AM SYLLABUS (2015) FRENCH AM 12 SYLLABUS

Similar documents
CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Lower and Upper Secondary

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Primary English Curriculum Framework

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Curriculum MYP. Class: MYP1 Subject: French Teacher: Chiara Lanciano Phase: 1

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Writing a composition

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Greeley-Evans School District 6 French 1, French 1A Curriculum Guide

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Timeline. Recommendations

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

Language Acquisition Chart

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

USING DRAMA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING CLASSROOMS TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF LEARNERS

Language Center. Course Catalog

One Stop Shop For Educators

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Mercer County Schools

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Intermediate Academic Writing

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Daily Assessment (All periods)

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Syllabus FREN1A. Course call # DIS Office: MRP 2019 Office hours- TBA Phone: Béatrice Russell, Ph. D.

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Night by Elie Wiesel. Standards Link:

Syllabus. Cambridge International AS Level Japanese Language Syllabus code 8281 For examination in November 2013

Modern Fantasy CTY Course Syllabus

9779 PRINCIPAL COURSE FRENCH

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Introduction Brilliant French Information Books Key features

TEKS Correlations Proclamation 2017

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

- Period - Semicolon - Comma + FANBOYS - Question mark - Exclamation mark

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Transcription:

AM SYLLABUS (2015) FRENCH AM 12 SYLLABUS

French AM 12 (Available in September) Syllabus Paper 1 (2 hrs) + Paper II (3 hrs) + Paper III (2½ hrs.)paper IV (30 mins.) + Oral AIMS The syllabus aims at consolidating and extending the knowledge of French acquired at SEC level by providing students the means of (a) understanding the spoken and written forms of the language from a variety of registers (b) reading coherently and articulating French linguistic sounds and French prosody in a context (c) being able to communicate clearly, confidently, fluently and intelligibly and with accuracy in spoken French (d) communicating accurately in writing (e) increasing their interest in a greater awareness of French culture and civilisation including francophonie, and developing critical insights into the culture of France and the other countries where French is spoken (f) instilling in them a love for French literature through the introduction of three integral texts. This introduction to French literature is also meant to stimulate the students to read other books. These texts also serve to illustrate the language, improve the students style and arouse a critical perception. It is also in itself an exercise in French civilisation and a reflection of life (g) acquiring such love for the language and the people who speak it as to encourage further studies at degree level. ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES The examination will test the candidate s ability to: (a) respond to the language spoken at normal speed by reproducing in the Dictation test French sounds and punctuation, and also by communicating effectively in the dialogue through an exchange of ideas, opinions and information in correct French (b) respond to the written language by showing an understanding of French and the ability to reformulate data (c) express opinions and ideas in a coherent form and logical sequence, with the use of correct grammar and syntax and to master a relatively wide range of vocabulary (d) demonstrate the ability to analyse a non-literary text by identifying its main theme or themes and analysing the form used to convey the same theme/themes. Candidates should be able to make linguistic remarks and analyse the functional element of the text as well as point out elements of style, features of language, the type of text and the author s intentions (e) demonstrate knowledge and understanding of aspects of French civilisation and culture (f) demonstrate a critical appreciation of the literary texts in the syllabus. SUBJECT CONTENT Introduction Three written papers are set. An oral examination and a dictation will also be held for all candidates. Instructions in all four papers will be given in French. Examination Paper I Analyse d un texte non littéraire (Two hours, 60 marks) In this exercise candidates are advised to look for the main theme/s of the text (350-400 words) and to explain the subject-matter by analysing the form chosen to convey the theme/s. Candidates are strongly advised not to deviate by simply making a summary of the text. Linguistic Remarks (i) aspects of syntax (such as sentence structure, length of sentences, sequence of sentences, linking words, pronouns: place and use); (ii) lexical items (such as choice of vocabulary, frequency of words, alternative forms, key words and phrases). Discourse Analysis (i) style (such as, point of view of the author, presence or complete absence of the author in the text, attitude of author, rhythm of text, imagery, symbolism); 2

