Retake Support. April 8, 2015

Similar documents
Secondary English-Language Arts

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Effective Supervision: Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Course # 1 EDCS 431 Collaborative Language and Learning (WI/OC*) "Effective use of communication in a cross-cultural setting -- Seville, Spain"

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Using SAM Central With iread

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook. Version January Northcentral University

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

lorem ipsum dolor sit amet

Distinguished Teacher Review

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

INSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

2 Any information on the upcoming science test?

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Moodle 2 Assignments. LATTC Faculty Technology Training Tutorial

SAMPLE. PJM410: Assessing and Managing Risk. Course Description and Outcomes. Participation & Attendance. Credit Hours: 3

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

GUIDE TO STAFF DEVELOPMENT COURSES. Towards your future

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Welcome to the session on ACCUPLACER Policy Development. This session will touch upon common policy decisions an institution may encounter during the

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

Department of Teaching and Learning

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

George Mason University College of Education and Human Development Secondary Education Program. EDCI 790 Secondary Education Internship

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

BEST PRACTICES FOR PRINCIPAL SELECTION

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

FLN Learning Helping your Child succeed

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

FACULTY Tk20 TUTORIALS: PORTFOLIOS & FIELD EXPERIENCE BINDERS

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

Generic Project Rubrics 4th Grade

Course Content Concepts

IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Illinois State Board of Education Student Information System. Annual Fall State Bilingual Program Directors Meeting

School Executive Standard 7: Micro-political Leadership. Dr. Kimberly Simmons NCEES Coordinator

Jefferson County School District Testing Plan

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

STA2023 Introduction to Statistics (Hybrid) Spring 2013

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Doctor of Philosophy in Theology

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Online Participant Syllabus

The Moodle and joule 2 Teacher Toolkit

E-Portfolio for Teacher Educators at EIU. February 2005

Portfolio-Based Language Assessment (PBLA) Presented by Rebecca Hiebert

RDGED 722: Reading Specialist Practicum Field Experience Handbook

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

CST Readiness: Targeting Bubble Students

Georgia Department of Education

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

Running Head GAPSS PART A 1

RESIDENCE DON APPLICATION

GLOBAL INSTITUTIONAL PROFILES PROJECT Times Higher Education World University Rankings

MGT/MGP/MGB 261: Investment Analysis

University of California, Irvine - Division of Continuing Education

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

Introduction to Moodle

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

OFFICE OF COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

World s Best Workforce Plan

Syllabus Education Department Lincoln University EDU 311 Social Studies Methods

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support of ABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

Upward Bound Program

Steps for Thesis / Thematic Paper Process (Master s Degree Program)

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

College of Liberal Arts (CLA)

The Teaching and Learning Center

Transcription:

Retake Support April 8, 2015

Presenters Amee Adkins, Illinois State University SCALE Guidance Document Jeanne Stone, University of California Irvine Sharing her experience with candidate support Elisa Palmer, Illinois State University Using ISU pilot data to draft local policy

SCALE Guidance Condition code Resubmit original addressing condition Single task retake New artifacts and new commentary Oversample everything Complete retake

SCALE Guidance Far below performance standard Pattern struggling across tasks Complete retake Struggling in multiple domains

SCALE Guidance Below performance standard Single task retake Weakness clustered in one task

SCALE Guidance Identify personnel with local evaluation or scoring expertise Review score profile and portfolio Explore candidate s decision and thinking about their practice Use resources such as Making Good Choices and Guidelines for Support

Jeanne M. Stone University of California School of Education jmstone@uci.edu

UCI Policies and Procedures Printed description of our procedures and policies : Scoring and Passing Requirements Reporting Protocol to Students Opportunities for Retakes Procedure for Supporting Students Communicate expectations early in the program. edtpa orientation the quarter before the students complete the edtpa Faculty orientation at the beginning of the school year to make connections to the edtpa in their methods classes

Identifying Students with Non- Passing Scores Review scores when they come in from Pearson. Email candidates that scores have arrived and to check their score report. Remind them of passing score. Email individual candidates that did not pass the edtpa and schedule a time to meet with them. Review portfolios with non-passing scores before meeting with candidates. Meet with Program Coordinator to decide on the retake needed for each student in that program.

