Fall 2014 ENGL 1 Waiver Students By Daniel Javier Berumen, MPA

Similar documents
STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Educational Attainment

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

46 Children s Defense Fund

Raw Data Files Instructions

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Transportation Equity Analysis

University of Arizona

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Shelters Elementary School

Bellevue University Admission Application

Idaho Public Schools

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation


12-month Enrollment

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Financial aid: Degree-seeking undergraduates, FY15-16 CU-Boulder Office of Data Analytics, Institutional Research March 2017

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

African American Male Achievement Update

HIGH SCHOOL PREP PROGRAM APPLICATION For students currently in 7th grade

Queens University of Charlotte

Serving Country and Community: A Study of Service in AmeriCorps. A Profile of AmeriCorps Members at Baseline. June 2001

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Foothill College: Academic Program Awards and Related Student Headcount, to

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

A Diverse Student Body

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

Best Colleges Main Survey

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Profile of BC College Transfer Students admitted to the University of Victoria

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

School of Engineering Foothill College Transfer Guide

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

Western Australia s General Practice Workforce Analysis Update

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

A Guide to Finding Statistics for Students

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

University of Maine at Augusta Augusta, ME

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION Legislative Counsel Bureau and Nevada Legislature 401 S. Carson Street Carson City, NV Equal Opportunity Employer

Access Center Assessment Report

The following resolution is presented for approval to the Board of Trustees. RESOLUTION 16-

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE COLLEGE CHOICE PROCESS FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS. Melanie L. Hayden. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the

Spanish Users and Their Participation in College: The Case of Indiana

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Australia s tertiary education sector

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Effective practices of peer mentors in an undergraduate writing intensive course

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Transcription:

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH RESEARCH BRIEF 828 August 2015 Fall 2014 s By Daniel Javier Berumen, MPA Introduction ENGL 21A is a Basic Skills course that is two levels below the transfer level course. s on a traditional pathway enroll into ENGL 21B (English Fundamentals 2) or ENGL 22 (Writing Laboratory) after successfully completing ENGL 21A. However, based on faculty recommendation, some students who complete ENGL 21A are given a waiver that allows them to skip ENGL 21B/ENGL 22 and enroll directly into. The current research brief describes the preliminary findings of a study to identify if there have been significant changes to the success of Santa Monica College (SMC) students who enrolled directly into (Reading and Composition) after the completion of ENGL 21A (English Fundamentals 1). A report completed by the Office of Institutional Research (Research Brief #633) in the fall 2014 term, showed that students who received a waiver had higher enrollment and success rates than students who followed the traditional pathway. As a result, changes were implemented by the English department to increase the number of students who receive an waiver. This brief contains the enrollment and success data for students who completed ENGL 21A in the fall 2014 term, and were given a waiver to enroll in under the new guidelines. Data were obtained from the California Community College Chancellor s Office (CCCCO) Management Information System (MIS) database and SMC s internal MIS system. s The following section describes the percentage of students who successfully completed ENGL 21A in the fall 2014 term and received a waiver to enroll directly into (waiver rate). The comparison group in these tables is the count of students who received waivers during the fall 2011-2013 terms. Table 1. s by Term Term Completed ENGL 21A Fall 2011-2013 4,041 863 21.4% Fall 2014 1,236 431 34.9% Total 5,277 1,294 24.5%

About 35% of students who successfully completed ENGL 21A in the fall 2014 term received a waiver to enroll in. This is an increase of 13.5% compared to the percentage of students who received a waiver during the fall 2011-2013 terms. Gender Table 2. s by Gender. Female 2,159 516 23.9% 670 271 40.4% +16.5% Male 1,882 347 18.4% 566 160 28.3% +9.8% Total 4,041 863 21.4% 1,236 431 34.9% +13.5% Females continued to receive waivers at a higher rate (a difference of 12.1%) than male students after the changes in the waiver policy were enacted. Ethnicity* Table 3. s by Ethnicity/Race. Asian/PI 359 88 24.5% 94 48 51.1% 26.6% Black 452 83 18.4% 125 29 23.2% 4.8% Hispanic 2432 426 17.5% 741 218 29.4% 11.9% Native American 4 * * 1 * * * White 127 37 29.1% 39 14 35.9% 6.8% 2 or more 618 222 35.9% 226 117 51.8% 15.8% Unknown 49 6 12.2% 10 * * * Total 4041 863 21.4% 1236 431 34.9% 13.5% *Percentages that include less than 10 students were excluded from the tables The data reveal that Asian/Pacific Islander students had the largest increase in their waiver rate at 26.6%. With the change in waiver policy, their waiver rates are almost identical to White students (51.1% and 51.8% respectively). While the changes in the waiver policy resulted in an increase in the waiver rate for Black and Hispanic students, they still received disproportionately fewer waivers than White and Asian students.

