In Paul de Lacy (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press.

Similar documents
Radical CV Phonology: the locational gesture *

Markedness and Complex Stops: Evidence from Simplification Processes 1. Nick Danis Rutgers University

Consonant-Vowel Unity in Element Theory*

To appear in the Proceedings of the 35th Meetings of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Post-vocalic spirantization: Typology and phonetic motivations

Consonants: articulation and transcription

Partial Class Behavior and Nasal Place Assimilation*

Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization

Pobrane z czasopisma New Horizons in English Studies Data: 18/11/ :52:20. New Horizons in English Studies 1/2016

Manner assimilation in Uyghur

An argument from speech pathology

SOUND STRUCTURE REPRESENTATION, REPAIR AND WELL-FORMEDNESS: GRAMMAR IN SPOKEN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION. Adam B. Buchwald

Universal contrastive analysis as a learning principle in CAPT

Bare Root Nodes in Basaa

1. REFLEXES: Ask questions about coughing, swallowing, of water as fast as possible (note! Not suitable for all

The analysis starts with the phonetic vowel and consonant charts based on the dataset:

Phonetics. The Sound of Language

LING 329 : MORPHOLOGY

Underlying Representations

Listener-oriented phonology

Parallel Evaluation in Stratal OT * Adam Baker University of Arizona

Phonological encoding in speech production

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

Acoustic correlates of stress and their use in diagnosing syllable fusion in Tongan. James White & Marc Garellek UCLA

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Lexical phonology. Marc van Oostendorp. December 6, Until now, we have presented phonological theory as if it is a monolithic

Portuguese Vowel Harmony: A Comparative Analysis and the Superiority of Autosegmental Representations

Phonological Processing for Urdu Text to Speech System

Christine Mooshammer, IPDS Kiel, Philip Hoole, IPSK München, Anja Geumann, Dublin

On the nature of voicing assimilation(s)

Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first

5. Margi (Chadic, Nigeria): H, L, R (Williams 1973, Hoffmann 1963)

SOME MINIMAL NOTES ON MINIMALISM *

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Lang Speech. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 January 1.

Psychology of Speech Production and Speech Perception

The Perception of Nasalized Vowels in American English: An Investigation of On-line Use of Vowel Nasalization in Lexical Access

A Fact in Historical Phonology from the Viewpoint of Generative Phonology: The Underlying Schwa in Old English

Mimetic gemination in Japanese: A challenge for Evolutionary Phonology*

Speech Recognition using Acoustic Landmarks and Binary Phonetic Feature Classifiers

University of Southern California Hayward R. Alker Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for International Studies,

The phonetic roots of phonological typology:

Canadian raising with language-specific weighted constraints Joe Pater, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Ph.D. Linguistics, University of Arizona. Dissertation: Confluence in phonology: evidence from Micronesian reduplication Director: Diana Archangeli

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. VCV-sequencies in a preliminary text-to-speech system for female speech

Multiple case assignment and the English pseudo-passive *

DEVELOPMENT OF LINGUAL MOTOR CONTROL IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Unvoiced Landmark Detection for Segment-based Mandarin Continuous Speech Recognition

Contrastiveness and diachronic variation in Chinese nasal codas. Tsz-Him Tsui The Ohio State University

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Voiced-voiceless distinction in alaryngeal speech - acoustic and articula

Process-specific constraints in Optimality Theory

**Note: this is slightly different from the original (mainly in format). I would be happy to send you a hard copy.**

The Prosodic (Re)organization of Determiners

Phonetic Knowledge in Tonal Adaptation: Mandarin and English. Loanwords in Lhasa Tibetan*

GEMINATION STRATEGIES IN L1 AND ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION OF POLISH LEARNERS

Precedence Constraints and Opacity

Joan Bybee, Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001,

Why PPP won t (and shouldn t) go away

18 The syntax phonology interface

L1 Influence on L2 Intonation in Russian Speakers of English

Similarity Avoidance in the Proto-Indo-European Root

DOWNSTEP IN SUPYIRE* Robert Carlson Societe Internationale de Linguistique, Mali

A survey of intonation systems

Audible and visible speech

Dissertation Summaries. Headedness in Word Formation and Lexical Semantics: Evidence from Italiot and Cypriot (University of Patras, 2014)*

