WJ III TEST NAMES AND DESCRIPTIONS

Similar documents
Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Large Kindergarten Centers Icons

SLINGERLAND: A Multisensory Structured Language Instructional Approach

Stages of Literacy Ros Lugg

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Weave the Critical Literacy Strands and Build Student Confidence to Read! Part 2

Tears. Measurement - Capacity Make A Rhyme. Draw and Write. Life Science *Sign in. Notebooks OBJ: To introduce capacity, *Pledge of

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Dyslexia/dyslexic, 3, 9, 24, 97, 187, 189, 206, 217, , , 367, , , 397,

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Phonemic Awareness. Jennifer Gondek Instructional Specialist for Inclusive Education TST BOCES

THE HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Fisk Street Primary School

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Considerations for Aligning Early Grades Curriculum with the Common Core

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

First Grade Standards

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

Richardson, J., The Next Step in Guided Writing, Ohio Literacy Conference, 2010

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

Philosophy of Literacy Education. Becoming literate is a complex step by step process that begins at birth. The National

Missouri GLE FIRST GRADE. Communication Arts Grade Level Expectations and Glossary

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

South Carolina English Language Arts

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Daily Assessment (All periods)

Contents. Foreword... 5

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Mercer County Schools

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Speech Recognition at ICSI: Broadcast News and beyond

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

Preschool assessment takes places for many reasons: screening, GENERAL MEASURES OF COGNITION FOR THE PRESCHOOL CHILD. Elizabeth O.

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

see that few students made As or Bs on the test from C to F, that the median grade was an F and the top grade was a C

The Bruins I.C.E. School

Wonderworks Tier 2 Resources Third Grade 12/03/13

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Fountas-Pinnell Level P Informational Text

AGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016

The Ontario Curriculum

Create Quiz Questions

Welcome to Year 2. The New National Curriculum

Confirmatory Factor Structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Second Edition: Consistency With Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory

BASIC TECHNIQUES IN READING AND WRITING. Part 1: Reading

Recommended Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Children with Learning Disabilities

Increasing Student Engagement

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Chapter 5. The Components of Language and Reading Instruction

21st Century Community Learning Center

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Longman English Interactive

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Mathematics Success Level E

Statewide Framework Document for:

have to be modeled) or isolated words. Output of the system is a grapheme-tophoneme conversion system which takes as its input the spelling of words,

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Publisher Citations. Program Description. Primary Supporting Y N Universal Access: Teacher s Editions Adjust on the Fly all grades:

READ 180 Next Generation Software Manual

Primary English Curriculum Framework

eguidelines Aligned to the Common Core Standards

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Seventh Grade Course Catalog

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

Timeline. Recommendations

Transcription:

Test Name Verbal Comprehension Visual-Auditory Learning Spatial Relations Sound Blending Concept Formation Visual Matching Numbers Reversed Incomplete Words Auditory Working Memory Del Rec Vis-Aud Lrng General Information Retrieval Fluency Picture Recognition Description of test Measures knowledge of word meanings. In Picture Vocabulary, the subject must name familiar and unfamiliar pictured objects. In Oral Vocab: Synonyms, the subject must say a word similar in meaning to the word presented. In Oral Vocab: Antonyms, the subject must say a word that is opposite in meaning to the word presented In Verbal Analogies the subject must complete phrases with words that indicate appropriate analogies. Measures the ability to associate new visual symbols (rebuses) with familiar words in oral language and to translate a series of symbols presented as a reading passage (a visual-auditory association task). This is a "learning" test where corrective feedback is provided to the subject. Measures the ability to visually match and combine shapes. The subject must select from a series of shapes, the component parts composing a given whole shape. Measures the ability to perform auditory synthesis on segments of speech. After hearing the recorded parts (syllables and/or phonemes) of a word the subject must blend the parts together to make a whole word (synthesis task). Measures the ability to identify and state the rule for a concept about a set of colored geometric figures when shown instances and noninstances of the concept. This is a "learning" test with corrective feedback and reinforcement of correct answers provided to the subject. There are two different versions of this test. The first version, Visual Matching 1, is designed for use with preschool children and individuals who have developmental delays or reduced functioning. The task requires the person to point to the two mathcing shapes in a row of four to five shapes. This section has a 2-minute time limit and does not requre the subject to write. The second version, Visual Matching 2, is designed for individuals above the developmental level of an average 5-year-old. On this section, the subject is asked to locate and circle the two identical numbers in a row of sex numbers. This task proceeds in diffeculty from single-digit numbers to tripledigit numbers and has a 3-minute time limit. Measures the ability to repeat a series of random numbers backward. The number sequences are presented by audio tape. Measures the ability to perform auditory closure on segments of speech. After hearing a recorded word with one or more phonemes missing, the subject must name the complete word (analysis task). Measures the ability to retain two types of orally presented information and then repeat them in a specified order. The subject is presented a mixed series of words and digits and is asked to rearrange them by first saying the words in order and then the numbers. The task requires divided attention as the subject must perform two different mental operations simultaneously. Measures the ability to recall and relearn (after 1 to 8 days) the symbols (rebuses) presented in Visual-Auditory Learning. This is a "relearning" task as the subject relearns forgotten associations. Corrective feedback is provided to the subject during the task. Measures knowledge of the common or typical characteristics of certain objects. The test has two components: "what" and "where" questions. The questions are presented orally and the subject must state the answer to "where you would find..." and "what you would do with..." questions. Measures fluency in retrieving the names of objects. The subject is asked to state as many items as they can of three different types, "things to eat or drink", "names of people", and "animals. Measures the ability to recognize a subset of previously presented pictures within a larger set of pictures.

