Contact: Claire Shewbridge Rien Rouw

Similar documents
National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

Summary and policy recommendations

Meeting on the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) and Good Practices in Skills Development

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Leading the Globally Engaged Institution: New Directions, Choices, and Dilemmas

Ben Kokkeler University of Twente 10 th September 2015 HEIR Network Conference University of the West of Scotland, Paisley

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

Beyond the contextual: the importance of theoretical knowledge in vocational qualifications & the implications for work

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

The European Consensus on Development: the contribution of Development Education & Awareness Raising

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Proposal for the Educational Research Association: An Initiative of the Instructional Development Unit, St. Augustine

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Submitted to IFIP World Computer Congress Montreal 2002

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Implementing Pilot Early Grade Reading Program in Morocco

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

A cautionary note is research still caught up in an implementer approach to the teacher?

The IDN Variant Issues Project: A Study of Issues Related to the Delegation of IDN Variant TLDs. 20 April 2011

URBANIZATION & COMMUNITY Sociology 420 M/W 10:00 a.m. 11:50 a.m. SRTC 162

CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Executive summary (in English)

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

Exploring the Development of Students Generic Skills Development in Higher Education Using A Web-based Learning Environment

Writing up qualitative data in SAP: Some observations

Name: STEP 1: Starting Questions. Description PSII Learner.. PSII Teacher.

KANDIDATUDDANNELSE I EUROPASTUDIER

Architecture of Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Participatory Design Program to Develop School Entrepreneurship Center in Vocational High School

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Economics. Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen

PAST EXPERIENCE AS COORDINATION ENABLER IN EXTREME ENVIRONMENT: THE CASE OF THE FRENCH AIR FORCE AEROBATIC TEAM

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

WHY DID THEY STAY. Sense of Belonging and Social Networks in High Ability Students

School Leadership Rubrics

prehending general textbooks, but are unable to compensate these problems on the micro level in comprehending mathematical texts.

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

Metadiscourse in Knowledge Building: A question about written or verbal metadiscourse

Monitoring and Evaluating Curriculum Implementation Final Evaluation Report on the Implementation of The New Zealand Curriculum Report to

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

CHAPTER 2: COUNTERING FOUR RISKY ASSUMPTIONS

MAINTAINING CURRICULUM CONSISTENCY OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS THROUGH TEACHER DESIGN TEAMS

A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties

ESSEC & MANNHEIM Executive MBA

Practice Examination IREB

Litterature review of Soft Systems Methodology

Assessment of Generic Skills. Discussion Paper

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Models of / for Teaching Modeling

Call for applications

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Introduction. Background. Social Work in Europe. Volume 5 Number 3

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Billett, S. (1994). Situating learning in the workplace: Having another look at Apprenticeships. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26(11) 9-16.

The Entrepreneurial Mindset Syllabus

the contribution of the European Centre for Modern Languages Frank Heyworth

Global Convention on Coaching: Together Envisaging a Future for coaching

DG 17: The changing nature and roles of mathematics textbooks: Form, use, access

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Certificate of Higher Education in History. Relevant QAA subject benchmarking group: History

Knowledge Synthesis and Integration: Changing Models, Changing Practices

The Incentives to Enhance Teachers Teaching Profession: An Empirical Study in Hong Kong Primary Schools

2 di 7 29/06/

DOES OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ENHANCE CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION AMONG GIFTED STUDENTS?

