Modern Languages Performance talking General assessment information

Similar documents
Science in the Environment: Living Things (National 1)

Information System Design and Development (Advanced Higher) Unit. level 7 (12 SCQF credit points)

Environmental Science: Earth s Resources (National 3) level 3 (6 SCQF credit points)

level 5 (6 SCQF credit points)

Human Biology: Physiology and Health (Higher) Unit. level 6 (6 SCQF credit points)

1 Use complex features of a word processing application to a given brief. 2 Create a complex document. 3 Collaborate on a complex document.

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Software Development: Programming Paradigms (SCQF level 8)

November 2012 MUET (800)

Qualification handbook

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

Lower and Upper Secondary

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

One Stop Shop For Educators

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

2 Higher National Unit credits at SCQF level 8: (16 SCQF credit points at SCQF level 8)

Fashion and Textile Technology, Health and Food Technology, Hospitality: Practical Cake Craft and Hospitality: Practical Cookery

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Practice Learning Handbook

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

Practice Learning Handbook

SOFTWARE EVALUATION TOOL

PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

Qualification Guidance

Directorate Children & Young People Policy Directive Complaints Procedure for MOD Schools

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

2. YOU AND YOUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Spreadsheet software UBU104 F/502/4625 VRQ. Learner name: Learner number:

Secondary English-Language Arts

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

REVIEW OF CONNECTED SPEECH

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Applying Speaking Criteria. For use from November 2010 GERMAN BREAKTHROUGH PAGRB01

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Wheelchair Rugby. The performance of skills and techniques in isolation/unopposed situations

Jazz Dance. Module Descriptor.

Level 3 Diploma in Health and Social Care (QCF)

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

MMOG Subscription Business Models: Table of Contents

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

10: The use of computers in the assessment of student learning

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

Handbook for Teachers

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

Accreditation of Prior Experiential and Certificated Learning (APECL) Guidance for Applicants/Students

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

Deal with substances hazardous to health

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

9779 PRINCIPAL COURSE FRENCH

Assessment and Evaluation

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

CX 101/201/301 Latin Language and Literature 2015/16

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Foundation Certificate in Higher Education

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

This publication is also available for download at

Exhibition Techniques

Digital Media Literacy

Learning and Teaching

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

SECTION 12 E-Learning (CBT) Delivery Module

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

EDUCATION AND TRAINING (QCF) Qualification Specification

: USING RUBRICS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS

Transcription:

Modern Languages Performance talking General assessment information This pack contains general assessment information for centres preparing candidates for the performance Component of Advanced Higher Modern Languages Course assessment. It must be read in conjunction with the specific assessment task(s) for this Component of Course assessment, which may only be downloaded from SQA s designated secure website by authorised personnel. Valid from session 2015/16 and until further notice This edition: March 2015 (version 1.0) The information in this publication may be reproduced to support SQA qualifications. This publication must not be reproduced for commercial or trade purposes. This material is for use by assessors. Scottish Qualifications Authority 2015

Contents Introduction 1 What this assessment covers 2 Assessment 3 General Marking Instructions 5

Introduction This is the general assessment information for Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking. The performance is worth 50 marks out of a total of 200 marks. This is 25% of the overall marks for the Course assessment. The Course will be graded A D. Marks for all Course Components are added up to give a total Course assessment mark which is then used as the basis for grading decisions. This is one of four Components of Course assessment. The other Components are a Reading and Translation question paper and a Listening and Discursive Writing question paper, and a portfolio. The performance requires candidates to take part in a discussion with a Visiting Assessor. During the discussion candidates will talk about themes or topics related to at least one context from society, learning, employability or culture and the candidate s specialist study of literature, media or language in work. This document describes the general requirements for the assessment of the performance Component for this Course. It gives general information and instructions for Visiting Assessors. It must be read in conjunction with the Assessment task for this Component of Course assessment. Equality and inclusion This Course assessment has been designed to ensure that there are no unnecessary barriers to assessment. Assessments have been designed to promote equal opportunities while maintaining the integrity of the qualification. For guidance on assessment arrangements for disabled candidates and/or those with additional support needs, please follow the link to the Assessment Arrangements web page: www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/14977.html Guidance on inclusive approaches to delivery and assessment in this Course is provided in the Course/Unit Support Notes. Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 1

