Which /r/ are you using as an English teacher? rhotic or non-rhotic?

Similar documents
Demonstration of problems of lexical stress on the pronunciation Turkish English teachers and teacher trainees by computer

Chapter 5: Language. Over 6,900 different languages worldwide

Language. Name: Period: Date: Unit 3. Cultural Geography

Language and Tourism in Sabah, Malaysia and Edinburgh, Scotland

International Conference on Education and Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2012)

Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies

Eye Level Education. Program Orientation

Progressive Aspect in Nigerian English

ACCOMMODATING WORLD ENGLISHES IN DEVELOPING EFL LEARNERS ORAL COMMUNICATION

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ( 2015 )

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 ( 2014 ) WCLTA Using Corpus Linguistics in the Development of Writing

Twenty years of TIMSS in England. NFER Education Briefings. What is TIMSS?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report

Linguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1

Overall student visa trends June 2017

Consonants: articulation and transcription

Introduction Research Teaching Cooperation Faculties. University of Oulu

Conversions among Fractions, Decimals, and Percents

TIMSS Highlights from the Primary Grades

GEB 6930 Doing Business in Asia Hough Graduate School Warrington College of Business Administration University of Florida

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 )

Possessive have and (have) got in New Zealand English Heidi Quinn, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Teaching sentential intonation through Proverbs

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 ( 2014 ) CY-ICER Teacher intervention in the process of L2 writing acquisition

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) WCES 2012

Quality Framework for Assessment of Multimedia Learning Materials Version 1.0

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

James H. Williams, Ed.D. CICE, Hiroshima University George Washington University August 2, 2012

OCW Global Conference 2009 MONTERREY, MEXICO BY GARY W. MATKIN DEAN, CONTINUING EDUCATION LARRY COOPERMAN DIRECTOR, UC IRVINE OCW

Information Session on Overseas Internships Career Center, SAO, HKUST 1 Dec 2016

GREAT Britain: Film Brief

Language Center. Course Catalog

Athens: City And Empire Students Book (Cambridge School Classics Project) By Cambridge School Classics Project

Business Students. AACSB Accredited Business Programs

Universal contrastive analysis as a learning principle in CAPT

Fashion Design Program Articulation

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

5th Grade Unit Plan Social Studies Comparing the Colonies. Created by: Kylie Daniels

Setting the Scene and Getting Inspired

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

2014 Sociology GA 3: Examination

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

English-German Medical Dictionary And Phrasebook By A.H. Zemback

MATERIAL COVERED: TEXTBOOK: NOTEBOOK: EVALUATION: This course is divided into five main sections:

Chiaku Chukwuogor Ph.D. REFEREED PUBLICATIONS

Using interactive simulation-based learning objects in introductory course of programming

Development of a scoring system to assess mind maps

Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction

Philip Hallinger a & Arild Tjeldvoll b a Hong Kong Institute of Education. To link to this article:

A typical day at Trebinshun

MIAO WANG. Articles in Refereed Journals and Book Volumes. Department of Economics Marquette University 606 N. 13 th Street Milwaukee, WI 53233

5 Guidelines for Learning to Spell

Information Session 13 & 19 August 2015

European 2,767 ACTIVITY SUMMARY DUKE GLOBAL FACTS. European undergraduate students currently enrolled at Duke

Teachers development in educational systems

Curriculum Vitae. Paolo Sartori

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

Approved Foreign Language Courses

Iraqi EFL Students' Achievement In The Present Tense And Present Passive Constructions

Lower and Upper Secondary

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

NCU IISR English-Korean and English-Chinese Named Entity Transliteration Using Different Grapheme Segmentation Approaches

From Empire to Twenty-First Century Britain: Economic and Political Development of Great Britain in the 19th and 20th Centuries 5HD391

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Level: 5 TH PRIMARY SCHOOL

Arabic Orthography vs. Arabic OCR

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

Latin America: From Colonization To Globalization By Noam Chomsky

RELATIONS. I. Facts and Trends INTERNATIONAL. II. Profile of Graduates. Placement Report. IV. Recruiting Companies

Amin U. Sarkar. Cornell University/NY State United University Professions (UUP) Leadership Institute, 2001, New Paltz, New York

Journal title ISSN Full text from

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

University of New Orleans

Regional Capacity-Building on ICT for Development Item 7 Third Session of Committee on ICT 21 November, 2012 Bangkok

Advances in Aviation Management Education

The Journey to Vowelerria VOWEL ERRORS: THE LOST WORLD OF SPEECH INTERVENTION. Preparation: Education. Preparation: Education. Preparation: Education

Rachel E. Baker, Ann R. Bradlow. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

THE APPROVED LIST OF HUMANITIES-SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSES FOR ENGINEERING DEGREES

Management of time resources for learning through individual study in higher education