Auditory Attention Analysis-Synthesis Decision Speed Memory for Words Rapid Picture Naming Planning Pair Cancellation Memory for Names Visual Closure Sound Patterns-Voice Number Series Cross Out Number Matrices Memory for Sentences Measures the ability to discriminate similar sounding words. An audio tape is used to present the words to the subject with increasing levels of background noise as a distracter. Measures the ability to analyze the components of an incomplete logic puzzle and to determine and name the missing components. This is a "learning" test with corrective feedback and reinforcement of correct answers provided to the subject. Measures the ability to rapidly scan a row of pictures and decide which of the two drawings are the most related. The decisions become slightly more abstract as the test progresses. The subject is instructed to complete as many rows of drawings as possible within a threeminute time limit. Measures the ability to repeat lists of unrelated words in the correct sequence; words are presented by audio tape. Measures the ability to rapidly identify and orally name pictures of common objects. The stimulus pictures are presented in rows of five. The test has a two-minute time limit. Measures the ability to plan a tracing route that covers as many segments of a dotted line drawing as possible without lifting the pencil or tracing over the same segment twice. The test requires "forward thinking" in that the subject is required to plan a sequence of steps prior to initializing the plan. Measures the capacity for sustained attention (vigilance). The subject is presented with rows that contain repeating pictures of a dog and a ball (in no particular sequence) and must circle all instances of when the ball is followed by the dog. The test has a three-minute time limit. Measures the ability to learn associations between unfamiliar auditory and visual stimuli (an auditory visual association task). The task requires learning the names of a series of space creatures. This is a "learning" test where corrective feedback is provided to the subject. Measures the ability to name a drawing or picture of a simple object that is represented by disconnected lines. The test requires the subject to visually combine the disconnected lines into a meaningful whole. Measures the ability to indicate whether pairs of complex sounds are the same or different. The sound patterns resemble human speech sounds. The pairs may differ in pitch, rhythm, or sound content. Measures the ability to identify the quantitative principle that underlies a sequence of numbers in a series of numbers and then apply the principle to supply a missing number in the series. Measures the ability to quickly scan and compare visual information. The subject must mark the five drawings in a row of 20 drawings that are identical to the first drawing in the row. The subject is given a 3-minute time limit to complete as many rows of items as possible. Measures the ability to identify the quantitative principle that underlies a series of numbers in matrices and then apply the principle to supply a missing number in the matrix. Measures the ability to remember and repeat simple words, phrases, and sentences presented auditorily by a tape player. Block Rotation Measures the ability to recognize two geometric designs, in a row of five, that are identical, although rotated to a different visual perspective from the target geometric design. Below the target stimulus are five pictures of geometric shapes or three-dimensional block strings that have been rotated in space. The subject must identify which two drawings are replications of the target item.

Sound Patterns-Music Del Rec Mem Names Measures the ability to indicate whether pairs of musical sounds are the same or different. The pairs may differ in pitch, rhythm, or sound content. Measures the ability to recall (after 1 to 8 days) the space creatures presented in Memory for Names.

