Delves Junior School Bell Lane, Walsall, WS5 4PU

Similar documents
Newlands Girls School

Eastbury Primary School

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Putnoe Primary School

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Oasis Academy South Bank

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Archdiocese of Birmingham

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

Head of Maths Application Pack

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

5 Early years providers

St Matthew s RC High School

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

Inspection report British International School

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Subject Inspection in Technical Graphics and Design and Communication Graphics REPORT

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

SELF-ASSESSMENT EXTREMISM & RADICALISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

The Waldegrave Trust Waldegrave School, Fifth Cross Road, Twickenham, TW2 5LH TEL: , FAX:

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

We seek to be: A vibrant, excellent place of learning at the heart of our Christian community.

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

School of Education. Teacher Education Professional Experience Handbook

DFE Number: 318/3315 URN Number: Headteacher: Mrs C. Moreland Chair of Governors: Mrs. D. Long

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

KAHNAWÀ: KE EDUCATION CENTER P.O BOX 1000 KAHNAW À:KE, QC J0L 1B0 Tel: Fax:

School Leadership Rubrics

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Ferry Lane Primary School

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

or by at:

Inspection report Transylvania College Cluj-Napoca Romania

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Upper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY

BENTLEY ST PAUL S C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL POLICY FOR I.C.T. Growing together in faith, love and trust, we will succeed. Date of Policy: 2013

Idsall External Examinations Policy

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

Practice Learning Handbook

Guide for primary schools

Practice Learning Handbook

Qualification handbook

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

Equality Policy Committee Responsible Human Resources Last review: 2015/2016 Next Review: 2016/2017 1

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

Pupil Premium Impact Assessment

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Whole School Evaluation REPORT. St. Colmcille s NS Inistioge, Co. Kilkenny Roll No. : 17073V

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

Transcription:

School report Delves Junior School Bell Lane, Walsall, WS5 4PU Inspection dates 18 19 September 2013 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. Pupils achieve well. Their attainment by the end of Year 6 has risen in the last two years. Rates of progress have also improved. Teachers make learning fun and this encourages pupils to work hard. Teachers generally match work well to meet pupils needs. This is particularly the case in Year 6 where some teaching is outstanding. Teachers make careful use of ongoing assessment in lessons to help pupils learn well. This is backed up by good marking which provides pupils with detailed guidance on how well they are doing and what they need to do next to improve further. Pupils very positive attitudes contribute well to their successful learning. Pupils enjoy school, feel safe and behave respectfully to each other and to staff. Relationships are good and the school is a very harmonious community. Leaders and managers, including governors, have tackled the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection well. Actions taken as a result of close checks on pupils progress have improved pupils achievement, especially in writing and mathematics. Training and work with consultants have contributed well to improving teaching, the use of assessment and the effectiveness of tracking procedures. Parents highly commend the school s work. It is not yet an outstanding school because Leaders have not yet secured teaching of a consistently outstanding quality. Occasionally, in Years 3 to 5, teachers do not target questions well enough to ensure all pupils are actively involved in lessons. There are occasions when work is not always planned sharply enough to ensure disabled pupils and those pupils with special educational needs make fast progress in lessons. Occasionally, in Years 3 to 5, teachers do not ensure that the work which more-able pupils undertake independently is hard enough.

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 2 of 9 Information about this inspection Inspectors observed teaching in 15 lessons taught by 15 teachers. Two of these lessons were observed together with senior leaders. In addition eight short visits were made to lessons taught by teachers and/or teaching assistants. Samples of pupils work in writing and mathematics from the previous school year were analysed. An inspector talked to a few pupils from Year 6 about their favourite books and listened to them reading. Meetings were held with school staff, a group of pupils, three governors and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors took account of the 31 questionnaires completed by staff. There were insufficient responses from parents to the online questionnaire for these to be recorded on Parent View. However, responses to the school s own recent survey of parents views about the school were analysed. Inspectors looked at a range of evidence including: the work in pupils books; monitoring records; school improvement plans; the school s own data on pupils attainment and progress; consultants reports; and policies, procedures and records relating to safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Inspection team Derek Aitken, Lead inspector Sheila Boyle Jenny Batelen Additional Inspector Additional Inspector Additional Inspector