What this assessment covers This assessment contributes 25% of the total marks for the Course. The assessment will assess the skills, knowledge and understanding specified for the performance in the Course Assessment Specification. These are: the ability to use complex and sophisticated spoken language, in the modern language, as part of a discussion the ability to take part effectively in a discussion the ability to use language accurately to convey meaning in the modern language the ability to maintain interaction as appropriate to purpose Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 2

Assessment Purpose The purpose of this assessment is to generate evidence for the Added Value of this Course by means of a performance talking. Assessment overview The performance will be a face-to-face discussion between the Visiting Assessor and the candidate. The marks awarded by the Visiting Assessor will be added to the candidates marks for the external question papers to form an overall award for the candidate. Centres will be required to provide details of the themes and topics studied by the candidate, and the focus of the candidate s specialist study, in advance of the performance. The Visiting Assessor will use a range of techniques to allow the candidate to demonstrate their ability to sustain a discussion. The assessment will take approximately 20 minutes. The performance will be audio-recorded by the Visiting Assessor and will be assessed in line with the Marking Instructions and General Marking Principles. Assessment conditions This assessment is a single assessment event. The Visiting Assessor will contact centres to agree suitable time(s) and dates, normally during February or March. Evidence that meets the requirements of this performance Component of Course assessment should be produced in approximately 20 minutes. During this assessment, candidates may use brief notes as an aide-memoire. These notes may comprise several bullet points containing prompt words but should not be full sentences to be read out. Frequent reference to notes can detract from the quality of the performance. Preparation for coursework in Advanced Higher, such as the performance assessment, may involve candidates undertaking a larger amount of autonomous work without close supervision than they have previously undertaken. Centres may provide guidance and support as part of the normal teaching and learning process. However, centres should not adopt a directive role or provide specific advice on how to re-phrase, improve responses or provide model answers. Candidates are expected to undertake their preparation for the assessment independently. However, reasonable assistance may be provided prior to the formal assessment process taking place. Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 3

The term reasonable assistance is used to try to balance the need for support with the need to avoid giving too much assistance. If any candidates require more than what is deemed to be reasonable assistance, they may not be ready for assessment or it may be that they have been entered for the wrong level of qualification. The performance will be conducted under a high degree of supervision. This means that: candidates should not speak to anyone other than the Visiting Assessor during the performance a suitable location for conducting the assessment without distractions must be provided Evidence to be gathered The following candidate evidence is required for this assessment: an audio recording of the performance which will be made by the Visiting Assessor Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 4

General Marking Instructions In line with SQA s normal practice, the following General Marking Instructions are addressed to the Visiting Assessor appointed by SQA to carry out the assessment and award a mark for the performance. They will also be helpful for those preparing candidates for Course assessment. All marking will be quality assured by SQA. General Marking Principles for Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking This information is provided to help you understand the general principles you must apply when marking candidate responses in this performance. These principles must be read in conjunction with the Detailed Marking Instructions, which identify the key features required in candidate responses. (a) (b) (c) Marks for each candidate response must always be assigned in line with these General Marking Principles and the Detailed Marking Instructions for this assessment. Marking should always be positive. This means that, for each candidate response, a single mark is awarded for the demonstration of relevant skills, knowledge and understanding. Marks are not deducted from a maximum on the basis of errors or omissions. Marking should be holistic. There may be strengths and weaknesses in the performance; Visiting Assessors should focus as far as possible on the strengths, taking account of weaknesses only where they significantly detract from the overall impression. Four main aspects of the performance should be considered: Content: organisation, communication and development of relevant ideas and opinions Accuracy: vocabulary and structures, pronunciation and intonation, grammatical accuracy Language Resource: variety and range of vocabulary and language structures used Interaction: understanding and using the modern language to maintain and sustain a discussion (d) (e) (f) Markers can award the highest pegged mark (50) for the performance even if there are minor errors. These should not detract from the overall impression. The length of the discussion is approximately 20 minutes. Visiting Assessors will support candidates in completing the performance within this approximate timescale through effective time management. The General and Detailed Marking Instructions should be applied even where the length of the discussion falls outside this range. Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 5

Detailed Marking Instructions for the Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance-talking Using the pegged marks table, the Visiting Assessor should first select the row of the table in which the descriptors most closely match the candidate s performance. Once that row has been identified, the Visiting Assessor should follow this guidance: if the evidence largely matches the descriptors across all of the aspects of the performance, award the higher of the two available marks if the evidence largely matches the descriptors across most of the aspects of the performance, award the lower of the two marks available if the Visiting Assessor is in doubt about which of the two adjacent rows to select: select the upper row and award the lower pegged mark in that row Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 6