THE PHONOLOGICAL WORD IN STANDARD MALA Y

REPRESENTATIONAL HANDLING OF POZNAŃ-CRACOW VOICING IN GOVERNMENT PHONOLOGY

The Acquisition of English Intonation by Native Greek Speakers

Student Experience Lab Historical Timeline Works Cited

Perceived speech rate: the effects of. articulation rate and speaking style in spontaneous speech. Jacques Koreman. Saarland University

source or where they are needed to distinguish two forms of a language. 4. Geographical Location. I have attempted to provide a geographical

On the Formation of Phoneme Categories in DNN Acoustic Models

THE RECOGNITION OF SPEECH BY MACHINE

Copyright by Niamh Eileen Kelly 2015

Contrasting English Phonology and Nigerian English Phonology

A Level Playing-Field: Perceptibility and Inflection in English Compounds. Robert Kirchner and Elena Nicoladis (U. Alberta)

Som and Optimality Theory

2,1 .,,, , %, ,,,,,,. . %., Butterworth,)?.(1989; Levelt, 1989; Levelt et al., 1991; Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer, 1999

UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2014) What (else) Depends on Phonology?

SEGMENTAL FEATURES IN SPONTANEOUS AND READ-ALOUD FINNISH

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

Lingüística Cognitiva/ Cognitive Linguistics

A Cross-language Corpus for Studying the Phonetics and Phonology of Prominence

Rachel E. Baker, Ann R. Bradlow. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

Journal of Phonetics

An Acoustic Phonetic Account of the Production of Word-Final /z/s in Central Minnesota English

Different Task Type and the Perception of the English Interdental Fricatives

1972 M.I.T. Linguistics M.S. 1972{1975 M.I.T. Linguistics Ph.D.

age, Speech and Hearii

Sounds of Infant-Directed Vocabulary: Learned from Infants Speech or Part of Linguistic Knowledge?

The Indian English of Tibeto-Burman language speakers*

Interfacing Phonology with LFG

Language Change: Progress or Decay?

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Sound symbolism in deictic words

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

Indo-European Reduplication: Synchrony, Diachrony, and Theory. Sam Zukoff

Fix Your Vowels: Computer-assisted training by Dutch learners of Spanish

Journal of Phonetics

AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO NEW AND OLD INFORMATION IN TURKISH LOCATIVES AND EXISTENTIALS

Morris Halle: An Appreciation

Speech Segmentation Using Probabilistic Phonetic Feature Hierarchy and Support Vector Machines

Transcription:

