Differentiating Instruction and Assessment for ELLs Rebecca Freeman Field

Similar documents
LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION. English as a Second Language Level 1 (Entering) and Level 2 (Beginning)

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

EQuIP Review Feedback

Language Acquisition Chart

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

New Jersey Department of Education

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

New Ways of Connecting Reading and Writing

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Grade 5: Module 2A: Unit 1: Lesson 6 Analyzing an Interview with a Rainforest Scientist Part 1

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Academic Language: Equity for ELs

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

What can I learn from worms?

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

A Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher

Hokulani Elementary School

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Understanding Language

Blank Table Of Contents Template Interactive Notebook

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

21st Century Community Learning Center

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

English as a Second Language Students and Teachers Perceptions of Effective Literacy Instruction

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Mercer County Schools

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Focus of the Unit: Much of this unit focuses on extending previous skills of multiplication and division to multi-digit whole numbers.

Informational Writing Graphic Organizer For Kids

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Grade 4: Module 2A: Unit 1: Lesson 3 Inferring: Who was John Allen?

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Trophies Grade 5

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

WiggleWorks Software Manual PDF0049 (PDF) Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Characteristics of the Text Genre Realistic fi ction Text Structure

STANDARDS. Essential Question: How can ideas, themes, and stories connect people from different times and places? BIN/TABLE 1

Using SAM Central With iread

Unit: Human Impact Differentiated (Tiered) Task How Does Human Activity Impact Soil Erosion?

Grade 8: Module 4: Unit 1: Lesson 8 Reading for Gist and Answering Text-Dependent Questions: Local Sustainable Food Chain

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Fifth Grade. (Questions based on Harry Potter and the Sorcerer s Stone by J.K. Rowling. paired with

Characteristics of the Text Genre Informational Text Text Structure

MCAS_2017_Gr5_ELA_RID. IV. English Language Arts, Grade 5

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

Summarizing A Nonfiction

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Language Center. Course Catalog

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Intensive Writing Class

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Co-teaching in the ESL Classroom

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

REQUIRED TEXTS Woods, M. & Moe, A.J. (2011). Analytical Reading Inventory with Readers Passages (9 th edition). Prentice Hall.

Work Stations 101: Grades K-5 NCTM Regional Conference &

Poll. How do you feel when someone says assessment? How do your students feel?

Grade 3 Science Life Unit (3.L.2)

1. Locate and describe major physical features and analyze how they influenced cultures/civilizations studied.

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

West Haven School District English Language Learners Program

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Summarize The Main Ideas In Nonfiction Text

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

4 th Grade Curriculum Essentials Document

Universal Design for Learning Lesson Plan

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

Foreign Languages. Foreign Languages, General

Secondary English-Language Arts

Transcription:

Differentiating Instruction and Assessment for ELLs Rebecca Freeman Field (rdfield@casloninc.com) Session Description This session is for mainstream and ESL teachers who have ELLs in their classes, and for the ESL/bilingual coordinators who are responsible for the professional development of all educators who work with ELLs. It draws on the WIDA ELP Standards, and shows teachers how to select appropriate instructional and assessment strategies for their ELLs at different English language proficiency levels. We also consider how other important factors (e.g., literacy in the first language, prior education, cultural differences) inform a teachers efforts to differentiate instruction for the ELLs in their classes. We highlight the importance of collaboration among ESL and mainstream educators so that ALL teachers who have ELLs in their classes have the knowledge and skills they need to ensure that ALL students, particularly ELLs, can participate and achieve. Agenda Before Content and language objectives During Essential questions for reflective practitioners Student can-do descriptors Student profiles Strategies for differentiating instruction and assessment After Taking it to your classrooms What stood out? What did you learn? What can you use? Content Objectives Participants will Describe what students at different ELP levels can be expected to do with R/W/L/S in English Identify factors beyond ELP level that influence an ELL s participation and achievement in class Explain how to use essential questions for reflective practitioners to guide selection of instructional and assessment strategies Identify appropriate instructional and assessment strategies for different ELLs that we find in our classrooms Articulate ways to use our role as leaders in ELL education to facilitate mainstream educators efforts to address the needs of their ELLs. Note: Content objectives are about the big ideas and should be more or less the same for all students. Language Objectives Participants will Use content-obligatory and content-compatible vocabulary orally and in writing o WIDA standards o Student can-do descriptors o ELP levels: Entering, beginning, developing, expanding, bridging o Conversational fluency/bics; Academic language proficiency/calp o Differentiated instruction; differentiated assessment Use oral and written language to identify, describe and explain. Note: Language objectives should be differentiated to address the language and literacy needs of students in the classroom. 1 Caslon Publishing

