Elements of Critical Thinking

Similar documents
Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

What is Thinking (Cognition)?

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Language Acquisition Chart

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Master s Programme in European Studies

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

E-3: Check for academic understanding

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

Course evaluations at Chalmers

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

A Web Based Annotation Interface Based of Wheel of Emotions. Author: Philip Marsh. Project Supervisor: Irena Spasic. Project Moderator: Matthew Morgan

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Understanding Language

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Uncertainty concepts, types, sources

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Early Warning System Implementation Guide

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

The Extend of Adaptation Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Domain In English Questions Included in General Secondary Exams

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Shank, Matthew D. (2009). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

Abstractions and the Brain

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

North Carolina Information and Technology Essential Standards

What can I learn from worms?

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Relating Math to the Real World: A Study of Platonic Solids and Tessellations

Teachers Guide Chair Study

PH.D. IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM (POST M.S.)

understandings, and as transfer tasks that allow students to apply their knowledge to new situations.

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

Instructions and Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Review of IUB Librarians

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ TOWARDS A UNIVERSAL PARAMETRIC PLAYER MODEL

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Mock Trial Preparation In-Class Assignment to Prepare Direct and Cross Examination Roles 25 September 2015 DIRECT EXAMINATION

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Missouri Mathematics Grade-Level Expectations

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Probability and Statistics Curriculum Pacing Guide

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

USF Course Change Proposal Global Citizens Project

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Use of CIM in AEP Enterprise Architecture. Randy Lowe Director, Enterprise Architecture October 24, 2012

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Urban Analysis Exercise: GIS, Residential Development and Service Availability in Hillsborough County, Florida

Reading Horizons. Aid for the School Principle: Evaluate Classroom Reading Programs. Sandra McCormick JANUARY Volume 19, Issue Article 7

Getting Started in Developing the Portfolio

Soaring With Strengths

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Functional Maths Skills Check E3/L x

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Biome I Can Statements

MMOG Subscription Business Models: Table of Contents

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Lecturing Module

A student diagnosing and evaluation system for laboratory-based academic exercises

Modified Systematic Approach to Answering Questions J A M I L A H A L S A I D A N, M S C.

Florida Reading for College Success

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

Study Group Handbook

Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support of ABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment

EDUC 998 The Doctoral Dissertation Proposal Summer 2004

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Working with Rich Mathematical Tasks

Teacher Action Research Multiple Intelligence Theory in the Foreign Language Classroom. By Melissa S. Ferro George Mason University

Writing Research Articles

Plenary Session The School as a Home for the Mind. Presenters Angela Salmon, FIU Erskine Dottin, FIU

On-Line Data Analytics

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

Transcription:

Elements of Critical Thinking Prepared by: D. Anthony Miles, Ph.D. 1

Introduction Purpose of this presentation Objective: Improve critical thinking skills for business. Outcome: Create a community of business thinkers at Our Lady of the Lake University. 2

Agenda Level I: Knowledge Level 2: Comprehension Level 3: Application Level 4: Analysis Level 5: Synthesis Level 6: Evaluation 3

Level I: Knowledge Knowledge: present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria. Understand the problem situation. Read the case Critical Thinking Skills Applied Know where and how to get information from the case. Determine the facts and evidence. 4

Level I: Knowledge Knowledge: present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria. Choose Define Find Label Select Relate List Questions asked are: What is..? Where is.? How did happen? When did..? How would you show..? Who were the main? Which one..? 5

Level 2: Comprehension Comprehension: demonstrate understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions and stating main ideas Identify business concepts embedded/illustrated in the case. Critical Thinking Skills Applied Recognize central thesis or arguments. Assemble information into one s own words. 6

Level 2: Comprehension Comprehension: demonstrate understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions and stating main ideas. Classify Contrast Explain Outline Illustrate Summarize Infer Questions asked are: How would classify the type of? How would you compare? Will you state or interpret in your own words..? How would you rephrase the meaning? What facts or ideas show? What is the main idea of.? Which statements support..? 7

Level 3: Application Application: involves solving problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way. Comprehend the effects of the business concepts within the case. Critical Thinking Skills Applied Identify cause and effect relationships. Assess relevance, truth, validity, and strength of information. 8

Level 3: Application Application: involves solving problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, facts, techniques and rules in a different way. Questions asked are: Apply Build Choose Construct Model Develop Select Organize How would you use? What example can you find to.? How would you solve using what you ve learned.? What approach would you use.? How would you apply what you learned to develop..? What elements would you choose to change? 9

Level 4: Analysis Analysis: examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations. Analyze the problem situation. Analyze and evaluate components of the situation and their interactions. Identify underlying facts and assumptions. Judge the effectiveness of business concepts in the situation. Critical Thinking Skills Applied Recognize stated and implied assumptions Identify cause and effect relationships. Assess strengths and weakness of options. 10

Level 4: Analysis Analysis: examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations. Questions asked are: Analyze Contrast Categorize Classify Compare Distinguish Examine Simplify Relationships What are the parts or features of..? What is the relationship between? How would you categorize? What evidence can you find..? Can you identify parts..? What ideas justify? What inference can you make..? 11

Level 5: Synthesis Synthesis: compile information together in a different way by combing elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions. Identify and evaluate alternatives. Identify other concepts to apply. Establish criteria to evaluate alternative solutions. Evaluate the impact and reasoning of alternatives. Critical Thinking Skills Applied Draw conclusions and evaluate the effectiveness and justification of the conclusion. Evaluate information from multiple perspectives. Create multiple options Determine the facts and evidence. Assess strengths and weaknesses of options 12

Level 5: Synthesis Synthesis: compile information together in a different way by combing elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions. Adapt Design Combine Compose Improve Predict Modify Questions asked are: What changes would make to solve..? How would you improve.? How would you adapt to create a different..? What way would you design..? How would you show..? What facts can you compile? Formulate Propose Can you construct a model that would change..? 13

Level 6: Evaluation Evaluation: present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria. Evaluate how the alternative changed the case scenario Identify potential changes in the business environment that could affect the solution. Critical Thinking Skills Applied Identify cause and effect relationships. Evaluate information from multiple perspectives. Assess strengths and weaknesses of options. 14

Level 6: Evaluation Evaluation: present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria. Agree Dispute Assess Conclude Criticize Justify Recommend Support Questions asked are: Do you agree with the actions..? What is your opinion of.? What would you recommend? What information can you use to support the view..? How would you prioritize the facts..? Based on what you know, how would you explain..? What data was used to make the conclusion..? 15

Elements of Critical Thinking Questions? Prepared by: D. Anthony Miles, Ph.D. 16

Elements of Critical Thinking Prepared by: D. Anthony Miles, Ph.D. 17