Conferencing with Students Student conferences include the edtpa Coordinator and/or Program Coordinator and the subject-matter faculty member if needed. At the conference: Use guiding questions to walk through key areas of the portfolio with the student. Share the next steps for the student (full portfolio retake or partial retake). Provide the target due date and work with the candidate to set an appropriate time line for meeting the target due date. Outline the types of support available to the student.

Supporting Students Depending on the number of students your are supporting, these options can be done individually or in groups. Use Task-specific sessions to review the What Do I Need to Do section of the handbook and the rubrics. Provide content-specific sessions with a faculty member with the appropriate subject area expertise. Use weekly email or office meetings to check progress of students during retake. Ask them to share where they are in relation to the planned time line. Ask student what additional assistance they might need.

Using ISU pilot data Elisa Palmer, edtpa Coordinator Illinois State University elpalme@ilstu.edu

How to Begin? Retake options currently are one task or full retake Use score profiles to determine task evaluation criteria Based on the premise that candidates need to demonstrate solid practice in each task to ensure readiness to teach

edtpa Blueprint Guiding Question Task name: Title Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Struggling candidate, not ready to teach Some skill but needs more practice to be teacher-ofrecord Acceptable level to begin teaching Solid foundation of knowledge and skills Stellar candidate

Guiding Principles Proficiency of practice Reasonableness of expectations Responsibility to all involved

Determining How Many Tasks a Candidate Must Retake Task/rubric correlation Task 1: Planning (rubrics 1-5) Task 2: Instruction (rubrics 6-10) Task 3: Assessment (rubrics 11-15) Use task scores to determine what task or tasks need to be resubmitted

Using Task Scores to Determine Retake Needs Task must have a total score of 12. ISU Criteria There must be at least three 3s or higher. There can be no more than one 1.

Candidate #1 edtpa Score Profile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Composite Score 2 3 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 3 3 34 Retake Task 1? Retake Task 2? Retake Task 3? No Yes No Recommendation: One Task Retake of Task 2

Candidate #2 edtpa Score Profile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Composite Score 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 33 Retake Task 1? Retake Task 2? Retake Task 3? Yes Yes Yes Recommendation: Full edtpa Retake

Additional Findings/Questions Based on the initial analysis, several teacher candidates who were close to passing would have been full retakes. Is there a way to do a second analysis for candidates who are within 3 points of passing?

Second Round Analysis Screening Questions 1. Is there a task in which the candidate fails to show any proficiency? 2. If no single task meets criteria #1, then ask Is there a task that scored lower than all the other tasks? 3. If no single task meets criteria #2, then ask Which task would the candidate mostly likely be able to complete without an additional teaching placement?

Re-analysis edtpa Score Profile #1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Composite Score 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 33 Round 2 Analysis 1. Is there a single task in which the candidate fails to show any proficiency? Recommendation: One Task Retake of Task 3

Re-analysis edtpa Score Profile #2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Composite Score 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 33 Round 2 Analysis 1. Is there a single task in which the candidate fails to show any proficiency? 2. Is there a single task that scored lower than all the other tasks? Recommendation: One Task Retake of Task 3

Re-analysis edtpa Score Profile #3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Composite Score 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 34 Round 2 Analysis 1. Is there a single task in which the candidate fails to show any proficiency? 2. Is there a single task that scored lower than all the other tasks? 3. Which remaining task would the candidate mostly likely be able to complete without an additional teaching placement? Recommendation: One Task Retake of Task 1

SCALE Resources for Mentoring edtpa Retakes Guidelines for edtpa Retake and Decision-Making and Support (2015) Review of Low-Scoring edtpas and Guidance for Re-takes (October 2014) edtpa Webinar for Submission Requirements, Condition Codes, and Retakes (pp 38-42)

SCALE Guides for edtpa Retakes edtpa Webinar for Submission Requirements, Condition Codes, and Retakes (pp 26-31) Candidate Instructions for edtpa Retake (2015) Guidelines for edtpa Retake Decision- Making and Support (2015)