Essential Questions for Reflective Practitioners 1. Who are my ELLs? 2. What are my goals and objectives? 3. What is challenging about this unit/lesson/activity for the ELLs in my class? 4. What instructional strategies can I use to enable my ELLs to participate and achieve in this activity/lesson/unit/class/program? 5. What assessment strategies can I use to collect evidence of my ELLs learning? 6. How can we use evidence of student learning to a) drive instruction; b) foster collaboration among ESL/bilingual and mainstream teachers (drawing on expertise of ESL/bilingual staff); c) structure PD; and d) inform the development of authentic accountability for ELLs (i.e., document student growth over time)? Profiles of the ELLs in one fifth grade class is a Level 1 ELL from Brazil who speaks Brazilian Portuguese. Marco arrived in the United States earlier this year. The ESL teacher determined informally that Marco can read and write in Portuguese, but probably below grade level. According to the district s ESL placement test, Marco is a Level 1 Listening, Level 1 Speaking, Level 1 Reading, and Level 1 Writing. His levels are indicated on the Can-do descriptors in Figure 1 in blue. Julia is a Level 3 ELL who was born in the United States into a Mexican family that speaks mostly Spanish at home and in the neighborhood. Julia has attended school in the US since kindergarten, and she has been in pull-out ESL each year. There is no bilingual program at the school, and Julia has not learned to read and write in Spanish. According to the ACCESS for ELLs, Julia is a Level 5 Listening, Level 4 Speaking, Level 3 Reading, and Level 2 Writing. Her levels are indicated on the Can-do descriptors in Figure 1 in green. Hassan is a Level 3 ELL from Sudan who speaks Arabic. Hassan is a refugee and has been in the United States for two years. He had no formal schooling before coming to the United States, nor had he learned to read or write. When Hassan arrived, he was placed in a newcomer/port of entry class that focused on literacy and numeracy development, with attention to the cultural norms of US schools and society. According to the ACCESS for ELLs, Hassan is a Level 4 Listening and Speaking, and a Level 2 Reading and Writing. His levels are indicated on the Can-do descriptors in Figure 1 in purple. is a Level 3 ELL from India who speaks Gujarati. Amitabh arrived in the United States in the middle of last year. He has a strong educational background which included English instruction every year in India. However, Amitabh s English instruction gave him little opportunity to speak English at school, and he has had little exposure to American English prior to his arrival. According to the ACCESS for ELLs, Amitabh is a Level 2 Listening, Level 1 Speaking, Level 5 Reading, and Level 4 Writing. His levels are indicated on the Can-do descriptors in Figure 1 in red. A Sample of Julia s Writing Before deforestation. The rainforest is very beautiful and there are many trees and birds and animals. The habitat is very beautiful. After deforestation. They cut the trees and they make money but they kill the bird habitat and they kill the animal habitat and there are too many death. The habitat is destroy. They must not kill too many trees. 2 Caslon Publishing

For the given level of English language proficiency, with support, English language learners can: LISTENING SPEAKING READING WRITING Level 1 Entering Point to stated pictures, words, phrases Follow one-step oral directions Match oral statements to objects, figures or illustrations Name objects, people, pictures Answer WH- (who, what, when, where, which) questions ; Match icons and symbols to words, phrases or environmental print Identify concepts about print and text features Label objects, pictures, diagrams Draw in response to a prompt Produce icons, symbols, words, phrases to convey meaning Level 2 Beginning Sort pictures, objects according to oral instructions Follow two-step oral directions Match from oral descriptions to objects, illustrations Ask WH-questions Describe pictures, events, objects, people Restate facts Locate and classify Identify facts and explicit messages Select language patterns associated with facts Hassan Make lists Produce drawings, phrases, short sentences, notes Give requested from oral or written directions Julia; Hassan Level 3 Developing Locate, select, order from oral descriptions Follow multi-step oral directions Categorize or sequence oral pictures, objects Formulate hypotheses, make predictions Describe processes, procedures Sequence pictures, events, processes Identify main ideas Use context clues to determine meaning of words Julia Produce bare-bones expository or narrative texts Compare/contrast Describe events, people, processes, procedures Level 4 Expanding Compare/contrast functions, relationships from oral Analyze and apply oral Identify cause and effect from oral discourse Hassan Discuss stories, issues, concepts Give speeches, oral reports Offer creative solutions to issues, problems Julia; Hassan Interpret or data Find details that support main ideas Identify word families, figures of speech Summarize from graphics or notes Edit and revise writing Create original ideas or detailed responses 3 Caslon Publishing Level 5 Bridging Draw conclusions from oral Construct models based on oral discourse Make connections from oral discourse Julia Engage in debates Explain phenomena, give examples, and justify responses Express and defend points of view Conduct research to glean from multiple sources Draw conclusions from explicit and implicit text Apply to new contexts React to multiple genres and discourses Author multiple forms/genres of writing Variability of students cognitive development due to age, grade level spans, their diversity of educational experiences and diagnosed learning disabilities (if applicable), are to be considered in this. Figure 1: Focal ELLs placed on WIDA Can-do Descriptors for the Levels of English Language Proficiency, PreK-12 Key: ; Julia; Hassan; Level 6 Reaching

