Obama tops Republican frontrunners in Wisconsin

Similar documents
Opinion on Private Garbage Collection in Scarborough Mixed

SUMMARY REPORT MONROE COUNTY, OH OFFICIAL RESULTS PRIMARY ELECTION MARCH 6, 2012 RUN DATE:03/20/12 11:03 AM STATISTICS REPORT-EL45 PAGE 001

Simple Random Sample (SRS) & Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: A Voluntary Response Sample: Examples: Systematic Sample Best Used When

Camas School levy passes! 69% approval! Crump! Truz! GOP homies tussle for Camas primary votes! Trump trumps with 42%, vs. 24% for Cruz!

APPENDIX 2: TOPLINE QUESTIONNAIRE

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Community Power Simulation

Standards, Accountability and Flexibility: Americans Speak on No Child Left Behind Reauthorization. soeak

Creating the Student Platform Fall 2008

THE MAN BEHIND THE LEGEND

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

FACT: FACT: The National Coalition for Public Education. Debunking Myths About the DC Voucher Program

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

Introduction to Questionnaire Design

The BG News November 5, 2012

Practice Examination IREB

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

TACOMA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Basic: Question Words: Who, What, Where, When week 1

Part I. Figuring out how English works

Lessons on American Presidents.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

Today we examine the distribution of infinitival clauses, which can be

TRANSFORMING THE SYSTEMS MOVEMENT

Wisconsin Youth Apprenticeship. Historical Overview

Bournemouth Training Programme

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Junior State of America JSA. Handbook

Rote rehearsal and spacing effects in the free recall of pure and mixed lists. By: Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen and Peter F. Delaney

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Librarians of Highlights of a survey of RUL faculty. June 7, Librarians of 2023 June 7, / 11

REFERENCE GUIDE AND TEST PRODUCED BY VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS

Book Review: Build Lean: Transforming construction using Lean Thinking by Adrian Terry & Stuart Smith

SEPERAC MEE QUICK REVIEW OUTLINE

babysign 7 Answers to 7 frequently asked questions about how babysign can help you.

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

Training Staff with Varying Abilities and Special Needs

Youth Mental Health First Aid Instructor Application

Laboratorio di Intelligenza Artificiale e Robotica

Dana Chisnell, UsabilityWorks Ethan Newby, Newby Research (consultant on statistics) Sharon Laskowski, NIST Svetlana Lowry, NIST

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Concept Formation Learning Plan

that when ONE ISSUE NUMBER e Education Chair House Rep. Harry Brooks favor. evaluations, Jim Coley of on their own evaluated

North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges Student Application

Understanding Fair Trade

Buffalo School Board Governance

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Outcome 1: Students analyze governmental institutions, political behavior, civic engagement, and their political and philosophical foundations.

Getting into top colleges. Farrukh Azmi, MD, PhD

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

MGMT3403 Leadership Second Semester

The University of West Florida (MAN : T/R) SUMMER 2011 POLICY ANALYSIS & FORMULATION SCHEDULE

Social, Economical, and Educational Factors in Relation to Mathematics Achievement

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Algebra 2- Semester 2 Review

The First Annual Survey of the Community

Spring North Carolina Community Colleges Golden LEAF Scholars Program Two-Year Colleges

What Am I Getting Into?

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

TQM in Higher Education: A Preliminary Look at Ten Boston Area Institutions

Course Syllabus Chem 482: Chemistry Seminar

Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008

Basic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars. Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1

Effective Team Resource Management. Danielle Marciniak, M.S. ASDA Vice President

C O U R S E. Tools for Group Thinking

Exploration. CS : Deep Reinforcement Learning Sergey Levine

ACCT 3400, BUSN 3400-H01, ECON 3400, FINN COURSE SYLLABUS Internship for Academic Credit Fall 2017

A Diverse Student Body

Short vs. Extended Answer Questions in Computer Science Exams

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Introduction to the HFLE course

CRIJ 2328 Police Systems and Practices. Class Meeting Time:

Superior Commencement - December 2011 Justin W. Patchin

National Survey of Student Engagement

Enter Samuel E. Braden.! Tenth President

GRIT. The Secret to Advancement STORIES OF SUCCESSFUL WOMEN LAWYERS

Dimensions of Classroom Behavior Measured by Two Systems of Interaction Analysis

SMARTboard: The SMART Way To Engage Students

Students will be able to describe how it feels to be part of a group of similar peers.

