Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills

Similar documents
Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Newlands Girls School

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Eastbury Primary School

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Putnoe Primary School

Oasis Academy South Bank

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

Qualification handbook

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

5 Early years providers

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi

Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

Post-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

GCSE Results: What Next? Ü Ü. Norfolk County Council. Are your results better or worse than expected?

Qualification Guidance

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011

Liverpool Hope University ITE Partnership Handbook

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Practice Learning Handbook

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

An APEL Framework for the East of England

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Practice Learning Handbook

Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire

ADULT & COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE

The University of British Columbia Board of Governors

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

Charging and Remissions Policy. The Axholme Academy. October 2016

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

ROC Mondriaan Student Charter

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

London School of Economics and Political Science. Disciplinary Procedure for Students

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

St Matthew s RC High School

EDUCATION AND TRAINING (QCF) Qualification Specification

Inspection report British International School

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Apprenticeships in. Teaching Support

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

The Waldegrave Trust Waldegrave School, Fifth Cross Road, Twickenham, TW2 5LH TEL: , FAX:

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND SCHOLARSHIP POLICY

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

SOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

OCR Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector Qualification Units

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

Programme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Level 3 Diploma in Health and Social Care (QCF)

School Complaints Policy

Services for Children and Young People

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Archdiocese of Birmingham

MATHS Required September 2017/January 2018

NCFE - Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Training Evaluation and Impact Framework 2017/19

Subject Inspection of Mathematics REPORT. Marian College Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 Roll number: 60500J

Transcription:

Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills For use from September 2012 The was devised by Her Majesty s Chief Inspector, in line with the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It summarises the judgements inspectors will make during inspection. Age group: 16+ (14 16 provision in colleges) Published: June 2012 Reference no: 120062

The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. This publication is available at www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/120062. Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user. Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk No. 120062 Crown copyright 2012

Contents Introduction 4 Principles of inspection and regulation 4 Provision inspected under the Common Inspection Framework 5 The grading scale for inspection judgements 5 The Common Inspection Framework 2012 6 Overall effectiveness 6 Outcomes for learners 6 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment 6 Effectiveness of leadership and management 7 Working together 7 Code of conduct for inspectors 7 Expectations of providers 8 Complaints about inspections and regulation visits 8 Terms used in the framework 9 Annex A. Structure of grades 11

Introduction The was devised by Her Majesty s Chief Inspector in line with the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It sets out the principles that apply to further education and skills inspections under part 8 of the Act, the structure of the inspection, and the key aspects we make judgements against. This document is a summary of the key features of the full Common Inspection Framework. The framework is published in full as part of the Handbook for the inspection of further education and skills. 1 The handbook has two parts. Part 1 is guidance for inspectors and providers on the preparation for, and conduct of, inspections. Part 2 is the full framework and evaluation schedule, and guidance on how inspectors will use the Common Inspection Framework to make judgements and award the main and contributory grades. Principles of inspection and regulation The principles of inspection and regulation reflect Ofsted s values and ensure that we carry out our statutory duties efficiently and effectively. The principles focus on the interests of service users children, young people, parents, adult learners and employers. They promote improvement in the services we inspect or regulate, and value for money. They also take full account of our policies on equality and diversity. All inspections carried out by us or on our behalf must: support and promote improvement be proportionate focus on the needs of users focus on the needs of providers be transparent and consistent be accountable demonstrate value for money. 1 Handbook for the inspection of further education and skills (120061), Ofsted, 2012; www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/120061. 4

Provision inspected under the Common Inspection Framework The Common Inspection Framework applies to the inspection of provision either wholly or partly funded by the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) or Education Funding Agency (EFA) 2 in: further education colleges, sixth form colleges and independent specialist colleges independent learning providers: companies community learning and skills providers: local authorities, special designated institutions and not-for-profit organisations employers higher education institutions providing further education providers of learning in the judicial services. The different types of provision inspected under the Common Inspection Framework for learners aged 16 18 and 19+, and learners aged 14 16 in colleges only, are: apprenticeships, access to apprenticeships and national vocational qualifications offered in the workplace community learning National Careers Service careers advice and guidance learning programmes leading to a qualification learning provision in the judicial services employability programmes foundation learning. The grading scale for inspection judgements This four-point grading scale will be used in all inspections to make principal judgements: grade 1: outstanding grade 2: good grade 3: requires improvement grade 4: inadequate. 2 The Common Inspection Framework does not apply to provision wholly funded by the European Social Fund (ESF). We don t inspect this type of provision. 5

The Common Inspection Framework 2012 The Common Inspection Framework lists the principal questions that inspectors must ask every education and training provider. The inspectors make a judgement on adequacy from the two categories: adequate and inadequate. A provider will be deemed to be inadequate if it is graded inadequate for Overall effectiveness. For all other grades, the provider is deemed adequate. Overall effectiveness The judgement on Overall effectiveness is based on how effective and efficient the provider is in meeting the needs of learners and other users, and why. Inspectors will use all the available evidence and take into account judgements on: Outcomes for learners Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Effectiveness of leadership and management. Outcomes for learners Inspectors will make a judgement on Outcomes for learners by evaluating the extent to which: all learners achieve and make progress relative to their starting points and learning goals achievement gaps are narrowing between different groups of learners learners develop personal, social and employability skills learners progress to courses leading to higher-level qualifications and into jobs that meet local and national needs. Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inspectors will make a judgement on the Quality of teaching, learning and assessment by evaluating the extent to which: 6 learners benefit from high expectations, engagement, care, support and motivation from staff staff use their skills and expertise to plan and deliver teaching, learning and support to meet each learner s needs staff initially assess learners starting points and monitor their progress, set challenging tasks, and build on and extend learning for all learners learners understand how to improve as a result of frequent, detailed and accurate feedback from staff following assessment of their learning teaching and learning develop English, mathematics and functional skills, and support the achievement of learning goals and career aims

