Sentence-picture matching task

Similar documents
The Perception of Nasalized Vowels in American English: An Investigation of On-line Use of Vowel Nasalization in Lexical Access

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

Summary / Response. Karl Smith, Accelerations Educational Software. Page 1 of 8

Lecture 2: Quantifiers and Approximation

Revisiting the role of prosody in early language acquisition. Megha Sundara UCLA Phonetics Lab

Sensitivity to second language argument structure

Effects of speaker gaze on spoken language comprehension: Task matters

Visual processing speed: effects of auditory input on

An Empirical and Computational Test of Linguistic Relativity

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

172_Primary 4 Comprehension & Vocabulary-7th Pass 07/11/14. Practice. Practice. Study the flyer carefully and then answer questions 1 8.

Eye Movements in Speech Technologies: an overview of current research

Aging and the Use of Context in Ambiguity Resolution: Complex Changes From Simple Slowing

Which verb classes and why? Research questions: Semantic Basis Hypothesis (SBH) What verb classes? Why the truth of the SBH matters

Linking object names and object categories: Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month-olds

An Evaluation of the Interactive-Activation Model Using Masked Partial-Word Priming. Jason R. Perry. University of Western Ontario. Stephen J.

Today we examine the distribution of infinitival clauses, which can be

Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form

Grade 3: Module 1: Unit 3: Lesson 5 Jigsaw Groups and Planning for Paragraph Writing about Waiting for the Biblioburro

Bitstrips for Schools: A How-To Guide

1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class

EVERY PICTURE TELLS A STORY

Jack Jilly can play. 1. Can Jack play? 2. Can Jilly play? 3. Jack can play. 4. Jilly can play. 5. Play, Jack, play! 6. Play, Jilly, play!

Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization

STUDENT APPLICATION FORM 2016

Paper presented at the ERA-AARE Joint Conference, Singapore, November, 1996.

Lower and Upper Secondary

Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: Evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory

Running head: DELAY AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY 1

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Theoretical Syntax Winter Answers to practice problems

Learning Lesson Study Course

Meaning and Motor Action

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 )

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain Imaging Reveals About the Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences

Manual Response Dynamics Reflect Rapid Integration of Intonational Information during Reference Resolution

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

UNDERSTANDING DECISION-MAKING IN RUGBY By. Dave Hadfield Sport Psychologist & Coaching Consultant Wellington and Hurricanes Rugby.

More ESL Teaching Ideas

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Presentation Format Effects in a Levels-of-Processing Task

Comparison Between Three Memory Tests: Cued Recall, Priming and Saving Closed-Head Injured Patients and Controls

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

The ABCs of FBAs and BIPs Training

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Science Fair Project Handbook

Cincinnati Country Day Middle School Parents Athletics Handbook

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Good Enough Language Processing: A Satisficing Approach

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Written by: YULI AMRIA (RRA1B210085) ABSTRACT. Key words: ability, possessive pronouns, and possessive adjectives INTRODUCTION

Iraqi EFL Students' Achievement In The Present Tense And Present Passive Constructions

International Undergraduate Application for Admission

Steps Before Step Scanning By Linda J. Burkhart Scripting by Fio Quinn Powered by Mind Express by Jabbla

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Running head: FINAL CASE STUDY, EDCI Addressing a Training Gap. Final Case Study. Anna Siracusa. Purdue University

Sensory-Friendly. Hallowe en in Greenfield Village. Social Narrative

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

School Uniform Policy. To establish guidelines for the wearing of school uniforms.

Cued Recall From Image and Sentence Memory: A Shift From Episodic to Identical Elements Representation

Falling on Sensitive Ears

Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?