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 3 of 9 Full report Information about this school The school is larger than most primary schools. Just over 50% of pupils are from White British backgrounds. The remaining pupils are mainly of Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage. No pupil is at an early stage of learning English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium is broadly average. In this school, this extra government funding is currently received for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals. The proportions of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action, school action plus or a statement of special educational needs are below average. The school meets the government s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils attainment and progress in English and mathematics. What does the school need to do to improve further? Make more teaching outstanding and help pupils to make faster progress by: making sure teachers always target questions well to keep all pupils actively involved in learning improving the sharpness of teachers planning to ensure that the needs of disabled pupils and all groups of pupils with special educational needs are consistently well met. Increase the proportion of pupils attaining at the higher levels by: ensuring that work is always well matched to the needs of more-able pupils in Years 3 to 5 planning a wide range of opportunities across the curriculum to enable these pupils to develop their skills to the full.

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 4 of 9 Inspection judgements The achievement of pupils is good The school s very rigorous checks show that pupils attainment in reading, writing and mathematics at the start of Year 3 varies from year to year and is presently average. However, attainment on entry was below average for current Year 5 and Year 6 pupils and very recent Year 6 groups. Attainment in these subjects by the end of Year 6 has risen to average in the last two years and in 2012 it was at its highest level for five years. The rise in attainment is most noticeable in writing and mathematics. The proportion of pupils in 2012 who exceeded the progress expected of them in mathematics was above average. Preliminary results for the 2013 national tests show that these standards have been maintained, and pupils in the current Year 6 classes are working at slightly above-average levels in reading and mathematics. In 2012, in Year 6, the attainment of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium was lower than that of other pupils in the year group, about two terms behind in English and one and a half terms behind in mathematics. However, from their starting points, these pupils made similar progress to other pupils in both subjects. This gap in attainment is closing steadily for pupils in all year groups, including Year 6. This is because leaders check carefully that the actions they take to raise these pupils attainment are very effective. Most disabled pupils and those pupils who have special educational needs achieve well by the end of Year 6. This is particularly the case for statemented pupils, some of whom make rapid progress due to the intensive support they receive. However, fewer pupils than is nationally the case achieve at the higher Levels 5 and 6. Lesson planning does not always ensure more-able pupils in Years 3 to 5 are fully challenged and there are few purposeful opportunities across the curriculum for more-able pupils to extend their research and investigative skills. Across the school most groups of pupils make equally good progress, although the picture is not quite so strong for Pakistani pupils, especially the small minority with poor levels of attendance. The quality of teaching is good The teaching is good in most lessons, and in some lessons in Year 6 it is outstanding. Teachers have good subject knowledge and know how individual pupils learn best. Teachers enthusiasm, ready encouragement and effective mix of methods capture pupils attention and ensure that they find their learning enjoyable. Teachers explain tasks clearly and make good use of ongoing assessment in lessons to clarify for pupils the next steps in their learning. Nearly all lessons move at a brisk pace because routines and relationships are very well established and teachers recognise when pupils have mastered an idea and are ready to move on to the next task. These strengths in teaching ensure that lessons run smoothly and interruptions are very rare. Pupils are expected to concentrate and to work hard. They make good use of paired partner routines to discuss new ideas. Teachers apply the school s marking policy consistently and, in Year 6, marking is of a particularly high standard. Pupils are given regular, detailed feedback which leaves them in no doubt about what levels they are working at, how well they are progressing over time and their mini-targets provide them with short-term goals to aim at. In the best lessons, for example in Year 6, teachers high expectations for pupils progress are reflected in the challenging work they provide for pupils of all abilities. In otherwise successful lessons in Years 3 to 5, this feature is less evident, including in the work pupils undertake on

