EDU228AB Field Experience One-On-One Reading Tutoring

Similar documents
Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Field Experience Verification and Mentor Teacher Evaluation Form

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

Graduate Program in Education

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

Week 4: Action Planning and Personal Growth

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

A Guide to Student Portfolios

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Education Leadership Program Course Syllabus

The Paradox of Structure: What is the Appropriate Amount of Structure for Course Assignments with Regard to Students Problem-Solving Styles?

Teachers Guide Chair Study

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

LOYOLA CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL FEB/MARCH 2015

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Parent Information Welcome to the San Diego State University Community Reading Clinic

November 2012 MUET (800)

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

PSYC 2700H-B: INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

South Carolina English Language Arts

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

ACCT 3400, BUSN 3400-H01, ECON 3400, FINN COURSE SYLLABUS Internship for Academic Credit Fall 2017

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Topic: Making A Colorado Brochure Grade : 4 to adult An integrated lesson plan covering three sessions of approximately 50 minutes each.

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Annual Report for Assessment of Outcomes Fire Protection Technology (FP) Outcomes Assessed for the AAS degree in Fire Protection

PYP Back-to-School Alturas International Academy

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium:

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Topic 3: Roman Religion

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY College of Education & Human Development Graduate School of Education

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

eportfolio Assessment of General Education

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

TUCSON CAMPUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SYLLABUS

Professional Experience - Mentor Information

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

Psychology 101(3cr): Introduction to Psychology (Summer 2016) Monday - Thursday 4:00-5:50pm - Gruening 413

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

MGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Adler Graduate School

Table of Contents. Course Delivery Method. Instructor Information. Phone: Office hours: Table of Contents. Course Description

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description

Introduce yourself. Change the name out and put your information here.

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Assessment and Evaluation

Focus Groups and Student Learning Assessment

Transcription:

EDU228AB Field Experience One-On-One Reading Tutoring The Signature Assignment for this course requires the following: Create a report of sessions using the Action Reading program. (InTASC 6(a), 6(d)) Creates a tutoring pre/post assessment of the students learning outcomes. (InTASC 6(b)) Describe student strengths/weaknesses along with review, reinforcement, and remedial activities used throughout the. (InTASC 6(c), 7(j)) Identify the various assessments, both formal and informal, used throughout the. (InTASC 6(g), 6(j)) Compile a final report to present to parents and/or the classroom teacher. Write a follow-up reflection of the presentation to parents and/or classroom teacher. (InTASC 1(c), 1 (k)) Indicator Exceeds Meets Approaches Falls Far Below Creates a report of one-onone. A. The student balances the use of formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify, and document learning. (InTASC 6(a)) detailed report of the oneon-one that uses formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify, and document learning. report of the one-onone that uses formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify, and document learning. 8 points partial report of the that uses formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify, and document learning. create a report of the sessions that uses formative and summative assessment as appropriate to support, verify, and document learning.

B. The student engages learners in identifying quality work and provides them with effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work. (InTASC 6(d)) detailed report of the oneon-one that engages learners in identifying quality work and provides them with effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work. report of the one-onone that engages learners in identifying quality work and provides them with effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work. partial report of the that engages learners in identifying quality work and provides them with effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work. create a report of the sessions that engages learners in identifying quality work and provides them with effective descriptive feedback to guide their progress toward that work. Creates a tutoring pre/post assessment of the students learning outcomes. C. The student designs assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources (InTASC 6(b)) The student designs detailed assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources of bias that can distort The student designs assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources 8 points The student designs partial assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources design assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources

Describe student strengths and/or weaknesses along with review, reinforcement, and remedial activities used throughout the D. The student works independently to examine test and other performance data to understand each learner s progress and to guide planning. (InTASC 6(c)) The student describes in detail how he/she examined test and other performance data to understand each learner s progress and to guide planning. The student describes how he/she examined test and other performance data to understand each learner s progress and to guide planning. 8 points describes how he/she examined test and other performance data to understand each learner s progress and to guide planning. describe how he/she examined test and other performance data to understand each learner s progress and to guide planning. E. The student understands the strengths and needs of individual learners and how to plan instruction that is responsive to these (InTASC 7(j)) The student describes in detail the strengths and needs of individual learners and how he/she planned instruction that is responsive to these The student describes the strengths and needs of individual learners and how he/she planned instruction that is responsive to these describes the strengths and needs of individual learners and how he/she planned instruction that is responsive to these describe the strengths and needs of individual learners and how he/she planned instruction that is responsive to these

Describe the various assessments, both formal and informal, used during the tutoring F. The student effectively uses multiple and appropriate types of assessment data to identify each student s learning needs and to develop differentiated learning experiences. (InTASC 6(g)) detailed description of formal and informal assessments used during the. description of the formal and informal assessments used during the tutoring partial description of the formal and informal assessments used during the. provide a description of the formal and informal assessments used during the tutoring G. The student understands the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment and knows how and when to use each. (InTASC 6(j)) detailed description of the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment and knows how and when to use each. description of the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment and knows how and when to use each. partial description of the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment and knows how and when to use each. provide a description of the differences between formative and summative applications of assessment and knows how and when to use each.

Compile a final report to present to parents and/or the classroom teacher, that assesses student progress. H. The student collaborates with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote learner growth and (InTASC 1(c)) detailed final report to present to parents and/or classroom teacher that demonstrates collaboration with families, communities, professionals to promote learner growth and 2 final report to present to parents and/or classroom teacher that demonstrates collaboration with families, communities, professionals to promote learner growth and 1 creates a final report to present to parents and/or classroom teacher that demonstrates collaboration with families, communities, professionals to promote learner growth and 12 points create a final report to present to parents and/or classroom teacher that demonstrates collaboration with families, communities, professionals to promote learner growth and I. The student values the input and contributions of families, professionals in understanding and supporting each learner s (InTASC 1(k)) detailed reflection of the final report presentation that demonstrates the value of input contributions of families, colleagues, and other professionals in supporting each learner s reflection of the final report presentation that demonstrates the value of input contributions of families, colleagues, and other professionals in supporting each learner s 5 points creates a reflection of the final report presentation that demonstrates the value of input contributions of families, colleagues, and other professionals in supporting each learner s 3 points create a reflection of the final report presentation that demonstrates the value of input contributions of families, professionals in supporting each learner s Grammar/Mechanics Nearly error-free. Reflects thorough proofreading for grammar and spelling. 4 points Occasional grammatical errors. Spelling has been proofread. 3 points Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. 2 points Unacceptable/incomplet e grammar and spelling. Total: 10

Rubric Notes: Detailed = Exceeds Responds to the assignment in an exemplary fashion. Maintains a strong sense of purpose and organization throughout. Provides relevant, specific, and convincing supporting details. Meets Follows directions adequately. "Partially" = "Approaches" Vague, Limited, or does not attempt = Falls Far Below Is primarily presented in a purposeful and well-organized manner. Contains mostly relevant supporting details. Follows directions at a minimum. Purpose and organization are existent but weak. Elaboration and explication are minimal where necessary. Follows directions unevenly. Purpose is not clear and answer is disorganized. Makes very general statements or repeats ideas; lacks elaboration and explication where necessary.