Average Number of Letters

Grade Band: High School Unit 1 Unit Target: Government Unit Topic: The Constitution and Me. What Is the Constitution? The United States Government

Committee on Academic Policy and Issues (CAPI) Marquette University. Annual Report, Academic Year

Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the Illinois Certification Testing System Examinations

Operational Knowledge Management: a way to manage competence

LMS - LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM END USER GUIDE

Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Paper presented at the ERA-AARE Joint Conference, Singapore, November, 1996.

520 HISTORY.ORG CIVICS HOW DO PEOPLE WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS?

Participatory Learning and Action

EVERYTHING DiSC WORKPLACE LEADER S GUIDE

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

SKEPTICAL ACTIVISM CAMPAIGN MANUAL

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

What Teachers Are Saying

WE GAVE A LAWYER BASIC MATH SKILLS, AND YOU WON T BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED NEXT

Transcription:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 15, 2010 INTERVIEWS: DEAN DEBNAM 888-621-6988 / 919-880-4888 (serious media inquiries only please, other questions can be directed to Tom Jensen) QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POLL: TOM JENSEN 919-744-6312 Obama tops Republican frontrunners in Wisconsin Raleigh, N.C. President Obama beat John McCain by 14 points in the Badger State two years ago, but in a look ahead to 2012, he now matches that margin against only McCain s running mate, Sarah Palin. Another candidate comes as close as four points, making the state look more like it did in 2004, when John Kerry barely beat out George W. Bush. Obama does best, as usual, against Palin, topping her, 52-38, but that narrows to only a 46-42 advantage over Mitt Romney. Intervening are Mike Huckabee s 41-47 deficit and Newt Gingrich s 41-50. Except for Palin, each of the Republicans does almost as good a job at locking up the GOP base as Obama does at unifying Democrats. In fact, Romney holds 89% of the GOP to Obama s 87% of Democrats. But Palin musters only 80% to the president s 93%. The three non-palin contenders, even Gingrich, also take more Democrats away from the president than he does Republicans from them Romney best with 7% of the opposite party to Obama s 2% of Republicans. So the president s leads are largely explained by his seven- to 20-point advantages with independents, who make up a third of the electorate in Wisconsin, a larger share than in most states. Romney does best with unaffiliateds, lagging only 36-43, followed by Huckabee s 37-46. Without the pro-republican enthusiasm gap, the president s approval rating has rebounded from a dismal 37-54 before the election to a decent 47-46 now, a turnaround of 18 points. In the wider electorate, none of his Republican opponents manages even close to a positive favorability rating. Romney does best with a 33- margin, followed by Huckabee s 32-, Palin s 35-58, and Gingrich s 28-54. So it is no surprise that the president bests each of them head-to-head. The results here are another reinforcement of Palin s electability problem with her own base: of the four, she does by far the best with Republicans personally, but the worst against Obama. They love her, but many are not willing to vote for her, even against someone they hate as much as the president. Wisconsin is one state where is clearly weaker than he was in 2008 even when you move out of the 2010 electorate, said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. With voters split evenly on his job performance he could be in trouble in the state, but for now he benefits from a weak GOP field. PPP surveyed 702 Wisconsin voters from December 10 th to 12 th. The survey s margin of error is +/-3.7%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify. Public Policy Polling Phone: 888 621-6988 Web: www.publicpolicypolling.com Email: information@publicpolicypolling.com