Age Group 19 and younger Table 4. s by Age Group. 3,256 675 20.7% 1,030 353 34.3% +13.5% 20 to 24 540 131 24.3% 148 52 35.1% +10.9% 25 to 29 118 34 28.8% 35 18 51.4% +22.6% 30 to 39 54 13 24.1% 17 6 35.3% +11.2% 40 to 49 25 7 28.0% 3 * * * 50 and up 20 2 10.0% 2 * * * Total* 4,041 863 21.4% 1,236 431 34.9% +13.5% *Total includes students with an unreported age Enrollment Status First Time First Time Transfer Returning Continuing Special Admit Table 5. s by Enrollment Status. 3,115 656 21.1% 1,019 359 35.2% +14.2% 241 66 27.4% 72 23 31.9% +4.6% 126 30 23.8% 33 14 42.4% +18.6% 554 109 19.7% 108 33 30.6% +10.9% 5 * * 4 * * * Total 4,041 863 21.4% 1,236 431 34.9% +13.5% The data reveal that students in the 25-29 age group had the largest increase in waiver rates, with an increase of about 23%. In regards to enrollment status, returning students (which are students who return after an absence of one or more primary terms) had an 18.6% increase in their waiver rate.

ENGL 21A Grade Table 6. s by ENGL 21A Grade. A 1,093 623 57.0% 353 276 78.2% +21.2% B 1,623 184 11.3% 477 130 27.3% +15.9% C 1,319 54 4.1% 403 25 6.2% +2.1% P 6 * * 3 * * * Total 4,041 863 21.4% 1,236 431 34.9% +13.5% s who earned an A in their ENGL 21A class had a 21.2% increase in their waiver rate. These students make up the majority of students who receive waivers. The following table contains the waiver rates for students who earned an A in the course by ethnicity. Ethnicity Table 7. s for s who earned an A in ENGL 21A Asian/PI 117 66 56.4% 41 35 85.4% +29.0% Black 99 54 54.5% 25 18 72.0% +17.5% Hispanic 584 298 51.0% 177 130 73.4% +22.4% Native American 1 * * 1 * * * White 40 30 75.0% 11 9 81.8% +6.8% 2 or more 237 170 71.7% 93 80 86.0% +14.3% Unknown 15 5 33.3% 5 * * * Total 1,093 623 57.0% 353 276 78.2% +21.2% Of students who earned an A in ENGL 21A, Asian/PI students had the largest increase in their waiver rate, at 29%. As with the results in table 3, this group of students received waivers at a rate similar to White students (85.4% and 81.8% respectively). Black and Hispanic students who earned an A in ENGL 21A received waivers at disproportionately lower rates than Asian/PI and White students. The following section describes the course outcomes of selected students from the ENGL 21A cohort. The tables are divided by course entry method; those who enrolled in via waiver (direct enrollment) vs. those who enrolled in ENGL 21B or ENGL 22 prior to enrollment (traditional enrollment). The latter group includes 14 students who received a waiver to, but instead enrolled in ENGL 21B or ENGL 22 prior to their spring enrollment 1. 1 Research Brief 633 addresses the differences in success rates for this type of ENGL 21A student