Content Accuracy Language Resource Interaction Pegged Mark The candidate: comprehensive, relevant and wellorganised expresses ideas and opinions confidently readily goes beyond minimal responses uses idiomatic language and expressions clear, relevant and well-organised expresses ideas and opinions clearly goes beyond minimal responses adequate, relevant and organised expresses ideas and opinions adequately attempts to go beyond minimal responses uses language with a high level of accuracy. Where the candidate attempts to use language beyond Advanced Higher level, inaccuracies need not detract from the overall impression uses verbs and tenses consistently and with a high level of accuracy which are readily understood by a speaker of the language uses language which is mostly accurate. Where the candidate attempts to use language appropriate to Advanced Higher level, minor inaccuracies need not detract from the overall impression generally uses verbs and tenses consistently and accurately although there may be a few errors which are mostly understood by a speaker of the language uses language which is generally accurate although errors can develop during the discussion uses verbs and tenses consistently with an adequate level of accuracy although there may be errors which are generally understood by a speaker of the language although some points may not be immediately clear uses complex and sophisticated language uses a comprehensive range of verbs/verb forms, tenses and constructions and other language features uses interjections and connectives appropriately uses mostly complex and sophisticated language uses a wide range of verbs/verb forms, tenses, constructions and other language features uses connectives may use interjections generally uses complex and sophisticated language uses an adequate range of verbs/verb forms, tenses constructions and other language features uses language which is perhaps repetitive and some verbs and fixed phrases not appropriate to Advanced Higher level sustains the discussion, using a range of techniques confidently immediately understands almost all of what is said may occasionally seek clarification in the modern language readily takes the initiative shows little, if any, undue hesitation sustains the discussion, using a range of techniques understands almost all of what is said may seek clarification in the modern language takes the initiative shows little undue hesitation and where there is some hesitation, recovers well sustains the discussion adequately, using some techniques understands most of what is said may seek clarification in the modern language takes the initiative although may require occasional prompting may show some hesitation 50 or 45 40 or 35 30 or 25 Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 7

Content Accuracy Language Resource Interaction Pegged Mark The candidate: limited, possibly irrelevant and disorganised expresses limited ideas and opinions may have difficulty going beyond minimal responses basic, irrelevant and disorganised expresses ideas and opinions with difficulty is unable to go beyond the use of learned material very basic, irrelevant and disorganised may not express ideas and opinions gives minimal responses uses language which is sufficiently accurate to convey meaning although there may be frequent errors which impede communication uses verbs and tenses inconsistently with an inadequate level of accuracy which can be understood by a sympathetic speaker of the language although many points may not be clear uses inaccurate language throughout the discussion uses verbs and tenses inaccurately and there are serious errors which would not be readily understood by a sympathetic speaker of the language uses language which is almost completely inaccurate which would allow very little understanding by a sympathetic speaker of the language uses a limited range of complex and sophisticated language uses a limited range of verbs/verb forms, tenses, constructions and other language features frequently uses language which is not appropriate to Advanced Higher level uses little, if any, complex and sophisticated language uses basic verbs/verb forms, tenses, constructions and other language features mostly uses language which is not appropriate to Advanced Higher level uses no complex and sophisticated language may demonstrate several examples of other language interference may have difficulty sustaining the discussion may encounter difficulty in understanding what is said may attempt to seek clarification in the modern language rarely takes the initiative and may require some help and prompting in order to respond to questions may speak with a considerable degree of hesitation, but makes some attempt to recover is unable to sustain the discussion has difficulty in understanding what is said frequently requires clarification and prompting is unable to take the initiative shows hesitation and/or other language interference which frequently impedes communication is unable to sustain the discussion does not understand what is said does not seek clarification does not take the initiative shows hesitation and/or other language interference which seriously impedes communication 20 or 15 10 or 5 0 Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 8

Administrative information Published: March 2015 (version 1.0) History of changes Version Description of change Authorised by Date Security and confidentiality This document can be used by practitioners in SQA approved centres for the assessment of National Courses and not for any other purpose. Copyright This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for assessment purposes provided that no profit is derived from reproduction and that, if reproduced in part, the source is acknowledged. If it needs to be reproduced for any purpose other than assessment, it is the centre s responsibility to obtain copyright clearance. Re-use for alternative purposes without the necessary copyright clearance may constitute copyright infringement. Scottish Qualifications Authority 2015 Advanced Higher Modern Languages performance talking: general assessment information 9