Towards a Systematic Approach to Reviewing Literature for Interpreting Public and Business Management Research Results

ROLE OF TEACHERS IN CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

new research in learning and working

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

An International University without an International Office: Experiences in Mainstreaming Internationalisation at the University of Helsinki

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SOCIAL STUDIES SYLLABUS FOR BASIC EDUCATION STANDARD III-VI

Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs; Angelo & Cross, 1993)

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Taking Action to Strengthen

CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

Navigating in a sea of risks: MARISCO, a conservation planning method used in risk robust and ecosystem based adaptation strategies

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

Transcription:

Contact: Claire Shewbridge (Claire.Shewbridge@oecd.org) Rien Rouw (Marinus.Rouw@oecd.org)

2 Table of contents Background... 3 Aims... 4 Design... 4 Participants... 4 Preparation... 5 Carrying out the seminar... 5 Follow-up... 5 Costs... 5 The SEG Learning Seminars in brief SEG Learning Seminars apply OECD's insights on strategic education governance to specific policy challenges. Countries/systems can draw lessons for governance practice by contrasting and comparing their governance approaches and the challenges they face. The seminars will produce new knowledge or make tacit knowledge explicit, by deepening our insight in the design and implications of implementation strategies. Cornerstones of each Learning Seminar: A focus on reconstruction of real-life policy experiences with the help of stakeholders involved Each host country or system decides the theme in consultation with the OECD Each Seminar has an explicit phase of reflection and translation to different contexts The OECD prepares a background paper, in close collaboration with the host country, as a basis for each seminar The OECD prepares a short final report on the main findings Duration of 1.5 2 days

3 Background The OECD work on Strategic Education Governance identifies six domains as the cornerstones of strategic governance: strategic thinking, accountability, capacity, stakeholder involvement, knowledge governance, whole-of-system perspective (see Box 1). Although these domains provide a framework for strategic governance of today s complex education systems, translating them into national, regional and local contexts and for particular policies is not always obvious and calls for differentiation and contextualisation. To facilitate this, the SEG Learning Seminars support countries to learn from each other on how to realise those elements in the everyday governance of specific policies, such as reducing school drop-out or improving the achievement of disadvantaged children. The SEG Learning Seminars will create a space where country representatives can learn from exchanging and studying real life cases. Box 1. Strategic Education Governance Organisational Framework The Strategic Education Governance (SEG) project supports countries/systems in identifying how to achieve system-wide objectives for education in complex contexts: Multiple actors are involved in decision-making at different governance levels. At the same time, the availability of education performance data engages parents and other stakeholders. Nonetheless, ministries of education remain responsible for ensuring high quality, efficient, equitable and innovative education. The study of complex systems requires a step back to examine how the various interconnections can form a coherent whole, in what way current structures facilitate or hinder this coherence, and how best to develop new forms of governance that take this complexity into account (Snyder, 2013 [1] ). This analytical lens, coupled with empirical work and efforts to develop aspirational indicators to analyse governance gaps, strengthens our ability to provide realistic and feasible suggestions for policy reform and strong examples from the field. Facilitating this, the work of the SEG project revolves around an Organisational Framework comprising six domains: Strategic thinking, to promote forward-looking policy making and to balance long-term strategic goals with short-term priorities. Accountability, to enable local discretion in policy making while limiting fragmentation, and to promote a culture of learning and improvement. Capacity, to ensure capacity for policy-making and implementation and to foster collaborative capacity building. Whole-of-system perspective, to mitigate tensions and to develop synergies across the system. Stakeholder involvement, to integrate knowledge and perspectives of diverse stakeholders as well as to foster ownership, trust and support. Knowledge governance, to engender a culture of using rich data and varied knowledge to improve policy making and realisation.