Further reading For references on individual features see the works cited in the relevant section. The studies cited below deal with general aspects of distinctive features. An excellent survey of the phonetics of the articulations discussed above is Ladefoged and Maddieson (1996). For earlier approaches to distinctive features see SPE, Anderson (1974), Hyman (1975) and Keating (1988a). The latter article is useful because it examines distinctive features from the point of view of phonetics. For articlelength studies on Feature Geometry see McCarthy (1988) and Clements and Hume (1995). See Boersma (1998), Padgett (2002) and Hamann (2003) for various approaches which question assumptions made in Feature Geometry. For studies on laryngeal features see Lombardi (1991), Kehrein (2002), Fallon (2002) and Clements (2003). On the phonology and phonetics of nasals see the contributions in Huffman and Krakow (1993) as well as Herbert (1986) and Hajek (1997). On CORONAL and the coronal features see Paradis and Prunet (1991), Hume (1992), and Hall (1997). See Hamann (2003) for a detailed study on the phonetics and phonology of retroflex consonants. An excellent study on complex segments is van de Weijer (1994). References Anderson, J. and C. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Anderson, S. R. 1971. On the description of apicalized consonants. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 103-107. Anderson, S. R. 1974. The Organization of Phonology. New York: Academic Avery, P. and W. Idsardi 2001. Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In: Hall, T. A. (2001: 41-70). Blevins, J. 1994. A place for lateral in the feature geometry. Journal of Linguistics 30: 301-348. Boersma, P. 1998. Functional Phonology. Formalizing the Interactions between Articulatory and Perceptual Drives. The Hague: LOT. Browmann C. P and L. Goldstein 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6.2: 201-251. Brown, C. 1995. The feature geometry of lateral approximants and lateral fricatives. In: Hulst, H. van der and J. van de Weijer (eds.) Leiden in Last. HIL Phonology Papers I. 41-88. The Hague: Holland Academic Campbell, L. 1974. Phonological features: problems and proposals. Language 50.1: 52-65. Cho, Y. - M. Y. 1991. On the universality of the coronal articulator. In: Paradis, C. and J.-F. Prunet (1991: 159-179) Chomsky, N. and M. Halle 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. Clements, G. N. 1976. Palatalization: linking or assimilation? CLS 12: 96-109. Clements, G. N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225 252. Clements, G. N. 1987. Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. CLS 23: 29-50. Clements, G. N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, J. and M. Beckman (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 283-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University In Paul de Lacy (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University

2 Segmental Features (ch.12) Clements, G. N. 1999. Affricates as noncontoured stops. In: O. Fujimura et al. (eds.). Item, Order in Language and Speech. 271-299. Prague: Charles University Clements, G. N. 2001. Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In: T. A. Hall (ed.) Distinctive Feature Theory. 71-146. Berlin: Mouton. Clements, G. N. 2003. Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 20.3: 287-333. Clements, G. N. and E. V. Hume 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In: J. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 245-306. Oxford: Blackwell. Clements, G. N. and S. J. Keyser 1983. CV Phonology. A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambeidge, Mass.: MIT Cohn, A. 1990. Phonetic and phonological rues of nasalization. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 76: 167-216. Cohn, A. 1993. The status of nasalized continuants. In: M. K. Huffman and R. A. Krakow (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology 5: Nasals, Nasalization and the Velum, 329-367. San Diego: Academic Dart, S. 1991. Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Apical and Laminal Articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79. Dogil, G. and H. C. Luschützky 1990. Notes on sonority and segmental strength. Rivista di Linguistica 2.2: 3-54. Fallon, P. D. 2002. The Synchronic and Diachronic Phonology of Ejectives. London: Routledge. Feinstein, M. H. 1977. The Linguistic Nature of Prenasalization. Ph.D. Dissertation: CUNY. Flemming, E. 1995. Auditory Representations in Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. [Published 2002. London: Routledge] Flemming, E. 2003. The relationship between coronal place and vowel backness. Phonology 20.3: 335-373. Fox, A. 2000. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Gnanadesikan, A. 1993. The feature geometry of coronal subplaces. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16: 27-67. Grijzenhout, J. 1995. Feature geometry and coronal transparency. In: Hulst, H. van der and J. van de Weijer (eds.) Leiden in Last. HIL Phonology Papers I. 165-185. The Hague: Holland Academic Grijzenhout, J. 2001. Representing nasality in consonants. In: T. A. Hall (ed.) Distinctive Feature Theory. 177-210. Berlin: Mouton. Gussenhoven C. and H. Jacobs 1998. Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold. Hajek, J. 1997. Universals of Sound Change in Nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell. Hall, T. A. 1997. The Phonology of Coronals. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Halle, M. 1983. On distinctive features and their articulatory implementation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 91-105. Halle, M. 1995. Feature geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 1-46. Halle, M. and G. N. Clements 1983. Problem Book in Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Halle, M. and K. N. Stevens 1971. A note on laryngeal features. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report 101: 198 213. Halle, M. and K. Stevens 1979. Some reflections on the theoretical bases of phonetics. In: B. Lindblom and S. Ohman (eds.) Frontiers of Speech Communication. London: Academic 335-349. Hamann, S. 2003. The Phonetics and Phonology of Retroflexes. Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University. Hamilton, P. 1993. Intrinsic markedness relations in segment structure. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12.2: 79-95.