In order to better evaluate the relationship between entry method and success, only the first attempt in was included in the analyses. Additionally, only students enrolled in by at least the spring term after their fall ENGL 21A enrollment are included. The following tables contain the grade point average () and success rates of students in their first course after completion of ENGL 21A. rates are calculated by taking the number of A, B, C and P grades and dividing that number by the total enrollment. is calculated by assigning a numerical value to A, B, C, D and F grades from four to zero, respectively. Table 8. Outcomes by Term. Term Fall 2011-2013 287 2.46 74.9% 572 3.01 85.7% Fall 2014 151 2.64 71.5% 344 2.86 75.6% Fall 2014 direct enrollment students had a higher and a higher overall success rate in when compared to traditional enrollment students. The gap between the two is smaller than it was for the fall 2011-2013 cohort. Additionally, the and success rates for the fall 2014 direct enrollment students are lower than the fall 2011-2013 direct enrollment students. Completion While the previous section contained information about how well students performed in their first ENGL 1 course, the following tables look at the total number of students who completed. The following table contains the count of ENGL 21A students who successfully completed by the end of following spring term. This table includes students who may have repeated after attempting the course during the winter term. Cohort Table 9. Completion s by Terms fully fully Completed ENGL Completed ENGL 21A 1 by end of Spring Completion Fall 2011-2013 4,041 705 17.4% Fall 2014 1,236 377 30.5% The fall 2014 cohort had an completion rate that was 13.1% higher than the previous three fall terms (2011-2013).

Table 10. Average Number of Completers by Type of Enrollment Cohort Traditional Enrollment Direct Enrollment Total Fall 2011-2013 (Average) 71.7 163.3 235.0 Fall 2014 108 269 377 The number of completers increased in fall 2014 for students who took both the traditional and direct enrollment route, compared to the average number of completers for fall 2011-2013. There were about 106 more direct enrollment completers in the fall 2014 term than the average for fall 2011-2013. Summary The research brief reported on data for 1,236 students who successfully completed ENGL 21A during the fall 2014 term. Of these students, 431 (34.9%) received waivers which allowed them to enroll directly into rather than having to enroll in ENGL 21B or ENGL 22 beforehand. The waiver rate for fall 2014 ENGL 21A students was 13.5% higher than the waiver rate for the previous three fall terms. Approximately 52% of Asian/PI and White students received a waiver to enroll directly into. In comparison only 23.2% of Black students and 29.4% of Hispanic students received a waiver. s from the fall 2014 cohort who enrolled directly into had a higher and success rate in when compared to students who enrolled in either ENGL 21B or ENGL 22 first. s from the fall 2014 cohort who enrolled directly into had a lower and success rate than students who directly enrolled during the fall 2011-2013 terms. The completion rate for the fall 2014 cohort of ENGL 21A students was almost double that of the fall 2011-2013 cohort (30.5% and 17.4%, respectively).

Appendix A: Fall 2014 Cohort s and s 1. and by Gender Gender Female 85 2.54 65.9% 223 2.85 75.8% Male 66 2.76 78.8% 121 2.87 80.2% Total 151 2.64 71.5% 344 2.86 77.3% 2. and by Ethnicity Ethnicity Asian/PI 8 2.86 87.5% 42 2.95 78.6% Black 18 2.08 44.4% 23 2.47 69.6% Hispanic 99 2.59 71.7% 172 2.55 70.3% 2 or more 3 -- -- 14 3.08 85.7% White 20 3.06 80.0% 91 3.42 91.2% Unknown 3 -- -- 2 -- -- Total 151 2.64 71.5% 344 2.86 77.3% 3. and by Age Group Age Group 19 and younger 135 2.65 71.9% 286 2.86 79.4% 20 to 24 11 2.38 54.5% 41 2.68 58.5% 25 to 29 3 3.00 100.0% 13 3.09 84.6% 30 to 39 2 3.00 100.0% 4 3.25 100.0% Total 151 2.64 71.5% 344 2.86 77.3%

4. and by Enrollment Status Enrollment Status First Time First Time Transfer Returning Continuing 136 2.63 70.6% 296 2.85 78.4% 6 2.83 83.3% 17 2.50 64.7% 1 3.00 100.0% 11 3.11 81.8% 8 2.57 75.0% 19 3.14 68.4% Special Admit 1 4.00 100.0% Total 151 2.64 71.5% 344 2.86 77.3%

Appendix B: Fall 2014 ENGL 20 s 1. Data Summary for Fall 2014 ENGL 20 Completers fully Completed ENGL 20 183 to enroll in 79 43.2% Enrolled in (by Spring 2015) 64 Enrollment 81.0% (First Attempt) 64.1% (First Attempt) 2.50 Completed (by end of Spring 2015) 41 Completion 51.9%