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Idaho Public Schools

Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Prodi

New Ways of Connecting Reading and Writing

Modern Languages. Introduction. Degrees Offered

Universities as Laboratories for Societal Multilingualism: Insights from Implementation

The Perception of Nasalized Vowels in American English: An Investigation of On-line Use of Vowel Nasalization in Lexical Access

REGIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING ON ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT

Agha, Asif 2003 The social life of cultural value, Language and Communication 23:

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

Abdul Rahman Chik a*, Tg. Ainul Farha Tg. Abdul Rahman b

English for Specific Purposes World ISSN Issue 34, Volume 12, 2012 TITLE:

Master s Degree Programme in East Asian Studies

Is M-learning versus E-learning or are they supporting each other?

Undergraduate Programs INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE STUDIES. BA: Spanish Studies 33. BA: Language for International Trade 50

Transcription:

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2659 2663 WCES 2012 Which /r/ are you using as an English teacher? rhotic or non-rhotic? Mehmet Demirezen * a Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Beytepe Campus, Ankara, Turkey Abstract There are many obvious differences between North American English (NAE) and British English (BrE) /r/ phoneme, and a great majority of Turkish English teachers do not know which variant of the /r/ they are using. It must be noted that such a case easily confuses the students. The articulation and production of North American English-r is ambiguous. In terms of articulation and pronunciation, NAE is also referred as General American (GA), and BrE is accepted as Received Pronunciation (RP). The American-r phoneme, whose IPA sign is, which is a retroflex case of pronunciation, also called a flap, represents a very serious setback in teaching standard American pronunciation to Turks. As opposed to this, the BrE-r is a tap whose articulation is very close to Turkish-r word-initially and intervocalically. Keywords: articulatory phonetics, flap, tap, retroflex, bunched-r. 2012 2012 Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. 1. Introduction Rhotic and non-rhotic are terms coined by the British phonetician John Wells (1982) for two kinds of spoken English as a fundamental contrastive feature. Received Pronunciation (RP) is a form of pronunciation of the English language, sometimes defined as the "educated spoken English of southeastern England". It is close to BBC English (the kind spoken by British newscasters) and it is represented in the pronunciation schemes of most British dictionaries. RP is rather a social accent and is not regional accent. It is associated, as a prestigious dialect, with the educated upper classes or with other people who have attended public schools for education in Britain. Accents of English can be either rhotic or non-rhotic. English pronunciation, both in Received pronunciation (RP) and General American(GA), can be split into two main accent groups: rhotic and non-rhotic. Rhotic accent (pronounced / /) speakers pronounce a rhotic consonant-r in words like car, bar, far, hard, farm, and first. Non-rhotic speakers, for example, speakers of British English (BrE) and Australian English do not articulate the /r/ in all of such words. That is, rhotic speakers articulate /r/ in all positions, while non-rhotic speakers pronounce /r/ only if it is followed by a vowel sound in the same phrase or prosodic unit as a "linking and intrusive r " in linguistic terms, non-rhotic accents are said to exclude the sound [r] from the syllable coda before a consonant or prosodic break. *Mehmet Demirezen. Tel.: 090. 312 297 8585 E-mail address: md49@hacettepe.edu.tr 1877-0428 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.542