4 Aims Design The aim of the SEG Learning Seminars is to make the insights on strategic education actionable and to inspire systems to draw lessons for governance practice by contrasting and comparing their governance approaches and the challenges they face in governing their systems. This will provide critical feedback on their own systems, strengthen their self-reflection on the role of government in complex systems, and expand their repertoire to act effectively in various forms of governance. Both for participating countries and countries in general the seminars will produce new knowledge about implementation and realisation issues, or make tacit knowledge explicit, by deepening insight to the design and implications of implementation strategies. In particular, the seminars aim to: Participants gain a deeper understanding of the issues at stake and the range of governance options available across countries; learn about effective and/or innovative governance policy practice in other countries and context-specific obstacles and enablers, and develop consequently decisional capital of participants; identify governance options and possible trajectories (next practice) for future action; and generate knowledge of the actual how-to of implementation and realisation of policies. For the purpose of creating an engaging learning environment, methods focus on enactment and translation: A first phase focuses on the direct reconstruction of policy experiences, ideally with the help of stakeholders involved in the policy process. This is followed by an explicit phase of reflection and translation to different contexts. The cases are meant to illustrate and apply governance concepts. The approach is deliberately interactive, with participants actively engaging in discussion and explicit reflection. A learning seminar will generally take 1.5 2 days. Ideally a group of around four countries will participate in a particular seminar. Each country can delegate two or three participants. Participants may come from different layers of the education system; it is up to the country to decide upon the delegation. One of the participating countries will host the seminar. This host country will not only provide facilities but also the main case to be discussed. Jointly decided by the SEG team and the host country, invitations are extended to comparable systems; however, there will be room to invite an outlier to insert radically different perspectives and sharpening the discussion. The main case will be presented by the most involved policy makers and external stakeholders from the host country. Optionally, one to two experts can be invited to strengthen reflection and translation. The SEG-team will provide theoretical and empirical insights from previous work on

5 Preparation governing complex education systems 1 and ongoing work on strategic governance. The seminar will be guided by an experienced facilitator. Seminars will be designed in close cooperation with the host country and taking into account considerations of the participating countries. For each seminar both a governance topic will be selected (for example participatory governance or accountability) as well as a particular policy initiative (for example introducing a new curriculum or attracting and retaining high quality teachers) as illustration of the governance issue. Cases might either be retrospective or prospective. For each seminar a background paper will be drafted jointly by the SEG-team and the host country. Part of the preparatory document will be a short country questionnaire to collect the learning needs of the participants. Carrying out the seminar Follow-up Costs Seminars will take 1.5 2 days. The seminar starts with an introduction of the governance topic at hand. The next step is the reconstruction (for retrospective cases) or elaboration (for prospective cases) of the main policy case by the host country. The reconstruction (or elaboration, respectively) involves policy makers, stakeholders and potentially experts to get a comprehensive view on the case and to learn about the involvement and interests of various stakeholders. Ideally, the case presentation includes evaluation results or exploratory research, or draws from research on governance in general. A site visit could also be part of the reconstruction (elaboration) phase. This phase is followed by discussion, translation to other systems and reflection, among others based on a comparison between / systems, resulting in a list of challenges and opportunities. Short presentations of country experiences might be included. The last step entails the formulation of lessons and recommendations for governance interventions across countries. A short designing exercise might be part of this. The discussions and outcomes of the seminar will be included in a short final report (5-10 pages) prepared by the SEG-team in consultation with the host country. Publication of this report will be decided upon in consultation with the participating countries. Starting with the biennium 2017-2018, key lessons of all corresponding seminars will be included in a publicly available synthesis report at the end of a given biennium. Costs are to be discussed with respective host countries. 1 Work on governing complex education systems (GCES) was carried out between 2011 and 2016. The GCES project aimed to help countries develop and realize policies to meet modern education governance challenges (OECD, 2016 [2] ). Two volumes synthesize the conceptual and empirical work undertaken (Burns, Köster and Fuster, 2016 [3] ; Burns and Köster, 2016 [4] ) and provide the basis for ongoing work on strategic education governance.

6 References Burns, T., F. Köster and M. Fuster (2016), Education Governance in Action: Lessons from Case Studies, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264262829-en. Burns, T. and F. Köster (2016), Governing Education in a Complex World, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-en. OECD (2016), Governing Complex Education Systems - Project Overview 2011-2016, OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/gces-final-project-plan-2016.pdf. Snyder, S. (2013), The Simple, the Complicated, and the Complex: Educational Reform Through the Lens of Complexity Theory, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 96, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3txnpt1lnr-en. [3] [4] [2] [1]