Segmental Features (ch.12) 3 Harris, J. 1983. Syllable Structure and Stress in Spanish. A Nonlinear Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Harris, J. 1989. Towards a lexical analysis of a sound change in progress. Journal of Linguistics 25: 35-56. Hayward, K. M. and R. J. Hayward 1989. Guttural : arguments for a new distinctive feature. Transactions of the Philological Society 87: 179-193. Herbert, R. K. 1986. Lamguage Universals, Markedness Theory, and Natural Phonetic Processes. Berlin: Mouton. Huffman, M. K. and R. A. Krakow (eds.) 1993, Phonetics and Phonology 5: Nasals, Nasalization and the Velum. San Diego: Academic Hulade, J. I. 1987. On Basque affricates. WCCFL 6: 77-89. Hulst, H. van der and C. Ewen 1991. Major class and manner features. In: P. M. Bertinetto, M. Kenstowicz and M. Loporcaro (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum II: Papers from the 1990 Cortona Phonology Meeting, 19-41. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier. Hume, E. 1992. Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in non-linear phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. [Published 1994. New York: Garland. Hume, E. and D. Odden 1996. Reconsidering [consonantal]. Phonology 13.3: 345-376. Hyman, L. 1973. The feature [grave] in phonological theory. Journal of Phonetics 1: 329-337. Hyman, L. 1975. Phonology. Theory and Analysis. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hyman, L. 1988. Underspecification and vowel height transfer in Esimbi. Phonology 5: 255-273. Ito, J., A. Mester and J. Padgett 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26.4: 571-614. Jakobson, R., G. Fant and M. Halle 1952. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press [sixth printing, 1965]. Kaisse, E. 1992. Can [consonantal] spread? Language 68: 313-332. Kaye, J., J. Lowenstamm and J.-R. Vergnaud 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305-328. Keating, P. A. 1988a. A survey of phonological features. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Keating, P. A. 1988b. Palatals as complex segments: x-ray evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 69: 77-91. Kehrein, W. 2002. Phonological Representation and Phonetic Phrasing: Affricates and Laryngeals. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Keyser, S. J. and K. N. Stevens 1994. Feature geometry and the vocal tract. Phonology 11.2: 207-236. Kirchner, R. 1997. Contrastiveness and faithfulness. Phonology 14: 83-111. LaCharité, D. 1993. The Internal Structure of Affricates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa. Ladefoged, P. 1993. A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Third edition. Ladefoged, P. and I. Maddieson 1996. Sounds in the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell. Lahiri, A. and S. Blumstein 1984. A re-evaluation of the feature coronal. Journal of Phonetics 12: 133-146. Lahiri, A. and V. Evers 1991. Palatalization and coronality. In: C. Paradis and J.-F. Prunet (eds.), The Special Status of Coronals, 79-100. San Diego, Academic. Levin, J. 1985. A Metrical Theory of Syllabicity. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