2660 Mehmet Demirezen / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2659 2663 Whereas the sound represented by the- er in water is a schwa in non-rhotic accents like Received Pronunciation, in rhotic dialects like most of North American English, "-er" designates an r-colored schwa, [ ], which is pronounced like schwa, except the tongue is pulled back in the mouth and "bunched up". Thus, we use the term accents to refer to differences in pronunciations. Pronunciation can vary with cultures, regions and speakers, but there are two major standard varieties in English pronunciation: British English and American English. 2. The Basic Phonetic Structure of Rhotic Accent The pronunciation of English language in the World is also divided into two main accent groups, the rhotic and the non-rhotic, depending on when the phoneme /r/ is pronounced. Rhotic speakers pronounce written "r" in all positions: word-initially word-medially, and word-finally. 2.1. Non-rhotic Countries The main rhotic countries are USA (the northern and western states of the US apart from the Boston area and New York City), Canada, India, Ireland, south-western England, Scotland, and Barbados (MacArthur, 1998). North American English is rhotic; therefore, the "r" sound is always pronounced, with the notable exception of the Boston area and New York City. How non-rhoticism spread through the American southeast is a frequently asked question. A claim holds that these areas received British influence through sending their children to England for education. Another claim says that the speech of slaves played a sizeable role. 3. The Basic Phonetic Structure of Rhotic Accent In another set of accents, r-sound is pronounced in syllable-initial position (read, rain, rest, right, real) and intervocalically (error, mirror, terror, clearer), but not postvocalically (tar, speaker, heard, walker). In these positions it is vocalized (turned into a vowel) and not pronounced unless another vowel follows. Such a variety is variously known as non-rhotic, non-r-pronouncing, or r-less. 3.1. A Brief History of /r/ Articulation in England 4. The Celtic, Roman, Germanic (angles, Saxons, Frisians, and Jutes) languages were indeed rhotic and they have left a legacy in the English dialects. English officially starts when the Germanic tribes and their languages reach the British Isles in 449 (Gelderen, 2006: 1. It may have been an alveolar approximant [ ] as in most modern accents, an alveolar flap [ ], or an alveolar trill [r] (Hogg and David, 2006). In the 9th century, the Scandinavian and the Norman conquest in 1066 brought in audible trilled-r, which survived up to the 18 th century in England. 3. 2 Some Non-rhotic Countries It must be noted that in the spread of non-rhotic dialect England is primarily influential because England occupied the 2/3 of the whole World. Non-rhotic countries can be stated as follows: England apart, in the main, from the south-west; New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Black Africa, the Caribbean, except for Barbados ; the southern states, the Boston area of New England, and New York City vernacular speech; and Black English Vernacular in the US, and Wales (MacArthur, 1998). Non-rhotic speakers pronounce "r" only if it is followed by a vowel - rip, right, reader, room, cart, tar, part, etc. Once again, it must be noted that England is non-rhotic, apart from the southwestern England and some ever-diminishing northern areas. Scotland and Ireland are rhotic. In addition, in North America, old southern accents (i.e., by regions that were settled in the 18th century and are not as characterized by the Scotch Irish migration of the 19th Century), are generally non-rhotic. How non-rhoticism spread through the American southeast is an interesting issue. A view insists that England occupied the 2/3 of the whole world and imposed its language upon the local people. Another view holds that these

Mehmet Demirezen / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2659 2663 2661 areas received British influence through sending their children to England for education, and they had closer trading ties with the British before the Civil War. According to another view, the other the speech of slaves played a considerable role. 4. The Distribution of /r/ Accents in the World English is officially used as the first language in 53 countries. The following map demonstrates this fact: Figure 1: Map of spoken and written English in the world Figure 2: The distribution of rhotic non-rhotic In the following map, the articulation of /r/ as rhotic and non-rhotic is denoted. It must be noted too that this map does not show small details: in the Caribbean, for instance, most varieties of English are non-rhotic, but Barbados stands out as fully rhotic (Wells 1982:582-5). Urban Scottish accents may occasionally be non-rhotic, and residual areas of rhoticism may linger in the rhotic area of England shown below. Wells also mentions reports of rhoticism from South Island, New Zealand (606). This map also fails to show areas in Africa, India, and the Far East where English may be spoken as a first language: (languagehttp://notendur.hi.is/peturk/kennsla/02/top/rhoticity). 5. The Distribution of Rhotic and Non-Rhotic in England and Europe Celts were one of the first inhabitants of Europe; therefore, their rhotic language predominated the Europe. Figure (3) indicates this truth. The Celtic languages were indeed rhotic and they have left a legacy in the forthcoming English dialects. From the first century B.C through the fifth centuries A. D, Romans ruled over the land of England. The Roman Empire reigned in much of Europe until 476 A. D., Latin was a rhotic language whose-r was either an alveolar trill [r], like Spanish or Italian double /r/, or maybe an alveolar flap [ ], with a tap of the tongue against the upper gums. English officially starts when the Germanic tribes and their languages reach the British Isles in 449 (Gelderen, 2006: 1), but the exact nature of /r/ is not known. It may have been an alveolar approximant [ ] as in most modern accents, an alveolar flap [ ], or an alveolar trill [r] (Hogg and David, 2006). In the 9th century, the Scandinavian Vikings invaded England, who spoke Old Norse Old Norse language which is derived from the same ancestral Proto-Germanic language like Anglo-Saxon. The Norman conquest in 1066 over England brought in an enormous number of Norman form of French words that carried a highly audible trilled-r, which survived up to early Modern English period.