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 5 of 9 their own. While most pupils respond well to the teacher s questions, teachers do not always target questioning well enough to ensure all pupils, including disabled pupils and those pupils with special educational needs, are always actively involved in learning. Statemented pupils are often provided with expert support but work for other categories of disabled pupils and those pupils with special educational needs is occasionally not planned sharply enough to ensure they make fast progress in lessons. The behaviour and safety of pupils are good Pupils report that they enjoy school and that teachers make learning fun. Attendance levels have risen considerably in the last three years and are a little above average. Pupils behaviour is nearly always good and is, on a few occasions, exemplary both in lessons and around school. Pupils display high levels of courtesy to each other, staff and visitors. They respect the clear routines, comply with staff requests without fuss and help to ensure interior areas of the school are kept clean by changing their footwear before going outside at playtimes. Pupils concentrate well, work hard in lessons and persevere. Their very positive attitudes support their good progress, although, on a few occasions when less involved in question and answer activities, some pupils are content to sit passively. Pupils good sense of teamwork was evident during the inspection not only in group-work but during a reading lesson where pupils unobtrusively helped each other out if they had difficulties pronouncing unfamiliar words. Pupils have few concerns about behaviour. There have been no exclusions in the last three years. Pupils report that bullying very rarely occurs and say that fallouts which sometimes occur are quickly resolved before incidents can escalate, often with the help of the learning mentor and Year 6 pupils on safety patrol. Pupils are trained well in how to stay safe and are alert to potential dangers such as cyber-bullying. All of the 160 parents who responded to the school s recent questionnaire stated that their children are safe in school and almost all reported that staff manage pupils behaviour well. Pupils of different ethnic origins work and play well together. They enjoy playtimes and, spontaneously, show initiative in making up their own team games for those pupils who particularly enjoy physical activities, such as hopscotch and balancing on the upturned tyres trim-trail. The school promotes pupils sense of community well through the active school council and the house system. Pupils value the house-points they receive for good work and behaviour. The leadership and management are good Pupils improved achievement is underpinned by the close checks senior and key middle leaders make on information collected not only on pupils academic progress but also on other important matters, such as teachers performance and pupils attendance. This detailed information is thoroughly analysed and cross-checked with regular, useful reports provided by local authority and other external consultants. Consequently, the school knows itself well, understands what its priorities for immediate action are, and targets resources sensibly to tackle areas of weakness. This, for example, has enabled leaders to implement a series of welljudged measures to improve pupils achievement in writing and mathematics. Data on pupils performance are shared very effectively with teachers, who have a clear awareness of the levels at which pupils are working and their accountability for ensuring pupils good progress. Staff morale is strong because teachers appreciate the consistency of leaders expectations for their performance and they know that they too are expected to make an important contribution to the robustness of the school s management systems. Leaders methodical approach, as reflected for example in their leadership logs, has ensured that

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 6 of 9 good progress has been made in tackling the key issues identified at the previous inspection. Although leaders have not yet secured teaching of a consistently outstanding quality, they have used training very effectively to develop teachers expertise, for example in assessment moderation, to establish firm baselines for measuring and charting pupils progress. Leaders are currently taking steps to improve the curriculum for disabled pupils and those pupils with special educational needs. In all other respects, provision for pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable is good. Assessment information is used well to tackle potential discrimination. Resources have been used wisely to improve the achievement of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium. Small group and after-school tuition has been particularly effective in this respect. While the curriculum is very effective in promoting pupils basic skills and offers some useful enrichment activities for pupils in sport and music, such as guitar tuition, there are few planned opportunities for more-able pupils to extend their skills. The school fosters pupils spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Key cultural events are celebrated, the school is a very harmonious community and pupils participate enthusiastically in fund-raising events. Recent funding for physical education is being targeted well to strengthen the curriculum, through using a specialist teacher to spread good practice and by employing external partners to teach pupils new skills, for example hockey. This funding is being supplemented by additional monies from the school budget. The school s steady improvement has enhanced its popularity among parents and enabled the local authority to reduce its support to an appropriate light-touch level. The governance of the school: Governors have improved their effectiveness since the previous inspection. Their evaluation of the school s work to improve achievement is well informed and accurate and they know what needs to be done next to raise pupils attainment further. Governors have examined the progress of different groups of pupils and checked that pupil premium funding is being spent wisely and is raising achievement for eligible pupils. Governors make clear links between the performance of teachers and senior leaders and outcomes for pupils and ensure that salary progression is used appropriately. Governors are not complacent. They check the school s safeguarding arrangements regularly and have undertaken a programme of training to develop their skills to ensure they hold leaders closely to account.

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 7 of 9 What inspection judgements mean School Grade Judgement Description Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

Inspection report: Delves Junior School, 18 19 September 2013 8 of 9 School details Unique reference number 104170 Local authority Walsall Inspection number 426950 This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 7 11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 350 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mark Pulford Headteacher Victoria Russell Date of previous school inspection 24 25 January 2012 Telephone number 01922 721112 Fax number 01922 722938 Email address postbox@delves-j.walsall.sch.uk

Any complaints about the inspection or the report should be made following the procedures set out in the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection. You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to Subscribe. Piccadilly Gate Store St Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk Crown copyright 2013