Interpersonal Communications

Similar documents
Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008

Non-Secure Information Only

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Topic 3: Roman Religion

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Language Acquisition Chart

Writing an Effective Proposal for Teaching Grant: Focusing on Student Success & Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

ENG 111 Achievement Requirements Fall Semester 2007 MWF 10:30-11: OLSC

Secondary English-Language Arts

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Blank Table Of Contents Template Interactive Notebook

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

MISSISSIPPI OCCUPATIONAL DIPLOMA EMPLOYMENT ENGLISH I: NINTH, TENTH, ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH GRADES

Modified Systematic Approach to Answering Questions J A M I L A H A L S A I D A N, M S C.

BUSINESS OPERATIONS RESEARCH EVENTS

CDTL-CELC WORKSHOP: EFFECTIVE INTERPERSONAL SKILLS

CMST 2060 Public Speaking

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Public Speaking Rubric

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Exegesis of Ephesians Independent Study (NTE 703) Course Syllabus and Outline Front Range Bible Institute Professor Tim Dane (Fall 2011)

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

Urban Legends Three Week Unit 9th/10th Speech

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

Lesson Plan. Preparation

SAN DIEGO JUNIOR THEATRE TUITION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

3. Improving Weather and Emergency Management Messaging: The Tulsa Weather Message Experiment. Arizona State University

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Learning Microsoft Publisher , (Weixel et al)

Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University

Science Olympiad Competition Model This! Event Guidelines

Gr. 9 Geography. Canada: Creating a Sustainable Future DAY 1

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Longman English Interactive

Lecturing Module

Northern Virginia Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated Scholarship Application Guidelines and Requirements

Digital Media Literacy

SAMPLE. PJM410: Assessing and Managing Risk. Course Description and Outcomes. Participation & Attendance. Credit Hours: 3

Lab Reports for Biology

ACCT 3400, BUSN 3400-H01, ECON 3400, FINN COURSE SYLLABUS Internship for Academic Credit Fall 2017

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Alberta Police Cognitive Ability Test (APCAT) General Information

SPCH 1315: Public Speaking Course Syllabus: SPRING 2014

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

Table of Contents. Course Delivery Method. Instructor Information. Phone: Office hours: Table of Contents. Course Description

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Faculty Meetings. From Dissemination. To Engagement. Jessica Lyons MaryBeth Scullion Rachel Wagner City of Tonawanda School District, NY

Sri Lankan School - Muscat Leadership Cultivation

Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

American College of Emergency Physicians National Emergency Medicine Medical Student Award Nomination Form. Due Date: February 14, 2012

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Transcription:

Interpersonal Communications Interpersonal Communications, an individual or team event, recognizes participants who use Family and Consumer Sciences and/or related occupation skills and apply to develop a project designed to strengthen in a chosen area: community, employment relationships, family, peer groups, or school groups. Participants must prepare a file folder, an oral presentation, and a response to a related case study. EVENT CATEGORIES Junior: through grade 9 Senior: grades Occupational: grades See page 7 for more information on event categories. PROCEDURES & TIME REQUIREMENTS. Each entry will submit a file folder with required documents to the event room consultant at the designated participation time.. Room consultants and evaluators will have minutes to preview the file folder before the presentation begins.. Participant(s) will have minutes to set up for the event. Other persons may not assist.. The oral presentation may be up to minutes in length. A one-minute warning will be given at minutes. Participant(s) will be stopped at minutes.. Following the presentation, evaluators will have minutes to interview participant(s). 6. Participant(s) will then be given a written case study related to their project. They will have minutes to prepare a response to the case study. 7. Participant(s) will have up to minutes to present the case study response to evaluators. Evaluators may ask questions after the response. 8. Evaluators will have up to minutes to use the rubric to score and write comments for participant(s). File folders will be returned to participants at the end of scoring. (continued next page) GENERAL INFORMATION Individual or Prepare Team Event Ahead of Individual or Team File Folder, Oral Equipment Provided Table, blank note cards Electrical Access Not provided Participant Set Up / Prep minutes set up/ minutes case study Room Consultant & Evaluator Review minutes prior to presentation Maximum Oral -minute warning at minutes; stopped at minutes (same for case study) Evaluation Interview Total Event minutes minutes PRESENTATION ELEMENTS ALLOWED Flip Props/ Audio Costumes Easel(s) File Folder Portfolio Skits Visuals Chart(s) Pointers Equipment -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org 6

ELIGIBILITY & GENERAL INFORMATION. Review Eligibility and General Rules for All Levels of Competition on page 77 prior to event planning and preparation.. A table and blank note cards for the preparation of the case study response will be provided. Participant(s) must bring all other necessary supplies and/or equipment. Wall space will not be available.. Access to an electrical outlet will not be provided. Participant(s) are encouraged to bring fully charged electronic devices such as laptops, tablets, etc., to use for visual presentation, if desired. -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org 7

INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS Specifications File Folder Participant(s) must submit one letter-size file folder containing three identical sets, with each set stapled separately, of the items listed below to the event room consultant at the designated participation time. The file folder must be labeled (typed or handwritten) in the top left corner with name of event, category, participant s name(s), state, and FCCLA national region. Project Identification Page FCCLA Planning Process Summary Page Evidence of Online Project Summary Submission One 8 / " x " page on plain paper, with no graphics or decorations; must include participant s name(s), chapter name, school, city, state, FCCLA national region, event name, project title, and chosen area of emphasis (i.e. family, peer groups, school groups, community, or employment relationships). One 8 / " x " summary page of how each step of the Planning Process was used to plan and implement the project; may also be described in the oral presentation. Complete the online project summary form located on the STAR Events Resources page of the FCCLA national website and include proof of submission in the file folder. Works Cited/Bibliography Use MLA or APA citation style to cite all references. Resources should be reliable and current. Oral The oral presentation may be up to minutes in length and is delivered to evaluators. The presentation should describe project in detail and discuss how and methods such as verbal, nonverbal, written, active listening, one-on-one, and/or conflict resolution were used. Audio and/or video recordings are not permitted. Organization/Delivery Identify Concerns Set a Goal Form a Plan Act Follow Up Project Rationale Clearly Stated Use of Appropriate Techniques Impact on Interpersonal Communications; Accomplishments Relationship to FCCLA Purposes and Family and Consumer Sciences Voice Body Language/Clothing Choice Grammar/Word Usage/ Pronunciation Evaluators Questions Deliver oral presentation in an organized, sequential manner; concisely and thoroughly summarize project. Identify the need to act and provide two or more reasonable options or alternative actions. State a detailed and measureable goal. Develop a thorough and feasible plan. Execute plan with a thorough understanding and application of and solutions. Evaluate project and express the significance of the project and its outcome. Identify reason for implementing the project. Show evidence of and methods used in the project, such as verbal, nonverbal, written, one-on-one, active listening, and/or conflict resolution. Show how an area of interpersonal s was strengthened through the project. Explain direct connection to the purposes of FCCLA and Family and Consumer Sciences. Speak clearly with appropriate pitch, tempo, and volume. Use appropriate body language including gestures, posture, mannerisms, eye contact, and appropriate handling of visuals and notes or notecards if used. Wear appropriate clothing for the nature of the presentation. Use proper grammar, word usage, and pronunciation. Provide clear and concise answers to evaluators questions regarding the project. -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org 8

Interpersonal Communications Specifications (continued) Case Study Participants will be given a written case study to evaluate their understanding of. The case study will relate to the area of the participant s project. Participant(s) will have minutes to prepare a response. The response may not exceed minutes. Work will take place in a separate room with no spectators. No prewritten material is allowed, but blank note cards will be provided. Knowledge of Communication Techniques Appropriate Solutions Evaluators Questions Case study responses indicate an understanding of the concepts and issues. Show evidence of awareness of methods for strengthening and of. Present feasible and suitable solutions for the situation. Provide clear and concise answers to evaluators questions regarding case study response. -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org 9

STAR Events Point Summary Form INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS Name of Participant Chapter State Team # Station # Category DIRECTIONS:. Make sure all information at top is correct. If a student named is not participating, cross their name(s) off. If a team does not show, please write No Show across the top and return with other forms. Do NOT change team or station numbers.. Before student presentation, the room consultants must check participants file folder using the criteria and standards listed below and fill in the boxes.. At the conclusion of presentation, verify evaluator scores and fill in information below. Calculate the final score and ask for evaluators verification. Place this form in front of the completed rubrics and paper clip all items related to the presentation together. Please do NOT staple.. At the end of competition in the room, double check all scores, names, and team numbers to ensure accuracy. Sort results by team order and turn in to the Lead or Assistant Lead Consultant.. Please check with the Lead or Assistant Lead Consultant if there are any questions regarding the evaluation process. ROOM CONSULTANT CHECK Registration Packet or points Orientation or points File Folder points Punctuality point EVALUATORS SCORES Picked up by adviser or designated adult during scheduled time No Yes Did not attend/incomplete attendance No File Folder presented Participant was late for presentation -- File Folder presented with incorrect labeling/insufficient materials for evaluators (less than copies of contents) or incomplete content The individual attended or ALL participating team members attended File Folder is presented with correct labeling and evaluators material Project ID page Planning Process Summary Project Summary Submission Proof Works Cited Participant was on time for presentation ROOM CONSULTANT TOTAL Evaluator Initials ( points possible) Evaluator Initials AVERAGE EVALUATOR SCORE Evaluator Initials (9 points possible) Total Score divided by number of evaluators FINAL SCORE = AVERAGE EVALUATOR SCORE (Average Evaluator Score plus Room Consultant Total) RATING ACHIEVED (circle one) Gold: 9- Silver: 7-89.99 Bronze: -69.99 VERIFICATION OF FINAL SCORE AND RATING (please initial) Points Evaluator Evaluator Evaluator Adult Room Consultant Event Lead Consultant -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org

INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS Rubric Name of Participant Chapter State Team # Station # Category FILE FOLDER FCCLA Planning Process Summary Page points Works Cited/ Bibliography points ORAL PRESENTATION Organization/ Delivery points Identify Concerns - points Set a Goal - points Form a Plan - points Act - points Evaluation Follow- Up - points Project Rationale Clearly Stated - points Use of Appropriate Techniques - points Planning Process summary not provided No resources listed is not done or presented briefly and does not cover components of the project No evidence of identifying concerns No evidence No evidence No evidence Inadequate steps in the Planning Process are presented - covers some topic elements All Planning Process steps are presented but not summarized Resources are incomplete, not current, or not reliable for project Identifying concerns and needs are limited in scope Goal is evident Plan is stated with some detail Action steps are evident Some evaluation and follow-up is planned Project rationale is limited Participants understanding limited methods of - covers all topic elements but with minimal information All Planning Process steps are summarized Reliable resources but incorrect style (see style sheet) -6 gives complete information but does not explain the project well Participants use one or two methods to identify concerns Goal is clearly stated Plan is detailed Plan is detailed in steps, tasks, and timelines Evaluation plans include multiple strategies Rationale for the project is clearly stated Participants show some understanding of various Rationale for the project is stated in a convincing manner, citing reasons and data Participants show understanding of two or three Evidence that the Planning Process was utilized to plan project 7-8 covers information completely but does not flow well Participants use surveys, data collection, interviews or other methods to identify concerns Goal is thoroughly stated Plan includes details, timelines, and alternatives Plan included analysis of effects of technology in family, work, and community settings Evaluation and follow-up is detailed and varied in strategies Rationale for the project is thorough and compelling Participants show understanding and can apply various The Planning Process is used to plan the project. Each step is fully explained Complete list of current and reliable resources, in MLA or APA style (see style sheet) 9- covers all relevant information with a seamless and logical delivery Participants identify the need to act; realize circumstances are uncertain and changing; and two or more reasonable options or alternative actions Goal is stated in detail with measurable outcomes Plan is thorough, feasible and complete Plan includes a thorough understanding and application of and solutions Evaluation and follow-up is extensive and includes evidence of Project Self- Evaluation Rationale for the project is thorough, a compelling and urgent need and well documented Participants effectively apply that are effective and appropriate Points -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org

Interpersonal Communications Rubric (continued) Impact on Interpersonal Communications points Relationship to FCCLA Purposes and FACS - points Voice pitch, tempo, volume - points Body Language/ Clothing Choice - points Grammar/Word Usage/ Pronunciation - points Evaluators Questions - points CASE STUDY - points Knowledge of Communication Techniques - points Appropriate Solutions - points Evaluators Questions - points Participants show a limited knowledge of the impact of interpersonal s with their project Minimal evidence of FCCLA and FACS relationship Voice qualities not used effectively Uses inappropriate gestures, posture or mannerisms, avoids eye contact/inappropriate clothing Extensive (more than ) grammatical and pronunciation errors Did not answer evaluators questions Unable to answer some questions No case study presentation is made in explanations Participants show areas of interpersonal that were strengthened by the project Some knowledge of relationship of FCCLA and FACS Voice quality is adequate Gestures, posture, mannerisms and eye contact is inconsistent/ clothing is appropriate Some (-) grammatical and pronunciation errors Knowledge of is limited Participants share a limited response to one or two solutions Responded to all questions but without ease or accuracy -- Participants explain one or more of the following: --how similarities and differences among people affect conflict prevention and management in their project --how to create an environment that encourages and respects ideas and perspectives --apply the roles of decision making and problem solving in reducing and managing conflict Knowledge of FCCLA and FACS relationship but not shared Voice quality is good, but could improve Gestures, posture, mannerisms, eye contact, and clothing are appropriate Few (-) grammatical and pronunciation errors Responded adequately to all questions Case study response is limited in scope Did not answer questions Knowledge of is evident in the case study response. Participants demonstrate effective listening and feedback Participants share feasible and suitable solutions 6-7-8-9- Participants show extensive knowledge and application of interpersonal that was strengthened by the project. Some of which might include those mentioned earlier and: --demonstrate processes for cooperating, compromising, and collaborating --demonstrate ethical behavior in family, workplace and community settings --demonstrate strategies to motivate, encourage, and build trust in group members --compare the relative merits of opposing points of view regarding current ethical issues Knowledge of FCCLA and FACS relationship is evident and shared Gave appropriate responses to evaluators questions Knowledge of FCCLA and FACS relationship is evident and well explained Voice quality is outstanding and pleasing Gestures, posture, mannerisms, eye contact, and clothing enhance presentation has no grammatical or pronunciation errors questions were appropriate and given without hesitation Case study responses indicate an understanding of the concepts and issues Knowledge of is thorough. Explain how similarities and differences among people affect conflict prevention and management Answers show a limited understanding Participants share many feasible and suitable solutions Knowledge of is explained in detail. Apply ethical principles of Participants share extensive suitable solutions and insights Answers are in depth and thorough Points Evaluator s Comments: TOTAL (9 points possible) Evaluator # Evaluation Initial Room Consultant Initial -6 COMPETITIVE EVENTS GUIDE Family, Career and Community Leaders of America, Inc. www.fcclainc.org