2662 Mehmet Demirezen / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2659 2663 Figure 3: Celtic, Germanic Viking, French Invasion and Rhotic Dialects in England 6. Status of Rhotic and Non-rhotic Dialects in North America After the internal migrations in the USA, the map of non-rhotic migrations can be presented as follows: The red areas are those where Labov, Ash, and Boberg (2006:48) found some non-rhotic pronunciation among some whites in major cities in the United States, AAVEinfluenced non-rhotic pronunciations may be found among African-Americans throughout the country. Figure 4: The regions of non-rhotic pronunciation in USA The population of USA is over 306 million as of 2009, at least 50-60 million of them speak non-rhotic English: these would include New Yorkers, many Southerners, and Blacks. In the United States, much of the South was once non-rhotic, but in recent decades non-rhotic speech has declined. Today, non-rhoticity in Southern American English is found primarily among older speakers, and only in some areas such as central and southern Alabama, Savannah, Georgia, and Norfolk, Virginia. Parts of New England, especially Boston, are non-rhotic as well as New York City and surrounding areas. African American Vernacular English (AAVE) is largely non-rhotic. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/rhotic_and_non-rhotic_accents). Canada has 33.6 million people, of whom English is the home language of 67%: that's about 22.5 million, all rhotic (http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t13115.htm). Canada is entirely rhotic except for small isolated areas in southwestern New Brunswick, parts of Newfoundland, and Lunenburg and Shelburne Counties, Nova Scotia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/rhotic_and_non-rhotic_accents. 7. The Distribution of Rhotic and Non-rhotic Accents in Asia and Other Parts of the World The English spoken in Asia, India, and the Philippines is predominantly rhotic. In the case of the Philippines, this may be explained because the English that is spoken there is heavily influenced by the American dialect. In addition,

Mehmet Demirezen / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 2659 2663 2663 many East Asians (in China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) who have a good command of English generally have rhotic accents because of the influence of American English. This excludes Hong Kong, whose RP English dialect is a result of it s almost 150-year-history as a British Crown colony (later British dependent territory). Other Asian regions with non-rhotic English are Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei. Spoken English in Myanmar is non-rhotic, but there are a number of English speakers with a rhotic or partially rhotic pronunciation (http://en Wikipedia. org/wiki/rhotic_and_non-rhotic_accents). The phenomenon of non-rhoticity can be found in some other languages as well, such as Malay. Malay in Malaysia (Bahasa Melayu, Bahasa Malaysia) is non-rhotic whilst Malay in Indonesia (Bahasa Indonesia) is distinctively rhotic. Indeed most southern Chinese languages like Hokkien, Teochew and Cantonese do not make use of /r/ at all, whereas northern Chinese languages like Mandarin make use of it extensively, so that some Singaporean versions of Mandarin are also non-rhotic (http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elltankw/history/phon/d.htm) 6. Conclusion Accents of English scattered in the world can be either rhotic or non-rhotic. A rhotic accent generally has an audible /r/ in pronunciation. A non-rhotic accent, however, does not have the /r/ in final or pre-consonantal positions (this is sometimes known as the post-vocalic /r/, although others use the more accurate, but perhaps more cumbersome term, the non-prevocalic /r/). What this means is that speakers of non-rhotic accents have this rule: if the <r> in the spelling does not occur before a vowel sound, don t pronounce it. (NOTE: vowel sound, not vowel letter). We can say that all English accents were rhotic up until the early Modern English Period and non-rhoticity was a relatively late development. It is said to have started in 18 th century as a prestige motive. What is particularly interesting about the non-prevocalic /r/ is that before it was lost, it affected the vowel preceding it. It did three kinds of things: (1) lengthened the preceding vowel sound; (2) changed the quality of the vowel sound; (3) caused diphthongization (http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elltankw /history/). Foreign learners from such backgrounds as the Romance languages and Arabic and those who have Network American as their pronunciation model tend to be rhotic. Foreign learners in Black Africa, and from China and Japan, as well as those who have RP (BBC English) as their model tend to be non-rhotic (MacArthur, 1998). There has been a general amalgamation of accents towards GA and loss of regional distinctiveness in the U.S. with the advent of television and cinema. The affinity is seen in the dialect of England whose rhotic dialects are being leveled to RP: this is still an on-going process. So, which type of /r/ are you using while teaching English, rhotic or non-rhotic? References Bauman-Waengler, J. (2009). Introduction to phonetics and phonology: From concepts to transcription. Boston: Pearson. Gelderen, E. V. (2006). A history of the English language: Amsterdam: John Benjamins publishing Company. Hogg, Richard; & Denison, David (eds.) (2006) A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter. Longman dictionary of American English. (2004). Pearson: Longman. Longman dictionary of contemporary American English. (2009). LDOCE5 Pearson. MacArthur, T. (1998). Concise Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Orton, H. et al. (1962-71). Survey of English dialects: Basic materials. (Vols 1-4). Leeds: E. J. Arnold & Son. Oxford English Dictionary. (2008). Retrieved from www.eod.com Trudgill, P. (1984). Language in the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wolfram, W & Johnson, R. (1982). Phonological analysis: Focus on American English. Englewood Cliffs, N. J: Prentice-Hall. Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 3: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t13115.htm http://courses.nus.edu.sg/course/elltankw/history/phon/d.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/rhotic_and_non-rhotic_accents http://mapweb.parc.xerox.com/map languagehttps://notendur.hi.is/peturk/kennsla/02/top/rhoticity.html