(ii) Paraphrase référentielle, features of language, likely to be used with reference to a notion, an action, an event, and other such elements present in the text; (iii) Paraphrase pragmatique; (iv) type of text (descriptive, narrative, argumentative, dialogue form, or any combination) ; (v) author s intention in writing text (to warn, to instruct, to sensitise reader to some cause, to recommend, etc.) Functional Analysis (i) tenses; (ii) mood; (iii) aspect (perfectif, imperfectif, incoatif, progressif, etc.) (iv) direct/indirect speech. Candidates are not expected to examine ALL these features. The analysis should not, however, be presented in point form, but in a passage of continuous prose. When quoting from the text candidates are expected to use inverted commas. Candidates are expected to use correct grammar and syntax. The use of a French monolingual dictionary is permitted for this paper only. Paper II Essay and Written Comprehension (Three hours, 175 marks) This paper will consist of: (a) Essay (100 marks) Candidates will be asked to write 350-400 words on a topic chosen from a list of 4/5 titles. These topics will be mainly argumentative, but descriptive and narrative topics are not excluded. Candidates are expected to demonstrate their ability to explain, argue, justify, describe, evaluate, present and discuss facts, etc., according to the topic chosen by them, in a logical and coherent manner, making use of correct grammar and syntax. They should also make use of a wide range of vocabulary and include idiomatic expressions. (b) Written Comprehension (75 marks) A set of questions dealing directly or indirectly with the subject-matter of the text (450-500 words), not excluding sentence paraphrasing and rewording (reformulation) will be set in French. Candidates are advised to give full answers and use correct grammar and syntax. They are expected to formulate their answers in such a way as to avoid repeating whole sentences or even phrases from the text. Paper III Literary Studies (Two and a half hours, 75 marks) An essay question (with one alternative) will be set in French on each of the six prescribed texts. Candidates must answer three questions on three different works. Answers may be given in French, Maltese or English. No extra credit will be given for answers in French. Candidates are also advised to include in their answers a few relevant quotations taken from the French text. In their answer, they may be expected to display a knowledge not only of the text, but also of the author and the literary age in which he lived. The following are the prescribed texts: Molière, L'Avare, Bordas, ed. Hartweg, 2003. A. de Saint-Exupéry, Le Petit Prince, Gallimard-Jeunesse, 1999 François Mauriac, Thérèse Desqueyroux, Hachette, 2002. Marguerite Duras, Hiroshima mon amour, Gallimard, coll. Folio, 1972. Jean Giraudoux, La Guerre de Troie n'aura pas lieu, Hatier,1997. Mohammed Dib, Au café, Actes Sud, 1999. Note : Other editions of the texte intégral of the prescribed texts may be used. Paper IV Dictation (30 minutes, 30 marks) The Dictation will consist of a passage of modern French (140-160 words) which will be read aloud three times to the candidates. All punctuation marks included in the passage are dictated by the examiner exclusively in French. French names and surnames which may appear in the text will be written in full on the board or spelt out in French before the dictation commences. 3