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Fully English Proficient Copy three words or phrases describing Marco Write three simple sentences occasional vocabulary describing Hassan; Julia Write three short paragraphs some vocabulary and simple/complex sentence structures describing Write a three-paragraph essay some vocabulary and complex sentence structures that describe Amitabh Write a three-paragraph essay demonstrating a variety of vocabulary and complex sentence structures that describe Write a three-paragraph essay grade-level vocabulary and sentence structures that describe Standards-Based Content or Topic (from the curriculum): features of the rain forest before and after deforestation Figure 2: Differentiating Assignment/Assessment Template for a fifth grade writing assignment differentiated by English language proficiency levels. Note: Marco, Julia, Hassan and Amitabh have been placed on the template according to the writing levels, and the scaffolding and support that the general education teacher plans to provide for fully English proficient students is included. Source: Fairbairn & Jones-Vo, 2010, reprinted and adapted with permission from Caslon Publishing. 4 Caslon Publishing

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Fully English Proficient onto a Venn diagram center, word and picture cards featuring pretaught vocabulary (to be used when labeling a Venn diagram), a chant to assist students in remembering key phrases and vocabulary a Venn diagram, a think-aloud demonstration of labeling, pictorially supported rain forest texts, realia related to rain forest products (e.g., fruit, medicinal plants, wood carvings), and photographs of forestation and deforestation to guide writing. center, pretaught vocabulary, a chant to assist students in remembering key phrases and vocabulary a Venn diagram, a think-aloud demonstration of paragraph writing, academic sentence frames posted in the classroom, pictorially supported rain forest texts, realia related to rain forest products (e.g., fruit, medicinal plants, wood carvings), and photographs of forestation and deforestation to guide writing. Julia; Hassan center, pretaught vocabulary, a Venn diagram, a chant to assist students in remembering key phrases and vocabulary a think-aloud demonstration of paragraph writing, academic sentence frames posted in the classroom, pictorially supported rain forest texts, and photographs of forestation and deforestation to guide writing. 5 Caslon Publishing Figure 3: support for focal activity differentiated according to English language proficiency levels (row 3 of differentiation template). Note: Marco, Julia, Hassan and Amitabh have been placed on the template according to their writing levels. Source: Fairbairn & Jones-Vo, 2010, reprinted and adapted with permission from Caslon Publishing.

Essential Questions for Reflective Practitioners: Think aloud protocol w/ notemaking guide Task: As you listen to the think-aloud, make notes about your class. Guiding questions 1. Who are my ELLs? Linguistic and cultural background Level of English language proficiency (reading, writing, listening, speaking) Literacy in first language Age and grade Educational background Interests, motivation, learning style 2. What are my goals? Content and ELP standards Other factors (e.g., personal, program, school, parental, community concerns/agendas) Big ideas/knowledge/skills of grade level/unit/lesson/activity Content objectives Language objectives 3. What is challenging about those goals/objectives for all students/my ELLs? Content Literacy English language proficiency (reading, writing, listening, speaking) Cultural Other? Notes for your class When I know the specific strengths and needs of my particular ELLs and I clearly identify my content objectives (for all students) and language objectives (differentiated according to ELP level and other important background factors), I can select appropriate strategies to build on their strengths, address their needs, and provide evidence of student learning. 4. What instructional strategies can I use to enable my ELLs to participate and achieve in this activity/lesson/unit/class/program? Use can-do descriptors as a guide Remember: an ELL s actual level is what they can-do independently. Target the next level for instruction. 6 Caslon Publishing

5. What assessment strategies can I use to collect evidence of my ELLs /all students learning? Performance-based assessments that yield formative data Use can-do descriptors as a guide Remember: an ELL s actual level is what they can-do independently. Use this level for evaluation. Target the next level for instruction. 6. How can we use evidence of student learning to a) drive instruction; b) foster collaboration among ESL/bilingual and mainstream teachers (drawing on expertise of ESL/bilingual staff); c) structure PD; and d) inform the development of authentic accountability for ELLs (i.e., document student growth over time)? Common formative and summative assessments Pivotal portfolio References by Caslon Publishing www.caslonpublishing.com Cloud, N., Lakin, J., Leininger, E., & Maxwell, L. (2010). Teaching Adolescent ELLs: Essential Strategies for Middle and High School. De Jong, E. (2011). Foundations for Multingualism in Education: from Principles to Practice. Fairbairn, S. & Jones-Vo, S. (2010). Differentiating Instruction and Assessment for ELLs: A Guide for K- 12 Teachers. Freeman, R. (2004). Building on Community Bilingualism. Gottlieb, M. & Nguyen, D. (2007). Assessment and Accountability in Language Education Programs: A Guide for Administrators and Teachers. Hamayan, E., Marler, B., Sanchez-Lopez, C. & Damico, J. (2007). Special Education Considerations for English Language Learners: Delivering a Continuum of Services. Hamayan, E. & Freeman, R. (2006). English Language Learners at School: A Guide for Administrators. Hamayan, E. & Freeman Field, R. (in preparation). English Language Learners at School: A Guide for Administrators. 2 nd Edition. Wright, W. (2010). Foundations for Teaching English Language Learners: Research, Theory, Policy, and Practice. 7 Caslon Publishing