Test Name Letter-Word Identification Reading Fluency Story Recall Understanding Directions Calculation Math Fluency Spelling Writing Fluency Description of test Measures the subject's reading skills in identifying isolated letters and words. It is not necessary that the subject knows the meaning of any words correctly identified. Measures the ability to quickly comprehend the correctness of simple sentences. The subject is presented a series of simple sentences and must circle whether each sentence is true or false. The subject is required to complete as many items as possible within a 3-minute time limit. Measures the ability to recall increasingly complex stories presented orally to the subject. The subject is asked to tell back as much of the story as they can. The score is based on the number of correctly recalled story elements. Measures comprehension of linguistic concepts (receptive language). The subject is asked to follow oral directions by pointing to different items in a picture. Measures the ability to perform mathematical calculations ranging from simple addition to calculus. The subject is not required to make any decisions about what operations to use or what data to include. Measures the ability to quickly perform single-digit addition, subtraction, and multiplication facts. The subject is presented a series of simple arithmetic problems on a worksheet. The subject has two minutes to complete as many problems as possible. Measures the ability to write correct spellings of orally presented words. Measures the ability to formulate and write simple sentences quickly. This subtest has a 7-minute time limit. Passage Comprehension Applied Problems Writing Samples Del. Recall-Story Recall Word Attack Picture Vocabulary Oral Comprehension Measures the subject's skill in reading a short passage and identifying a missing key word. In this modified cloze procedure, the subject must exercise a variety of comprehension and vocabulary skills. Measures the ability to analyze and solve problems in mathematics. The subject must decide not only the appropriate mathematical operations to use but also which of the data to include in the calculation. Measures the ability to write responses to a variety of demands. The subject must phrase and present written sentences that are evaluated with respect to the quality of expression. The subject is not penalized for errors in the basic mechanics of writing (spelling; punctuation). Measures the ability to recall (after 1 to 8 days) the stories presented in Oral Recall. Measures the ability to apply phonic and structural analysis skills to the pronunciation of unfamiliar printed words. The subject reads aloud letter combinations that are linguistically logical in English but that do not form actual words (nonsense word), or words that constitute low-frequency words in the English language. The subject must name familiar and unfamiliar pictured objects. Measures the ability to listen to a short tape-recorded passage and to verbally supply the single word missing at the end of the passage.

Editing Reading Vocabulary Quantitative Concepts Academic Knowledge Spelling of Sounds Sound Awareness Punctuation & Capitalization Measures the ability to identify, and indicate how to correct, mistakes in typewritten passages. The error in the passage may be incorrect punctuation or capitalization, inappropriate word usage, or a misspelling. Measures subject s skill in reading and understanding the meanings of words. In Part A: Synonyms, the subject must read a word and provide a word similar in meaning to the word presented. In Part B: Antonyms, the subject must read a word and provide a word that is opposite in meaning to the word presented. In Part C: Analogies, the subject must read an analogy and provide the missing word. Measures the subject's mathematical vocabulary, concepts and quantitative reasoning. The test consists of a mixture of number series items and items requiring the subject to display mathematical knowledge. The number series items require the subject to identify the underlying numerical relation in a series of numbers and then apply this principle by supplying a missing number in the series. Measures the subject's knowledge in various areas of the biological and physical sciences, history, geography, government, economics, art, music, and literature. Measures the ability to listen to a nonsense word and produce a written response representing the likely spelling of that word if it were a real English word. It is a measure of the subject s comprehension of the alphabetic principle. The subject is presented the nonsense word from an audio tape and is asked to write it. Measures oral sound analysis skills at the preschool and primary level of development. It contains four parts: Rhyming, Substitution, Deletion, and Reversal. The items are presented orally by the examiner, or by tape, and the subject responds orally. Measures knowledge of punctuation and capitalization.

K. McGrew (IAP) 12-08-03 Table : First-order Factors First-order Factors/Tests RQ KM PG WA/V Gsa Gf Gv MA Gc Ga MS Gsc NA Quantitative Reasoning (RQ) Number Series 0.80 Number Matrices 0.71 Math Achievement (KM) Calculation 0.58 0.29 Quantitative Concepts-Concepts 0.54 0.41 Applied Problems 0.06 0.49 0.38 Processing Speed-Achievement (Gsa) Math Fluency 0.32 0.30 0.39 Reading Fluency 0.73 0.25 Writing Fluency 0.53 0.23 Phoneme-Grapheme Knowledge (PG) Word Attack 0.78 Spelling 0.76 Letter-Word Identification 0.69 0.16 Spelling of Sounds 0.57 0.26 0.33 Writing Ability/Verbal (printed) Lng Comp. (WA/V) Editing 0.75 Writing Samples 0.73 Passage Comprehension 0.54 0.20 Fluid Reasoning (Gf) Understanding Directions 0.93 Concept Formation 0.81 Analysis-Synthesis 0.35 0.34 Visual Processing (Gv) Spatial Relations 0.59 Block Rotation 0.51 Planning 0.41 Visual Closure 0.37 Picture Recognition 0.19 0.24 Associative Memory (MA) Visual-Auditory Learning 0.83 Memory for Names 0.66 Crystallized Intelligence (Gc) General Information 0.84 Verbal Comprehension-Oral Vocabulary 0.83 Academic Knowledge-Science 0.76 Academic Knowledge-Social Studies 0.73 Academic Knowledge-Humanities 0.72 Verbal Comprehension-Picture Vocabulary 0.72 Oral Comprehension 0.68 Verbal Comprehension-Analogies 0.68 Story Recall 0.30 0.54 Reading Vocabulary 0.39 0.46 Auditory Processing (Ga) Sound Blending 0.69 Incomplete Words 0.58 Auditory Attention 0.52 Sound Awareness 0.47 0.30 Sound Patterns-Voice 0.35 0.20 Memory Span (MS) Memory for Words 0.80 Memory for Sentences 0.35 0.47 Auditory Working Memory 0.24 0.27 0.26 Numbers Reversed 0.21 0.18 0.13 Processing Speed-Cognitive (Gsc) Pair Cancellation 0.93 Visual Matching 0.19 0.79 Decision Speed 0.22 0.63 Cross Out 0.33 0.56 Naming Facility *NA) Rapid Picture Naming 0.68 Retrieval Fluency 0.25 0.49