appropriate and timely information, advice and guidance supports learning effectively equality and diversity are promoted through teaching and learning. Effectiveness of leadership and management Inspectors will make a judgement on the Effectiveness of leadership and management by evaluating the extent to which leaders, managers and, where applicable, governors: demonstrate an ambitious vision, have high expectations for what all learners can achieve, and attain high standards of quality and performance improve teaching and learning through rigorous performance management and appropriate professional development evaluate the quality of the provision through robust self-assessment, taking account of users views, and use the findings to promote and develop capacity for sustainable improvement successfully plan, establish and manage the curriculum and learning programmes to meet the needs and interests of learners, employers and the local and national community actively promote equality and diversity, tackle bullying and discrimination, and narrow the achievement gap safeguard all learners. Working together Code of conduct for inspectors Inspectors must uphold the highest professional standards in their work and treat everyone they encounter during inspections fairly and with respect. Inspectors must: evaluate objectively, be impartial and inspect without fear or favour evaluate provision in line with frameworks, national standards or requirements base all evaluations on clear and robust evidence have no connection with the provider that could undermine their objectivity report honestly and clearly, ensuring that judgements are fair and reliable carry out their work with integrity, treating all those they meet with courtesy, respect and sensitivity try to minimise the stress on those involved in the inspection act in the best interests and well-being of service users 7

maintain purposeful and productive dialogue with those being inspected, and communicate judgements clearly and frankly respect the confidentiality of information, particularly about individuals and their work respond appropriately to reasonable requests take prompt and appropriate action on any safeguarding or health and safety issues. Expectations of providers So that inspection and regulation are productive and beneficial, it is important that inspectors and providers establish and maintain a working environment based on courtesy and professional behaviour. Inspectors will uphold the code of conduct and Ofsted expects providers to: be courteous and professional apply their own codes of conduct in their dealings with inspectors enable inspectors to conduct their visit in an open and honest way enable inspectors to evaluate the provision objectively against the standards/framework provide evidence that will enable the inspector to report honestly, fairly and reliably about their provision work with inspectors to minimise disruption, stress and bureaucracy ensure the health and safety of inspectors while on their premises maintain a purposeful dialogue with the inspector or the inspection team draw any concerns about the inspection to the attention of inspectors promptly and in a suitable manner respect that inspectors will need to observe practice and talk to staff and users without the presence of a manager or registered person. Complaints about inspections and regulation visits If providers or interested parties are dissatisfied with some aspect of their inspection, Ofsted s complaints procedure sets out how they can complain, and what will happen with their complaint. 3 3 Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted (070080), Ofsted, 2010; www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/070080. 8

Terms used in the framework Activity Aspect Employerbased provision Foundation learning Inspection services provider Learner Learning programmes Learning One of the range of activities that a learner may take part in, including taught sessions, training, assessments, reviews of progress, coaching and job search, both on and off the provider s premises. Term used to describe one of the main areas of the Common Inspection Framework. These are: Outcomes for learners; Quality of teaching, learning and assessment; and Effectiveness of leadership and management. Employer-based provision includes apprenticeships, and NVQs delivered wholly or partially in the workplace. Programmes that support achievement and progression through entry level and level 1 towards level 2 or, as appropriate, towards other destinations such as open, supported or voluntary employment, further education or training and increased levels of independence. Inspection services providers are external organisations contracted by Ofsted to provide Additional Inspectors, administrative support on inspection, the collation of pre-inspection information for inspectors via a portal, quality assurance and production of reports, and post-inspection evaluation by providers. A person seeking information or advice on learning opportunities or employment, and taking part in education, training and development programmes or activities, including student, apprentice, participant, client and customer. Learning programmes provision covers further education programmes in school sixth forms, colleges and other providers for learners above the compulsory school-leaving age, who have not yet reached 19 years of age at the start of an academic year where the main aim is a vocational or academic qualification. Gaining of knowledge and understanding, and development of skills and attributes that lead to the attainment of learning goals, including qualifications. Nominee Provider Provision RARPA Record of main findings The nominee is a senior member of staff from the provider who is the key link between the provider and the inspection team. Any organisation, including consortium or partnership, involved in providing information and advice services, education, training or development programmes or activities, including colleges, independent training providers, local authorities, voluntary organisations and employers. The range and type of learning programmes available. A process for recognising and recording progress and achievement for nonaccredited learning. A template for recording grades awarded for the aspects of the Common Inspection Framework, the provision as a whole and for the different types of provision. The record of main findings is published as part of the inspection report. 9

Tariff for inspection User Employability programmes The tariff for inspection refers to the number of inspector days allocated to that inspection. It consists of preparation days for HMIs, on-site days for HMIs and Additional Inspectors, and post-inspection days for report writing. Young people, adult learners and employers, parents and carers. Short learning programmes aiming to get unemployed learners into work. Terms used for the unemployed on benefits include: work related activity group (WRAG), jobseekers allowance (JSA) and employment support allowance (ESA). 10

Annex A. Structure of grades Overall effectiveness Outcomes for learners Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Effectiveness of leadership and management 11