4 Segmental Features (ch.12) Lin, Y.-H. 1989. The retroflex as a complex segment. ESCOL 6: 182-193. Lloret, M. R. 1995. The representation of glottals in Oromo. Phonology 13.2: 257-280. Lombardi, L. 1990. The nonlinear organization of the affricate. NLLT 8: 375-425. Lombardi, L. 1991. Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts at Amherst [published 1994, New York/London: Garland]. Martinet, A. 1964. Elements of General Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago McCarthy, J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43: 84-108. McCarthy, J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In: P. Keating (ed.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University 191-233. Ní Chiosáin, M. 1994. Irish palatalization and the representation of place features. Phonology 11: 89-106. Ní Chiosáin, M and J. Padgett (1993). Inherent VPlace. UC Santa Cruz Working Papers in Linguistics. Odden, D. 1978. Further evidence for the feature [grave]. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 141-144. Odden, D. 1991. Vowel geometry. Phonology 8: 261-289. Padgett, J. 1991. Stricture in Feature Geometry. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachesetts Amherst. Padgett, J. 1994. Stricture and nasal place assimilation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12.3: 465-513. Padgett, J. 2002. Feature classes in phonology. Language 78.1: 81-110. Palmada, B. 1995. From place to continuancy. In: 299-313. H. van der Hulst and J. van de Weijer (eds.) Leiden in Last. HIL Phonology Papers I. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. Paradis, C. and J.-F. Prunet (eds.) 1991. Phonetics and Phonology. The Special Status of Coronals. Internal and External Evidence. San Diego: Academic Piggott, G. 1992. Variability in feature dependency: the case of nasality. NLLT 10: 33-77. Pulleyblank, E. 1989. The role of coronal in articulator based features. CLS 25: 379-393. Rice, K. 1993. A reexamination of the feature [sonorant]: the status of sonorant obstruents. Language 69.2: 308-344. Rice, K. 1994. Peripheral in consonants. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 39.3: 191-216. Rice, K. and P. Avery 1991. On the relationship between laterality and coronality. In: Paradis, C. and J.-F. Prunet (eds.) The Special Status of Coronals. 101-124. San Diego: Academic. Robinson, O. 2001. Whose German? The ach/ich alternation and related phenomena in standard and colloquial German. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Rose, S. 1996. Variable laryngeals and vowel lowering. Phonology 13.1: 73-117. Rosenthall, S. 1988. The representation of prenasalized consonants. WCCFL 7: 277-291. Rubach, J. 1984. Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris. Rubach, J. 1994. Affricates as strident stops in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 119-143. Sagey, E. 1986. The Representations of Features and Relations in Nonlinear Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Schafer, R. 1995. Headedness and the representation of affricates. The Linguistic review 12: 61-87. Selkirk, E. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In: M. Aronoff and R. T. Oehrle (eds.), Language Sound Structure: Studies in Phonology Presented

Segmental Features (ch.12) 5 to Morris Halle by his Teacher and Students, 107-136. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Shaw, P. 1991. Consonant harmony systems: the special status of coronal harmony. In: Paradis, C. and J.-F. Prunet (eds.) The Special Status of Coronals. 125-157. San Diego: Academic. Spencer, A. 1984. Eliminating the feature [lateral]. Journal of Linguistics 20: 23-43. Stampe, D. 1973. A Dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York: Garland. Steriade, D. 1987. Locality conditions ad feature geometry. NELS 17: 595-617. Steriade, D. 1993. Closure, release, and nasal contours. In: M. Huffman and R. A. Krakow (eds.) Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. 401-469. New York: Academic Steriade, D. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In: M. Broe and J. Pierrhumbert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5, 313-334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Trigo, R. L. 1991. On pharynx-larynx interactions. Phonology 8: 113-136. Trigo, R. L. 1993. The inherent structure of nasal segments. In: M. Huffman and R. A. Krakow (eds.) Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. 369-400. New York: Academic Vago, R. 1976. More evidence for the feature [grave]. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 671-674. Vaux, B. 1998. The laryngeal specifications of fricatives. Linguistics Inquiry 29.3: 497-511. Vennemann, T. and P. Ladefoged 1973. Phonetic features and phonological features. Lingua 32: 61-74. Walker, R. 2000. Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity Effects. New York: Garland. Walsh Dickey, L. 1997. The Phonology of Liquids. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Weijer, J. van de 1992. Basque affricates and the manner-place dependency. Lingua 88: 129-147. Weijer, J. van de 1993. The manner-place dependency in complex segments. Linguistics 31: 87-110. Weijer, J. van de 1994. Segmental Structure and Complex Segments. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden. Wetzels, W. L 1995. Mid-vowel alternations in the Brazilian Portuguese verb. Phonology 12: 281-304. Wetzels, W. L. and J. Mascaró 2001. The typology of voicing and devoicing. Language 77.2: 207-244. Yip, M 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University

In Paul de Lacy (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University