Quarterly Progress and Status Report. Voiced-voiceless distinction in alaryngeal speech - acoustic and articula

Level 1 Mathematics and Statistics, 2015

Individual Differences & Item Effects: How to test them, & how to test them well

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

E-3: Check for academic understanding

The Werewolf Knight Drama. School Drama TM

Example answers and examiner commentaries: Paper 2

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

ASSISTIVE COMMUNICATION

Rwanda. Out of School Children of the Population Ages Percent Out of School 10% Number Out of School 217,000

The Good Judgment Project: A large scale test of different methods of combining expert predictions

Student Perceptions of Reflective Learning Activities

Young Enterprise Tenner Challenge

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Basic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars. Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

Improving Conceptual Understanding of Physics with Technology

Language acquisition: acquiring some aspects of syntax.

raıs Factors affecting word learning in adults: A comparison of L2 versus L1 acquisition /r/ /aı/ /s/ /r/ /aı/ /s/ = individual sound

Phenomena of gender attraction in Polish *

GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

Accreditation in Europe. Zürcher Fachhochschule

Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Human Comprehension. Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA

Unit 13 Assessment in Language Teaching. Welcome

Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Morphosyntactic and Referential Cues to the Identification of Generic Statements

Transcription:

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 Tracking the Acquisition & Processing of English s: Using Acoustic Cues to Disambiguate s & s English s & s s: Mary was pushing Bill (full active) Production: children never make mistakes Comprehension: children better than chance by 24 mos K. Stromswold*, J. Eisenband, E. Norland & J. Ratzan Dept. of Psychology & Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University * Correspondence to karin@ruccs.rutgers.edu Supported by F (BCS-9875168, BCS-42561, BCS-12495) s: Bill was pushed by Mary (by passive) Production: By passives rare in adult & child speech Comprehension: Children at or near chance until age 4. Processing: Even normal adults find passives harder Questions to be addressed Do children and adults process passives in the same way? Sentence-picture matching task When do they decide if a sentence is active or passive? : was push-ing the boy : was push-ed by the boy What cues do they use to decide a sentence is passive? : pushes the boy : was push-ed by the boy Why do children and aphasic adults do poorly on passives? : e.g., was pushing the boy : e.g., was pushed by the boy Stimuli Sentences (All pre-recorded & digitalized) 12 s: e.g., was pushing the boy 12 s: e.g., was pushed by the boy 3 Fillers (adults only) 14 Verb: The boy was touching/kissing the woman 16 Verb & Agent/Patient shift: The boy was touching the woman The woman was kissing the boy Verbs: touch,tickle, push, shove, kiss, sniff NP pairs: girl & boy; woman & man Design 6 verbs x Act/Psv x Adult/Child = 24 trials Also controlled/balanced for whether Target picture was on the left or the right Agent was to left or right of patient Agent was male or female Male or female character was mentioned first Sentences in pseudorandom order 1

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 Subjects Normal, native, monolingual English speakers Preschool: 17 children (3;1-4;8, mean 3;1) => Error rates, RTs School-age: 16 children (4;9-7;4, mean 5;8) => Error rates, RTs, Eye-movements College students: 23 adults => Error rates, RTs, Eye-movements Adult Trial CRITICAL TRIAL Fixation: Look at the cross Critical: Which picture shows was pushing the boy Distractor: Which picture shows The boy was wearing the blue shirt FILLER TRIAL Fixation: Look at the cross Filler: Which picture shows The boy was climbing the woman Distractor: Which picture shows The woman was wearing the blue shirt Child Trial TRAINING TRIALS One person: Which picture shows a man? Picture of man Picture of woman Action: Which picture shows kissing? Pic of girl touching boy Pic of girl kissing boy 2 people: Which picture shows a man and a woman? Pic of man pushing woman Pic of boy riding girl Accuracy: Preschoolers : 74%, : 58%, F(1, 15) = 5.79, p =.3 4 did significantly better on Act than Psv, 13 children no significant difference 5 above chance on Act & Psv, 6 above chance on Act but not Psv, 5 at chance on Act & Psv, 1 above chance on Act & below chance on Psv 3 yr olds: 61%, 4 yr olds: 71%, F(1, 15) = 2.99, p =.1 Verb: F(5, 75) = 2.26, p =.6 (push vs. shove, p =.6) CRITICAL TRIAL Fixation: Look at Woody Critical: Which picture shows was pushing the boy Reward: Cartoon on side of screen child chooses % correct 4 2 KISS SNIFF PUSH SHOVE TOUCH TICKLE Accuracy: School-Age & College Accuracy Rates School Age: 16 children (4;9-7;4) : 94%, : 78%, F(1, 14) = 9.56, p =.8 3 did significantly better on Act than Psv, 13 children no significant diff. 12 above chance on Act and Psv, 4 above chance on Act but not Psv No Effect of Age (5 yr : 82%, 6 yr : %, p >.1) No Effect of Verb (p >.1) % Correct 7 p <.5 p <.1 p <.5 College Age: 23 adults (18-25 years) : 99.6%, : 96%, F(1, 22) = 6.11, p =.2 No subjects did significantly better on actives than passives. All above chance on both active and passive No Effect of Verb (p >.1) 5 : was pushing the boy : was pushed by the boy 3;4 4;3 5;2 6;3 > 17 years 2