Wisconsin Survey Results Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Do you approve or disapprove of President s job performance? Approve...47% Disapprove...46%... 7% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Newt Gingrich?...28%...54%...18% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mike Huckabee?...32%...%...23% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Sarah Palin?...35%...58%... 7% Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Mitt Romney?...33%...%...22% If the candidates for President in 2012 were Democrat and Republican Newt Gingrich, who would you vote for?...50% Newt Gingrich...41% Undecided...10% Q7 Q8 Q9 If the candidates for President in 2012 were Democrat and Republican Mike Huckabee, who would you vote for?...47% Mike Huckabee...41% Undecided... 11% If the candidates for President in 2012 were Democrat and Republican Sarah Palin, who would you vote for?...52% Sarah Palin...38% Undecided...10% If the candidates for President in 2012 were Democrat and Republican Mitt Romney, who would you vote for?...46% Mitt Romney...42% Undecided...12% Q10 Would you describe yourself as a liberal, moderate, or conservative? Liberal...19% Moderate...41% Conservative...40% Q11 If you are a woman, press 1. If a man, press 2. Woman...52% Man...48% Q12 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican, press 2. If you are an independent or identify with another party, press 3. Democrat...35% Republican...31% Independent/Other...33% Survey of 702 Wisconsin voters

Q13 If you are white, press 1. If American, press 2. If other, press 3....90% American... Other... 6% 4% Q14 If you are years old, press 1. If, press 2. If, press 3. If you are older, press 4.... 5%...33%...%...18% Survey of 702 Wisconsin voters

Liberal Moderate Conservative Liberal Moderate Conservative Obama Approval Gingrich Favorability Approve 47% 89% 63% 12% 28% 6% 15% 51% Disapprove 46% 8% 26% 84% 54% 84% 66% 28% 7% 3% 11% 4% 18% 10% 19% 21% Liberal Moderate Conservative Liberal Moderate Conservative Huckabee Favorability 32% 7% 23% 53% % 77% 49% 26% 23% 16% 28% 21% Palin Favorability 35% 5% 18% 66% 58% 93% 77% 24% 7% 2% 5% 10%

Liberal Moderate Conservative Liberal Moderate Conservative Romney Favorability Obama/Gingrich 33% 12% 27% 49% 50% 91% 69% 12% % 71% 49% 30% Newt Gingrich 41% 6% 22% 76% 22% 17% 24% 21% Undecided 10% 3% 9% 13% Obama/Huckabee Mike Huckabee Undecided Liberal Moderate Conservative 47% 93% 63% 10% 41% 4% 22% 78% 11% 3% 15% 12% Liberal Moderate Conservative Obama/Palin 52% 92% 71% 15% Sarah Palin 38% 4% 18% 74% Undecided 10% 4% 11% 11%

Obama/Romney Mitt Romney Undecided Liberal Moderate Conservative 46% 90% 61% 10% 42% 7% 25% 76% 12% 4% 15% 14% Obama Approval Approve Disapprove Wom an Man 47% 49% 46% 46% 43% 50% 7% 8% 5% Gingrich Favorability Wom an Man 28% 22% 34% 54% 53% 55% 18% 25% 11% Huckabee Favorability Wom an Man 32% % 35% % 43% 46% 23% 27% 19%

Wom an Man Wom an Man Palin Favorability Romney Favorability 35% 33% 38% 33% 31% 35% 58% 60% 57% % 41% 50% 7% 8% 5% 22% 28% 15% Obama/Gingrich New t Gingrich Unde cided Wom an Man 50% 52% 48% 41% 39% 42% 10% 10% 9% Wom an Man Obama/Huckabee 47% 47% 48% Mike Huckabee 41% 41% 42% Unde cided 11% 12% 11%

