearsed and complex exchanges, giving detailed analysis and explanation, on a wide range of topics of personal and global significance communicates substantial information containing complex ideas and some sophisticated language in a wide variety of situations makes excellent use of a wide range of vocabulary and varied grammatical structures, generally accurately speaks with a good level of competence in oratory technique. Note: In the strand referring to the use of comprehensible pronunciation and intonation, for tonal languages intonation is replaced by correct tone. Language B guide 77

Phase 6 criterion B: Visual interpretation Maximum: 8 0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below. 1 2 The student: makes a limited attempt to evaluate information, main ideas and supporting details in visual texts dealing with social and academic situations makes a limited attempt to evaluate some conventions in visual texts dealing with a range of social and academic situations makes a limited attempt to engage with the visual text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text; makes minimal connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows limited understanding of the content of the visual, spoken and written text as a whole. 3 4 The student: at times evaluates and draws some conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in visual texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates some conventions in visual texts dealing with a range of social and academic situations occasionally engages with the visual text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making some connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows some understanding of the content of the visual, spoken and written text as a whole. 5 6 The student: usually evaluates and draws conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in visual texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates most conventions in visual texts dealing with a range of social and academic situations usually engages with the visual text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making ample connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows considerable understanding of the content of the visual, spoken and written text as a whole. 78 Language B guide

7 8 The student: evaluates and draws conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in visual texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates conventions in visual texts dealing with a range of social and academic situations engages with the visual text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making substantial connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows perceptive understanding of the content of the visual, spoken and written text as a whole. Language B guide 79

Phase 6 criterion C: Reading comprehension Maximum: 8 0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below. 1 2 The student: makes a limited attempt to evaluate information, main ideas and supporting details, and draw conclusions in a wide range of texts dealing with social and academic situations makes a limited attempt to evaluate texts but has difficulty making inferences and interpreting the author s choice of style, format and ideas to suit an intended audience and purpose makes a limited attempt to engage with the text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text; makes minimal connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows limited understanding of the content of the text as a whole. 3 4 The student: at times evaluates and draws some conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in a wide range of texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates texts by making some inferences that are supported with details from the text and by superficially interpreting the author s choice of style, format and ideas to suit an intended audience and purpose occasionally engages with the text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making some connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows some understanding of the content of the text as a whole. 5 6 The student: usually evaluates and draws some conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in a wide range of texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates texts by making inferences that are supported with details from the text and by interpreting the author s choice of style, format and ideas to suit an intended audience and purpose usually engages with the text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making ample connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows considerable understanding of the content of the text as a whole. 80 Language B guide

7 8 The student: evaluates and draws some conclusions from information, main ideas and supporting details in a wide range of texts dealing with social and academic situations evaluates texts by making inferences convincingly supported with details from the text and by interpreting the author s choice of style, format and ideas to suit an intended audience and purpose engages with the text by synthesizing ideas, opinions and attitudes in the text and making substantial connections with own experiences, attitudes, points of view and global perspectives shows perceptive understanding of the content of the text as a whole. Language B guide 81

Phase 6 criterion D: Writing Maximum: 8 0 The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below. 1 2 The student: has difficulty writing texts to express ideas and opinions supported by examples and illustrations in a wide range of social and academic contexts. Shows little depth in understanding of the topic; ideas are irrelevant and repetitive; opinions have little or no relevant support has difficulty organizing information and ideas clearly and effectively into a logical and well-structured text; uses a limited range of cohesive devices has difficulty using a range of vocabulary, complex grammatical structures and conventions; frequent errors interfere with communication writes with little effect or creativity; there is little sense of register, purpose or style. 3 4 The student: writes texts to express some ideas and opinions in a wide range of social and academic contexts. Shows some depth in understanding of the topic, though some of the message remains superficial; ideas are not always relevant and opinions insufficiently supported organizes some information and ideas clearly and effectively into a logical and well-structured text; uses a range of cohesive devices effectively uses a range of vocabulary, complex grammatical structures and conventions; some errors and inappropriate word choice occasionally affect comprehensibility writes with some effect and creativity and some sense of register, purpose and style. 5 6 The student: writes complex texts to express clearly a range of focused ideas and opinions in a wide range of social and academic contexts. Shows satisfactory depth in understanding of the topic; ideas and opinions are relevant and generally supported usually organizes information and ideas clearly and effectively into a logical and well-structured text; uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively makes good use of a range of vocabulary, complex grammatical structures and conventions; errors do not affect comprehensibility writes with considerable effect and creativity and a clear sense of register, purpose and style. 82 Language B guide

7 8 The student: writes sophisticated, complex texts effectively to express a wide range of focused ideas and opinions in a wide range of social and academic contexts. Shows a sophisticated, in-depth understanding of the topic; ideas and opinions are relevant, focused and supported by examples and illustrations organizes information and ideas clearly and effectively into a logical and well-structured text; uses a wide range of cohesive devices effectively makes excellent use of a wide range of vocabulary, complex grammatical structures and conventions to write effectively and accurately writes with a high degree of effect and creativity and a clear sense of register, purpose and style. Language B guide 83