Table : K. McGrew (IAP) 12-08-03 Second-order Carroll EFA-based Factors System 1 System 1 System 1 System 2 (controlled) (controlled) (controlled) (automatic) Process-dominant Process-dominant Product-dominant First-order Factors (numerical) (verbal) (Gs) Quantitative Reasoning (RQ) 0.93 0.27 Math Achievement (KM) 0.40 0.37 Processing Speed-Cognitive (Gsc) 0.51 Naming Facility (NA) 0.18 0.90 Fluid Reasoning (Gf) 0.86 Visual Processing (Gv) 0.83 Associative Memory (MA) 0.80 Crystallized Intelligence (Gc) 0.71 0.18 Auditory Processing (Ga) 0.80 Memory Span (MS) 0.56 0.10 Processing Speed-Achievement (Gsa) 0.60 0.37 Phoneme-Grapheme Knowledge (PG) 0.90 Writing Ability/Verbal (printed) Lng Comp. (WA/V) 0.92 Third-order (g) Factor 0.62 0.92 0.87 0.64 Table : Second-order Berlin BIS Content Model Factors Figural First-order Factors Numerical Geometric Verbal Quantitative Reasoning (RQ) 0.99 Math Achievement (KM) 0.69. Processing Speed-Cognitive (Gsc) 0.54 Naming Facility (NA) 0.57 Fluid Reasoning (Gf) 0.87 Visual Processing (Gv) 0.84 Associative Memory (MA) 0.80 Crystallized Intelligence (Gc) 0.86 Auditory Processing (Ga) 0.84 Memory Span (MS) 0.63 Processing Speed-Achievement (Gsa) 0.79 Phoneme-Grapheme Knowledge (PG) 0.84 Writing Ability/Verbal (printed) Lng Comp. (WA/V) 0.86 Third-order (g) Factor 0.85 0.95 0.93

Dual cognitive processes distinction in cognitive psychology Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. There is considerable agreement on the characteristics that distinguish the two types of cognitive processes, which Stanovich and West (2000) labeled System 1 and System 2. The scheme shown in Figure 1 summarizes these characteristics: The operations of System 1 are typically fast, automatic, effortless, associative, implicit (not available to introspection), and often emotionally charged; they are also governed by habit and are therefore difficult to control or modify. The operations of System 2 are slower, serial, effortful, more likely to be consciously monitored and deliberately controlled; they are also relatively flexible and potentially rule governed. The effect of concurrent cognitive tasks provides the most useful indication of whether a given mental process belongs to System 1 or System 2. Because the overall capacity for mental effort is limited, effortful processes tend to disrupt each other, whereas effortless processes neither cause nor suffer much interference when combined with other tasks (Kahneman, 1973; Pashler, 1998). P. 698

Dual cognitive processes distinction in cognitive psychology Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. As in several other dual-process models, one of the functions of System 2 is to monitor the quality of both mental operations and overt behavior (Gilbert, 2002; Stanovich & West, 2002). As expected for an effortful operation, the self-monitoring function is susceptible to dual-task interference. People who are occupied by a demanding mental activity (e.g., attempting to hold in mind several digits) are more likely to respond to another task by blurting out whatever comes to mind (Gilbert, 1989). The anthropomorphic phrase System 2 monitors the activities of System 1 is used here as shorthand for a hypothesis about what would happen if the operations of System 2 were disrupted. P. 699 Kahneman and Frederick (2002) suggested that the monitoring is normally quite lax and allows many intuitive judgments to be expressed, including some that are erroneous. P. 699