Wom an Man Wom an Man Obama/Palin Obama/Romney 52% 54% 51% 46% 47% 44% Sarah Palin 38% 35% 42% Mitt Romney 42% 40% % Unde cided 10% 12% 7% Unde cided 12% 13% 12% Obama Approval Approve Disapprove Democrat Republican Independent/Other 47% 85% 5% 47% 46% 10% 91% 42% 7% 5% 4% 10% Democrat Republican Independent/Other Gingrich Favorability 28% 4% 61% 23% 54% 81% 21% 56% 18% 16% 18% 21%

Democrat Republican Independent/Other Democrat Republican Independent/Other Huckabee Favorability 32% 7% 56% 36% % 67% 21% 43% 23% 25% 23% 21% Palin Favorability 35% 5% 73% 32% 58% 92% 18% 61% 7% 3% 10% 7% Romney Favorability Democrat Republican Independent/Other 33% 11% 56% 34% % 66% 22% 46% 22% 23% 22% 21% Democrat Republican Independent/Other Obam a/gingrich 50% 89% 5% 51% Newt Gingrich 41% 7% 84% 35% Undecided 10% 4% 11% 14%

Democrat Republican Independent/Other Obama/Huckabee 47% 87% 4% 46% Mike Huckabee 41% 7% 84% 37% Undecided 11% 6% 12% 17% Democrat Republican Independent/Other Obam a/palin 52% 93% 6% 54% Sarah Palin 38% 5% 80% 34% Undecided 10% 3% 14% 12% Democrat Republican Independent/Other Obam a/rom ney 46% 87% 2% 43% Mitt Romney 42% 7% 89% 36% Undecided 12% 6% 9% 22% Obama Approval Approve Dis approve 47% 44% 90% 59% 46% 49% 5% 33% 7% 7% 5% 7%

Gingrich Favorability 28% 30% 10% 19% 54% 53% 71% 56% 18% 18% 19% 26% Huckabe e Favorability 32% 33% 5% 50% % 44% 81% 19% 23% 23% 14% 31% Palin Favorability 35% 37% 10% 26% 58% 57% 86% 59% 7% 6% 5% 15% Romney Favorability 33% 35% 5% 26% % 43% 76% 48% 22% 22% 19% 26%

Obama/Gingrich Obama/Huckabee 50% 47% 86% 63% 47% % 81% 52% New t Gingrich 41% 44% 5% 26% Mike Huckabee 41% 44% 10% 26% Undecide d 10% 9% 10% 11% Undecide d 11% 11% 10% 22% Obama/Palin Sarah Palin Undecide d 52% 50% 90% 59% 38% 41% 5% 30% 10% 10% 5% 11% Obama/Romney Mitt Romney 46% 42% 86% 56% 42% % 5% 30% Undecide d 12% 12% 10% 15%

Obama Approval Gingrich Favorability Approve 47% 54% 42% 53% 42% 28% 20% 30% 25% 34% Dis approve 46% 43% 52% 41% 49% 54% 40% 52% 58% 50% 7% 3% 6% 7% 9% 18% 40% 17% 17% 16% Huckabee Favorability 32% 23% 38% 28% 34% % 52% 40% 52% 34% 23% 26% 23% 19% 33% Palin Favorability 35% 31% 41% 30% 38% 58% 57% 54% 63% 56% 7% 11% 5% 8% 5%

Romney Favorability Obama/Gingrich 33% 28% 33% 33% 34% 50% 54% 44% 55% 47% % 43% 44% 49% 38% New t Gingrich 41% 40% 51% 34% 38% 22% % 22% 18% 28% Undecide d 10% 6% 5% 11% 15% Obama/Huckabee Mike Huckabee Undecide d 47% 54% 41% 52% % 41% 34% 48% 37% 41% 11% 12% 10% 11% 14% Obama/Palin Sarah Palin 52% 52% 47% 58% 47% 38% 40% 44% 33% 40% Undecide d 10% 8% 8% 9% 13%

Obama/Romney Mitt Romney 46% 52% 39% 50% 44% 42% 40% 49% 36% % Undecide d 12% 9% 11% 14% 11%