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 RTs for Correct Trials (Preschoolers) : 5289 msec, : 5739 msec F(1, 14) = 7.85, p =.1 Act/Psv x Age : F(1, 14) = 14.48, p =.2 62 RTs for Correct Trials (School Age) : 4313 msec, : 4953 msec F(1, 13) = 16.61, p =.1 Act/Psv x Age : F(1, 13) = 8.11, p =.1 52 5 RTs for Correct Trials 5 5 54 52 RTs for Correct Trials 4 4 44 42 4 5 3;4 4;3 Mean Age 3 5;2 6;3 Mean Age RTs for Correct Trials (College Age) 2289 msec & 2449 msec F(1, 22) = 29.4, p <.5 Verb: F(5, 11) = 4.85, p <.5 Act/Psv x Verb: F(5, 11) = 2.39, p =.4 RTs for Correct Trials 3 25 2 15 5 KISS SNIFF PUSH SHOVE TOUCH TICKLE RT (in msecs) 7 5 4 3 2 Reaction Times for Correct Trials p <.1 p <.5 : was pushing the boy : was pushed by the boy p <.5 3;4 4;3 5;2 6;3 > 17 years Eye-Movement Data Apparatus: I-Scan Mobile Eye-Tracker (3 frames/sec) Children: Head-mounted system Adults: Table top system Linking Hypothesis: People look at the picture that matches what (they think) a sentence means Coding: All data hand-coded. Which picture: Target or Competitor Picture [Within picture: Agent, Patient, Point of Contact, Else] Graphs: Track-loss & looks to cross eliminated Graphs depict means of subject means Mean Word Onsets (in frames) ACTIVE WORD OETS was pushing the boy 1 4.6 16.1 21.5 35.9 39. PASSIVE WORD OETS was pushed by the boy 1 4.4 15.9 21.5 34.3 38.5 41.8 3

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 Picture Eye-Tracking: Children's Data Child Data: Looks for Correct Trials ACTIVE PASSIVE.3 (correct trials) (correct trials).3 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 65 7 75 85 95.2 1 2 3 4 5 7 Child Data: Looks for Correct and Incorrect Trials Child Data: Looks for Correct and Incorrect Trials Correct s.3 Correct s.2 Incorrect s.3 Incorrect s.1 1 2 3 4 5 7.2 1 2 3 4 5 7 Picture Eye-Tracking: Adult Data Adult Data: Looks for Correct Trials (correct trials) (correct trials).3 1 2 3 4 5 7.3 1 2 3 4 5 7 4

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 Adult Data: Looks for Correct and Incorrect Trials s: Adult & Child Looks (All Trials) Correct s Adult s.2 Child s. 1 2 3 4 5 Incorrect s 7 1 2 3 4 5 7 s: Adult and Child Looks (Correct Trials Only) s: Adult & Child Looks (All Trials) Adult s Adult s Child s Child s 1 2 3 4 5 7 1 2 3 4 5 7 s: Adult and Child Looks (Correct Trials Only) Duration of Morphemes in s & s Adult s Child s Duration (in msec).3.2.1 p =.2 p <.5 p <.5 p =.5 1 2 3 4 5 7. The woman was kiss ing/ed the man 5

Stromswold et al. (22) Tracking the Acquisition & to Disambiguate s & s March 21-23, 22 Duration in msec.3.2.1. Verb Stem Durations in s & s shove sniff kiss touch tickle push Conclusions Children and adults process passives in different ways Adults: process on-line. No active bias. Children: process off-line. Have an active bias. They begin to decide a sentence is active at different points Adults: at or before the verb stem (i.e., before participle) Children: at or after the progressive participle They begin to decide a sentence is passive at different points Adults: at the passive participle Children: after the sentence is over Only adults appear to use early acoustic cues to disambiguate Perhaps this partially explains why young children (and aphasics) do poorly on passives 6