The Oral Examination (60 marks) AM Syllabus (2015): French Reading (15 marks) Each candidate will be allowed some time to prepare the reading passage (approx. 140-160 words) which will be taken from modern French. The objective of this exercise is to test the candidate s articulation of French linguistic sound and French prosody in a context. Dialogue (45 marks) The conversation exercise is made up of two components: free conversation and a dialogue based on the text set in the syllabus. Free conversation (20 marks) Free conversation is intended to test the candidate s ability to communicate in good spoken French. Seven (7) themes will be set and candidates will be asked to draw a theme by lot. The theme chosen by the candidate will be the subject of the conversation. Candidates will be allowed some time to prepare for this exercise. Dialogue on a set text (25 marks) Prescribed text: Ross Steele, Civilisation progressive du français, Clé International, 2002, pages 14-19, (Unité 2), 40-45 (Unité 5), 56-61(Unité 8), 88-97 (Unité 14 and Unité 15), 104-115 (Unité 17 and Unité 18), 154-159 (Unité 24), 166-171 (Unité 26). A book of Corrigés accompanies this text. Before the beginning of this part of the oral examination, candidates will be asked to pick at random two unseen topics on which this part of the examination will be based. The preparation time for the reading and free conversation exercises will not be less than that of fifteen (15) minutes' duration. SCHEME OF ASSESSMENT The examination consists of four papers and an Oral examination. All instructions are given in French. Paper I (Two hours) This paper carries 60 marks. Only one exercise is given: Analyse d un texte non littéraire. Candidates are expected to write one or more paragraphs in continuous prose as advised in the Subject Content dealing with this part of the paper. Paper II (Three hours) This paper consists of an essay which carries 100 marks and a written comprehension which carries 75 marks. Both exercises are compulsory. Candidates are given a choice of 4 or 5 topics and they are asked to write 350-400 words on any one topic of their choice. The questions on the written comprehension are all compulsory. The marks allotted to each of them are given on the question paper. Paper III (Two and a half hours) This paper carries 75 marks. Six literature text-books are set in the syllabus, however candidates are expected to answer ONE question on each of THREE different texts. Candidates will answer three questions on three different books out of the 12 that are set in the paper. These must be in the form of an essay and may be answered in French, Maltese and English. Each question carries 25 marks. Paper IV (30 minutes) This paper consists of a dictation (140-160 words) and it carries 30 marks. All proper nouns are written on a blackboard/whiteboard or spelt out in French before the commencement of the test. All punctuation marks are dictated in French. The Dictation passage is read out twice through. Then, it is dictated in breath groups of words and each breath group is repeated once. At the end of the dictation, the passage is read through once again. Five minutes are then allowed for revision. These 5 minutes over, the papers are collected. The Oral Examination (15 minutes) The Oral examination is made up of three components. As soon as the candidate enters the examination room, s/he is given a reading passage to prepare and is asked to draw a folded paper which contains a topic which will be the subject of the conversation between her/him and the examiner. The candidate will have some 10 minutes to prepare her/himself for the reading and conversation exercises. Spontaneous corrections are accepted. After taking the reading test (15 marks) the candidate is examined in free 4

conversation (20 marks). Topics of general interest are chosen. This is not meant to test the candidate s general knowledge but his ability to carry on a conversation in good, correct French. Finally, the candidate is examined orally on the aspects of French civilisation set in the syllabus. This part of the examination carries 25 marks. The candidate will be asked to draw at random two unites out of the nine prescribed in the subject content. GRADE DESCRIPTIONS Grade A is awarded to candidates who are able to respond readily and to speak fluently are able to develop their answers and to express themselves in idiomatic and correct French demonstrate accurate pronunciation and intonation and only occasionally hesitate or make some slight mistake demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the civilisation topics set in the syllabus show clear understanding of written texts and the ability to infer meaning and ideas and to analyse detail content and style communicate ideas and information clearly and effectively demonstrate a thorough knowledge of French grammar and syntax except for errors of a minor nature possess a wide range of vocabulary and idiom demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the literary texts by focusing on the particular aspect of the topic in question and through clear, concise and logical arguments supported by relevant references and quotations. Grade C is awarded to candidates who respond readily but require some help to carry on a conversation at some length are able to express themselves in correct French but their vocabulary and idiom is quite limited may show some interference from other languages in their pronunciation and intonation show a satisfactory, though incomplete knowledge of the civilisation topics, though satisfactory, is not complete understand written texts and can identify the main arguments and analyse content and style communicate ideas and information clearly with limitations concerning vocabulary and expression demonstrate a knowledge of the basic grammar rules, in spite of some grammatical errors mainly due to negligence demonstrate a knowledge of the literary texts by focusing on the aspect of the topic in question, through arguments that are not always supported by a reasonable amount of references and quotations. Grade E is awarded to candidates who are hesitant, lack fluency, and communication is restricted with the result that their language becomes unintelligible make basic errors of grammar and syntax demonstrate that their pronunciation and intonation are influenced by interference from other languages communicate ideas and information in a fairly comprehensible manner and with obvious difficulty demonstrate a very limited knowledge of French grammar and syntax and make basic errors demonstrate restricted vocabulary which often leads to repetition and shows interference from other languages do not plan their literary essays and lose sight of the question, reproducing memorised material which hardly bears any relation to the question do not support their literary arguments by any references or quotations. 5